Our next Civil War will be over abortion

[The Original Tree]

Studies show that most babies being aborted are gay.

Liberals hate gays.

They hate gay babies even more.

 

[Lysistrata]

I don't think that these folks ever had a plan as to where they were going to take these babies.Ask them who is going to raise these babies and who is going to pay for this and they run out of the room, and then nothing but silence.I don't think that they ever had a clue. They certainly never offered anything to the public.

Your post would have been more realistic and sensible if you had stopped with, "I don't think."

I would explain why questions like, "Well, if we don't kill the babies, what do we do with them?" get met with silence, but let's face it: you don't have the brain capacity to even comprehend the words.

Look. I know that you are a fundie perv. But I was asking a simple question. If Big Government forces women to complete gestation and give birth, where do all of these babies go? Who takes responsibility? Will pigpence take responsibility for them all? graham? jeffress? perkins? the guys at the family research council? focus on that family? They have got a lot of hard work in front of them, much of it smelly.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Women will be losing voting rights because of more easy to fool and elect crooks that destroys the nation

excuse me. I think that you are male and voted for people like trump and pence, who are obvious trash. The orange whore/conman and a sexually obsessed pervert who probably could not get it up if he wanted to???

Trump has the men especially the white men

How long in history has women had voting or decision rights ?

This abortion issue will wake up men to stop the freedoms of the unwise before it destroys the nation

Back to the same voting laws as the wise founders

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Will trump call out the military to New York to stop killing American babies ?

 

[litman]

If you knew anything you would know that abortion is just being used for political purposes to keep the evangelicals in line. They ignore the fact that by a very large margin women want the right to control their own bodies. Our righties think it is OK to put government between a women and her doctor. It is so easy for men who think they know more than women about their health and are just being fooled by the political bullshit.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

How long has women in history ruled over men?

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Andrew Jackson called out the military when congress and the courts said no

Trump has the same supporters as Jackson

Will trump call out the military to stop the crooks of the deep state?? And bring a logic test for voters ?

 

[The VOR]

No. Not even a top 5 item.

1. Gun Confiscation
2. Suppression of Free Speech
3. Voter Fraud
4. Motherfuckers trying to shove communism down our throats
5. Declaration of an Emergency for Any Reason not related to WAR

Abortion is the linchpin behind all of it.

Abortion is the reason Democrats have gone insane.

The blood of fetuses is the fuel the keeps the Democrats angry.

I got some news for you Skippy, you and your fellow nutters are the insane ones.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I don't think that these folks ever had a plan as to where they were going to take these babies.Ask them who is going to raise these babies and who is going to pay for this and they run out of the room, and then nothing but silence.I don't think that they ever had a clue. They certainly never offered anything to the public.

Your post would have been more realistic and sensible if you had stopped with, "I don't think."

I would explain why questions like, "Well, if we don't kill the babies, what do we do with them?" get met with silence, but let's face it: you don't have the brain capacity to even comprehend the words.

Look. I know that you are a fundie perv. But I was asking a simple question. If Big Government forces women to complete gestation and give birth, where do all of these babies go? Who takes responsibility? Will pigpence take responsibility for them all? graham? jeffress? perkins? the guys at the family research council? focus on that family? They have got a lot of hard work in front of them, much of it smelly.

No, you weren't asking a question at all. You were making a statement, and an asinine one at that, regarding what you "know" about what other people are thinking, aka what you wish they were thinking because it makes you feel slightly less like an amoral, pathetic moron in your own positions.

Glad we could clear that up. And once again, you still have my pity for your bitterness and hatred over how leftist feminazi-ism has destroyed your life. Seriously, seek help for your obsession with hating me for being better than you.

 

[Cecilie1200]

If you knew anything you would know that abortion is just being used for political purposes to keep the evangelicals in line. They ignore the fact that by a very large margin women want the right to control their own bodies. Our righties think it is OK to put government between a women and her doctor. It is so easy for men who think they know more than women about their health and are just being fooled by the political bullshit.

"If you knew anything, you would know that people don't think and believe what they say they do, they ACTUALLY think this, and I know because I read minds!"

If YOU knew anything . . . ah, never mind, that will never happen, so why bother?

 

[Lesh]

Anti-abortion zealots love life so much that they're willing to KILL to get their way

 

[BS Filter]

why should anyone take the right wing seriously about morals?

Do you think killing a human infant in the womb is moral?

it depends on the circumstance.

do you believe prosecuting the general warfare on a for-profit basis is moral? we have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You don't even know what the General welfare clause is for. There's no circumstance where killing a child is moral.

 

[Chuz Life]

Hilarious!. Some years ago in South Dakota the state voted on a bill to make abortion illegal in all circumstances.
Everyone assumed it was going to pass. Then people started coming out and saying how much money are you willing to give up to take care of someone else’s kids? Money that you need to take care of your own kids? Suddenly the bill didn’t pass. People voted against it once that fact was put out there in the public discourse.
Remember, republicans only want to take care of the fetus, once the kid is born they Don’t give a sh!t.

No links to support ledtarded claims.

That's so potato.

 

[John Shaw]

LOL! No it won't.

The religious right is so desperate to win they settled on Donald Trump as their hero. Goes to show they don't have much time left.

 

[Mr Natural]

LOL! No it won't.

The religious right is so desperate to win they settled on Donald Trump as their hero. Goes to show they don't have much time left.

Much time or much credibility

 

[John Shaw]

LOL! No it won't.

The religious right is so desperate to win they settled on Donald Trump as their hero. Goes to show they don't have much time left.

Much time or much credibility

Both. They lost all credibility because they cling to Trump despite 1. Trump lacking a single religious bone in his body, and 2. being a serial philanderer and liar. Trump is pretty far from being a moral man, yet they've attached themselves to his name with overwhelming support. That makes them as big of hypocrites as anyone I can think of.

In addition, in younger generations, religion is as unpopular as it's ever been, and liberalism is more popular. What's worse, Millennials are not becoming as socially conservative as what one would expect from previous generations.

 

[JoeB131]

There is a possibility we could have a war over abortion. The Supreme Court ruled slavery the law of the land in 1856. A few years later the Civil war ended it. The people always have the final word.

By that logic, we should have had a civil war in 1979

 

[BS Filter]

There is a possibility we could have a war over abortion. The Supreme Court ruled slavery the law of the land in 1856. A few years later the Civil war ended it. The people always have the final word.

By that logic, we should have had a civil war in 1979

Why?

 

[Faun]

Sure I do. For years, many on the right have fought against Roe v. Wade, saying abortion should be left up to the states to decide, not the federal government.

Now here we have a state doing exactly that, and rightards are lambasting the state for doing that.

So now I see they were lying when they said, let the states decide. What they really meant was, let the states decide as long as states decide to outlaw abortion.

Amazingly enough, "leave it up to the states" does not mean "We won't have any input into state decisions". If you were assuming that, then that teaches you not to make assumptions.

And it's not a lie because you assumed something we never said.

No one said anything about not having any input in state decisions.

Yeah, actually, you did. You're pissing and ranting because "You said you wanted it to be a state issue, and when a state decides, you object to their choice! That means you lied about wanting it to be a state issue!" Whether you were smart enough to understand the meaning and import of your words or not, that is essentially what they were.

That means what it says ... righties are pissed at the decision the state made — it does not say they’re pissed because they didn’t have input; which, by the way, they did have input. Their input was at the polls, electing legislators who represent them. So there’s no way possible I said righties are passed because they had no input in the decision.

Your statements DO mean what they say . . . and what they say is that you think if conservatives say something should be decided by the state rather than the federal government, that means they have to just shut up and be happy with the decision. Otherwise, they "lied" about wanting it to be a state decision.

Thanks for the pointless digression into "I didn't say they were pissed because they didn't have input." It was nice of you to clarify that point, but since that point was never actually made, or even hinted at, it seems suspiciously like you're inventing an argument you can win, because you know you lost the original one and you're too dishonest to just admit it.

And by the way, if you ever even once in your two-faced, hypocritical life consider your "input was at the polls when the legislators were elected" when it comes to laws you DON'T like, I might actually listen seriously to this BS for a whole five seconds before laughing at it. Might. But since you and I both know that you don't stop screeching to even draw a new breath when the elected legislators pass laws you disagree with, I'm not even going to bother pretending you're not a joke.

”But since you and I both know that you don't stop screeching to even draw a new breath when the elected legislators pass laws you disagree with, I'm not even going to bother pretending you're not a joke.”

Not even remotely close to what I’ve been arguing. Try again if you ever figure it out.

 

[JoeB131]

There is a possibility we could have a war over abortion. The Supreme Court ruled slavery the law of the land in 1856. A few years later the Civil war ended it. The people always have the final word.

By that logic, we should have had a civil war in 1979

Why?

Because if the people were to have a "say" on a moral issue. They'd have had it a few years after the decision.

Instead, what the people did was say, "Um, yeah, we were having abortions anyway, glad the law finally caught up."

Until of course, the Religious Loons decided they needed an issue to keep asses in pews.