- Moderator
- #281
Harvey Milk's whole goal was to do away with the country's Judeo-Christian sexual ethics. Probably so he could sexually abuse young boys without guilt. Of course the left embraces this.
Oh brother.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Harvey Milk's whole goal was to do away with the country's Judeo-Christian sexual ethics. Probably so he could sexually abuse young boys without guilt. Of course the left embraces this.
Pleanty of actual gay pedophiles in history to use, why you'd make one up is curious.
And why does any of that matter in context of this thread?
He must have been asking for it, right?Probably funded his college education too, right?Milk picked up a homeless hustler...who turned out to be 16...and stayed with him for years.
At least he could say in later years he had been reared by Milk.
Dunno, maybe. The question I ask is why was he a homeless gay teen?
Again, what did Milk do to earn himself a stamp honoring him?
Sad you know so little about Harvey Milk.
No....but they issued an Elvis Presley stamp.
He diddled and married a 14 yr old girl and there is no outrage over commemorating him with a stamp?
No....but they issued an Elvis Presley stamp.
He diddled and married a 14 yr old girl and there is no outrage over commemorating him with a stamp?
She was 16 when married - but your party thanks you for lying. Lying is the greatest good for a democrat.
Probably because he thinks all gays are pedophiles.
So, Milk would have been fine if he'd just married the kid?
Are these ding a lings actually arguing that statutory rape and targeting troubled children as sex toys is ok?
Liberals are deranged.
No....but they issued an Elvis Presley stamp.
He diddled and married a 14 yr old girl and there is no outrage over commemorating him with a stamp?
She was 16 when married - but your party thanks you for lying. Lying is the greatest good for a democrat.
Are these ding a lings actually arguing that statutory rape and targeting troubled children as sex toys is ok?
Liberals are deranged.
So we agree that Milk was a disgusting pervert. Good. So why is the USPS honoring htat dead cocksucker with a stamp?
Would you feel so strongly if it were an attractive 33 year old woman having sex with 16 year old boys?
.
Are these ding a lings actually arguing that statutory rape and targeting troubled children as sex toys is ok?
Liberals are deranged.
Only if you're Elvis.
.
Are these ding a lings actually arguing that statutory rape and targeting troubled children as sex toys is ok?
Liberals are deranged.
Only if you're Elvis.
So are you ever going to list Milk's accomplishments? Or are you just going to continue to prop up his sexual predator status with deflections?
.
Are these ding a lings actually arguing that statutory rape and targeting troubled children as sex toys is ok?
Liberals are deranged.
Only if you're Elvis.
So are you ever going to list Milk's accomplishments? Or are you just going to continue to prop up his sexual predator status with deflections?
I never said he did anything particular to merit a stamp. But then, I don't think Elvis did either. How long will you continue this laughable double standard?
So you are accusing ME of promoting pedophilia.......reported.You just admitted he didn't mess with her until she was of legal age. Not unheard of in the deep south. And yes, people do see homosexuals differently and always will. But mostly you missed the point that Elvis was a big factor in American culture. He wasn't honored or martyred for his sex life.
And very well SHOULD see homosexuality differently. In the 80's there was the talk of defining deviancy down, now we are promoting perversion up.
One of the arguments against acceptance of homosexuals in society - which I always supported - was that if accepted, they would prey on children. The homosexual community always bristled against this notion.
Now we see assclown bodey (shortbus) openly supporting and promoting the predation by homosexuals on children.
Promoting perversion up.
No, it is a psychiatric disorder where an adult or older adolescent has a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children usually under 11 years of age. This is not to excuse a grown man chasing 16 year olds for sex. That's pretty damn creepy, but it isn't necessarily pedophilia.Bullshit. Pedophilia=sex with underage people. Under 18 is underage in most places.Under 18=crime. He was a criminal. He could have been prosecuted for underage sex/statutory rape.
That's exactly what they do and it's BS. Mess with a kid you're a pedo
Yes. But it still is not pedo.
Do you have any reason to believe Rabbi wouldn't
other than the fact that YOU wouldn't, and you project your crap onto others?
So, Milk would have been fine if he'd just married the kid?
You already forgot that word I tried to teach you - biology.