Racism: The Last Refuge of Us All?

Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.

:lol:

So slavery was a "bad idea" - not because it was an injustice of epic proportions that treated hundreds of thousands of human beings as animals, but because now you're stuck having to coexist alongside black people.


:lol:

The population of Black slaves in the U.S.A actually grew faster than that of all of Europe, including industrial age Britain, which really puts into question how poorly they truly had it.

I'd argue that many European peasants had it worse, they had to fend for themselves, and many starved to death, as opposed to Black slaves who were kept fed.
Well done.....pointing out that slaves really didn't have it all that bad. Next up: "They should have been grateful".

I'm sure many starving Irish during the Irish Potato Famine were envious of fed Black slaves.

Actually many Irish even chose temporary slavery over famine, and became Indentured Servants by their own choice.
And they have hated blacks ever since because black slaves took their jobs.
 
Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.
Ahh..but America would still be a
backward developing nation without the wealth generated by slavery.

My goodness, how did Germany, and Japan become wealthy technological super-powers without being involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade?
Neither are as wealthy and as much a super power as the United States.... no other place on earth is!

The U.S.A wasn't ahead of much of Europe until the World wars hit...

Switzerland, and Ireland 2 nations which were basically not involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade much at all, do in fact surpass the U.S.A today in per capitai ncome GDP.
That's because socialism in Europe distributes wealth more equitably. Here most wealth is in the hands of the top ten percent.
 
Racism: The Last Refuge of Us All?

We’ve all heard Samuel Johnson’s famous adage about patriotism being the last refuge of a scoundrel, but I’ve always believed it’s racism that’s the last refuge of a scoundrel. Race is what you cling to when you have no meaningful achievements of your own to display. It’s a safe space for the unaccomplished. That’s why there’s been such an explosion of racism on the left, especially among some of its less successful demographic groups. When you have nothing to offer, or when you just don’t want to make the effort to be successful or productive, well…at least you have your skin. And the left has proved to be expert at making everything about skin. With so many layabouts, welfare cases, entitlement whores, and blame shifters among the masses, leftist intellectuals in politics, the media, and academia gain lots of traction by continually reassuring certain constituencies, “Hey, man, your skin color makes you special! Your skin color makes you deserving!”

***

The new racism of the left is an alarming development, but in hindsight, it was inevitable that the Democrat Party's politics of division would lead to this.


There is really nothing new about it. Racism is the foundation of the democratic party. Andrew Jackson along with Aaron Burr (Convicted traitor) founded the democratic party. The main plank for Jackson was the eradication of Indians. Burr sought that as well, along with his plan to overthrow the government and establish a dictatorship. Honestly, Burr had identical goals to the democrats today.

Later the democrats started a civil war so that the could continue to keep people as slaves based on the color of their skin.

Literally the ONLY thing that has changed with the democrats is that they now hate people with white skin, instead of people with black skin. The democrats themselves are no different at all., still racist traitors who seek to crush the constitutional republic in favor of a totalitarian dictatorship.

LOL- another Contard who is saying that the party of all races is racist- and the party of white people is lily white pure of racism.

Another Contard saying that these are all the racists
View attachment 127606

But these people can't be racists

View attachment 127607



As you were saying shit for brains?




View attachment 127704




View attachment 127705
.
Does that mean you will respect these stupid mofos more than you do. Al Sharpton? Yeah...I thought so heh heh heh!
 
Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.
Ahh..but America would still be a
backward developing nation without the wealth generated by slavery.

My goodness, how did Germany, and Japan become wealthy technological super-powers without being involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade?
Neither are as wealthy and as much a super power as the United States.... no other place on earth is!

The U.S.A wasn't ahead of much of Europe until the World wars hit...

Switzerland, and Ireland 2 nations which were basically not involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade much at all, do in fact surpass the U.S.A today in per capitai ncome GDP.
That's because socialism in Europe distributes wealth more equitably. Here most wealth is in the hands of the top ten percent.

The U.S.A works longer hours, and probably harder hours too.... Then there's all that stimulus style funding in the U.S.A for the massive military industrial complex, and also it's prison complex.

I think if you account for that, there's basically no difference.
 
Ahh..but America would still be a
backward developing nation without the wealth generated by slavery.

My goodness, how did Germany, and Japan become wealthy technological super-powers without being involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade?
Neither are as wealthy and as much a super power as the United States.... no other place on earth is!

The U.S.A wasn't ahead of much of Europe until the World wars hit...

Switzerland, and Ireland 2 nations which were basically not involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade much at all, do in fact surpass the U.S.A today in per capitai ncome GDP.
That's because socialism in Europe distributes wealth more equitably. Here most wealth is in the hands of the top ten percent.

The U.S.A works longer hours, and probably harder hours too.... Then there's all that stimulus style funding in the U.S.A for the massive military industrial complex, and also it's prison complex.

I think if you account for that, there's basically no difference.
Let's not lose sight of the era in which great wealth was created in America. We are talking about the years occuring before the industrial revolution. Britain was a feudal monarchy; and, until1776, the American colonies were british territory. Indentured servitude and slavery co-existed in the colonies to create wealth for Britain.
After the revolution, slavery bought in wealth that later. provided capital necessary to take advantage of the advancing industrial revolut.
 
My goodness, how did Germany, and Japan become wealthy technological super-powers without being involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade?
Neither are as wealthy and as much a super power as the United States.... no other place on earth is!

The U.S.A wasn't ahead of much of Europe until the World wars hit...

Switzerland, and Ireland 2 nations which were basically not involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade much at all, do in fact surpass the U.S.A today in per capitai ncome GDP.
That's because socialism in Europe distributes wealth more equitably. Here most wealth is in the hands of the top ten percent.

The U.S.A works longer hours, and probably harder hours too.... Then there's all that stimulus style funding in the U.S.A for the massive military industrial complex, and also it's prison complex.

I think if you account for that, there's basically no difference.
Let's not lose sight of the era in which great wealth was created in America. We are talking about the years occuring before the industrial revolution. Britain was a feudal monarchy; and, until1776, the American colonies were british territory. Indentured servitude and slavery co-existed in the colonies to create wealth for Britain.
After the revolution, slavery bought in wealth that later. provided capital necessary to take advantage of the advancing industrial revolut.

Portuguese were the biggest European slave traders, and were long behind much of Europe in per capita income GDP.
 
Neither are as wealthy and as much a super power as the United States.... no other place on earth is!

The U.S.A wasn't ahead of much of Europe until the World wars hit...

Switzerland, and Ireland 2 nations which were basically not involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade much at all, do in fact surpass the U.S.A today in per capitai ncome GDP.
That's because socialism in Europe distributes wealth more equitably. Here most wealth is in the hands of the top ten percent.

The U.S.A works longer hours, and probably harder hours too.... Then there's all that stimulus style funding in the U.S.A for the massive military industrial complex, and also it's prison complex.

I think if you account for that, there's basically no difference.
Let's not lose sight of the era in which great wealth was created in America. We are talking about the years occuring before the industrial revolution. Britain was a feudal monarchy; and, until1776, the American colonies were british territory. Indentured servitude and slavery co-existed in the colonies to create wealth for Britain.
After the revolution, slavery bought in wealth that later. provided capital necessary to take advantage of the advancing industrial revolut.

Portuguese were the biggest European slave traders, and were long behind much of Europe in per capita income GDP.
Slave trading and slave labor is two different things.I thought you knew that.
 
The U.S.A wasn't ahead of much of Europe until the World wars hit...

Switzerland, and Ireland 2 nations which were basically not involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade much at all, do in fact surpass the U.S.A today in per capitai ncome GDP.
That's because socialism in Europe distributes wealth more equitably. Here most wealth is in the hands of the top ten percent.

The U.S.A works longer hours, and probably harder hours too.... Then there's all that stimulus style funding in the U.S.A for the massive military industrial complex, and also it's prison complex.

I think if you account for that, there's basically no difference.
Let's not lose sight of the era in which great wealth was created in America. We are talking about the years occuring before the industrial revolution. Britain was a feudal monarchy; and, until1776, the American colonies were british territory. Indentured servitude and slavery co-existed in the colonies to create wealth for Britain.
After the revolution, slavery bought in wealth that later. provided capital necessary to take advantage of the advancing industrial revolut.

Portuguese were the biggest European slave traders, and were long behind much of Europe in per capita income GDP.
Slave trading and slave labor is two different things.I thought you knew that.

4 - 5 million slaves went to Portuguese Brazil, and 300- 600 thousand slaves went to the U.S.A territories.

By your logic Brazil should be doing well economically, no?
 
:lol:

"I'm not a racist, but all those whiny black people are lazy dumb welfare leeches."
Like all the ones living in Appalachia.

Oh wait, they're white.

Never mind.

But, many Blacks live in urban centers with strong job opportunity, while many White Appalachians live in a rural community with weak job opportunity.
 
:lol:

"I'm not a racist, but all those whiny black people are lazy dumb welfare leeches."
Like all the ones living in Appalachia.

Oh wait, they're white.

Never mind.

But, many Blacks live in urban centers with strong job opportunity, while many White Appalachians live in a rural community with weak job opportunity.
So it's all about opportunity.

Well, I fail to see how having Black (Dark brown) skin coloring hinders people in modern America?

Keep in mind now the highest earning group in the U.S.A are the Asian Indians who are typically the exact same coloring as African Americans, no?
 
Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.


You're lower than racists like Steve McGarrett, Tank, Shootspeeders etc. They strut around, knowing they're less than human. They know they are ignorant and uneducated and take pride in that.

You're worse because you lie about it. You pose as a christian and all the while, you are actually evidence of true evil.

Come to think of it, one of the piles of garbage I named also lies about being christian but I'm not positive which one.

Anyway, I believe most, probably all people are, to some extent, racist. I think it's human nature to tend to flock together with those with whom we have much in common.

Because I'm closely associated with a university, my friends are educated and many are other than white bread.

But outside that circle, I seldom see people of many other races.

What's important to me is that I not let people like you and the others I named into my circle of friends.

Yeah, I'm a snob.

Works for me.

[emoji4]


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
 
Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.

:lol:

So slavery was a "bad idea" - not because it was an injustice of epic proportions that treated hundreds of thousands of human beings as animals, but because now you're stuck having to coexist alongside black people.


:lol:

The population of Black slaves in the U.S.A actually grew faster than that of all of Europe, including industrial age Britain, which really puts into question how poorly they truly had it.

I'd argue that many European peasants had it worse, they had to fend for themselves, and many starved to death, as opposed to Black slaves who were kept fed.


Black slave women in the US were often raped and had no choice but to give birth to the massa's kid.

Which means that all us white bread have Black blood.

Drives the racist honkies nuts.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
 
Last edited:
Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.


You're lower than racists like Steve McGarrett, Tank, Shootspeeders etc. They strut around, knowing they're less than human. They know they are ignorant and uneducated and take pride in that.

You're worse because you lie about it. You pose as a christian and all the while, you are actually evidence of true evil.

Come to think of it, one of the piles of garbage I named also lies about being christian but I'm not positive which one.

Anyway, I believe most, probably all people are, to some extent, racist. I think it's human nature to tend to flock together with those with whom we have much in common.

Because I'm closely associated with a university, my friends are educated and many are other than white bread.

But outside that circle, I seldom see people of many other races.

What's important to me is that I not let people like you and the others I named into my circle of friends.

Yeah, I'm a snob.

Works for me.

[emoji4]


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Speaking of ignorant, and evil...

More than half Native Americans, and Jews in the U.S.A marry outside of their group.

Imperialism failed to wipe them out, but Liberal integration seems to be leading them to extinction.

Is this about ignorance, or evil?
 
Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.


You're lower than racists like Steve McGarrett, Tank, Shootspeeders etc. They strut around, knowing they're less than human. They know they are ignorant and uneducated and take pride in that.

You're worse because you lie about it. You pose as a christian and all the while, you are actually evidence of true evil.

Come to think of it, one of the piles of garbage I named also lies about being christian but I'm not positive which one.

Anyway, I believe most, probably all people are, to some extent, racist. I think it's human nature to tend to flock together with those with whom we have much in common.

Because I'm closely associated with a university, my friends are educated and many are other than white bread.

But outside that circle, I seldom see people of many other races.

What's important to me is that I not let people like you and the others I named into my circle of friends.

Yeah, I'm a snob.

Works for me.

[emoji4]


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Speaking of ignorant, and evil...

More than half Native Americans, and Jews in the U.S.A marry outside of their group.

Imperialism failed to wipe them out, but Liberal integration seems to be leading them to extinction.

Is this about ignorance, or evil?


On your part?

Both.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
 
That's because socialism in Europe distributes wealth more equitably. Here most wealth is in the hands of the top ten percent.

The U.S.A works longer hours, and probably harder hours too.... Then there's all that stimulus style funding in the U.S.A for the massive military industrial complex, and also it's prison complex.

I think if you account for that, there's basically no difference.
Let's not lose sight of the era in which great wealth was created in America. We are talking about the years occuring before the industrial revolution. Britain was a feudal monarchy; and, until1776, the American colonies were british territory. Indentured servitude and slavery co-existed in the colonies to create wealth for Britain.
After the revolution, slavery bought in wealth that later. provided capital necessary to take advantage of the advancing industrial revolut.

Portuguese were the biggest European slave traders, and were long behind much of Europe in per capita income GDP.
Slave trading and slave labor is two different things.I thought you knew that.

4 - 5 million slaves went to Portuguese Brazil, and 300- 600 thousand slaves went to the U.S.A territories.

By your logic Brazil should be doing well economically, no?
You've made a damn good point there. I can only imagine that the difference in crops and productivity had some bearing. But also note that Brazil doesn't really have an industrial base even today. That agrarian inclination lingers still. As you might know, slavery only ended in Brazil as late as 1888.
That foot dragging might have been their undoing. While America, Britain, Germany and France were emerging as industrialized nations ,machines in those places were out pacing any productivity slaves could mister. Cotton was king anyway.... and Brazil wasn't a cotton producing nation and they held on to slavery far too long....

I'm not arguing that industrialization did not exponentially expand the wealth of America and Europe compared to Brazil with all those millions of slaves.
My argument is that the wealth created by the labor of American slaves was exploited to take advantage of emerging technology and the vastly increased productivity it brought. If the North had not won the Civil War... Slavery would have continued for years and we would have ended up just like Brazil.
 
Last edited:
Slavery was probably the worst idea ever, because now we're stuck with these people.


You're lower than racists like Steve McGarrett, Tank, Shootspeeders etc. They strut around, knowing they're less than human. They know they are ignorant and uneducated and take pride in that.

You're worse because you lie about it. You pose as a christian and all the while, you are actually evidence of true evil.

Come to think of it, one of the piles of garbage I named also lies about being christian but I'm not positive which one.

Anyway, I believe most, probably all people are, to some extent, racist. I think it's human nature to tend to flock together with those with whom we have much in common.

Because I'm closely associated with a university, my friends are educated and many are other than white bread.

But outside that circle, I seldom see people of many other races.

What's important to me is that I not let people like you and the others I named into my circle of friends.

Yeah, I'm a snob.

Works for me.

[emoji4]


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

More than half Native Americans, and Jews in the U.S.A marry outside of their group.

Imperialism failed to wipe them out, but Liberal integration seems to be leading them to extinction.

Is this about ignorance, or evil?

Since they are marrying- and having children- they clearly aren't becoming extinct- their blood lines continue- and their cultures continue also.

if by 'liberal integration' you mean allowing people to love, marry and have children with who they will , rather than what you or Big Brother tells them that must- yeah 'liberal integration' is doing just fine.
 

Forum List

Back
Top