The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Studies show that most babies being aborted are gay.
Liberals hate gays.
They hate gay babies even more.
Liberals hate gays.
They hate gay babies even more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think that these folks ever had a plan as to where they were going to take these babies.Ask them who is going to raise these babies and who is going to pay for this and they run out of the room, and then nothing but silence.I don't think that they ever had a clue. They certainly never offered anything to the public.
Your post would have been more realistic and sensible if you had stopped with, "I don't think."
I would explain why questions like, "Well, if we don't kill the babies, what do we do with them?" get met with silence, but let's face it: you don't have the brain capacity to even comprehend the words.
Women will be losing voting rights because of more easy to fool and elect crooks that destroys the nation
excuse me. I think that you are male and voted for people like trump and pence, who are obvious trash. The orange whore/conman and a sexually obsessed pervert who probably could not get it up if he wanted to???
I got some news for you Skippy, you and your fellow nutters are the insane ones.Abortion is the linchpin behind all of it.No. Not even a top 5 item.
1. Gun Confiscation
2. Suppression of Free Speech
3. Voter Fraud
4. Motherfuckers trying to shove communism down our throats
5. Declaration of an Emergency for Any Reason not related to WAR
Abortion is the reason Democrats have gone insane.
The blood of fetuses is the fuel the keeps the Democrats angry.
I don't think that these folks ever had a plan as to where they were going to take these babies.Ask them who is going to raise these babies and who is going to pay for this and they run out of the room, and then nothing but silence.I don't think that they ever had a clue. They certainly never offered anything to the public.
Your post would have been more realistic and sensible if you had stopped with, "I don't think."
I would explain why questions like, "Well, if we don't kill the babies, what do we do with them?" get met with silence, but let's face it: you don't have the brain capacity to even comprehend the words.
Look. I know that you are a fundie perv. But I was asking a simple question. If Big Government forces women to complete gestation and give birth, where do all of these babies go? Who takes responsibility? Will pigpence take responsibility for them all? graham? jeffress? perkins? the guys at the family research council? focus on that family? They have got a lot of hard work in front of them, much of it smelly.
If you knew anything you would know that abortion is just being used for political purposes to keep the evangelicals in line. They ignore the fact that by a very large margin women want the right to control their own bodies. Our righties think it is OK to put government between a women and her doctor. It is so easy for men who think they know more than women about their health and are just being fooled by the political bullshit.
You don't even know what the General welfare clause is for. There's no circumstance where killing a child is moral.it depends on the circumstance.Do you think killing a human infant in the womb is moral?why should anyone take the right wing seriously about morals?
do you believe prosecuting the general warfare on a for-profit basis is moral? we have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.
Hilarious!. Some years ago in South Dakota the state voted on a bill to make abortion illegal in all circumstances.
Everyone assumed it was going to pass. Then people started coming out and saying how much money are you willing to give up to take care of someone else’s kids? Money that you need to take care of your own kids? Suddenly the bill didn’t pass. People voted against it once that fact was put out there in the public discourse.
Remember, republicans only want to take care of the fetus, once the kid is born they Don’t give a sh!t.
LOL! No it won't.
The religious right is so desperate to win they settled on Donald Trump as their hero. Goes to show they don't have much time left.
LOL! No it won't.
The religious right is so desperate to win they settled on Donald Trump as their hero. Goes to show they don't have much time left.
Much time or much credibility
There is a possibility we could have a war over abortion. The Supreme Court ruled slavery the law of the land in 1856. A few years later the Civil war ended it. The people always have the final word.
Why?There is a possibility we could have a war over abortion. The Supreme Court ruled slavery the law of the land in 1856. A few years later the Civil war ended it. The people always have the final word.
By that logic, we should have had a civil war in 1979
”But since you and I both know that you don't stop screeching to even draw a new breath when the elected legislators pass laws you disagree with, I'm not even going to bother pretending you're not a joke.”No one said anything about not having any input in state decisions.Sure I do. For years, many on the right have fought against Roe v. Wade, saying abortion should be left up to the states to decide, not the federal government.
Now here we have a state doing exactly that, and rightards are lambasting the state for doing that.
So now I see they were lying when they said, let the states decide. What they really meant was, let the states decide as long as states decide to outlaw abortion.
Amazingly enough, "leave it up to the states" does not mean "We won't have any input into state decisions". If you were assuming that, then that teaches you not to make assumptions.
And it's not a lie because you assumed something we never said.
Yeah, actually, you did. You're pissing and ranting because "You said you wanted it to be a state issue, and when a state decides, you object to their choice! That means you lied about wanting it to be a state issue!" Whether you were smart enough to understand the meaning and import of your words or not, that is essentially what they were.
That means what it says ... righties are pissed at the decision the state made — it does not say they’re pissed because they didn’t have input; which, by the way, they did have input. Their input was at the polls, electing legislators who represent them. So there’s no way possible I said righties are passed because they had no input in the decision.
![]()
Your statements DO mean what they say . . . and what they say is that you think if conservatives say something should be decided by the state rather than the federal government, that means they have to just shut up and be happy with the decision. Otherwise, they "lied" about wanting it to be a state decision.
Thanks for the pointless digression into "I didn't say they were pissed because they didn't have input." It was nice of you to clarify that point, but since that point was never actually made, or even hinted at, it seems suspiciously like you're inventing an argument you can win, because you know you lost the original one and you're too dishonest to just admit it.
And by the way, if you ever even once in your two-faced, hypocritical life consider your "input was at the polls when the legislators were elected" when it comes to laws you DON'T like, I might actually listen seriously to this BS for a whole five seconds before laughing at it. Might. But since you and I both know that you don't stop screeching to even draw a new breath when the elected legislators pass laws you disagree with, I'm not even going to bother pretending you're not a joke.
Why?There is a possibility we could have a war over abortion. The Supreme Court ruled slavery the law of the land in 1856. A few years later the Civil war ended it. The people always have the final word.
By that logic, we should have had a civil war in 1979