Question about Shanksville crash

You completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.

What's pure comedy is you ignored that link buy expect the link you provided to be responded to.....even though the link I posted already addressed the point you are trying to make. You bitches always ignore facts and links that prove your position wrong. I'm just glad I realized long ago you have absolutely no interest in honest discussion.
Fallacies of Relevance: Legitimate Appeal to Authority

dipshit

You ignored other links provided but you probably feel entitled to have your link addressed. Know what's sooper dooper funny? You just defeated your own argument you dumfuk! The fbi fails in criteria for 1 and 2. As for number 3, not all experts agree.

So even when you adhere to your usual dishonesty and fail to address points posted by others you still get pwned.
wrong again, dipshit
 
But in Candyfizzdiveability Land they don't have to adhere to anything except for what the first dumfuk posts. If the first one said an "authority" is Captain Hook the rest would follow suit and peter pan themselves right into another false sense of security by numbers.
ROFLMAO

you just defined the troofer mentality to a T


Keep lying bitch......it's funny. I've openly criticized eots, terral, christophera, etc and you all know this for a fact. I don't walk lock step like you punks and once again you ignored eots' point and he was fully correct. One's expertise is not defined by who did a particular investigation you cocksucking whiner.
you have??????
WHERE???
i've NEVER seen it


and you are the whiniest dipshit on this forum, next to pubes
 

You ignored other links provided but you probably feel entitled to have your link addressed. Know what's sooper dooper funny? You just defeated your own argument you dumfuk! The fbi fails in criteria for 1 and 2. As for number 3, not all experts agree.

So even when you adhere to your usual dishonesty and fail to address points posted by others you still get pwned.
wrong again, dipshit

Oh thass right...in your world you are always correct and you never support your claims. Now be a good bitch and respond with one of the following:

1. More tpp

Or

2. Call me a name

Or

3. A combination of the two.
 
you.jpg



LooneyTunesWallpaper800.jpg



the+end.jpg



Go cry to Staff some more. Bitch.


I never did in the first place.

You are looney tunes.

That is all.
 
You completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.

here is what is really funny....

you claim athiesm.about.com is an authority on the fallacy of the appeal to authority :lol:
 
You ignored other links provided but you probably feel entitled to have your link addressed. Know what's sooper dooper funny? You just defeated your own argument you dumfuk! The fbi fails in criteria for 1 and 2. As for number 3, not all experts agree.

So even when you adhere to your usual dishonesty and fail to address points posted by others you still get pwned.
wrong again, dipshit

Oh thass right...in your world you are always correct and you never support your claims. Now be a good bitch and respond with one of the following:

1. More tpp

Or

2. Call me a name

Or

3. A combination of the two.
you get what you deserve
 
You completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.

here is what is really funny....

you claim athiesm.about.com is an authority on the fallacy of the appeal to authority :lol:

It's embarrassing when you try to debate. Your deflection is painfully weak and here is the proof:

Pick any link of your choice that offers a sincere definition of the fallacy. Your fallacy on citing the fbi's claim doesn't change regardless of the source you use but you will ignore that as well.
 
Really now. Got a link to some overwhelming proof of that?
its been posted, dipshit
read the fucking thread
I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.

I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
 
Here's a good comparison of investigations.

Stack committed terrorism by his own personal 9E attack. He even left a suicide note on the web. So what happened? The NTSB gave a preliminary report after 7 weeks. It took the experts that long for a single man cessna attack but the fbi, who are not experts at plane crash investigations completed theirs in less than 13 days on a commercial jet. The really interesting part is the fbi took over the investigation after the ntsb did it's job. How can the fbi be qualified for flight 93 but not qualified for a single engine cessna?


"The aircraft was destroyed on impact into the office building. The NTSB says the FBI has taken over the investigation."
Http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D9ETS97G0.html
 
its been posted, dipshit
read the fucking thread
I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.

I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.

I'd also like to see some evidence there was a hole! I only saw a crater there.
 
You completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.

here is what is really funny....

you claim athiesm.about.com is an authority on the fallacy of the appeal to authority :lol:

It's embarrassing when you try to debate. Your deflection is painfully weak and here is the proof:

Pick any link of your choice that offers a sincere definition of the fallacy. Your fallacy on citing the fbi's claim doesn't change regardless of the source you use but you will ignore that as well.
^^^^ more TPP
 
I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.

I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.

I'd also like to see some evidence there was a hole! I only saw a crater there.

You can call it anything you like crater, hole, crevice. Doesn't matter. Remember this was a reclaimed mine. the ground was rather soft. Anything smashing into it at 500+MPH is going to sink in. If I remember right they stopped digging at about 45 ft deep.
 
I only see a link that says 95% of the plane was recovered (cough-bullshit-cough). No where did it say most of the plane was found in the hole. I'm looking for proof of that.

I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.

I'd also like to see some evidence there was a hole! I only saw a crater there.

well google is your best friend while you search for these things.

What is the difference between a crater and a hole? I know it doesn't have anything to do with anything, but am curious. A crater is a hole isn't it? However, a hole is not neccesarily a crater, but it can be.
So, everyone feel free to answer my question;

What exactly is the difference between a crater and a hole?
 
You completely ignored the link I provided because you know how to obey like the leetle bitch you are. Good job.

here is what is really funny....

you claim athiesm.about.com is an authority on the fallacy of the appeal to authority :lol:

It's embarrassing when you try to debate. Your deflection is painfully weak and here is the proof:

Pick any link of your choice that offers a sincere definition of the fallacy. Your fallacy on citing the fbi's claim doesn't change regardless of the source you use but you will ignore that as well.

no, here is what must be really embarrassing for you. the FBI was the lead investigative agency and was assisted by the NTSB. please tell me who would be more authoritive than those two. :cuckoo:
 
I doubt 95% was found in the hole, there was a debris field. I believe an engine was found in a nearby pond even. But 95% of the plane was recovered, And DNA matches identified body parts of all passengers and crew, minus the hijackers as they had no DNA samples of theirs to compare to.
I'd like to see some evidence for that other guy's claim that most of the plane was down in the hole.

I'd also like to see some evidence there was a hole! I only saw a crater there.

well google is your best friend while you search for these things.

What is the difference between a crater and a hole? I know it doesn't have anything to do with anything, but am curious. A crater is a hole isn't it? However, a hole is not neccesarily a crater, but it can be.
So, everyone feel free to answer my question;

What exactly is the difference between a crater and a hole?


A crater is CurveLights head.

A hole is what he puts his mouth to down at the porno lounge.
 

Forum List

Back
Top