Opinion: In U.S., right wing extremists more deadly than jihadists

The Nazis came to power do to the weakness of the Weimar Constitution (see below) and the ease in which minority and extreme parties could control the debate. A good lesson for American patriots who are critical of the current state of affairs in the H. of Representatives:

Weimar Republic's Constitution


"Minority party?" The Nazis were the biggest party in Germany. They had the most seats in the legislature. If they are a "minority party," then so was every other party in Germany. Libs just hate to admit the fact that the Nazis were popular in Germany and beat the opposition

The nexus between the members of he H. of Rep. and the Nazi Party isn't linear; yet it does serve as a warning, when the power of the minority can control the debate and policy decisions chaos results.


The Nazis came to power because their ideas were popular with the vast mass of numskulls in Germany. Libturds just can't get over the idea that a large plurality of people voted the Nazis into power. That's because it undermines all their delusions about the miracles of democracy


The Nazis were a minority party in Germany but were able to get Hitler appointed Chancellor by German President Hindenburg because the Nazi Party was the largest party in the Reichstag. The German President appointed Adolph Hitler Chancellor on January 30, 1933.

Being the largest party in the Reichstag means they were the most popular party in Germany. Your continued use of the term "minority party" is purely an attempt to deflect from the fact that the Nazis won the popular vote.

Hitler ascended to the Chancellorship the traditional way, using demagoguery, hate and fear, the same three tactics used by the leaders of the Tea Party in their successful takeover of the H. or Reps in 2010. Given that half the population is by definition of below average intelligence, it's easy to see democracies can be easily manipulated, and when the laws are misused bad things happen.

Three weeks after Hitler was appointed, on Feb. 27, 1933 the Reichstag burned. See the details and the consequence to the world here:

The Reichstag Fire, 1933

Yes, that is the "traditional way." It's the way every Democrat got himself elected. When Democrats are elected, the laws are abused and bad things happen. Furthermore, you just admitted that the people are not qualified to government themselves. In other words, democracy is a failure.

Also, I'm perfectly aware of all the events that led to Hitler's rise to power. Democrats have obviously studied his methods.
 
Last edited:
OK , in that case let's try the Lewrockwell website which can not be considered leftwing:


"The evidence is abundant, that in the 15 years of military rule, Pinochet either ordered or failed to stop the state-sponsored murder of about 3,000 leftist activists, many of whom were foreigners (prompting Pinochet’s arrest as a "war criminal" in 1998). 1,200 more disappeared and there is some evidence that in the late 70′s, remains of many of the dead were dumped at sea.

It quickly becomes apparent that when considering dead bodies, the Pinochet regime looks less than enlightened. This is partially due to the fact that while Pinochet had a bureaucratic regime that was highly organized and easy to connect to Pinochet himself, the killing under Allende tended to be committed by paramilitary groups that Allende did not have direct control over, but was nevertheless quite friendly with. So the choice the Chileans had was between two kinds of murderous government. One that was haphazard and guerrilla-centered, and one that was ruthlessly efficient. "

.

Says a lot about people who would hero worship this guy, doesn't it?


Says more about the outcome "people" like you would prefer.

Gulags, internment camps, concentration camps, and systematic mass murder is OK with "people" like you as long as it's conducted according to law right?

The "human resources" need to be managed after all right?

Fascist sociopath.

Yes, because the only two options are murdering thugs or gulags.

You know, one of the most common responses on these boards to arguments one can't answer is to make up a bunch of false choices and personal attacks about the messenger.

It's a sign of defeat
 


"Minority party?" The Nazis were the biggest party in Germany. They had the most seats in the legislature. If they are a "minority party," then so was every other party in Germany. Libs just hate to admit the fact that the Nazis were popular in Germany and beat the opposition


Being the largest party in the Reichstag means they were the most popular party in Germany. Your continued use of the term "minority party" is purely an attempt to deflect from the fact that the Nazis won the popular vote.

Hitler ascended to the Chancellorship the traditional way, using demagoguery, hate and fear, the same three tactics used by the leaders of the Tea Party in their successful takeover of the H. or Reps in 2010. Given that half the population is by definition of below average intelligence, it's easy to see democracies can be easily manipulated, and when the laws are misused bad things happen.

Three weeks after Hitler was appointed, on Feb. 27, 1933 the Reichstag burned. See the details and the consequence to the world here:

The Reichstag Fire, 1933

Yes, that is the "traditional way." It's the way every Democrat got himself elected. When Democrats are elected, the laws are abused and bad things happen. Furthermore, you just admitted that the people are not qualified to government themselves. In other words, democracy is a failure.

Also, I'm perfectly aware of all the events that led to Hitler's rise to power. Democrats have obviously studied his methods.

You might really believe what you write. That's sad. Or you might not and believe some will believe the bullshit you post. That's both sad and dishonest.
 
You're quoting the LA Times?

Enough said.

OK , in that case let's try the Lewrockwell website which can not be considered leftwing:


"The evidence is abundant, that in the 15 years of military rule, Pinochet either ordered or failed to stop the state-sponsored murder of about 3,000 leftist activists, many of whom were foreigners (prompting Pinochet’s arrest as a "war criminal" in 1998). 1,200 more disappeared and there is some evidence that in the late 70′s, remains of many of the dead were dumped at sea.

It quickly becomes apparent that when considering dead bodies, the Pinochet regime looks less than enlightened. This is partially due to the fact that while Pinochet had a bureaucratic regime that was highly organized and easy to connect to Pinochet himself, the killing under Allende tended to be committed by paramilitary groups that Allende did not have direct control over, but was nevertheless quite friendly with. So the choice the Chileans had was between two kinds of murderous government. One that was haphazard and guerrilla-centered, and one that was ruthlessly efficient. "

.

Says a lot about people who would hero worship this guy, doesn't it?

All the commie nimrods who hate him worship murdering scumbags like Castro, Che Guevara, Hugo Chaves, Maduro and Daniel Ortega. By going on a jihad about Pinochet you're pretty much announcing to the world that you're a communist piece of shit.
 

I would eliminate from consideration liberals, progressives, labor unions, members of OWS, most civil servants, Democrats, the League of Women Voters, the Nuns on the Bus, Jews, real Christians, the ACLU and Doctors without Borders.

Those who idolize are easy to spot, they hate and hope to censor (at least) all of the above.
 


"Minority party?" The Nazis were the biggest party in Germany. They had the most seats in the legislature. If they are a "minority party," then so was every other party in Germany. Libs just hate to admit the fact that the Nazis were popular in Germany and beat the opposition



Being the largest party in the Reichstag means they were the most popular party in Germany. Your continued use of the term "minority party" is purely an attempt to deflect from the fact that the Nazis won the popular vote.

Hitler ascended to the Chancellorship the traditional way, using demagoguery, hate and fear, the same three tactics used by the leaders of the Tea Party in their successful takeover of the H. or Reps in 2010. Given that half the population is by definition of below average intelligence, it's easy to see democracies can be easily manipulated, and when the laws are misused bad things happen.

Three weeks after Hitler was appointed, on Feb. 27, 1933 the Reichstag burned. See the details and the consequence to the world here:

The Reichstag Fire, 1933

Yes, that is the "traditional way." It's the way every Democrat got himself elected. When Democrats are elected, the laws are abused and bad things happen. Furthermore, you just admitted that the people are not qualified to government themselves. In other words, democracy is a failure.

Also, I'm perfectly aware of all the events that led to Hitler's rise to power. Democrats have obviously studied his methods.

You might really believe what you write. That's sad. Or you might not and believe some will believe the bullshit you post. That's both sad and dishonest.

What have I posted that isn't 100% true?

Apparently you believe knowing the facts is "sad." That's because you're a clueless leftwing moron.
 
Holder needs to come down hard on these rw clingers and their violence. By all means necessary. Serious.

Is this also serious?

Of course she's serious.

The biggest mistake the reasonable majority has made in the last 40 years, and which has led to the situation we're in now, is failing to recognize how inherently violent and crazed progressives really are. They are, and always have been, cognizant of the fact that their policies lead to nightmares like WWII concentration camps and communist genocides. They APPROVE of that sort of thing.

These are the same people who result in those nightmares happening the world over. They don't go away..and we're stupid to think that nobody MEANS for that to happen.
 
"Minority party?" The Nazis were the biggest party in Germany. They had the most seats in the legislature. If they are a "minority party," then so was every other party in Germany. Libs just hate to admit the fact that the Nazis were popular in Germany and beat the opposition



Being the largest party in the Reichstag means they were the most popular party in Germany. Your continued use of the term "minority party" is purely an attempt to deflect from the fact that the Nazis won the popular vote.



Yes, that is the "traditional way." It's the way every Democrat got himself elected. When Democrats are elected, the laws are abused and bad things happen. Furthermore, you just admitted that the people are not qualified to government themselves. In other words, democracy is a failure.

Also, I'm perfectly aware of all the events that led to Hitler's rise to power. Democrats have obviously studied his methods.

You might really believe what you write. That's sad. Or you might not and believe some will believe the bullshit you post. That's both sad and dishonest.

What have I posted that isn't 100% true?

Apparently you believe knowing the facts is "sad." That's because you're a clueless leftwing moron.

For a start, the Social Democrats were the largest political party in Germany at the time. If you weren't so blissfully ignorant you might seek out some evidence to support your opinions. You might then not be perceived as a fatuous potboiler.
 
Says a lot about people who would hero worship this guy, doesn't it?


Says more about the outcome "people" like you would prefer.

Gulags, internment camps, concentration camps, and systematic mass murder is OK with "people" like you as long as it's conducted according to law right?

The "human resources" need to be managed after all right?

Fascist sociopath.

Yes, because the only two options are murdering thugs or gulags.

You know, one of the most common responses on these boards to arguments one can't answer is to make up a bunch of false choices and personal attacks about the messenger.

It's a sign of defeat

Those were the choices the people of Chile were faced with. Furthermore, killing people who are trying to overthrow your country isn't murder.
 
You're quoting the LA Times?

Enough said.

Because you've NEVER heard of Pinochet ????
That's just sad.

Yes, I have heard of Pinochet. He saved his country from communist rule. He is the best thing that ever happened to Chile. It's the most prosperous country in South America because of him. Allende would have turned Chile into a Soviet client state. He and all the people who supported him were traitors to their country.

I agree that Allende was a LEFTWING Marxist scumbag.

But his replacement should have not been a RIGHT WING Marxist Scumbag.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top