Oh, how the Republican party has changed

Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.

I guess using that logic southern Christian white people are still pro-slavery since they were (obviously) by far more supportive of the practice.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.

I guess using that logic southern white people are still pro-slavery since they were (obviously) by far more supportive of the practice.

No, not at all. Current dems are still pro-bondage and keeping their voters enslaved. I don't expect you to ever grasp that.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.

I guess using that logic southern white people are still pro-slavery since they were (obviously) by far more supportive of the practice.

No, not at all.
Why not?

Current dems are still pro-bondage and keeping their voters enslaved.

Sure ensuring black people have access to the ballot box is total slavery.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.

I guess using that logic southern white people are still pro-slavery since they were (obviously) by far more supportive of the practice.

No, not at all.
Why not?

Current dems are still pro-bondage and keeping their voters enslaved.

Sure ensuring black people have access to the ballot box is total slavery.

Lol, has nothing to do with the ballot box. They have easy access to the ballot. You didn't disappoint.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.

I guess using that logic southern white people are still pro-slavery since they were (obviously) by far more supportive of the practice.

No, not at all.
Why not?

Current dems are still pro-bondage and keeping their voters enslaved.

Sure ensuring black people have access to the ballot box is total slavery.

Lol, has nothing to do with the ballot box. They have easy access to the ballot. You didn't disappoint.

You think removing polling places from inner cities is helpful for voting?


Why is that happening in Republican led states?

You still didn't answer my question but let's face it, you aren't capable.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


But a shitload of dems did.

Here are the Democratic Senators who voted YEA on October 2002.


Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea


Neat a majority of Democrats didn't vote for the war. That was the point. Thanks for backing it up.

But a shit load of them did.
Including Biden,Clinton,Kerry,Fienstien...all your favorites.

They're my favorites? That's news to me. Why do you make stuff up?

They were the leaders in your party and you're trying to tell me you dont like them? :auiqs.jpg:
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

You know who was in favor of slavery in the U.S.? White people. I guess using your logic white people are pro slavery too.

Yeah....and according to you nut jobs all white people are racist.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.

I guess using that logic southern white people are still pro-slavery since they were (obviously) by far more supportive of the practice.

No, not at all.
Why not?

Current dems are still pro-bondage and keeping their voters enslaved.

Sure ensuring black people have access to the ballot box is total slavery.

Claiming white people want to take away your food stamps is.
You're buying the black vote with promises you never deliver on. Unfortunately the black community is finally catching on and walking away in droves.
Just like people are bailing on blue states.
 
I think NATO is kind of OK where we are right now.

Is it?
Are they better off funding Putin's military via Nord Stream 2?

Why are you editing my post?

I think NATO is kind of OK where we are right now. Is Trump?

1624224296364.png


Are you unfamiliar with the function where you highlight a portion of a post and hit reply?

It prevents replies with dozens of previous posts.

I think NATO is kind of OK where we are right now.

It might be better if the other members spent more on their own defense.

Is Trump?

You should ask him.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.
You mean like Trump giving farmers bailout money after his disasterous tarriff policies, assclown?
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:
They should have put Truman on trial for war crimes after he ordered Dresden to be firebombed. Burned thousands of innocent men, women & children alive for no other reason then to extract vengeance. He destroyed & burned to the ground the most beautiful city in Europe. One of the most tragic events of ww2.
Just curious. Where do you stand on invading a country based on bullshit evidence of WMDs?

Ask the dems the same question.
After all,they signed up for the invasion of Iraq.

More Democrats voted against the war in Iraq and they also weren't the ones who ran it. They also weren't the ones screaming on tv every night that you're a traitor if you were against the war.


There were 156 of both the House and Senate members who voted against the Iraq War.

Of those 156:

150 were democrats
6 were republicans

Zero republican senators voted against the Iraq War.


Yeah but to be fair the wingnuts here will turn on a dime and become the biggest peacniks this side of Woodstock if it means they think they can own a lib.

Lets not forget that democrats are the party of slavery and segregation, voted for both WW's and Vietnam. You have nothing to stand on.

I guess that means the South is the geographic center of slavery then and they're all Conservatives.

No, it means the democrats are the party of slavery and segregation and continue to project that same bondage through social engineering and the promise of free trinkets out of the treasury for a vote. Its despicable but its what dems do.

I guess using that logic southern white people are still pro-slavery since they were (obviously) by far more supportive of the practice.

No, not at all.
Why not?

Current dems are still pro-bondage and keeping their voters enslaved.

Sure ensuring black people have access to the ballot box is total slavery.

Lol, has nothing to do with the ballot box. They have easy access to the ballot. You didn't disappoint.
And I wonder who helped take two branches of government over the top in 2020 elections. Did that disappoint the losing party?
 
By telling NATO members to meet their spending committments? Yeah, that was awful!

Was Vladimir Putin delighted when Trump resisted his new natural gas pipeline?
Is that all you have to say to my report? Well, at least you commented. The rest of the Republicans here avoided my report. It dealt with what is happening now. They preferred talking about the past.

I posted the report twice. I simply can't get Republicans here to defend their own party.
Your a babbling liar . Nobody even reads your bullshit. You created hundreds of I hate Trump posts that consist of pure made up bullshit. And remember your a Republican! No good liar.
 
Can't answer?

Was Vladimir Putin delighted when Trump resisted his new natural gas pipeline?
Considering what I had to say in post 126, that question is a distraction. You want to change the subject.

Beside, Trump did nothing to stop the pipeline. In essence you said so.
 
Eisenhower new Dem hero, the man who on orders from a Dem president burned 100's of thousands of men, women, and children alive during WWII firebombing raids. :cuckoo:

You've OBVIOUSLY never been in a war, have you sonny?
I'm mocking the Dems hypocrisy. I'd have already turned Iran to glass you don't want me waging war on our enemies, we'd run out of enemies.
Iran is definitely an enemy of the United States but I'm not certain such extreme measures are warranted against it.
 
Were they spending more on defense?
When did they stop "dealing with the US"?

Any specifics?
The fact that Trump alienated our European allies is general knowledge. The fact that you don't know about that confirms what I have said all along. Today's Republicans have no idea what is going on.
 
Can't answer?

Was Vladimir Putin delighted when Trump resisted his new natural gas pipeline?
Considering what I had to say in post 126, that question is a distraction. You want to change the subject.

Beside, Trump did nothing to stop the pipeline. In essence you said so.

Considering what I had to say in post 126, that question is a distraction.

You listed several things that Trump did that you felt delighted Putin.
Why is listing a Trump action that probably didn't delight Putin, a "distraction"?

Beside, Trump did nothing to stop the pipeline.

Trump's Nord Stream 2 sanctions did nothing?
Then why all the Russian and German whining?


Our capitol was invaded and ransacked. Five were killed.

If I point out that 5 weren't killed, is that also a "distraction"?
 

Forum List

Back
Top