otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 36,840
- 11,821
- 1,315
How many of you dumbasses believe Richard Blumenthal when he speaks?
Dumbasses believe conservatives.
Your sentence doesn’t make sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many of you dumbasses believe Richard Blumenthal when he speaks?
making absolutely no sense is your hobby?One thing is clear after all of this.....
Democrats have openly declared their belief that in any case where someone is accused of a crime 'the accused bears the burden of proof' as, according to Democrats / Snowflakes, Americans are GUILTY until PROVEN innocent.
Based on this exposed truth / revelation and understanding the significance and importance of the USSC, Democrats - based on this - should NEVER be allowed to appoint another Judge or a USSC Justice again .. until they submit themselves to attending classes where they will learn the meaning of Justice, learn the legal system, how it works, understand that trying cases in the public eye / the court of public opinion without evidence but instead attempting to emotionally manipulate people is wrong, and fully comprehend the Constitutional Rights afforded to them by the Constitution and law.
Until that time, they have proven themselves to be threats to the American people, to justice in this country, and threats to our democracy.
Same with Clarence Thomas, but he has served on the bench for a long time.The optics look bad whether he is guilty or not. Tainted for life he is. Likely unfairly.
Obviously. How stupid are you, that you think that needs to be said? Holy crap, dude.Confirm a rapist? Fuck no. Are you crazy?Then go ahead and confirm him and impeach him later.As long as necessary
Accuser #3 is not up for confirmation.
A woman whose life is destroyed (which it wasn't), even in theory, because she went to a party and was groped by a drunk teen boy while his friends laughed....is a piss poor example of a female.
If that is the worst thing that has even happened to her, she's not a woman. She's a fucking child.
She is actually very childlike and immature for her physical age and education/profession. She is answering in such a way that a 15yo would. Did she never grow up during those 32 years?
I enjoyed the redundant phrasing and poor grammar used in her opening statement. I was asking myself, "This person has a Doctorate?"
Put that English major to work and speak English yah wanker.
She was in a hotel room and she slept there. She was in mourning. She is trying to be honest.Wait, she couldn't remember if she took the polygraph test on the day she buried her Grandmother?
Seriously?
As long as necessaryagain? The FBI can be asked by the President to vet and investigate. You're throwing around talking pints meant to deflectNo one has said the FBI had jurisdiction. Thank you for the offer f of red herringThere the FBI had jurisdiction, and the incident was less time in the past.
Here the FBI has no jurisdiction.
I guess the longer in the past an incident is, the less you want it investigated.
sad
So you are saying the FBI can just up and investigate someone breaking a State law (which is what Kavenaugh is accused of) without the permission of the State law enforcement?
It's not a Red Herring, it's how things work.
The FBI investigates federal crimes, crimes across State lines (which usually become federal crimes), can be invited by Local law enforcement to assist. At most otherwise they can come in when local law enforcement is doing their jobs (watch Mississippi Burning for that) but even then that falls under the category of federal crimes.
question: What would be so wrong with asking the president to allow the FBI to look into this?
and if then find nothing, what them? How long to we give them to investigate something that is based on one person's claims and that there is no evidence or corroborating testimony?
^ speaking of dumb as a rock...Obviously. How stupid are you, that you think that needs to be said? Holy crap, dude.Confirm a rapist? Fuck no. Are you crazy?Then go ahead and confirm him and impeach him later.As long as necessary
Accuser #3 is not up for confirmation.
He could be as dumb as a rock and still be smarter than you.
The GOP is full of useless hacks like Grassley.Grassley getting a beating for his inept handling of the hearing.
Same with Clarence Thomas, but he has served on the bench for a long time.The optics look bad whether he is guilty or not. Tainted for life he is. Likely unfairly.
Confirm him and move on.
I agree that Mitchel is not effective at all. Wish Trey Gowdy was acting prosecutor.she was afraid to fly to DC but has flown to Delaware every year to visit relatives and has flown to Hawaii several times. Lie number one
Mitchell is doing a terrible job, not challenging Ford on any of her lies, the republicans really screwed up giving up their time to her. the dems are going to win this and the GOP has probably lost control of congress after November----------and they deserve it for being pussies and worrying too much about what the corrupt media is going to say about them. ball less fools.
But having said all that, having the dems in control of congress will be a disaster for this country. do not let that happen regardless of how incompetent the republicans seem to be, they are better than the dems.
And so is Kavanaugh, so quit yer whining already...She's a means to an end.
from what century?I have BA degrees in mathematics and history, and a Master's in Education.
Not even close.Grassley getting a beating for his inept handling of the hearing.
^ speaking of dumb as a rock...Obviously. How stupid are you, that you think that needs to be said? Holy crap, dude.Confirm a rapist? Fuck no. Are you crazy?Then go ahead and confirm him and impeach him later.
Accuser #3 is not up for confirmation.
He could be as dumb as a rock and still be smarter than you.
So you believe Blumenthal because he is a democrat?How many of you dumbasses believe Richard Blumenthal when he speaks?
Dumbasses believe conservatives.
Your sentence doesn’t make sense.
You conveniently left out a few things, snowflake:if Franken was there, he would only be asking Ford for her secret chocolate chip cookie recipe
That has absolutely nothing to do with the thread. If you believe it does then you likley have rocks in your head.
really? I guess it's true what brain science says about peopleThis woman doesn't look in anyway shape or form angry or upset. In fact she looks like she's enjoying her moment in the spot light. What a freaking circus.