Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesnt matter it is a real and correct ruling establishing justice
It was not the corporation's rights at stake, it was the gay couples'This is an excellent point.
SCOTUS clearly erred in this case by extending constitutional rights to 303 Creative LLC, which is a corporation.
The employer is required to reasonably accommodate their religious beliefs and they cannot be fired for it.Consider this example.
An indie record label, sells rap.
They hire people from Craig's List, to work on Pro Tools. I know o e such outfit that has 24 full time employees doing nothing but ProTools.
So now, the boss says to his employee, "I want you to put an echo here, where the song says "OPP'.
And the employee says "no, I ain't gonna do that, it's against my religion".
What happens?
I'm sorry you don't know this. Of you were educated in this country It's the sad state of education.Can they go to jail?
There was no gay couple. The only rights at stake were the web designers.It was not the corporation's rights at stake, it was the gay couples'
It's up to the owner.Consider this example.
An indie record label, sells rap.
They hire people from Craig's List, to work on Pro Tools. I know o e such outfit that has 24 full time employees doing nothing but ProTools.
So now, the boss says to his employee, "I want you to put an echo here, where the song says "OPP'.
And the employee says "no, I ain't gonna do that, it's against my religion".
What happens?
It was the owner of the corporation who sued to protect their own rights.It was not the corporation's rights at stake, it was the gay couples'
Exactly. The employer has "other options", such as, other employees he can ask to get the job done.The employer is required to reasonably accommodate their religious beliefs and they cannot be fired for it.
What happens when someone hires a Christian band then demands that they play Lola and WAP. The band refuses.Consider this example.
An indie record label, sells rap.
They hire people from Craig's List, to work on Pro Tools. I know o e such outfit that has 24 full time employees doing nothing but ProTools.
So now, the boss says to his employee, "I want you to put an echo here, where the song says "OPP'.
And the employee says "no, I ain't gonna do that, it's against my religion".
What happens?
A judgment has to follow the law.Wrong.
The whole point of any judgement is to create a balance between the rights of both opposing sides.
If one or both sides are fake, then there is no real rights or facts to consider.
So then any judgement is fake, inappropriate, and impossible to actually ever apply.
To be done correctly, any judge should be directly questioning the actual people involved.
Yet it got to SCOTUS and the law is enjoined.
There is no real argument. Instead of arguing, look it up.I would love to argue this point, but... different thread. I'll participate if you'd like to start one about this...
I'm sorry you don't know this. Of you were educated in this country It's the sad state of education.
Legal scholars don't agree with you.
You can't seem to find anyone of substance who agrees with you.
Common sense should be used. You can't make up a religious belief as an excuse to not do something. Same-sex marriage is not exclusively against Christian beliefs.The employer is required to reasonably accommodate their religious beliefs and they cannot be fired for it.
The law isn't determined by how many agree with the law.Wrong.
Almost everyone agrees with me.
It is the SCOTUS that is in the tiny minority.
Then why even have a SCOTUS?And invalidating the validity of the entire SCOTUS in the process.
Not sure what the best solution is.
I prefer not pitchforks and torches.
Perhaps since the SCOTUS has become politicized, we need a political solution, such as increasing the members of the SCOTUS to 50, one for each state, to increase popular representation?
The SCOTUS is not law, and can not be allowed to rule.
the ruling does not go that far. so calm down and don't get your panties in a bunchHow long will it be before some business refuses service to black people because they say it's against the owner's religion?
How long before an employer gets to refuse to hire a woman because the business owner's religious belief is that a woman should be at home serving her husband and raising children?
And how many other laws will get to be ignored on the basis of a religious claim?
Your “ claim” that people would quote religion to support Slavery as being “ equal” to those who oppose Gay Marriage is repugnant
Then it depends what the contract says.What happens when someone hires a Christian band then demands that they play Lola and WAP. The band refuses.
