jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 138,929
- 29,007
- 2,180
never said it was. It should be. it's the russians interfering in our election and what the special counsel paper stated. russians interfering in an election. right? I'm just saying, we have specific facts out in public and ignoring that is stupid. But hey, I never said a leftist was ever smart.well actually we do have the collusion from the dems in our hands. it's called the dossier. you know it exists right? you know she paid for it right? it was gotten from the same lady people wanted trump jr. tried for . hmmmmmm but hitlery actually has the info. we know this right? was it opposition research? yep. fact. was it used to get a warrant to spy on a opposition campaign? yep, fact. so what do you have that puts trump in that same field?no, he was the campaign. he is not an associate. without him there is no campaign.
Well that is your opinion on the noun. I disagree I think he was an associate oh his own campaign. However the term used was a verb. He was most definitely associated with his own campaign.
"any links and/or coordination bet ween the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump;"
the only Russian collusion that has been discovered was between the Hillary campaign, the DNC, and Russian criminals. Bring on the indictments--------------lock her up.
REally? So you have Muller's notes huh. I bet you could get a small fortune from the Times for them.
But I know you don't You're just spewing the RussianGOPWing's talking points. It's not us, it's them.
Wait, what? That's in Mueller's notes? You could make a fortune if that were true.
If is the most powerful word in the universe.
I suppose that means you capitulated on the point that the investigation included the President "How could you vote for a person with a face like that?"