Then that alone means he cannot get a fair trial anyway - thanks to the BLM savages who rampaged the nation. (They were more than “protests.”) Their actions have tainted the jury pool.After 2 to 3 months of protests,there isn't a place in this Nation where this killing incident was not known.
The jury pool anywhere in the nation would result in the same results, everyone interviewed knows about it, and likely had an opinion on it....
So then it goes to the next step, find jurors who can set their opinion aside, and decide with the facts presented in court.....
So what’s the answer when savages burn, loot, and murder across the country over an unintentional death of a violent ex-felon who was freaking out on drugs after having committed yet another crime - and the suspect can no longer get a fair trial, which by law he is entitled to?