Overturning Roe Is a Radical, Not Conservative, Choice

the left has had plenty of time to make this law and be done with it. they choose instead to use to like now, fire up a base over an issue.

their own fault for making it political and it resolving problems.
With Roe as settled law, there would have been no reason to at the time.
 
1651976975963.png


That certainly sounds fair and reasonable to me!
 
They had no idea Roe would ever be overturned.

yes. they did. getting mad about it now doesn't change the fact they like to keep their political talking points alive and well and this blew up in their face.
 
“America is a different place, with most of its population born after Roe was decided. And a decision to overturn Roe — which the court seems poised to do, according to the leak of a draft of a majority opinion from Justice Samuel Alito — would do more to replicate Roe’s damage than to reverse it.

It would be a radical, not conservative, choice.

What is conservative? It is, above all, the conviction that abrupt and profound changes to established laws and common expectations are utterly destructive to respect for the law and the institutions established to uphold it — especially when those changes are instigated from above, with neither democratic consent nor broad consensus.”


Overturning Roe is therefore repugnant to conservativism – it is radical, extreme, reckless, and irresponsible.
Well, look at this stinking pile of shit. Hey, everybody, overturning Roe v. Wade is repugnant to conservatism. :lmao:

I'm done with any semblance of civility with he left. Leftists are passive-aggressive, gaslighting sociopaths.

One does not reason with evil. One defeats evil.

It's past time for conservatives to take a flamethrower to their asses.

:flameth:
 
The Rightwing penchant overturning long established precedent and established late, for putting in political judges and creating tbe most politically activist court since FDR almost a century ago….is indeed reckless.

The Supreme Court is losing credibility as being an impartial judiciary is being eroded in the eyes of many American. This isn’t good for our country. Neither is the possible precedent of giving individual rights and then taking them away.
Bullshit!

See post #19 and #210.
 
Bad law according to who? Rightwingers.
No dumbfuck, bad law according to noted leftists Alan Dershowitz and Ruth Bader Ginsberg among others.


This is where you refuse to acknowledge the truth because you can’t handle it..
 
View attachment 641832

That certainly sounds fair and reasonable to me!
Shove it asshole. Nobody committed perjury no matter how much you lie. They never were asked how they would rule on any appeal. By the way “settled law” is only settled until the next case comes up. By your standards, Brown vs Board of Education and Dred Scott best both be reverted back to what was “settled law”.
 
“America is a different place, with most of its population born after Roe was decided. And a decision to overturn Roe — which the court seems poised to do, according to the leak of a draft of a majority opinion from Justice Samuel Alito — would do more to replicate Roe’s damage than to reverse it.

It would be a radical, not conservative, choice.

What is conservative? It is, above all, the conviction that abrupt and profound changes to established laws and common expectations are utterly destructive to respect for the law and the institutions established to uphold it — especially when those changes are instigated from above, with neither democratic consent nor broad consensus.”


Overturning Roe is therefore repugnant to conservativism – it is radical, extreme, reckless, and irresponsible.
actually most legal scholars including RBG. think Roe was a poorly written illogical opinion.
 

yes. they did. getting mad about it now doesn't change the fact they like to keep their political talking points alive and well and this blew up in their face.
Since precedent and settled law do not exist for right anymore (only selectively) I imagine a lot of rulings will come under scrutiny, like Heller. It won’t always be a rightwing majority.
 
Since precedent and settled law do not exist for right anymore (only selectively) I imagine a lot of rulings will come under scrutiny, like Heller. It won’t always be a rightwing majority.
"for right"

this is funny as shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top