XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,692
- 10,521
- 435
Which medical examiner indicated that Chauvin did not kill Floyd?That was THAT medical examiner…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which medical examiner indicated that Chauvin did not kill Floyd?That was THAT medical examiner…
Unfortunately, because Google like most liberal platforms, skews everything to the left, it’s hard to find. Very lopsided coverage. Anyway, it was the first ME who said that drugs were a significant factor in his death.Which medical examiner indicated that Chauvin did not kill Floyd?
The first ME specifically indicated that it was a homicide.Unfortunately, because Google like most liberal platforms, skews everything to the left, it’s hard to find. Very lopsided coverage. Anyway, it was the first ME who said that drugs were a significant factor in his death.
They made it about race because a black person died.Now let me ask you something: why did BLM make this about race? It had nothing to do with it. Wasn’t even mentioned at trial.
The problem is that the leftists and BLM made it all about race, and as a result, there were months of violent riots where billions of dollars of damage was done in dozens of cities - and 30 people were killed. But for some reason, more was made about the value of the life of ONE violent ex-felon, horrible father whose own kids didn’t recognize, drug addict than the 30 others who were killed combined.They made it about race because a black person died.
I’m glad they didn’t bring race into the trial. It would have been impossible to prove that Chauvin’s actions were influenced by race, and it would have been an easy softball for any competent lawyer to destroy that argument.
Before this goes any further, I’ll just say that I don’t know if Chauvin is racist. I don’t see any evidence indicating that he is. Race, to me, isn’t what this trial was about. It’s about a shitty police officer murdering someone.
If he gets another trial the result would be the same. Guilty of murder and a not long enough sentence.
I don’t agree with people who riot. I don’t agree with any claims that Chauvin is racist. I‘m not sure where you’re going with this attempt to steer the conversation.The problem is that the leftists and BLM made it all about race, and as a result, there were months of violent riots where billions of dollars of damage was done in dozens of cities - and 30 people were killed. But for some reason, more was made about the value of the life of ONE violent ex-felon, horrible father whose own kids didn’t recognize, drug addict than the 30 others who were killed combined.
This was always about a political agenda.
The first ME specifically indicated that it was a homicide.
The medical examiner is under pressure to find the true cause of death.
You guys just always want to whine that the results were rigged when you don’t get what you want.
Why do you constantly say things that are blatantly false? It's weird. No, all deaths are not labeled as homicide. I have no idea where you get this nonsense.All deaths are labeled a homicide.
Of course they are.Homicide and murder are two different things.
Yeah, right.....Normally, a defendant can be convicted of murder only if a prosecutor shows that the defendant acted with the intent to kill or with a reckless indifference to human life.
You're up in arms about a police officer rightfully being convicted of murder.We're not up in arms about the possibility of him getting a new trial, it's you cop haters that are.
There’s a very thorough document outlining what happened with Russia.
There is no evidence indicating that the medical examiners lied in their reports.
Can you please provide your evidence that the medical examiners lied in their reports?
All I know is your Russia documents outlining what happened with regard to Russia are proven BS.There’s a very thorough document outlining what happened with Russia.
There is no evidence indicating that the medical examiners lied in their reports.
Very convincing argument.All I know is your Russia documents outlining what happened with regard to Russia are proven BS.
Not sure if you noticed, I didn't address that part of your partisan attack.Very convincing argument.
Can you please provide your evidence that shows that the medical examiners lied in their reports? Thanks.
Oh. So you don't have evidence that the medical examiners lied in their reports. I guess that would make that a baseless conspiracy theory, like I've been saying.Not sure if you noticed, I didn't address that part of your partisan attack.
Did I address that?Oh. So you don't have evidence that the medical examiners lied in their reports. I guess that would make that a baseless conspiracy theory, like I've been saying.
You've been very helpful. Thank you.