Racist Black Judge Railroading Amber Guyger

[rightwinger]

Botham Jean's brother forgives and hugs ex-cop as she's sentenced to 10 years for his killing

"A jury sentenced a former Dallas police officer to 10 years in prison Wednesday for the shooting death of her unarmed neighbor in his home last year.

"Amber Guyger was convicted of murder the day before by the same jury in the death of Botham Jean.

"The sentence was met with boos and jeers by a crowd gathered outside the courtroom.

"But Jean's younger brother, Brandt Jean, in a victim impact statement after the sentence, told Guyger he forgave her and loved her as he would any other person.

"He asked the judge if he could hug Guyger, and the two embraced as Guyger sobbed."

The lesson of this case was well learned by America's law enforcement professionals. Avoid confrontations with America's Sacred Cows, if you value your liberty and your life.

Next generation of cops will be recruited from the ghetto because no one else will take the job. The future cop will blur the lines between cop and gang thug

That is silly because all police are being asked to do is not murder innocent people.
Cops are already a gang of thugs, because they already do murder innocent people.
Having no police at all would be far better than to have police murdering innocent people.
We had no police in the US for over 100 years, and it was much better then.

The decisions Amber made that night do not deserve the protections of being a police officer

A comedy of errors ending in her decision to kill someone in their apartment

 

[Rigby5]

No, Hillary was not charged because there was no harm done..

Any number of hostile foreign actors had access to America's most sensitive secrets.

No one knows what harm was done, or could have been done.

Remember, the Great Plaxico Burress was sent upstate for possession of a weapon, after he accidentally shot himself in a leg. No one else was hurt, but he was still persecuted.

Wrong.
The Clinton email server was a Cisco VPN, which may be even more secure than the State Department server, which has so many more contractors given full access.
Nor was there any evidence of any sensitive secrets on it.
Part of classifies documents do not have to be sensitive.
And yes, the FBI does know if any harm could have been done, because they checked the server.

On Plaxico Burress
{...
Accidental shooting[edit]
On November 28, 2008, Burress suffered an accidental, self-inflicted gunshot wound to his right thigh at the nightclub LQ on Lexington Avenue in New York City when his Glock pistol in the pocket of his black-colored jeans began sliding down his leg; apparently in reaching for his gun, he inadvertently pressed the trigger, causing the gun to fire.[27] The Manhattan District Attorney stated Burress was wearing jeans.[28] The injury was not life-threatening and Burress was released from an area hospital the next afternoon.[29] Two days later, Burress turned himself in to police to face charges of criminal possession of a handgun.[30] It was later discovered that New York City police learned about the incident only after seeing it on television and were not called by NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital as required by law. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg called the hospital actions an "outrage" and stated that they are a "chargeable offense". Bloomberg also urged that Burress be prosecuted to the fullest extent, saying that any punishment short of the minimum 3½ years for unlawful carrying of a handgun would be "a mockery of the law."[31][32] Burress had an expired concealed carry license from Florida, but no New York license.

On December 2, 2008, Burress posted bail of $100,000.[33] Later in the day, Burress reported to Giants Stadium as per team policy for injured but active players and was told he would be suspended without pay[34] for the remaining four games of the 2008 regular season for conduct detrimental to the team. In addition, the Giants placed Burress on their reserve/non-football injury list,[35] meaning he was ineligible to return for the playoffs. Burress was also scheduled to receive $1 million from his signing bonus on December 10, 2008, initially withheld by the team.[36] The NFL Players Association filed a grievance, saying the team violated the collective bargaining agreement and challenging the suspension and fine received by Burress.[37] A Special Master in arbitration subsequently ruled that the Giants must deliver the entire $1 million to Burress, as per the collective bargaining agreement. "To think that a player could carry a loaded gun into a nightclub, shoot himself and miss the rest of the season but get to keep his entire signing bonus illustrates one of the serious flaws in the current system," said Giants co-owner John Mara in a statement afterward.[38]

On December 23, 2008, a search of Burress's New Jersey home by the Totowa, New Jersey police, the New York Police Department, and investigators from the Manhattan District Attorney turned up a 9 mm handgun, a rifle, ammunition and the clothing believed to have been worn by Burress on the night of his accidental shooting.[39] On June 12, 2009 Burress's attorney Benjamin Brafman announced that he had been unable to reach a sentencing agreement.[40]

Burress asked a Manhattan grand jury for sympathy during two hours of testimony on July 29, 2009.[41] On Monday, August 3, 2009, prosecutors announced that Burress had been indicted[42] by the grand jury on two felony counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and a single count of reckless endangerment in the second degree, a misdemeanor.[43][44]

On August 20, 2009, Burress accepted a plea deal that would put him in prison for two years with an additional two years of supervised release.[42] His sentencing was held on September 22, 2009. Burress hired a prison consultant to advise him on what to expect while in prison.[45] In January 2010, Burress applied for and was denied a work release from prison.[46] On June 6, 2011, Burress was released from a protective custody unit of the Oneida Correctional Facility in Rome, New York, having served 20 months.
...}

Sounds to me that NYC has bad gun laws.
But Burress committed 2 serious mistakes in that he had a round chambered and the safety was not on.

 

[Rigby5]

Question for you stupid Moon Bats.

The asshole Obama Administration let Crooked Hillary skate on her crimes and not be charged because they said she had "no intent".

Amber didn't have an intent to murder anybody so why was she charged?

Is there one set of laws for the Democrat Presidential Nominee and another set for the rest of us?

Moonbats believe that as a Honky police office, Amber was an irredeemable racist. In fact they are pissed that she wasn't charged with a hate crime.

Police officers would be well advised to avoid young blacks, America's Official Sacred Cows.

The liberal mobs are no more interested in reading your good reason for offending them than Hindus in Calcutta are interested on why people offended the Cow, the official Sacred Cow over there.

That is silly because people should be greatly offended by a needless and careless murder like this.
Blacks are and have been murdered by police in great number for centuries in the US.
In fact, lynching Blacks used to be sort of a sport.
It is right to demand a change and an end to these murders.

And ugly confrontations will end, as cops will disengage from black youths.

Good.

 

[Rigby5]

Question for you stupid Moon Bats.

The asshole Obama Administration let Crooked Hillary skate on her crimes and not be charged because they said she had "no intent".

Amber didn't have an intent to murder anybody so why was she charged?

Is there one set of laws for the Democrat Presidential Nominee and another set for the rest of us?

No, Hillary was not charged because there was no harm done.
Some portions of classified documents we on her unsecured server and sent to others in emails, but there was nothing significantly harmful.
In contrast Amber did kill Jean.

Someone who can be so careless as to kill an innocent person in their own home, is a clear and present danger to everyone.

You are confused Moon Bat.

If you go and look at Comey press conference he outlined the crimes that Crooked Hillary committed. We all are harmed with national security breaches and he outlined them.

However, since she was the Democrat Presidential nominee and under the protection of Obama Comey came up with this prosperous proclamation that no charges would be filed because she had "no intent". Despicable! Every criminal int he world would claim they really had no intent to commit a crime but only a Democrat Presidential nominee, under the protection of that asshole Obama, could get away with it.

When she came home from work Amber had no intention of murdering anybody. She is 100,000 times more deserving of "no intent" protection that piece of corrupt shit Crooked Hillary.

A Secretary of State is REQUIRED to share classified information and documents with others sometimes.
Comey listed no violation of law.
The regulation to use State Department servers is not a law, but a regulation intended to make it easier to fulfill the Freedom of Information act, and is not intended for security purposes.

Intent had nothing to do with letting Hillary off.
If she had been careless enough to let out some important secret, then she would have been prosecuted.

And your claim Amber had no intent to murder clearly is false because she shot more than once, at the kill zone of the victim. If she had just been startled or frightened, she instead would have backed up and fired a warning shot, or aimed at extremities.
And having no intend does NOT excuse extreme carelessness that causes death, or else ever single drunk driver would get off, since none of them had an intent to cause an accident or murder anyone.

 

[KissMy]

Botham Jean's brother forgives and hugs ex-cop as she's sentenced to 10 years for his killing

"A jury sentenced a former Dallas police officer to 10 years in prison Wednesday for the shooting death of her unarmed neighbor in his home last year.

"Amber Guyger was convicted of murder the day before by the same jury in the death of Botham Jean.

"The sentence was met with boos and jeers by a crowd gathered outside the courtroom.

"But Jean's younger brother, Brandt Jean, in a victim impact statement after the sentence, told Guyger he forgave her and loved her as he would any other person.

"He asked the judge if he could hug Guyger, and the two embraced as Guyger sobbed."

The lesson of this case was well learned by America's law enforcement professionals. Avoid confrontations with America's Sacred Cows, if you value your liberty and your life.

Next generation of cops will be recruited from the ghetto because no one else will take the job. The future cop will blur the lines between cop and gang thug

That is silly because all police are being asked to do is not murder innocent people.
Cops are already a gang of thugs, because they already do murder innocent people.
Having no police at all would be far better than to have police murdering innocent people.
We had no police in the US for over 100 years, and it was much better then.

The decisions Amber made that night do not deserve the protections of being a police officer

A comedy of errors ending in her decision to kill someone in their apartment

Yup! - She shot an unarmed man multiple times inside his own home, that was decorated completely differently than her own. There is no excuse that makes any sense whatsoever. She needs to do time!!!

 

[Rigby5]

Botham Jean's brother forgives and hugs ex-cop as she's sentenced to 10 years for his killing

"A jury sentenced a former Dallas police officer to 10 years in prison Wednesday for the shooting death of her unarmed neighbor in his home last year.

"Amber Guyger was convicted of murder the day before by the same jury in the death of Botham Jean.

"The sentence was met with boos and jeers by a crowd gathered outside the courtroom.

"But Jean's younger brother, Brandt Jean, in a victim impact statement after the sentence, told Guyger he forgave her and loved her as he would any other person.

"He asked the judge if he could hug Guyger, and the two embraced as Guyger sobbed."

The lesson of this case was well learned by America's law enforcement professionals. Avoid confrontations with America's Sacred Cows, if you value your liberty and your life.

Next generation of cops will be recruited from the ghetto because no one else will take the job. The future cop will blur the lines between cop and gang thug

That is silly because all police are being asked to do is not murder innocent people.
Cops are already a gang of thugs, because they already do murder innocent people.
Having no police at all would be far better than to have police murdering innocent people.
We had no police in the US for over 100 years, and it was much better then.

The decisions Amber made that night do not deserve the protections of being a police officer

A comedy of errors ending in her decision to kill someone in their apartment

Unfortunately this also brings up the question of size.
In the past, there was a minimal height and weight requirement so that police would be strong enough to not have to rely on their gun. Was it a bad idea to eliminate this so that more women could join the force?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Intent had nothing to do with letting Hillary off

That's NOT what Comey said

1:15 on

 

[Grumblenuts]

KissMy (sig):

Trump: 'I'm the king of debt' I will bankrupt the country.

"There are those that think I'm a very stable genius, okay?" he said. "I watch my words very, very closely.

 

[Jitss617]

The judge was clearly emotionally unstable, crying, and hugging, looking confused..
being a black democrat has to be confusing,, she was like WTF am I doing, I don’t hate her but white democrats expect me to.. grrr what to do???
Lol
I guarantee the judge will do more time in jail then that white female.

 

[Rigby5]

Intent had nothing to do with letting Hillary off

That's NOT what Comey said

1:15 on

Why would Comey comment on factors that did not happen?
If Hillary had for example, emailed the launch codes of NORAD, than lack of intent would not have protected her.
But Comey was not going to explain that.

 

[Grumblenuts]

In the past, there was a minimal height and weight requirement so that police would be strong enough to not have to rely on their gun. Was it a bad idea to eliminate this so that more women could join the force?

Just my opinion because too lazy to research it right now. But I think that, unfortunately, bullies and wimps are more or less evenly distributed. Big and small are just as apt to use lethal force recklessly in such situations. The "great equalizer" plus reminding the big they have no excuse for being bullies no longer the norm. Now Marvel and video games have everyone thinking men, huge monsters even, present little threat to women. That's right, the women are smarter. They still ain't really as tough though. Doesn't mean they shouldn't be cops. Means cops should only carry loaded guns in truly life threatening situations where encountering armed idiots is reasonably expected. Again, what used to be the norm.

 

[Jitss617]

In the past, there was a minimal height and weight requirement so that police would be strong enough to not have to rely on their gun. Was it a bad idea to eliminate this so that more women could join the force?

Just my opinion because too lazy to research it right now. But I think that, unfortunately, bullies and wimps are more or less evenly distributed. Big and small are just as apt to use lethal force recklessly in such situations. The "great equalizer" plus reminding the big they have no excuse for being bullies no longer the norm. Now Marvel and video games have everyone thinking men, huge monsters even, present little threat to women. That's right, the women are smarter. They still ain't really as tough though. Doesn't mean they shouldn't be cops. Means cops should only carry loaded guns in truly life threatening situations where encountering armed idiots is reasonably expected. Again, what used to be the norm.

Lol KOOOO KOOOOO

YOU live in the wrong country snow flake. It’s in the bill of rights. THAT WILL NEVER CHANGE

 

[Grumblenuts]

Speaking of insufferable bullies.. right on cue. Jitbags of the world unite!

 

[TheGreenHornet]

If Mr. Jean had gone into her apartment guns blazing, and said "this is for the Gentle Giant Michael Brown" or "This is for Trayvon", he would have been hailed as a hero by the left. Mumia is considered virtually a demigod by the libs for slaughtering a police officer in cold blood and has even delivered commencement speeches for liberal colleges.

But he didn't do that.....he was an innocent man who was murdered in his own home..

Which is why Amber is a hero to racist d1c suckers like yourself....

I do not think amber is a hero to anyone. Yes he was a innocent man who was tragically killed by mistake.

But if he had kept his door locked and had not disregarded a lawful order of a police order who was pointing a gun at him he would still be alive....why would anyone disobey a police officer in uniform whilst she was pointing a gun at him?

So the claim is that someone not following a police order deserves to be shot?

No gun, no weapon, no threat.......just failure to put your hands up

You KNOW that AFTER THE FACT.

YES! show your damn hands when a cop tells you to.

No you don't.
When the police illegally enter your home, you arrest them for trespassing.
Cops have no more authority to shoot than anyone.
If they can shoot for someone not instantly complying with an absurb order, than anyone can legally shoot a cop for not obeying their absurd order.
Police orders do NOT have the force of law.
They are NOT legal.
Cops do NOT have any addition legal authority than anyone.

Obedience Required to Police Officers and to School Crossing Guards. A person may not wilfully fail or refuse to comply with a lawful order or direction of: ... has been trained under Section 600.004 and is directing traffic in a school crossing zone
Texas Transportation Code § 542.501 | FindLaw

 

[rightwinger]

But he didn't do that.....he was an innocent man who was murdered in his own home..

Which is why Amber is a hero to racist d1c suckers like yourself....

I do not think amber is a hero to anyone. Yes he was a innocent man who was tragically killed by mistake.

But if he had kept his door locked and had not disregarded a lawful order of a police order who was pointing a gun at him he would still be alive....why would anyone disobey a police officer in uniform whilst she was pointing a gun at him?

So the claim is that someone not following a police order deserves to be shot?

No gun, no weapon, no threat.......just failure to put your hands up

You KNOW that AFTER THE FACT.

YES! show your damn hands when a cop tells you to.

No you don't.
When the police illegally enter your home, you arrest them for trespassing.
Cops have no more authority to shoot than anyone.
If they can shoot for someone not instantly complying with an absurb order, than anyone can legally shoot a cop for not obeying their absurd order.
Police orders do NOT have the force of law.
They are NOT legal.
Cops do NOT have any addition legal authority than anyone.

ilure to Obey the Lawful Order of a Police Officer
If you are charged with Failure to Obey the Lawful Order of a police officer, you will face a second-degree misdemeanor. If convicted, you could be subject to:

• Up to sixty days in Florida County jail;
• A fine as large as $500, and/or
• Six months’

(1) a police officer;  or

(2) a school crossing guard who:

(A) is performing crossing guard duties in a school crosswalk to stop and yield to a pedestrian;  or

(B) has been trained under Section 600.004 and is directing traffic in a school crossing zone.


Read this complete Texas Transportation Code § 542.501. Obedience Required to Police Officers and to School Crossing Guards

Good post

I didn’t see where failure to follow a lawful order justifies shooting

 

[TheGreenHornet]

The problem with your analysis is that she did not have the benefit of hindsight.

She perceived a threat to her life for 2 reasons and understandably so....she thought there was an intruder in her apartment and he refused to obey her order.

You simply refuse to consider her state of mind....sure she made a honest mistake and went into someone elses apartment. But case law on innocent trespassing dictates that a person who trespasses innocently is not responsible for any harm they do as a result ot that innocent trespass.

Again, 12 jurors saw it differently...

The fact her first response to HER "honest" mistake was to double-tap a citizen sitting in his own home eating Ice Cream is the problem here. It tells you how we are training cops to be trigger happy maniacs.

"Shoot First, Ask Questions Later" is not a good policy.

He was only shot once.....eating ice cream has nothing to do with anything in this case.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

That idea is changing. It was illegal for her to go into his home and point a gun at him.

One does not have to obey an illegal order.

Or, what about his right to stand his ground? I wonder how this case would have went had he shot her.

If Mr. Jean had gone into her apartment guns blazing, and said "this is for the Gentle Giant Michael Brown" or "This is for Trayvon", he would have been hailed as a hero by the left. Mumia is considered virtually a demigod by the libs for slaughtering a police officer in cold blood and has even delivered commencement speeches for liberal colleges.

But he didn't do that.....he was an innocent man who was murdered in his own home..

Which is why Amber is a hero to racist d1c suckers like yourself....

I do not think amber is a hero to anyone. Yes he was a innocent man who was tragically killed by mistake.

But if he had kept his door locked and had not disregarded a lawful order of a police order who was pointing a gun at him he would still be alive....why would anyone disobey a police officer in uniform whilst she was pointing a gun at him?

So the claim is that someone not following a police order deserves to be shot?

No gun, no weapon, no threat.......just failure to put your hands up

When an armed police officer is pointing their weapon at you ......common sense dictates you best follow their orders....if you want to preserve your life.

Afterwards if you want to contest whether the order was lawful or not is up to you and your lawyer....good luck with that.

 

[rightwinger]

The problem with your analysis is that she did not have the benefit of hindsight.

She perceived a threat to her life for 2 reasons and understandably so....she thought there was an intruder in her apartment and he refused to obey her order.

You simply refuse to consider her state of mind....sure she made a honest mistake and went into someone elses apartment. But case law on innocent trespassing dictates that a person who trespasses innocently is not responsible for any harm they do as a result ot that innocent trespass.

Again, 12 jurors saw it differently...

The fact her first response to HER "honest" mistake was to double-tap a citizen sitting in his own home eating Ice Cream is the problem here. It tells you how we are training cops to be trigger happy maniacs.

"Shoot First, Ask Questions Later" is not a good policy.

He was only shot once.....eating ice cream has nothing to do with anything in this case.

Shows the level of threat

 

[TheGreenHornet]

I do not think amber is a hero to anyone. Yes he was a innocent man who was tragically killed by mistake.

But if he had kept his door locked and had not disregarded a lawful order of a police order who was pointing a gun at him he would still be alive....why would anyone disobey a police officer in uniform whilst she was pointing a gun at him?

So the claim is that someone not following a police order deserves to be shot?

No gun, no weapon, no threat.......just failure to put your hands up

You KNOW that AFTER THE FACT.

YES! show your damn hands when a cop tells you to.

No you don't.
When the police illegally enter your home, you arrest them for trespassing.
Cops have no more authority to shoot than anyone.
If they can shoot for someone not instantly complying with an absurb order, than anyone can legally shoot a cop for not obeying their absurd order.
Police orders do NOT have the force of law.
They are NOT legal.
Cops do NOT have any addition legal authority than anyone.

ilure to Obey the Lawful Order of a Police Officer
If you are charged with Failure to Obey the Lawful Order of a police officer, you will face a second-degree misdemeanor. If convicted, you could be subject to:

• Up to sixty days in Florida County jail;
• A fine as large as $500, and/or
• Six months’

(1) a police officer;  or

(2) a school crossing guard who:

(A) is performing crossing guard duties in a school crosswalk to stop and yield to a pedestrian;  or

(B) has been trained under Section 600.004 and is directing traffic in a school crossing zone.


Read this complete Texas Transportation Code § 542.501. Obedience Required to Police Officers and to School Crossing Guards

Good post

That was just one component in the police officers belief that her life was in danger.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

The problem with your analysis is that she did not have the benefit of hindsight.

She perceived a threat to her life for 2 reasons and understandably so....she thought there was an intruder in her apartment and he refused to obey her order.

You simply refuse to consider her state of mind....sure she made a honest mistake and went into someone elses apartment. But case law on innocent trespassing dictates that a person who trespasses innocently is not responsible for any harm they do as a result ot that innocent trespass.

Again, 12 jurors saw it differently...

The fact her first response to HER "honest" mistake was to double-tap a citizen sitting in his own home eating Ice Cream is the problem here. It tells you how we are training cops to be trigger happy maniacs.

"Shoot First, Ask Questions Later" is not a good policy.

He was only shot once.....eating ice cream has nothing to do with anything in this case.

Shows the level of threat

Perhaps in hindsight....it was dark in the apartment....the officer only say the victim advancing on her whilst refusing to show his hands as ordered.