Obama, Worst president in history, bar none.

Yes, your Obama sold our uranium company to Russia....

Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope
He already sold it.....
The company was owned by Canadians, how can Oblama sell a company he doesn't own?
Well, no fuck....no American owned company can sell our uranium to Russia....:lol:
We import uranium. The US produces 2% of it's uranium needs...
We export to Canada, so the uranium company Obama sold tomtje Russians has product....:lol:
 
You said nuclear weapons in the OP...Uranium was delivered by Russia...Have you blamed them for anything yet?
Yes, your Obama sold our uranium company to Russia....

Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope


insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...
Selling uranium is however....
The uranium can't be sold or exported out of the USA...
 
the debt was doubled on his watch, he gets the credit or blame, that's the way it works.
There you are... Making the statement that the "debt doubled on his watch" is very different than saying that he was responsible for doubling the debt. You made a distorted misleading statement, if you'd like to change the critique to saying that the debt double under his administration you can do so but the direct attack should be on actual things that he was responsible for...


semantics, look it up if you don't know what it means.
It is not semantics it is accurate vs inaccurate , true vs false. You're OP is full of Bullshit talking points.


the debt was doubled under Obama's watch. That is true. Bush and Reagan also added to the debt, but no president added as much as Obama.
Yes, that is true... But that wasn't your statement. This is why I claimed your talking points were bullshit.. Either lies or distortions of the truth... The fact that you had to restate your original claim shows the distortion


then using your logic, Bush did not start the Iraq war. Right?
 
I disagree...Reagan was lousy. A corporate sellout with a hatred for the working person.
 
Yes, your Obama sold our uranium company to Russia....

Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope
He already sold it.....
The company was owned by Canadians, how can Oblama sell a company he doesn't own?


a US president could have prevented the transfer of nuclear material to a terrorist nation. Instead Obama and hilly brokered it.
The company that was sold has no license to export or sell uranium outside the USA...
The company is in Canada....idiot....your stupidity is fun....:lol:
 
Where do I start... There is a lie or distortion in each of those talking points. I'll start at the top. "Obama doubling the national debt" You are a fool if you think Obama alone was responsible for the doubling of the national debt. Discretionary spending is only a fraction of the debt and it's controlled by both the congress and the President. Though I think it a valid critique to criticize Obamas spending, saying he is responsible for 10 Trillion dollars being added to the debt is completely false.


the debt was doubled on his watch, he gets the credit or blame, that's the way it works.
There you are... Making the statement that the "debt doubled on his watch" is very different than saying that he was responsible for doubling the debt. You made a distorted misleading statement, if you'd like to change the critique to saying that the debt double under his administration you can do so but the direct attack should be on actual things that he was responsible for...
So, you're saying someone other than Obama was POTUS? Link?
This convo is over your head... Whether you agree or not, you haven't expressed understanding of any of the statements that i've made. Move along
You haven't said anything....
again the communication process seems to break with you as you REPLY to a thread of MY messages with a claim that I haven't said anything... Logic seems to escape this one :cuckoo:
 
You said nuclear weapons in the OP...Uranium was delivered by Russia...Have you blamed them for anything yet?
Yes, your Obama sold our uranium company to Russia....

Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope


insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...


allowing a hostile nation to obtain nuclear material is foreign policy.
Russia is hostile to the US?
 
the debt was doubled on his watch, he gets the credit or blame, that's the way it works.
There you are... Making the statement that the "debt doubled on his watch" is very different than saying that he was responsible for doubling the debt. You made a distorted misleading statement, if you'd like to change the critique to saying that the debt double under his administration you can do so but the direct attack should be on actual things that he was responsible for...
So, you're saying someone other than Obama was POTUS? Link?
This convo is over your head... Whether you agree or not, you haven't expressed understanding of any of the statements that i've made. Move along
You haven't said anything....
again the communication process seems to break with you as you REPLY to a thread of MY messages with a claim that I haven't said anything... Logic seems to escape this one :cuckoo:
Let us know when you do say something...won't you.....
 
Yes, your Obama sold our uranium company to Russia....

Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope


insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...
Selling uranium is however....
The uranium can't be sold or exported out of the USA...


can't be? well it was
 
Yes, your Obama sold our uranium company to Russia....

Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope


insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...


allowing a hostile nation to obtain nuclear material is foreign policy.
Russia is hostile to the US?
image.jpeg
 
Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope
He already sold it.....
The company was owned by Canadians, how can Oblama sell a company he doesn't own?


a US president could have prevented the transfer of nuclear material to a terrorist nation. Instead Obama and hilly brokered it.
The company that was sold has no license to export or sell uranium outside the USA...
The company is in Canada....idiot....your stupidity is fun....:lol:
The company is in Canada, that is the only thing you have gotten right so far..The company has no ability(license) to send the uranium out of the USA, do you understand that?
 
Yes, your Obama sold our uranium company to Russia....

Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope


insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...


allowing a hostile nation to obtain nuclear material is foreign policy.
Russia is hostile to the US?


Iran, try to keep up
 
He already sold it.....
The company was owned by Canadians, how can Oblama sell a company he doesn't own?


a US president could have prevented the transfer of nuclear material to a terrorist nation. Instead Obama and hilly brokered it.
The company that was sold has no license to export or sell uranium outside the USA...
The company is in Canada....idiot....your stupidity is fun....:lol:
The company is in Canada, that is the only thing you have gotten right so far..The company has no ability(license) to send the uranium out of the USA, do you understand that?
He company is in Canada, idiot....:lol:
 
Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope


insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...
Selling uranium is however....
The uranium can't be sold or exported out of the USA...


can't be? well it was
Russia doesn’t have the licenses to export uranium outside the United States, Oilprice.org pointed out, "so it’s somewhat disingenuous to say this uranium is now Russia’s, to do with what it pleases." The Kremlin was likely more interested in Uranium One’s assets in Kazakhstan, the world’s largest producer.

Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope
 
Oblama can't sell what is not his to sell


First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope


insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...


allowing a hostile nation to obtain nuclear material is foreign policy.
Russia is hostile to the US?


Iran, try to keep up
Iran has received no uranium from the USA..
 
There you are... Making the statement that the "debt doubled on his watch" is very different than saying that he was responsible for doubling the debt. You made a distorted misleading statement, if you'd like to change the critique to saying that the debt double under his administration you can do so but the direct attack should be on actual things that he was responsible for...


semantics, look it up if you don't know what it means.
It is not semantics it is accurate vs inaccurate , true vs false. You're OP is full of Bullshit talking points.


the debt was doubled under Obama's watch. That is true. Bush and Reagan also added to the debt, but no president added as much as Obama.
Yes, that is true... But that wasn't your statement. This is why I claimed your talking points were bullshit.. Either lies or distortions of the truth... The fact that you had to restate your original claim shows the distortion


then using your logic, Bush did not start the Iraq war. Right?
Bush along with the UK and other allies started the Iraq war when they attack Saddam in 2003. They were provoked to do so by the Saudi's so I guess you could argue that it was started by all parties involved. Whats your point?
 
insert "bush" for "Obama" in your rant. Still say the president is not responsible for foreign policy?
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...


allowing a hostile nation to obtain nuclear material is foreign policy.
Russia is hostile to the US?


Iran, try to keep up
Iran has received no uranium from the USA..
They received it from the American company the Russians bought....
 
There you are... Making the statement that the "debt doubled on his watch" is very different than saying that he was responsible for doubling the debt. You made a distorted misleading statement, if you'd like to change the critique to saying that the debt double under his administration you can do so but the direct attack should be on actual things that he was responsible for...
So, you're saying someone other than Obama was POTUS? Link?
This convo is over your head... Whether you agree or not, you haven't expressed understanding of any of the statements that i've made. Move along
You haven't said anything....
again the communication process seems to break with you as you REPLY to a thread of MY messages with a claim that I haven't said anything... Logic seems to escape this one :cuckoo:
Let us know when you do say something...won't you.....
The "ignore" button is a great thing... See ya... or not!
 
Selling a company is not a foriegn policy...


allowing a hostile nation to obtain nuclear material is foreign policy.
Russia is hostile to the US?


Iran, try to keep up
Iran has received no uranium from the USA..
They received it from the American company the Russians bought....
The comapny in the USA can't, I have already proved a link and statement to that effect..
 
allowing a hostile nation to obtain nuclear material is foreign policy.
Russia is hostile to the US?


Iran, try to keep up
Iran has received no uranium from the USA..
They received it from the American company the Russians bought....
The comapny in the USA can't, I have already proved a link and statement to that effect..
The company is in Canada....
 

Forum List

Back
Top