JoeB131
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2011
- 172,573
- 33,247
Politics.Then why did they respond and say they didn't follow procedure?
For the politicians to stop sucking NRA dick.What are you waiting for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Politics.Then why did they respond and say they didn't follow procedure?
For the politicians to stop sucking NRA dick.What are you waiting for?
Politics.
For the politicians to stop sucking NRA dick.
Sure it did. Our gun laws are intentionally weak because the NRA spends all it's time suing the government over even the most sane, common sense gun law.NRA had nothing to do with the FBI not following their own procedures.
Sure it did. Our gun laws are intentionally weak because the NRA spends all it's time suing the government over even the most sane, common sense gun law.
No wonder the FBI doesn't want to get involved.
Look what happened when they stopped those gun nuts who wanted to kidnap the governor of Michigan; you all made it out like they were the bad guys.
And make the alcohol industry responsible for background checks and hold them a 100% liable when a drunk driver injures or kills anyone.Nope, it's not the FBI's job to do background checks for guns. It's the ATF's.
But I had a much simpler solution. Make the gun industry responsible for background checks, and make them 100% liable when they sell to the wrong person.
Nope, it's not the FBI's job to do background checks for guns. It's the ATF's.
But I had a much simpler solution. Make the gun industry responsible for background checks, and make them 100% liable when they sell to the wrong person.
Nope, it's not the FBI's job to do background checks for guns. It's the ATF's.
600 a year is not rare. Of course, 2TinyGuy will tell you that most of them don't count because not enough people died, or it was just Darkies getting shot, or whatever bullshit he comes up with to downplay the problem.As pointed out by @2aguy in post #114, mass shootings are extremely rare considering how many guns there are in this country.
600 a year is not rare. Of course, 2TinyGuy will tell you that most of them don't count because not enough people died, or it was just Darkies getting shot, or whatever bullshit he comes up with to downplay the problem.
Here's the thing . Japan has NO mass shootings. European countries RARELY have mass shootings. Canada RARELY has mass shootings.
We have so many we can't keep track of them.
Why, because those countries start with "Why should we let you have a gun". We start with "Why can't I have a gun?"
Japan has no immigration problem.
Europe on the other hand.
Most gun violence is people who are born here.
Immigrants actually stay out of trouble, because they don't want to screw up their immigration cases.
Tell us more about how shootings are rare in Europe.
Except we have 600 mass shootings a year, and you can maybe find one or two when a "Good guy" stopped it before the body count got too high.
Nope, sounds like an exact problem.
We can't lock people up for what they say.
We have 70 million Americans with police records and 18% of the population suffers from some kind of mental illness. We can't lock them all up.
We can and should make it harder for these people to get guns.
Compared to the US, definitely...
![]()
The Health Costs of Gun Violence: How the U.S. Compares to Other Countries
This chartpack illustrates how gun violence affects Americans compared to people in 13 other high-income countries.www.commonwealthfund.org
We don't have 600 mass shootings a year you lying asshole.
There are THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY MILLION people in the USA. 600 is not even a rounding error. I will put in numbers so even you can count the zeros: 330,000,000 vs 600. Six hundred goes into three hundred thirty million five hundred and fifty times. It's so small a percentage, it's not even a rounding error.600 a year is not rare. Of course, 2TinyGuy will tell you that most of them don't count because not enough people died, or it was just Darkies getting shot, or whatever bullshit he comes up with to downplay the problem.
Here's the thing . Japan has NO mass shootings. European countries RARELY have mass shootings. Canada RARELY has mass shootings.
We have so many we can't keep track of them.
Why, because those countries start with "Why should we let you have a gun". We start with "Why can't I have a gun?"
There are THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY MILLION people in the USA. 600 is not even a rounding error. I will put in numbers so even you can count the zeros: 330,000,000 vs 600. Six hundred goes into three hundred thirty million five hundred and fifty times. It's so small a percentage, it's not even a rounding error.
All kinds of examples blow up your solution. Sandy Hook being the most obvious. I'll assume you know the details of Sandy Hook.You have common sense gun laws, and don't give out military-grade weapons to crazy people.
I never worried about hijacking.Is that like saying that we shouldn't worry about terrorism in the airport because most planes are never hijacked.
600 mass shootings a year is too many.
We shouldn't have to live this way, with militarized police, active shooter drills, metal detectors, etc. because some of you have a gun fetish you can't control.
All kinds of examples blow up your solution. Sandy Hook being the most obvious. I'll assume you know the details of Sandy Hook.
As everyone on this board has told you, people like me aren’t the problem with gun violence. The criminals and insane that people that people like you insist on allowing to run free are the problem. Out of the 600 mass shootings you claim happened, At least 588 were committed by known criminals, almost always killing other known criminals. If those criminal shooters had been in prison for their previous crimes, their criminal victims would still be alive, robbing, raping and killing other people.