PROVEN: Hillary Clinton DID COMPROMISE U.S. National Security

[ThunderKiss1965]

lock em up ....

At least six members of President Trump’s White House have used private email addresses while conducting government business, The New York Times reported Monday evening.

Current and former officials say that former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, former chief strategist Stephen Bannon and current advisers Gary Cohn and Stephen Miller sent or received government-related emails on personal email accounts, in addition to two staffers who were previously reported.



The news follows reports that White House senior adviser and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner has used a private email for White House business.

A watchdog group said Monday it obtained documents that also showed Ivanka Trump used a personal email account to communicate with a member of the Trump administration.

Six Trump officials used personal email accounts for White House business: report

Of course they are guilty and Clinton is not, right ?

 

[Dragonlady]

During the Hillary Clinton Server Investigation official classified documents were found on her server. When the media call for the release of those documents, even the redacted versions, President Obama himself declared the documents were SO classified that 'to release them in any format would cause grave damage to our national security'.

Understood - any foreign entity being able to gain access to these documents would cause 'grave damage' to our national security'.

SO, based on the news, Hillary Clinton DID 'cause grave damage to our national security':

Hillary Clinton's Email Accessed by Foreign Actors | National Review

“Foreign actors” accessed Hillary Clinton’s emails, including one that was classified “secret,” according to a memo produced by two Republican-led House committees"

...and snowflakes STILL be like:

The Congressional Committees, the FBI, the Senate oversight committee, the Inspector General have all said that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong and should not be charged. You might have missed that over there is Russia.

Keep repeating your lies, Ruskie!!!!

 

[AntonToo]

Link to where it’s illegal to e-mail classified information.

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

What did you fail to understand that the IG said there was no DOCUMENTED bias, meaning no one was stupid enough to put in writing or personally tell someone they were tanking the investigation, there was no smoking gun. There is adequate proof that bias existed, more than 50 FBI officials leaking to the press, multiple people were disparaging Trump and his supporters. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence.


.

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. Rather we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assesment of the facts, the law, and past department practice"

It doesn't get any clearer than that and you'll have to find a more sane way to deal.

 

[OKTexas]

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

What did you fail to understand that the IG said there was no DOCUMENTED bias, meaning no one was stupid enough to put in writing or personally tell someone they were tanking the investigation, there was no smoking gun. There is adequate proof that bias existed, more than 50 FBI officials leaking to the press, multiple people were disparaging Trump and his supporters. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence.


.

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations."

Then there was this quote form the executive summary. But try reading the article it came form, you might learn something.

"We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions".

Like I said, no smoking gun, but the bias was there, in the lead investigator and his minions, that is documented.

IG Report on FBI: No Bias Conclusion May Not Be Supported | National Review


.

 

[HaShev]

During the Hillary Clinton Server Investigation official classified documents were found on her server. When the media call for the release of those documents, even the redacted versions, President Obama himself declared the documents were SO classified that 'to release them in any format would cause grave damage to our national security'.

Understood - any foreign entity being able to gain access to these documents would cause 'grave damage' to our national security'.

SO, based on the news, Hillary Clinton DID 'cause grave damage to our national security':

Hillary Clinton's Email Accessed by Foreign Actors | National Review

“Foreign actors” accessed Hillary Clinton’s emails, including one that was classified “secret,” according to a memo produced by two Republican-led House committees"

...and snowflakes STILL be like:

The Congressional Committees, the FBI, the Senate oversight committee, the Inspector General have all said that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong and should not be charged. You might have missed that over there is Russia.

Keep repeating your lies, Ruskie!!!!

In Hillary's and Podesta's emails were proof of pay to play, we also have openly public pics of money hand offs with Saudis Sheiks as part of the pay to play.
We have historical fact accounts that in 1998
Bill Clinton let Saudis' Osama Bin Laden slip through & go, when he could have arrested or taken him out. WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD YOU NOT WANT TO KNOW IF CLINTON'S PAY TO PLAY GREED LEAD TO a Saudis favor that allowed 911? Why would you want to cover up this behavior and it's possible results cause and effects?

 

[westwall]

several classified emails.....watch your boy Comey's presentation.....a lot more than one.
and people have gone to jail for just one

Link to where it’s illegal to e-mail classified information.

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dummy, did you bother to listen to the mans testimony today? He testified differently than you claim.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Link to where it’s illegal to e-mail classified information.

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

There was no law saying that e-mails had to be stored on government servers until 2014

She was ordered to provide ALL work related emails by a court, she didn't and then destroyed the server after she was ordered to preserve it. Like I said there are other details I didn't mention.


.

hilly obstructed justice

 

[OKTexas]

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

There was no law saying that e-mails had to be stored on government servers until 2014

She was ordered to provide ALL work related emails by a court, she didn't and then destroyed the server after she was ordered to preserve it. Like I said there are other details I didn't mention.


.

hilly obstructed justice

YA THINK!!!!!!

Violations of the espionage act.
Perjury
Violations of the Records Keeping Act
and tons more.

.

 

[HaShev]

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

There was no law saying that e-mails had to be stored on government servers until 2014

She was ordered to provide ALL work related emails by a court, she didn't and then destroyed the server after she was ordered to preserve it. Like I said there are other details I didn't mention.


.

hilly obstructed justice

YA THINK!!!!!!

Violations of the espionage act.
Perjury
Violations of the Records Keeping Act
and tons more.

.

And since her campaign was involved in the fake lead and charges of "Russia Russia Russia" then fake charges is a crime and the 20 million spent on the fake investigation is owed the American people by her and the DNC.

 

[OKTexas]

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

There was no law saying that e-mails had to be stored on government servers until 2014

She was ordered to provide ALL work related emails by a court, she didn't and then destroyed the server after she was ordered to preserve it. Like I said there are other details I didn't mention.


.

hilly obstructed justice

YA THINK!!!!!!

Violations of the espionage act.
Perjury
Violations of the Records Keeping Act
and tons more.

.

And since her campaign was involved in the fake lead and charges of "Russia Russia Russia" then fake charges is a crime and the 20 million spent on the fake investigation is owed the American people by her and the DNC.

The bitch and the DNC may skate, but the actions of the FBI are being closely scrutinized by the IG and a prosecutor, working hand in hand. Those results may be very interesting.


.

 

[HaShev]

They are known to tactically deny everything, admit nothing (Clinton taught them well), so doubt we'll ever find out who Mr Big is and the circle of participants meeting up for this not so secret soft Coup.

 

[gipper]

This thread proves the following:

To some on the left, Hillary did nothing wrong. Simultaneously these same people believe Trump does everything wrong, colluded with Russia to steal the election, and is a blatant criminal.

These illogical mental contortions seem impossible, but apparently they aren't.

Partisanship distorts the mind...as does too much consumption of DNC Media.

 

[iceberg]

Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything, and of nothing in the real world ever coming from any of the nonsense you post?

how was he wrong? Do you ever get tired of posting nonsense, with no specific rebuttal of other's posts?

Also not true. You guys should get along well.

See you have to learn how to reply

what was also not true?

his post?
my saying you post nonsense?

I mean dude, I gave you an opportunity to say what was wrong about his post

you didn't

so I'll ask again, what is wrong about his post?

If it is not reported by NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSLSD, NYT, WAPO, etc....many Americans won't accept it.

These same Americans will do well in our Orwellian future.

if people don't like you - they won't accept it.

we've gone full mental.

 

[Dragonlady]

During the Hillary Clinton Server Investigation official classified documents were found on her server. When the media call for the release of those documents, even the redacted versions, President Obama himself declared the documents were SO classified that 'to release them in any format would cause grave damage to our national security'.

Understood - any foreign entity being able to gain access to these documents would cause 'grave damage' to our national security'.

SO, based on the news, Hillary Clinton DID 'cause grave damage to our national security':

Hillary Clinton's Email Accessed by Foreign Actors | National Review

“Foreign actors” accessed Hillary Clinton’s emails, including one that was classified “secret,” according to a memo produced by two Republican-led House committees"

...and snowflakes STILL be like:

The Congressional Committees, the FBI, the Senate oversight committee, the Inspector General have all said that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong and should not be charged. You might have missed that over there is Russia.

Keep repeating your lies, Ruskie!!!!

In Hillary's and Podesta's emails were proof of pay to play, we also have openly public pics of money hand offs with Saudis Sheiks as part of the pay to play.
We have historical fact accounts that in 1998
Bill Clinton let Saudis' Osama Bin Laden slip through & go, when he could have arrested or taken him out. WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD YOU NOT WANT TO KNOW IF CLINTON'S PAY TO PLAY GREED LEAD TO a Saudis favor that allowed 911? Why would you want to cover up this behavior and it's possible results cause and effects?
View attachment 199554

There was no pay for play. Donations to the Clinton Foundation went to charitable work and did not go to the Clintons who take no money from the Foundation.

This is confirmed by Republican Investigations in the House and Senate, as well as investigations by the FBI and the IRS. And the Foundation’s auditors.

 

[Dragonlady]

Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything, and of nothing in the real world ever coming from any of the nonsense you post?

how was he wrong? Do you ever get tired of posting nonsense, with no specific rebuttal of other's posts?

Also not true. You guys should get along well.

See you have to learn how to reply

what was also not true?

his post?
my saying you post nonsense?

I mean dude, I gave you an opportunity to say what was wrong about his post

you didn't

so I'll ask again, what is wrong about his post?

If it is not reported by NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSLSD, NYT, WAPO, etc....many Americans won't accept it.

These same Americans will do well in our Orwellian future.

if people don't like you - they won't accept it.

we've gone full mental.

You elected a lying conman, who has bankrupted 7 companies. That’s about as mentally deranged as you can get.

That you ignored his obvious racism, misogyny and xenophobia in doing so shows how morally bankrupt America now is.

At least Americans have the good sense to be morally outraged by his abuse of children. There’s some hope for you but not much.

 

[AntonToo]

Link to where it’s illegal to e-mail classified information.

The law was broken as soon as the information was removed from a secure place or system.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material


.

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

Hey dummy, did you bother to listen to the mans testimony today? He testified differently than you claim.

What man? What testimony? Doubt anyone knows wtf you are talking about.

You think I have time to "bother" with everything that goes on in the world?

 

[easyt65]

There was no pay for play. Donations to the Clinton Foundation went to charitable work and did not go to the Clintons who take no money from the Foundation.

Bwuhahahaha.......

 

[AntonToo]

DoJ after investigation and investigation of the investigation has concluded that no charges should be brought.

Now what the fuck do you little internet dwellers think you know that DoJ does not at this point about Clinton and her emails?

It's over, time to move on with your life.

To put it simply, I wouldn't want to overwhelm you puny brain, we know everything you chose to ignore.

The bitch set up a private server to avoid federal records keeping laws.

The bitch and her minions didn't send duplicates of their communication to the State Dept Archivist, as required by law.

The bitch and her minions removed classified information from their secure networks, a violation of law.

The bitch and her minions sent and received classified information over an unsecure network and stored classified information on that network, a violation of law.

The bitch communicated with the POTUS over an unsecure system, every communication with a president is classified automatically. Therefore both violated the law with regards to security.

Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence while ignoring all the points of intent. Having the server to avoid records keeping laws, false exculpatory statements made by the bitch to congress, the destruction of records under a congressional order to preserve and the destruction of devices under order to preserve.

No we have the documented bias of the people in charge of the investigation.

Which explains why immunity was handed out like candy at Halloween, why subpoenas weren't issued and why a grand jury wasn't utilized, as in all other large scale investigations.

There are many more details, but you're not worth the effort when you're going to ignore it anyway.


.

Hey dummy, what part of NO BIAS found in treatment of Clinton case do you not understand?

IG Report is concluded and that’s what it found. Case was brought to a proper conclusion.

Game Over. There is no next act here. No review of the review. Get it through your thick head and move on.

What did you fail to understand that the IG said there was no DOCUMENTED bias, meaning no one was stupid enough to put in writing or personally tell someone they were tanking the investigation, there was no smoking gun. There is adequate proof that bias existed, more than 50 FBI officials leaking to the press, multiple people were disparaging Trump and his supporters. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence.


.

Stop posting bullshit, the exact quote is:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations."

Then there was this quote form the executive summary. But try reading the article it came form, you might learn something.

"We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions".

Like I said, no smoking gun, but the bias was there, in the lead investigator and his minions, that is documented.

IG Report on FBI: No Bias Conclusion May Not Be Supported | National Review
.

Ok but they ALSO said that NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND. That means ANY evidence.

Aside from these straws, do you seriously think there will be yet ANOTHER DoJ review of this?

There is not. Time to move on already from Hillary's fucking emails. to something that actually matters....or is POTUS reality you get brought back to too painful?

 

[easyt65]

Ok but they ALSO said that NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND. That means ANY evidence.

Keep repeating the same BS and hope people eventually believe it.

Again, the FBI announced they had recovered from Hillary's illegal server over 15,000 (FIFTEEN THOUSAND) official documents that Hillary was required by law to turn over for record-keeping yet never did...in violation of both the FOIA and Federal Records Act. That makes over 30,000 criminal counts in-hand waiting to be filed that the FBI chose not to in order to protect Hillary Clinton, keep her out of Prison, and enable her to keep running for President.

Again, FBI Director Comey very publicly stated Hillary had broken the law but (HE) decided not to recommend incitement because she was too stupid to know she was breaking the law.

Keep trying to re-write history, snowflake...it's the only way you will convince anyone Hillary did not break the law.

 

[AntonToo]

Ok but they ALSO said that NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND. That means ANY evidence.

Keep repeating the same BS and hope people eventually believe it.

You are straight insane, what I'm posting is NOT an opinion, it is a FACT, as these are black and white words in the IG Report:

"We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. Rather we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assesment of the facts, the law, and past department practice"

You can disagree with these findings but you CAN'T sanely deny that this is IN FACT what the report says re. Clinton email case.