Obama Orders Climate Change Be Considered in Military Planning

[Rustic]

Fossil fuel bigots, not burning stuff for energy just seems wrong to them.

Fossil fuels were put on this earth to burn, quit your whining

Are you saying fossil fuels are a gift from God? What then is sunlight and wind? A commie plot?

I'm for all the above, renewables are decades away from being reliable and adequate... This is not fucking Star Trek

No the far left has yet to figure out how to tax the "renewable" energies.

The taxes collected on gas goes to pay for the roads, if you get rid of fossil fuels, what will pay for the roads?

Silly ass. Simple and reliable formula. Whenever you license your vehicle, you pay a road tax based on mileage and weight. With appropriate penalties for altering the mileage meter. Now what was so hard about figuring out that?

Fuck more taxes...

 

[Little-Acorn]

Just one problem with all this caterwauling about what we must do to halt climate change:

Man has never had any effect on the climate.

And there is nothing man can do to halt whatever changing is going on now.

The climate has been changing ever since Earth was formed. Or at least, ever since it's had a climate. Sometimes it gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Just one problem with all this caterwauling about what we must do to halt climate change:

Man has never had any effect on the climate.

And there is nothing man can do to halt whatever changing is going on now.

The climate has been changing ever since Earth was formed. Or at least, ever since it's had a climate. Sometimes it gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

I control the weather!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Good, we need a plan to invade Canada when the lower 48 become a barren dessert.

And then of course to capture Antarctica when it becomes the last refuge for humanity itself .........

Wtf?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Good, we need a plan to invade Canada when the lower 48 become a barren dessert.

And then of course to capture Antarctica when it becomes the last refuge for humanity itself .........

Wtf?

Time for the Gorebal Warmers to throw themselves into a volcano to save mankind.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Just one problem with all this caterwauling about what we must do to halt climate change:

Man has never had any effect on the climate.

And there is nothing man can do to halt whatever changing is going on now.

The climate has been changing ever since Earth was formed. Or at least, ever since it's had a climate. Sometimes it gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

It's arrogance combined with a need to feel good and be recognized. They never make a difference, in a positive way mind you. It's all about "see, I care!!!" Results matter not as long as they care.

They're pathetic.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Just one problem with all this caterwauling about what we must do to halt climate change:

Man has never had any effect on the climate.

And there is nothing man can do to halt whatever changing is going on now.

The climate has been changing ever since Earth was formed. Or at least, ever since it's had a climate. Sometimes it gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

It's arrogance combined with a need to feel good and be recognized. They never make a difference, in a positive way mind you. It's all about "see, I care!!!" Results matter not as long as they care.

They're pathetic.

Spot on. They do a Facebook like and they think they've done their civic duty.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Just one problem with all this caterwauling about what we must do to halt climate change:

Man has never had any effect on the climate.

And there is nothing man can do to halt whatever changing is going on now.

The climate has been changing ever since Earth was formed. Or at least, ever since it's had a climate. Sometimes it gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

It's arrogance combined with a need to feel good and be recognized. They never make a difference, in a positive way mind you. It's all about "see, I care!!!" Results matter not as long as they care.

They're pathetic.

Spot on. They do a Facebook like and they think they've done their civic duty.

I wonder if anyone ever told them that the climate has been changing for 4,500,000,000 years?

 

[easyt65]

Only 4 more months before the military can tell that squirrely bastard to F* off!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Just one problem with all this caterwauling about what we must do to halt climate change:

Man has never had any effect on the climate.

And there is nothing man can do to halt whatever changing is going on now.

The climate has been changing ever since Earth was formed. Or at least, ever since it's had a climate. Sometimes it gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

It's arrogance combined with a need to feel good and be recognized. They never make a difference, in a positive way mind you. It's all about "see, I care!!!" Results matter not as long as they care.

They're pathetic.

Spot on. They do a Facebook like and they think they've done their civic duty.

Facebook, God I hate Facebook.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Just one problem with all this caterwauling about what we must do to halt climate change:

Man has never had any effect on the climate.

And there is nothing man can do to halt whatever changing is going on now.

The climate has been changing ever since Earth was formed. Or at least, ever since it's had a climate. Sometimes it gets warmer. And sometimes it gets cooler.

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-six years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-six years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-SIX YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

It's arrogance combined with a need to feel good and be recognized. They never make a difference, in a positive way mind you. It's all about "see, I care!!!" Results matter not as long as they care.

They're pathetic.

Spot on. They do a Facebook like and they think they've done their civic duty.

Facebook, God I hate Facebook.

Yes and no. It's been nice to have routine contact with friends and family all over the world. This morning I just exchanged favorite recipes with one of my old sponsor kids in Kenya.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I'm so old I remember when the goal of the military was to destroy the enemy.

Obama orders climate change be considered in military planning

If you weren't such a stupid fuck, the reason would be obvious. A rising sea level is going to displace a lot of people, and there are going to be millions of refugees. Changes in climate mean changes in rainfall patterns, and have the potential to lead to wars over water. It is the job of our military to consider the consequences of whatever is happening in our world, political and physical, and what the results could be in reference to threats to our nation.

Thanks for the Onion news flash. You're hysterical.

Tell us, since most of Florida is less than a hundred feet elevation, has Cape Canaveral moved yet?

Dope.


USA - Tidal Flood Events in Miami Beach Increased by 400 Percent in 10 Years - FloodList

A new study by a team of scientists has found that tidal flooding in Miami Beach has increased by 400% in the last decade. Rain induced flood events have also increased significantly.

The University of Miami (UM) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science-led study found that Miami Beach flood events have significantly increased due to an acceleration of sea-level rise in South Florida.

Our analysis indicates that significant changes in flooding frequency occurred after 2006, in which rain-induced events increased by 33% and tide-induced events increased by more than 400%

Only south Florida has rising oceans? How does that work?

BTW - your study uses insurance data to draw it conclusions. Higher housing costs + more homes on the beach = bullshit study.

They have flooding now at high tides during clear weather. It's very easy to find information on this but you'd rather be a dope and post nonsense.

Miami Beach’s battle to stem rising tides

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You mean those toxic algae blooms that have happened in the Great Lakes for the past 3 years due to the lakes being warmer, or are you talking about the fact that the waterfalls in Yosemite are drying up earlier and earlier each year?

THOSE Great Lakes and Yosemite?

You mean those toxic algae blooms that have happened in the Great Lakes for the past 3 years due to the lakes being warmer, or are you talking about the fact that the waterfalls in Yosemite are drying up earlier and earlier each year?

THOSE Great Lakes and Yosemite?

Yeah, the Great Lakes and Yosemite that did not exist 12,000 years ago. Fortunately Fred Flinstone never carpooled and we can now enjoy those ice free places.

I guess you missed the part that because it's getting warmer that Yosemite is drying up earlier and earlier each year, as well as the fact that the Great Lakes have turned toxic for several weeks each year for the past 3 years because they were too warm and lots of chemical crap was being dumped into them.

Yeah, a 5 year drought would have nothing to do with it.
It's a good thing Democrats are spending billions on a train to no where instead of desalinization plants.

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oops!
View attachment 90618

The left never let the facts get in their way.

Take your pick dope.
1000 year drought in california - Google Search

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I'm so old I remember when the goal of the military was to destroy the enemy.

Obama orders climate change be considered in military planning

Smart but it's nothing new. The DOD has been analyzing the potential threats of climate change for years.


2014
U.S. Military: Climate Change Could Foster Terrorism
2012
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ges-ahead-with-plans-to-combat-climate-change
2004
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/2004/feb/22/usnews.theobserver?0p19G=e?client=ms-android-verizon

2014: Obummer.

2004, from your link:
"Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters.."

It's been 12 years, where are the global catastrophes, millions of dead bodies?

"A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world."

Secret report with no links to the report. Fiction. And only 3 more years and the U.K. will be buried in permafrost!

What a hoot, thanks for the links.

They were analyzing the threat even then. This is nothing new and certainly not by Obama's design.

Military analyzes an alien attack too, doesn't mean anyone thinks its about to happen.

Now answer the questions. UK is to be covered in permafrost in 3 years, how's that going? Millions are supposed to be dead from climate change, where are the bodies?

I showed you this wasn't started by Obama dope.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yeah, the Great Lakes and Yosemite that did not exist 12,000 years ago. Fortunately Fred Flinstone never carpooled and we can now enjoy those ice free places.

I guess you missed the part that because it's getting warmer that Yosemite is drying up earlier and earlier each year, as well as the fact that the Great Lakes have turned toxic for several weeks each year for the past 3 years because they were too warm and lots of chemical crap was being dumped into them.

Yeah, a 5 year drought would have nothing to do with it.
It's a good thing Democrats are spending billions on a train to no where instead of desalinization plants.

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oops!
View attachment 90618

The left never let the facts get in their way.

Take your pick dope.
1000 year drought in california - Google Search

Do you even know what a fucking thousand year drought even means?

Let me guess you think they looked in teepee's and in cave drawings for the records of the last one.



.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I guess you missed the part that because it's getting warmer that Yosemite is drying up earlier and earlier each year, as well as the fact that the Great Lakes have turned toxic for several weeks each year for the past 3 years because they were too warm and lots of chemical crap was being dumped into them.

Yeah, a 5 year drought would have nothing to do with it.
It's a good thing Democrats are spending billions on a train to no where instead of desalinization plants.

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oops!
View attachment 90618

The left never let the facts get in their way.

Take your pick dope.
1000 year drought in california - Google Search

Do you even know what a fucking thousand year drought even means?

Let me guess you think they looked in teepee's and in cave drawings for the records of the last one.



.

Read what I posted dope.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yeah, a 5 year drought would have nothing to do with it.
It's a good thing Democrats are spending billions on a train to no where instead of desalinization plants.

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oops!
View attachment 90618

The left never let the facts get in their way.

Take your pick dope.
1000 year drought in california - Google Search

Do you even know what a fucking thousand year drought even means?

Let me guess you think they looked in teepee's and in cave drawings for the records of the last one.



.

Read what I posted dope.

I am not reading it I know the propaganda hype and how they use little statistics of just a hundred years of records...not enough.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oh, you mean the driest period in 1,000 years?

Oops!
View attachment 90618

The left never let the facts get in their way.

Take your pick dope.
1000 year drought in california - Google Search

Do you even know what a fucking thousand year drought even means?

Let me guess you think they looked in teepee's and in cave drawings for the records of the last one.



.

Read what I posted dope.

I am not reading it I know the propaganda hype and how they use little statistics of just a hundred years of records...not enough.

That's right. Just post more nonsense then dope.

 

[LaDexter]

Do you even know what a fucking thousand year drought even means?

So, whether there are floods or droughts, it is "because of" CO2?

Arctic Sea ice is melting because of CO2, yet Antarctic Sea Ice is growing... proving the effect is NOT GLOBAL....

And, of course, 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica has added at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since Algore started lying...

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

 

[francoHFW]

July 2016 was world's hottest month since records began, says Nasa ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Aug 16, 2016 - As the string of hottest months continues, 2016 is 'virtually certain' to be the ... the past 14 months have broken the temperature record for each month, ... Hottest ever June marks 14thmonth of record-breaking temperatures.

Brainwashed functional morons everywhere.....

So you think think the earth is only 135 years old, figures you are more stupider then the 6,000 year old earth bible thumpers.

They have all kinds of other measurements going back millenia, ice cores tree rings, etc etc, dupe.

What was the temperature of Milwaukee 9/20/1235?

Stupid question, dupe.That's weather. They also know that CO2 hasn't been this high since dinosaurs.