Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quit your crying.... The leftist have been dealing dirty ever since before Trump took office, so hold on to your knickers, because it's going to be interesting watching the leftist cabal fall after all the hell they've raught in this country, and possibly in the world.Meanwhile, the right wingers who claim conservatism is different from fascism are reacting with laughing faces at the idea of information being given to someone other than only a right-wing commentator.
Just don't call them fascists!
Once again you fail
McCathy is not releasing video to RW news, just one talking head.
You claim Dems do it all the time
Show me
Why would Liberals on this board post for free?
USMB offers Liberal Posters Free Stuff
Did they?
Every one who entered broke the law, but I see a lot more excusing than I do condemnation on this board…whether it’s denying the verifiable facts or calling those who broke in and assaulted the police patriots...that’s just reality here. You’ve seen this here.
They made a distinction between those who did not enter and those who did. Many were charged with minor offenses es as was appropriate. Nothing was exaggerated or demonized imo. Just talk to the police trying to protect lawmakers and beaten with metal poles and bats and sprayed with bear spray. Those people came prepared. Screw them. Their actions that day were enough to damn them.
We are not going to agree. My cousin is a capitol police officer. I believe his accounts and the videos of the people who were there.
As Ms. Pelosi has zip, zero, nada, nothing and none to do with the security of the U.S. Capitol Building it is you do not know what you're talking about.
Nor did Ms. Pelosi has the authority to call out the D.C. National Guard, at the time of the Reich Wing Insurrection that could be done by the Secretary of the Army.
ANTIFA?
He might have been a super secret operative of Soros or AOC
Must have been ANTIFA
Because EVERYBODY knows TRUMP supporters wouldn’t attack our Capitol
View attachment 760728
Damn, thanks for reminding me! I keep forgetting that violence is impossible if you don't have guns.Why didn't they have any guns?
Conservatives fear facts and the truth – they know that reliable news sources will expose the lies Fox will attempt to contrive from the videos, reaffirm the fact that the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack was exactly that, and that the prosecution of the rightwing domestic terrorists was perfectly appropriate, Constitutional, and warranted.What the fuck is so damn scary about other news outlets have access to same 41,000 hours?
What was wrong with having equal and fair investigations by having all sides represented properly in the J6 hearings ? Carma is a B ain't she ?What is wrong with equal access to the same footage given to Fucker? Is the Reich Wing afraid of actual fair and balanced reporting, or do they just want to push the big lie?
Conservatives fear facts and the truth – they know that reliable news sources will expose the lies Fox will attempt to contrive from the videos, reaffirm the fact that the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack was exactly that, and that the prosecution of the rightwing domestic terrorists was perfectly appropriate, Constitutional, and warranted.
It's our house... we pay for it.... it belongs to the people not the politicians....If you see an open door and now you aren't supposed to enter, is that a valid defense?
Conservatives have been caught by surprise by this move, in which the media attempts to make government material available to more than a right wing commentator.
The fascist rigjt wanted the only commentary on the tape to be monopolized by one of their guys.
Conservatives fear facts and the truth – they know that reliable news sources will expose the lies Fox will attempt to contrive from the videos, reaffirm the fact that the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack was exactly that, and that the prosecution of the rightwing domestic terrorists was perfectly appropriate, Constitutional, and warranted.
Perhaps the J6 committee should have released the footage to everyone instead of releasing select clips designed to damage their political opponent, and keeping the rest under lock and key.Meanwhile, the right wingers who claim conservatism is different from fascism are reacting with laughing faces at the idea of information being given to someone other than only a right-wing commentator.
Just don't call them fascists!
I keep holding out hope that you might actually have an original thought, but oh well.
Republicans were offered full accessThe left has had the only commentary on the tape for the last 2 years as the partisan J6 committee was the only ones to have access to it.
Now I agree that they should have released it to everyone, but I’m not shedding any threats that they didn’t, because during this whole investigation, the left were the only ones with access to this material.
If it doesn’t say ‘no trespassing’, ‘do not enter’ or is directed into by authorities then I think it’s safe to assume entry is allowed.If you see an open door and now you aren't supposed to enter, is that a valid defense?
The whole testimony--ALL the video and testimony--backs up the fact that at most a hundred or so behaved very badly, but it was only that hundred or so. We can argue whether those who went past the barricades to the steps and balconies were in the right or wrong but there were Capitol Police in large numbers standing by and doing nothing about it, i.e. not telling them to move.That's a defense used by some of them who claimed they were in the back of the mob and "didn't see" the mob tear down the barricades" and overwelm the police. At best that might cover a handful of people out of the almost a thousand who swarmed the Capitol. I stated this before and I will again, I reserve the word terrorist for a subset of those who broke into the Capitol.
Is "the door was open so I walked in" a valid defense?
Consider this scenario. When a Floyd protest turns into rioting and looting, the door to a shop is open and a protester walks in, did he commit a crime? Can he claim the door was open so I just walked in? Should he be charged with anything even though he didn't loot?
There were a couple of police doing that and taking selfies, and they have either been reprimmended or lost their jobs. But it isn't. The people breaking in KNEW they were entering illegally and yet they still did. I can't believe they were completely oblivious to the violence going on around them. Terrorists? That depends on other factors. Breaking the law? Most certainly.
I do see it differently. And while the hearing was politicized it was neither rigged nor inaccurate. The violence was real and well documented as well as the injuries inflicted on the police. The fact that some did not engage in violence doesn't change the fact that all were there illegally and engaged in some form of illegal activity: tresspassing, impeding, picketing etc within the Capitol.
The peaceful people were those that chose not to enter the Capitol. They are the ones I defend. The rest were at best fools who made bad choices and at worst terrorists.
I do.
I disagree. Ray Epps has become a focal point of conspracy theorists who imo, are just trying to shift responsibity away from those who shouldbeheld accountable but are considered by some tobe "patriots".
The ones still injailare those who are facing major charges...not "far less" . These are not the ones charged with tresspassing.
Like the truck convoy was doing?
We might have a point of agreement here.
Law enforcement walks a fine line between free speech rights and criminal behavior andI get that. People have a right to protest, even if it means blocking streets or obstructing traffic, but at some point it has to stop because it is impinging on the rights of other people: localbusinesses, folks who commute orlive there etc. That is what happened with the truck convoy when they started blocking access to a bridge, preventing local business' from operating, keeping residents awake with their horns etc. That is why they were finally forced to to move.
And that applies to any other protest. The CHOP zone went on way too long and severely impacted local busi esses. And city officials are now the subject of lawsuits by those businesses (deservedly so).
There were thousands of protests, the majority of which WERE peaceful. Not any different from the Jan 6 rallywere the majority of participants chose to be peaceful and stop short ofbreaking into the Capitol.
And I agree,
and that is why I strongly disagree with about those who entered the Capitol that day.
It was not far worse. Our nation's Capitol was attacked, our lawmakers were attacked, and there was an attempt to violently overturn an election that was unprecedent in more than a century and a half of respecting the peaceful transfer of power. There is nothing to compare and that is not excusing the riots, they just aren't in the same ballpark.
(I apologize for breaking it up but there are too many different points in here)
Why does the Capitol debacle seem like a playground skirmish compared to the BLM riots, yet the Democrats are only enraging about J6?Every one who entered broke the law, but I see a lot more excusing than I do condemnation on this board…whether it’s denying the verifiable facts or calling those who broke in and assaulted the police patriots...that’s just reality here. You’ve seen this here.
They made a distinction between those who did not enter and those who did. Many were charged with minor offenses es as was appropriate. Nothing was exaggerated or demonized imo. Just talk to the police trying to protect lawmakers and beaten with metal poles and bats and sprayed with bear spray. Those people came prepared. Screw them. Their actions that day were enough to damn them.
We are not going to agree. My cousin is a capitol police officer. I believe his accounts and the videos of the people who were there.
Why does the Capitol debacle seem like a playground skirmish compared to the BLM riots, yet the Democrats are only enraging about J6?
See you in court.Congress either releases the footage or it doesn’t
Releasing it for the use of one reporter is preferential treatment
Of course, silly meBecause it was an attack on our Democracy
