You specifically named Woodward taking down a president, as in Woodward and Bernstein and their Watergate reporting and called someone stupid for suggesting the reporter in this story only had one source and hence, was not following standards of accceptable reporting. You called someone stupid and used a misrepresentation of fact to do it. Now instead of admitting a mistake and perhaps apologizing you are making an attempt to deflect by suggesting that because in todays world and by todays standards and because of a specific story you know of, your misrepresentation is somehow ok and you should not be held responsible for it.All Woodward had was one source, and he took down a president. I guess he really doesn't deserve the Pulitzer he won.
You can stop trying to prove how stupid you are now.
Stop showing how misinformed you are. Woodward and Bernstein had to have two sources for every allegation they presented. It's an integrel part of their story. They followed strict journalist standards and ethics. They new the importance of the story they were investigating and knew they and their story would be examined by other journalist as well as professional law enforcement officiers and agents.
No it isn't. Reporters prefer multiple sources, but they run with 1 source all the time. For example, when the story about bin Laden first broke there was only one source, yet it made headlines all around the world.