NYT: Trump told in January 2017 that Putin ordered hacking

28 CFR 45.2 - Disqualification arising from personal or political relationship.

(a) Unless authorized under paragraph (b) of this section, no employee shall participate in a criminal investigation or prosecution if he has a personal or political relationship with:

(1) Any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution; or

(2) Any person or organization which he knows has a specific and substantial interest that would be directly affected by the outcome of the investigation or prosecution.

(b) An employee assigned to or otherwise participating in a criminal investigation or prosecution who believes that his participation may be prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section shall report the matter and all attendant facts and circumstances to his supervisor at the level of section chief or the equivalent or higher. If the supervisor determines that a personal or political relationship exists between the employee and a person or organization described in paragraph (a) of this section, he shall relieve the employee from participation unless he determines further, in writing, after full consideration of all the facts and circumstances, that:

(1) The relationship will not have the effect of rendering the employee's service less than fully impartial and professional; and

(2) The employee's participation would not create an appearance of a conflict of interest likely to affect the public perception of the integrity of the investigation or prosecution.

(c) For the purposes of this section:

(1)Political relationship means a close identification with an elected official, a candidate (whether or not successful) for elective, public office, a political party, or a campaign organization, arising from service as a principal adviser thereto or a principal official thereof; and

(2)Personal relationship means a close and substantial connection of the type normally viewed as likely to induce partiality. An employee is presumed to have a personal relationship with his father, mother, brother, sister, child and spouse. Whether relationships (including friendships) of an employee to other persons or organizations are “personal” must be judged on an individual basis with due regard given to the subjective opinion of the employee.
 
From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

WASHINGTON — Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election.

The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.

Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

The shifting narrative underscores the degree to which Mr. Trump regularly picks and chooses intelligence to suit his political purposes. That has never been more clear than this week.

More: From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

This is a big deal that we'll be hearing a lot about tomorrow. What do you think?
Hmmmm....

Evidence shows Obama knew and did nothing about it in 2014, dumbass.

That's 3 years earlier and 2 years before the last election...

2014:

Obama ignored US promise to help Ukraine defend its sovereign borders & let Putin militarily annex Crimea

Obama, Mueller, Holder, & Hillary sell Uranium One to the Russians and give them 20% of the US supply of uranium while hiding Russian crimes

Obama learns of Russia's efforts to hack senior US politicians and interfere...and does nothing to stop them....

Obama knows about Hillary's illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server containing TOP SECRET data and does not shut it down or warn Hillary about Russian attempts to hack - 6 foreign entities, not just Russia, acquired her TS data....Barry facilitated the Espionage by allowing it to continue

2014 was the largest series of f*-ups by one President / one administration in US history, aiding and abetting a foreign enemy have its way with the United States...aiding and abetting Espionage...abandoning an ally and allowing Russia to invade an annex part of their country...

'F*-Ups'? No, this was TREASON!

He passed the message on to Putin through Medvedev that he would be more 'flexible' after he won re-election...and 2 years later Barry gives Putin a free hand in meddling and hacking, gives him 20% of the US supply of Uranium, and Top Secret data ... In exchange for Putin's permission for Barry to drag the US into another Un-Constitutional war, invading Syria without authorization from Congress, a clear violation of the War Powers Act!

Quit lying.
 

Dumbass, Comey and Rosestein did not have a personal or political relationship.

Rosenstein's possible recusal is about him being a potential witness in the Obstuction of Justice case against Trump.

Stop posting - you are totally fucking CLUELESS
I've shown ties.........and yes Rosenstein had to testify to Congress...

It was his words that he may have to recuse himself because he could be a witness.

Well guess what..........he had to be a witness in the investigation and is in charge of it.

Talk about CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

There you go.
 

Dumbass, Comey and Rosestein did not have a personal or political relationship.

Rosenstein's possible recusal is about him being a potential witness in the Obstuction of Justice case against Trump.

Stop posting - you are totally CLUELESS

See how the far left will deny facts even when they are written in the form of a text to a lover on a government device?
 

Dumbass, Comey and Rosestein did not have a personal or political relationship.

Rosenstein's possible recusal is about him being a potential witness in the Obstuction of Justice case against Trump.

Stop posting - you are totally CLUELESS

See how the far left will deny facts even when they are written in the form of a text to a lover on a government device?

....Idiot, Strzok and Rosenstein are actually two different people.

The dumbass shit Trumpsters post never siezes to amaze.
 
From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

WASHINGTON — Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election.

The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.

Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

The shifting narrative underscores the degree to which Mr. Trump regularly picks and chooses intelligence to suit his political purposes. That has never been more clear than this week.

More: From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

This is a big deal that we'll be hearing a lot about tomorrow. What do you think?
Not that highly classified if you are reading it.
 

Dumbass, Comey and Rosestein did not have a personal or political relationship.

Rosenstein's possible recusal is about him being a potential witness in the Obstuction of Justice case against Trump.

Stop posting - you are totally CLUELESS

See how the far left will deny facts even when they are written in the form of a text to a lover on a government device?

....Idiot, Strzok and Rosenstein are actually two different people.

See how the far left will deny facts in reality vs those in far left religious dogma?

Far left bias is present in all these investigations, only the far left can not see it!
 

Dumbass, Comey and Rosestein did not have a personal or political relationship.

Rosenstein's possible recusal is about him being a potential witness in the Obstuction of Justice case against Trump.

Stop posting - you are totally CLUELESS

See how the far left will deny facts even when they are written in the form of a text to a lover on a government device?

....Idiot, Strzok and Rosenstein are actually two different people.

The dumbass shit Trumpsters post never siezes to amaze.
So a now WITNESS in an ongoing investigation is in charge of overseeing the investigation whose wife has ties to many involved has no reason to Recluse himself.........................

No Conflict there at all.........Move along.........

He wrote the memo justifying Comey's firing..............LOL

This whole thing is a JOKE.
 
From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

WASHINGTON — Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election.

The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.

Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

The shifting narrative underscores the degree to which Mr. Trump regularly picks and chooses intelligence to suit his political purposes. That has never been more clear than this week.

More: From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

This is a big deal that we'll be hearing a lot about tomorrow. What do you think?

Given the lateset indicments, Trump is and has been acting as an accessory after the fact. IOW, obstruction of justice.
 
This happened when Obama was STILL the President, so OBAMA KNEW, why didn't he ORDER them to do something in October 2016? And if the CIA/FBI/NSA knew about it, why didn’t they do anything? Were they ordered not to? Did Obama tell them to STAND DOWN?

That is the underlining scandal. John Brennan and James Comey should be put UNDER OATH to testify about this situation.

Also countless American Intelligence officials already testified before The United States Senate Committee's that the “Russian interference” had NO effect on the election outcome result.

The questions are now:

What did Obama and his Administration know in October 2016?

Whatever they knew THEN WHY didn't they do something to prevent it?

NO ONE has said that 200,000+ views of fake news from over a thousand paid trolls and bots had "no effect" on the election. What they said was that there was no evidence VOTES WERE CHANGED (IOW, voting machine or election roll tampering).

Only an idiot would believe that it didn't didn't INFLUENCE an electoral outcome which was decided by less than 78,000 votes in three states.

As for Obama doing nothing? - WRONG. He didn't do enough.
Or perhaps Putin had Obama in his pocket. Obama promised to be more flexible and bend over backwards for Putin. Quite possibly the Hussein colluded with Putin to hack the DNC and ruin Hillary’s chances. He did hate Hillary after all for starting the birther movement. Would also explain why Obama’s man, Comey the cuck decided to reopen the Hillary email investigation before the election. Also explains why Obama let him invade and keep Crimea.
 
This happened when Obama was STILL the President, so OBAMA KNEW, why didn't he ORDER them to do something in October 2016? And if the CIA/FBI/NSA knew about it, why didn’t they do anything? Were they ordered not to? Did Obama tell them to STAND DOWN?

That is the underlining scandal. John Brennan and James Comey should be put UNDER OATH to testify about this situation.

Also countless American Intelligence officials already testified before The United States Senate Committee's that the “Russian interference” had NO effect on the election outcome result.

The questions are now:

What did Obama and his Administration know in October 2016?

Whatever they knew THEN WHY didn't they do something to prevent it?

NO ONE has said that 200,000+ views of fake news from over a thousand paid trolls and bots had "no effect" on the election. What they said was that there was no evidence VOTES WERE CHANGED (IOW, voting machine or election roll tampering).

Only an idiot would believe that it didn't didn't INFLUENCE an electoral outcome which was decided by less than 78,000 votes in three states.

As for Obama doing nothing? - WRONG. He didn't do enough.
Or perhaps Putin had Obama in his pocket. Obama promised to be more flexible and bend over backwards for Putin. Quite possibly the Hussein colluded with Putin to hack the DNC and ruin Hillary’s chances. He did hate Hillary after all for starting the birther movement. Would also explain why Obama’s man, Comey the cuck decided to reopen the Hillary email investigation before the election.

Too many lies here ^ to warrant a response.
 
This happened when Obama was STILL the President, so OBAMA KNEW, why didn't he ORDER them to do something in October 2016? And if the CIA/FBI/NSA knew about it, why didn’t they do anything? Were they ordered not to? Did Obama tell them to STAND DOWN?

That is the underlining scandal. John Brennan and James Comey should be put UNDER OATH to testify about this situation.

Also countless American Intelligence officials already testified before The United States Senate Committee's that the “Russian interference” had NO effect on the election outcome result.

The questions are now:

What did Obama and his Administration know in October 2016?

Whatever they knew THEN WHY didn't they do something to prevent it?

NO ONE has said that 200,000+ views of fake news from over a thousand paid trolls and bots had "no effect" on the election. What they said was that there was no evidence VOTES WERE CHANGED (IOW, voting machine or election roll tampering).

Only an idiot would believe that it didn't didn't INFLUENCE an electoral outcome which was decided by less than 78,000 votes in three states.

As for Obama doing nothing? - WRONG. He didn't do enough.
Or perhaps Putin had Obama in his pocket. Obama promised to be more flexible and bend over backwards for Putin. Quite possibly the Hussein colluded with Putin to hack the DNC and ruin Hillary’s chances. He did hate Hillary after all for starting the birther movement. Would also explain why Obama’s man, Comey the cuck decided to reopen the Hillary email investigation before the election.

Too many lies here ^ to warrant a response.

There are no lies in my statement. Feel free to point one out.
 
This happened when Obama was STILL the President, so OBAMA KNEW, why didn't he ORDER them to do something in October 2016? And if the CIA/FBI/NSA knew about it, why didn’t they do anything? Were they ordered not to? Did Obama tell them to STAND DOWN?

That is the underlining scandal. John Brennan and James Comey should be put UNDER OATH to testify about this situation.

Also countless American Intelligence officials already testified before The United States Senate Committee's that the “Russian interference” had NO effect on the election outcome result.

The questions are now:

What did Obama and his Administration know in October 2016?

Whatever they knew THEN WHY didn't they do something to prevent it?

NO ONE has said that 200,000+ views of fake news from over a thousand paid trolls and bots had "no effect" on the election. What they said was that there was no evidence VOTES WERE CHANGED (IOW, voting machine or election roll tampering).

Only an idiot would believe that it didn't didn't INFLUENCE an electoral outcome which was decided by less than 78,000 votes in three states.

As for Obama doing nothing? - WRONG. He didn't do enough.

"What they said was that there was no evidence VOTES WERE CHANGED (IOW, voting machine or election roll tampering)."

So if NO VOTES WERE CHANGED that means that Hillary LOST the election and The Donald won a LEGITIMATE ELECTION, IF votes WOULD have been CHANGED that would be a different situation, but that didn't happen so The Trump Derangement Syndrome Crowd and the Globalist Dick Suckers like those who head the POLITICAL Witch Hunt need to realise this:

HILLARY LOST THE ELECTION.

And EVEN if they removed The Donald, they get Mike Pence. Hillary is NOT going to be INSTALLED and Obama is NOT going to be RE-INSTALLED.

WTF?! This whole thing is so insane it's off the chart. TOTAL UNHINGED DERANGEMENT from across the board.

"As for Obama doing nothing? - WRONG. He didn't do enough."

Wrong Obama did NOTHING. He did 100% NOTHING. He even gave TWO press conferences where he stated that nothing or NOBODY could interfere with the election, he STATED the election process was PROTECTED. So he was babbling deliberate horsecrap OR the whole Russia interfered with the election is TOTAL horsecrap served up to YOU by the SAME American Intelligence Agencies that VOMITED up that Saddam Hussein had WMD when he DIDN'T because they said that because it gave GWB and his Lapdog Tony Blair the EXCUSE to invade Iraq and bomb to DEATH approx ONE MILLION Iraqi men, women and children.
Obama did "nothing" because Mitch Mcconnell watered down the Russia response.
2zpdnagb8ta11.jpg

Do you just read the Headline of an article or don't you read the whole article? If Mitch McConnell watered it down then so did Reid and Pelosi the Democrats because they SIGNED the letter with McConnell and Ryan, from the article you posted:

View attachment 205867
Pelosi and Reid are minority leaders. If they didnt sign it, then there would be no warning or majority leader would just push it thru.
 
Why didn’t Obama stop Putin?

He tried. Try to focus on the thread topic.

And he apparently failed.

So you're okay with Trump also failing? Trump even fails to admit it - even after seeing Top Secret intel that proves it.

But I thought he and Putin were in on it together... so what does it matter how he reacted? Do you not see how this contradicts the narrative that Trump colluded with Russia in the first place?
 
1D18ADAE-C47C-4D42-9E2D-9F6E078451BD.jpeg
Maybe since you weak minded cult members can’t understand English, a picture will help you.
 
Well there you have it - Another awesome piece of reporting from the NYT - With credit to Obejoekenobe

WASHINGTON — Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election.

The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.

Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

The shifting narrative underscores the degree to which Mr. Trump regularly picks and chooses intelligence to suit his political purposes. That has never been more clear than this week.​

From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

LOCK HIM UP!!

makeamerica-great-again-lock-him-up-occupy-democrats-21423728.png

LOL this article literally means nothing. It actually makes it look like the anti-Trumpers are desperate, bringing up his reaction to Russian meddling (which I thought Trump was supposed to have been helping Putin with, or did he find out about it after he was elected... which is it? Makes up your minds already).

It’s nothing new that Trump changes his mind way too often and regularly contradicts himself, so please explain to me why the info presented here is so significant and further points to his guilt.
 

Forum List

Back
Top