Next up for Jan 6 panel…….Mike Pence

[Hutch Starskey]

So the ACTUAL TAPES show WHAT?

Tapes?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It was both incompetence and malice, made possible by the thin blue line mentality of his fellow officers who watched the slow motion murder take place.

Suppose for the sake of argument that the rioters were completely wrong about the election being unfair.

How being wrong about that that a death penalty offense?

You seriously believe that after a year of Democratic Party cheered riots, those DC police thought police best practice was to shoot to kill if a rioter did not immediately comply?

Her being a clear and present threat to members of Congress is what did her in whether she recognized the danger she was in or not.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Her being a clear and present threat to members of Congress is what did her in whether she recognized the danger she was in or not.

I saw no members of congress in that video clip. So there was certainly no "present" danger.

Cops are supposed to shoot people who are about to use deadly force on the cops or on someone else, not people who break windows. What happened to tasers?

For the left to support this killing is absurdly hypocritical, given their excoriation of police and others who used deadly force in legitimate self-defense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You've already lost.

Hilarious, since this entire thing is about your loser orange god who refused to admit he lost and criminally tried to stay in office.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I saw no members of congress in that video clip. So there was certainly no "present" danger

Then you are an idiot who doesn't understand that you can't see through walls and doors.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Please list all the congress people harmed in the riot.

Explain how those rioters were somehow worse than all the rioters in the previous year.

Oof…
Ashli took that round to face like a champ which made the roaches scatter. It was in those moments that the members were able to escape. That doorway into the Speaker’s Lobby was just steps from the House chamber.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Then you are an idiot who doesn't understand that you can't see through walls and doors.

Ashli Babbitt could come through walls?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Oof…
Ashli took that round to face like a champ which made the roaches scatter. It was in those moments that the members were able to escape. That doorway into the Speaker’s Lobby was just steps from the House chamber.

Yes, that should have also worked on the previous rioters.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I saw no members of congress in that video clip. So there was certainly no "present" danger.

Cops are supposed to shoot people who are about to use deadly force on the cops or on someone else, not people who break windows. What happened to tasers?

For the left to support this killing is absurdly hypocritical, given their excoriation of police and others who used deadly force in legitimate self-defense.

The mob was steps away from the still as of yet fully evacuated House Chamber.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The mob was steps away from the still as of yet fully evacuated House Chamber.

Still does not justify cold blooded murder.

This is why Pelosi should have accepted the National Guard that Trump offered her. Police yokels who never deal with any real crime were unprepared to respond humanely to a riot.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes, that should have also worked on the previous rioters.

Your false equivalencies are so lacking in any relevancy or logic that they are childish.
None of them were threatening our democracy or Members of Congress, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Still does not justify cold blooded murder.

This is why Pelosi should have accepted the National Guard that Trump offered her. Police yokels who never deal with any real crime were unprepared to respond humanely to a riot.

It was not murder, dope.
Obviously, as it was ruled a clean shoot.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Your false equivalencies are so lacking in any relevancy or logic that they are childish.
None of them were threatening our democracy or Members of Congress, dope.

Personal insults indicate your frustration at being wrong and not wanting to admit it.

Democrats certainly do not feel that Supreme Court Justices are sacred people entitled to special protection at the cost of regular people's lives, so I don't see how they suddenly think members of congress are.

Police are not empowered to shoot people for "threatening democracy." Their role is to use their weapons in self-defense or defense of others using the least required force. A shot to the head for breaking a window goes far beyond that.

Your continued support of that action is disingenuous, unless your IQ is below room temperature.

 

[rightwinger]

You can doubt any reasonable conspiracy theory you want, but that doesn’t justify your denial of evidence. And I wasn’t even attempting to justify the criminal behavior of the individuals on 1/6 who stormed into the Capitol building. That’s what prosecutions are for: to assign proper blame.

You daft petty libtards keep telling others that the 1/6 Capitol Incident is not justifiable. You’re so disingenuous. I don’t see any conservatives here supporting any of the criminal behavior. As I have, I see them instead supporting prosecutions for criminal behaviors.

Your UFO claptrap is pointless, irrelevant and lame.

The place to bring evidence of fraud is through the courts and state and local election officials

Trump did that in a half dozen states and his evidence was mocked and attorneys were chastised

Trump still spread his lies to an angry mob and urged them to go to Congress and stop the election

The TRUMPmob had no more credible evidence than someone who believes in UFOs

 

[BackAgain]

The place to bring evidence of fraud is through the courts and state and local election officials

Trump did that in a half dozen states and his evidence was mocked and attorneys were chastised

Nope. Mostly the cases got tossed on procedural grounds. Cursory reviews of some pleadings doesn’t constitute a hearing or an airing. I will say that some of the pleadings seemed slovenly. A judge chastising a lawyer for slovenly pleadings is all well and good. But it’s not substantive.

Trump still spread his lies to an angry mob and urged them to go to Congress and stop the election

False. Your would be “argument” presumes — as a premise — that Trump’s position was a “lie.” Your presumption invalidates any hint of validity in your syllogism.

The TRUMPmob had no more credible evidence than someone who believes in UFOs

The non Trump mob had a lot of evidence of election chicanery. And that matters a lot. Your UFO “analogy” is still retarded of you.

 

[rightwinger]

Nope. Mostly the cases got tossed on procedural grounds. Cursory reviews of some pleadings doesn’t constitute a hearing or an airing. I will say that some of the pleadings seemed slovenly. A judge chastising a lawyer for slovenly pleadings is all well and good. But it’s not substantive.


False. Your would be “argument” presumes — as a premise — that Trump’s position was a “lie.” Your presumption invalidates any hint of validity in your syllogism.

The non Trump mob had a lot of evidence of election chicanery. And that matters a lot. Your UFO “analogy” is still retarded of you.

The court cases were so weak and had such shaky legal standing that they were tossed and lawyers were sanctioned

That does not mean you were not heard, it means you had no business wasting the courts time


Trumps position was a lie
He was repeatedly told his claims were false and unsupported. Because he kept telling them……that makes it a lie

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The place to bring evidence of fraud is through the courts and state and local election officials

Trump did that in a half dozen states and his evidence was mocked and attorneys were chastised

Trump still spread his lies to an angry mob and urged them to go to Congress and stop the election

The TRUMPmob had no more credible evidence than someone who believes in UFOs

Benny Thompson said it on day one. You take your grievances to the courts and the courts make decisions about these Grievances. And in this country, that's the end of the line.

 

[BackAgain]

The court cases were so weak and had such shaky legal standing that they were tossed and lawyers were sanctioned

That does not mean you were not heard, it means you had no business wasting the courts time


Trumps position was a lie
He was repeatedly told his claims were false and unsupported. Because he kept telling them……that makes it a lie

The court cases may have been weak. But when they got tossed on procedural grounds we will never know. Other than that, your entire argument is just you repeating your contention in newer, but still uninformative and unpersuasive ways.

I have told you that you are unpersuasive, several times. You deny it. So, by your daffynition, you must be “lying” when you persist in your unpersuasive efforts by repeating your same old lines.

 

[Indeependent]

The court cases may have been weak. But when they got tossed on procedural grounds we will never know. Other than that, your entire argument is just you repeating your contention in newer, but still uninformative and unpersuasive ways.

I have told you that you are unpersuasive, several times. You deny it. So, by your daffynition, you must be “lying” when you persist in your unpersuasive efforts by repeating your same old lines.

RWer sucking Democrat Club Leader dick.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

But when they got tossed on procedural grounds we will never know.

Haha...yeah, just "procedural grounds"...like the attorneys withdrawing all claims of fraud...like the attorneys not being able to present any evidence...

You know, little things, haha

Face it...you know less than nothing about any of this, and you are using terms you don't even understand.