Read The Closed-Door Hearing Transcripts Here

Why are Dem's scared shitless of the whistleblower testifying and being subject to cross examination hmmm?

The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point, dope.

Their story has been corroborated many times over.

Then you should have no problem with our side questioning him under oath.

To what end? It's not necessary to question the motives of the guy who called 911 when the fire dept is on the scene and fighting the fire.
More like you wish to leak their identity in an effort to impugne their reputation in violation of federal law.

The president has a constitutional right to face his accuser or have you forgotten that?

He doesn't ,dope.

Whistleblower identities are protected under federal law.

Wrong again dope. This idiot is not a whistleblower, he is a LEAKER. Thus subject to ZERO protection. Try again.
 
Trump approved the shipment of weapons on Dec 20, 2017.

And for THAT...Trump got a Ukrainian investigation of Manafort and the "black ledger" quashed...that would be the same black ledger that got Manafort fired in the first place.
 
As the Trumptards have unanimously demonstrated, not one of them is going to read the transcripts.

Trump totally depends on this kind of submissiveness to his lies.
 
Trump approved the shipment of weapons on Dec 20, 2017.

And for THAT...Trump got a Ukrainian investigation of Manafort and the "black ledger" quashed...that would be the same black ledger that got Manafort fired in the first place.

So it's ok for a Democrat Vice President to end a corruption investigation, but not for a Republican President?

Right, sparky.
 
The Donald can appoint and the Donald can fire, at will.
And the mentally ill criminal can be impeached for it, if it is shown he did it with criminal intent.

You trumpkins never quite seem to be able to wrap your minds around this.

And morons like you seem to forget that the President (in this case and for the next 4 years Trump) can fire anybody working for him at any time for any reason or no reason. You tried this same lame excuse with Comey and got slapped down. Yet more egg on your face.
 
And morons like you seem to forget that the President (in this case and for the next 4 years Trump) can fire anybody working for him at any time for any reason or no reason.
Actually, I literally said exactly that. Try to follow the thread, ya dumfuk.

Furthermore, he can be impeached for it.
 
So it's ok for a Democrat Vice President to end a corruption investigation, but not for a Republican President?

There's a slight problem there sparky.

That's not at all accurate.

Trump got the Manafort investigation quashed in return for Javelins...Biden got a corrupt prosecutor fired...he didn't get any investigation ended...there was none to end.

Stop lying
 
Trump approved the shipment of weapons on Dec 20, 2017.

And for THAT...Trump got a Ukrainian investigation of Manafort and the "black ledger" quashed...that would be the same black ledger that got Manafort fired in the first place.

So it's ok for a Democrat Vice President to end a corruption investigation, but not for a Republican President?

Right, sparky.
Biden did not stop a corruption investigation, retard. Who is telling these lies for you to parrot, and why do you keep going back for more of their piss to drink?
 
Biden did not stop a corruption investigation, retard. Who is telling these lies for you to parrot, and why do you keep going back for more of their piss to drink?

They know they're repeating lies...they just don't care.They don't even care that everyone knows they are repeating lies

It's like a Trump sickness
 
Wrong again dope. This idiot is not a whistleblower, he is a LEAKER. Thus subject to ZERO protection. Try again.

In your bullshit opinion

Wrong again LUSH. In the opinion of those who matter. You’d be one of the experts on bullshit, seeing how you swallow it from your overall masters every day.
Fuck you newbie. What "important person" has that bullshit opinion?

No, fuck YOU idiot. Look it up yourself. You can’t afford my rates lush.
 
Wrong again dope. This idiot is not a whistleblower, he is a LEAKER. Thus subject to ZERO protection. Try again.

In your bullshit opinion

Wrong again LUSH. In the opinion of those who matter. You’d be one of the experts on bullshit, seeing how you swallow it from your overall masters every day.
Fuck you newbie. What "important person" has that bullshit opinion?

No, fuck YOU idiot. Look it up yourself. You can’t afford my rates lush.
You made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.
 
And morons like you seem to forget that the President (in this case and for the next 4 years Trump) can fire anybody working for him at any time for any reason or no reason.
Actually, I literally said exactly that. Try to follow the thread, ya dumfuk.

Furthermore, he can be impeached for it.

Hey moron, try educating yourself. Since Trump has the Constitutional power to fire anybody at any time for any reason, he can NOT be impeached for exercising powers he has. Try to keep up nimrod.
 
Wrong again dope. This idiot is not a whistleblower, he is a LEAKER. Thus subject to ZERO protection. Try again.

In your bullshit opinion

That was not an "opinion", it was a fact. The so-called" whistleblower" did not reveal, nor was he privy to any information about the phone call. He was only repeating second-hand information that was told to him by someone else.

He is basically Schiff's butt-boy to make the media think he had some stunning revelation about the phone call.. And now Schiff won't even allow his little pajama-boy to testify, for fear that his ruse will be found out.

You probably don't even know that this "whistleblower" has been identified, do you?

Or anything about his past? Or about his acquaintances, his connections, and his motives?

Do you?
 
Wrong again dope. This idiot is not a whistleblower, he is a LEAKER. Thus subject to ZERO protection. Try again.

In your bullshit opinion

Wrong again LUSH. In the opinion of those who matter. You’d be one of the experts on bullshit, seeing how you swallow it from your overall masters every day.
Fuck you newbie. What "important person" has that bullshit opinion?

No, fuck YOU idiot. Look it up yourself. You can’t afford my rates lush.
You made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.

No retard. Per YOUR rules, you have to prove the negative. Now get busy you piss drinking moron.
 
Since Trump has the Constitutional power to fire anybody at any time for any reason, he can NOT be impeached for exercising powers he has.
Of course he can, if argued that he did it with criminal intent. How can you nutsacks not get this? What is wrong with your mushy little brains?
 
In your bullshit opinion

Wrong again LUSH. In the opinion of those who matter. You’d be one of the experts on bullshit, seeing how you swallow it from your overall masters every day.
Fuck you newbie. What "important person" has that bullshit opinion?

No, fuck YOU idiot. Look it up yourself. You can’t afford my rates lush.
You made the claim. The burden of proof is on you.

No retard. Per YOUR rules, you have to prove the negative. Now get busy you piss drinking moron.
Nope. Please take a course in logic, retard. You are making an argument from ignorance.

Argument from ignorance - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Forum List

Back
Top