I think that peace is a better possibility.
Some of the larger and oldest settlements would have to stay. There would need to be negotiated land swaps.
Likewise - no right of return, Palestine itself would have to absorb the refugees from the camps.
Jeruselum - just don't know what is best there...joint control....??
Once they have a state, they have something to keep (or lose) - and if they are bad actors, they'll be treated like other rogue states.
What have the Palestinians offered to " negotiate land swaps?" They are also insisting on " Right of Return" Just more proof that they are the ones who do not want a " Two State Solution" therefore no peace
Neither side has offered swaps in good faith. Both will have to give on some thing - settlements and right of return. Neither seems to want peace.
What more can the Palestinians give?I think that peace is a better possibility.
Some of the larger and oldest settlements would have to stay. There would need to be negotiated land swaps.
Likewise - no right of return, Palestine itself would have to absorb the refugees from the camps.
Jeruselum - just don't know what is best there...joint control....??
Once they have a state, they have something to keep (or lose) - and if they are bad actors, they'll be treated like other rogue states.
What have the Palestinians offered to " negotiate land swaps?" They are also insisting on " Right of Return" Just more proof that they are the ones who do not want a " Two State Solution" therefore no peace
Neither side has offered swaps in good faith. Both will have to give on some thing - settlements and right of return. Neither seems to want peace.
What more can the Palestinians give?I think that peace is a better possibility.
Some of the larger and oldest settlements would have to stay. There would need to be negotiated land swaps.
Likewise - no right of return, Palestine itself would have to absorb the refugees from the camps.
Jeruselum - just don't know what is best there...joint control....??
Once they have a state, they have something to keep (or lose) - and if they are bad actors, they'll be treated like other rogue states.
What have the Palestinians offered to " negotiate land swaps?" They are also insisting on " Right of Return" Just more proof that they are the ones who do not want a " Two State Solution" therefore no peace
Neither side has offered swaps in good faith. Both will have to give on some thing - settlements and right of return. Neither seems to want peace.
What more can the Palestinians give?I think that peace is a better possibility.
Some of the larger and oldest settlements would have to stay. There would need to be negotiated land swaps.
Likewise - no right of return, Palestine itself would have to absorb the refugees from the camps.
Jeruselum - just don't know what is best there...joint control....??
Once they have a state, they have something to keep (or lose) - and if they are bad actors, they'll be treated like other rogue states.
What have the Palestinians offered to " negotiate land swaps?" They are also insisting on " Right of Return" Just more proof that they are the ones who do not want a " Two State Solution" therefore no peace
Neither side has offered swaps in good faith. Both will have to give on some thing - settlements and right of return. Neither seems to want peace.
What more can the Palestinians give?
The question was that if Israel went back to the 67 Borders would there be peace. Don't have the exact response but the answer was NOT yes
The thing is what the Palestinians call 1967 borders are not the same thing as the actual 1967 armistice lines. They refer to the 1947 partition plan as the pre 1967 borders and that is what they want as the starting point for Palestine.