Really now. Got a link to some overwhelming proof of that?No it was found in hole, just as most of the plane was found in the hole.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really now. Got a link to some overwhelming proof of that?No it was found in hole, just as most of the plane was found in the hole.
wrong again, dipshitFallacies of Relevance: Legitimate Appeal to AuthorityYou completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.
What's pure comedy is you ignored that link buy expect the link you provided to be responded to.....even though the link I posted already addressed the point you are trying to make. You bitches always ignore facts and links that prove your position wrong. I'm just glad I realized long ago you have absolutely no interest in honest discussion.
dipshit
You ignored other links provided but you probably feel entitled to have your link addressed. Know what's sooper dooper funny? You just defeated your own argument you dumfuk! The fbi fails in criteria for 1 and 2. As for number 3, not all experts agree.
So even when you adhere to your usual dishonesty and fail to address points posted by others you still get pwned.
its been posted, dipshitReally now. Got a link to some overwhelming proof of that?No it was found in hole, just as most of the plane was found in the hole.
you have??????ROFLMAOBut in Candyfizzdiveability Land they don't have to adhere to anything except for what the first dumfuk posts. If the first one said an "authority" is Captain Hook the rest would follow suit and peter pan themselves right into another false sense of security by numbers.
you just defined the troofer mentality to a T
Keep lying bitch......it's funny. I've openly criticized eots, terral, christophera, etc and you all know this for a fact. I don't walk lock step like you punks and once again you ignored eots' point and he was fully correct. One's expertise is not defined by who did a particular investigation you cocksucking whiner.
wrong again, dipshit
You ignored other links provided but you probably feel entitled to have your link addressed. Know what's sooper dooper funny? You just defeated your own argument you dumfuk! The fbi fails in criteria for 1 and 2. As for number 3, not all experts agree.
So even when you adhere to your usual dishonesty and fail to address points posted by others you still get pwned.
I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.its been posted, dipshitReally now. Got a link to some overwhelming proof of that?No it was found in hole, just as most of the plane was found in the hole.
read the fucking thread
you get what you deservewrong again, dipshitYou ignored other links provided but you probably feel entitled to have your link addressed. Know what's sooper dooper funny? You just defeated your own argument you dumfuk! The fbi fails in criteria for 1 and 2. As for number 3, not all experts agree.
So even when you adhere to your usual dishonesty and fail to address points posted by others you still get pwned.
Oh thass right...in your world you are always correct and you never support your claims. Now be a good bitch and respond with one of the following:
1. More tpp
Or
2. Call me a name
Or
3. A combination of the two.
You completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.
here is what is really funny....
you claim athiesm.about.com is an authority on the fallacy of the appeal to authority![]()
I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.its been posted, dipshitReally now. Got a link to some overwhelming proof of that?
read the fucking thread
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.its been posted, dipshit
read the fucking thread
I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
^^^^ more TPPYou completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.
here is what is really funny....
you claim athiesm.about.com is an authority on the fallacy of the appeal to authority![]()
It's embarrassing when you try to debate. Your deflection is painfully weak and here is the proof:
Pick any link of your choice that offers a sincere definition of the fallacy. Your fallacy on citing the fbi's claim doesn't change regardless of the source you use but you will ignore that as well.
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.
I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
I'd also like to see some evidence there was a hole! I only saw a crater there.
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.
I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
I'd also like to see some evidence there was a hole! I only saw a crater there.
You completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.
here is what is really funny....
you claim athiesm.about.com is an authority on the fallacy of the appeal to authority![]()
It's embarrassing when you try to debate. Your deflection is painfully weak and here is the proof:
Pick any link of your choice that offers a sincere definition of the fallacy. Your fallacy on citing the fbi's claim doesn't change regardless of the source you use but you will ignore that as well.
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
I'd also like to see some evidence there was a hole! I only saw a crater there.
well google is your best friend while you search for these things.
What is the difference between a crater and a hole? I know it doesn't have anything to do with anything, but am curious. A crater is a hole isn't it? However, a hole is not neccesarily a crater, but it can be.
So, everyone feel free to answer my question;
What exactly is the difference between a crater and a hole?
I always thought that Laredo was a hole, and it would be a much nicer place if it was a crater.......