Reason vs. Morality

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,095
60,651
1. Reason or Morality....Which one should guide society?
Either our ability to use logic and reason, or obedience to the morality forged in the crucible of millennia of human interactions and experience?

I know....both would be nice. But, with secularism in the ascendancy, the cultural battle rarely allows for compromise.




2. Begin with the tools involved: The human mind may be worshiped, but it cannot be trusted. That is why we codify laws.
Eugene Debs said ‘Even if I could, I would not lead you into the Promised Land, because if I could lead you in, someone else could lead you out.’

a. Demagoguery is the attempt to convince the people that they can be led into the Promised Land. America would be better if the electorate would notice the similarities between ‘Lose Weight Without Dieting,’ and ‘Hope.’




3. The Bible is the wisdom of the West. It is from the precepts of the Bible that the legal systems of the West have been developed- systems, worked out over millennia, for dealing with inequality, with injustice, with greed, reducible t that which Christians call the Golden Rule, and the Jews had propounded as “That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor.”
It is these rules and laws which form a framework which allows the individual foreknowledge of that which is permitted and that which is forbidden.

a. This is the great contribution of our Judeo-Christian foundation to Western civilization. The principles of justice are laid down in the Torah and the Gospels, and implemented through human actions memorialized in judicial codes.
David Mamet, "The Secret Knowledge."




4. Since the 18th century Enlightenment, many Westerners have made the mistake of believing that reason can exist separate from civilization, and that ‘enlightened’ necessitates a repudiation of religion.

a. In the Middle Ages, people were irrational and superstitious and ignorant, and went around killing each other in religious wars. The view developed that disapproval of these characteristics and events meant embracing of an anti-religion viewpoint, and then progress, liberty and happiness must follow!

b. 'The Enlightenment' has been given many differing definitions but it was, at its broadest, a philosophical movement of the eighteenth century which stressed human reasoning over blind faith or obedience and was thus in contrast with much of the religious and political order of the day, while also encouraging 'scientific' thinking.\





5. And events that came from the Enlightenment resulted in 'throwing the baby out with the bathwater.' While the Enlightenment may be seen as a reaction to the abuses of clerical authority, it must be remembered that the biblical imprecation that all humanity was equal, having been fashioned in the image of God, provided the template for liberty.


But did said 'enlightenment' actually oppose " blind faith or obedience"? Or did it simple superimpose a different object of genuflection?






a. Voltaire claimed that the infamy was not just the Catholic Church, but phrase refers to abuses to the people by royalty and the clergy that Voltaire saw around him. Christianity itself, he cried "écrasez l'infâme," or "crush the infamous."

b. Unlike France, thinkers in Britain and America embraced religion as an amalgamation with ‘social virture,’ in the former and ‘political liberty’, in the latter.

c. The French invested reason with the same dogmatic status as religion, creating a secular reflection of the Catholic Church.
Reason, or nature, or the general will, became the civil religion. Thus authoritarianism was there from the time of the French Revolution.

d. The philosopher Condorcet believed that the application of mathematics and statistics to social policy would result in general happiness, truth and virtue.

e. Henri de Saint-Simon, the articulator of socialism, argued for the supremacy of the sciences over religion, and predicted that, like religious, secular propaganda would employ artists and poets.

f. His collaborator, Auguste Comte, also saw the need for a secular religion, a scientific materialism, which contends that the only reality is what can be detected and measured by human senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. His authoritarian thinking shapes today’s liberal’s doctrinaire insistence that science has the explanation for all things.
Breitbart, "Righteous Indignation."





So....where, then, is the great change, the great difference between the bending of the knee to what we call God, or the bending of the knee to the god called reason?

And, is the world better due to this change?
 
First of all, Love your avatar, though I am more of a Marvel man, and even more so Valiant fan today.

If we lose our morals, civilization is sure to collapse, and those movies we see, that we think can never happen(Hunger Games, Running Man, The Purge) will come to pass, in time.
 
First of all, Love your avatar, though I am more of a Marvel man, and even more so Valiant fan today.

If we lose our morals, civilization is sure to collapse, and those movies we see, that we think can never happen(Hunger Games, Running Man, The Purge) will come to pass, in time.


Thank you, and welcome to the board.

I look forward to your posts, and would like to see you flesh out more of "If we lose our morals, civilization is sure to collapse,..."


Keep on.
 
Secular worship could use some codification. It's pretty hard to be a secularist with some guidelines. They could call them the Ten Ideas or something.
 
Secular worship could use some codification. It's pretty hard to be a secularist with some guidelines. They could call them the Ten Ideas or something.



That was very clever, dillo.....the 10 Secular Commandments.....

I can begin it....

1. The rule of “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. Every culture and all behaviors are equal!

2. There are no unalienable rights, only those allowed by government....

3......
 
Morals. "Reason" is the gibberish if those without the guts to do what is Right instead of what they Want.
 
Secular worship could use some codification. It's pretty hard to be a secularist with some guidelines. They could call them the Ten Ideas or something.



That was very clever, dillo.....the 10 Secular Commandments.....

I can begin it....

1. The rule of “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. Every culture and all behaviors are equal!

2. There are no unalienable rights, only those allowed by government....

3......

Don't compete-----guess that's the same as #1 huh ?
 
Secular worship could use some codification. It's pretty hard to be a secularist with some guidelines. They could call them the Ten Ideas or something.



That was very clever, dillo.....the 10 Secular Commandments.....

I can begin it....

1. The rule of “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. Every culture and all behaviors are equal!

2. There are no unalienable rights, only those allowed by government....

3......
With one "real nice person" in charge to make sure it's all implemented fairly of course. :D
 
Morals. "Reason" is the gibberish if those without the guts to do what is Right instead of what they Want.

I wish I had the time to indulge this thread, but on the surface, I would say without first having reason, there can be no morals, as I define those. ( The Golden Rule )
 
1. Reason or Morality....Which one should guide society?
Either our ability to use logic and reason, or obedience to the morality forged in the crucible of millennia of human interactions and experience?

I know....both would be nice. But, with secularism in the ascendancy, the cultural battle rarely allows for compromise.




2. Begin with the tools involved: The human mind may be worshiped, but it cannot be trusted. That is why we codify laws.
Eugene Debs said ‘Even if I could, I would not lead you into the Promised Land, because if I could lead you in, someone else could lead you out.’

a. Demagoguery is the attempt to convince the people that they can be led into the Promised Land. America would be better if the electorate would notice the similarities between ‘Lose Weight Without Dieting,’ and ‘Hope.’




3. The Bible is the wisdom of the West. It is from the precepts of the Bible that the legal systems of the West have been developed- systems, worked out over millennia, for dealing with inequality, with injustice, with greed, reducible t that which Christians call the Golden Rule, and the Jews had propounded as “That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor.”
It is these rules and laws which form a framework which allows the individual foreknowledge of that which is permitted and that which is forbidden.

a. This is the great contribution of our Judeo-Christian foundation to Western civilization. The principles of justice are laid down in the Torah and the Gospels, and implemented through human actions memorialized in judicial codes.
David Mamet, "The Secret Knowledge."




4. Since the 18th century Enlightenment, many Westerners have made the mistake of believing that reason can exist separate from civilization, and that ‘enlightened’ necessitates a repudiation of religion.

a. In the Middle Ages, people were irrational and superstitious and ignorant, and went around killing each other in religious wars. The view developed that disapproval of these characteristics and events meant embracing of an anti-religion viewpoint, and then progress, liberty and happiness must follow!

b. 'The Enlightenment' has been given many differing definitions but it was, at its broadest, a philosophical movement of the eighteenth century which stressed human reasoning over blind faith or obedience and was thus in contrast with much of the religious and political order of the day, while also encouraging 'scientific' thinking.\





5. And events that came from the Enlightenment resulted in 'throwing the baby out with the bathwater.' While the Enlightenment may be seen as a reaction to the abuses of clerical authority, it must be remembered that the biblical imprecation that all humanity was equal, having been fashioned in the image of God, provided the template for liberty.


But did said 'enlightenment' actually oppose " blind faith or obedience"? Or did it simple superimpose a different object of genuflection?






a. Voltaire claimed that the infamy was not just the Catholic Church, but phrase refers to abuses to the people by royalty and the clergy that Voltaire saw around him. Christianity itself, he cried "écrasez l'infâme," or "crush the infamous."

b. Unlike France, thinkers in Britain and America embraced religion as an amalgamation with ‘social virture,’ in the former and ‘political liberty’, in the latter.

c. The French invested reason with the same dogmatic status as religion, creating a secular reflection of the Catholic Church.
Reason, or nature, or the general will, became the civil religion. Thus authoritarianism was there from the time of the French Revolution.

d. The philosopher Condorcet believed that the application of mathematics and statistics to social policy would result in general happiness, truth and virtue.

e. Henri de Saint-Simon, the articulator of socialism, argued for the supremacy of the sciences over religion, and predicted that, like religious, secular propaganda would employ artists and poets.

f. His collaborator, Auguste Comte, also saw the need for a secular religion, a scientific materialism, which contends that the only reality is what can be detected and measured by human senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. His authoritarian thinking shapes today’s liberal’s doctrinaire insistence that science has the explanation for all things.
Breitbart, "Righteous Indignation."





So....where, then, is the great change, the great difference between the bending of the knee to what we call God, or the bending of the knee to the god called reason?

And, is the world better due to this change?

A world in hundreds of shade of gray and seen in black and white is magicial/childish thinking. Let's for a moment consider the use of the Atomic Bomb by President Truman. What would be the moral judgment, thou shall not kill?

It has been said the had Ghandi lie before a German Panzer and not a British Tank he would have become flat as a pancake. What PC leaves out of this long and tedious rant is pragmatism.
 
Not kill, murder. Thou shalt not murder.

If God or a king tells you to kill, then by all means kill as many as you can because it's totally justified or something because, well it just is.
 
Not kill, murder. Thou shalt not murder.

If God or a king tells you to kill, then by all means kill as many as you can because it's totally justified or something because, well it just is.

anyone else wanna give it a shot ?
 
3. The Bible is the wisdom of the West. It is from the precepts of the Bible that the legal systems of the West have been developed- systems, worked out over millennia, for dealing with inequality, with injustice, with greed, reducible t that which Christians call the Golden Rule, and the Jews had propounded as “That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor.”
It is these rules and laws which form a framework which allows the individual foreknowledge of that which is permitted and that which is forbidden.

I can begin it....

1. The rule of “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. Every culture and all behaviors are equal!

Why do these two seem to contradict?

As for reason vs. religion: I like the old saying: "who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?"
 
Not kill, murder. Thou shalt not murder.

If God or a king tells you to kill, then by all means kill as many as you can because it's totally justified or something because, well it just is.

War is murder on a Grand Scale. We murdered Nazi's and Japanese because they were murderers......................

Was it wrong to destroy and murder much of Germany to stop their murders of the Jews and the other countries in the region.

The bible has verses were force and killing are justified. WWII being a prime example.
 
3. The Bible is the wisdom of the West. It is from the precepts of the Bible that the legal systems of the West have been developed- systems, worked out over millennia, for dealing with inequality, with injustice, with greed, reducible t that which Christians call the Golden Rule, and the Jews had propounded as “That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor.”
It is these rules and laws which form a framework which allows the individual foreknowledge of that which is permitted and that which is forbidden.

I can begin it....

1. The rule of “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. Every culture and all behaviors are equal!

Why do these two seem to contradict?

As for reason vs. religion: I like the old saying: "who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?"

not necessarily religion----morals
 
Not kill, murder. Thou shalt not murder.

If God or a king tells you to kill, then by all means kill as many as you can because it's totally justified or something because, well it just is.

War is murder on a Grand Scale. We murdered Nazi's and Japanese because they were murderers......................

Was it wrong to destroy and murder much of Germany to stop their murders of the Jews and the other countries in the region.

The bible has verses were force and killing are justified. WWII being a prime example.

I'm not trying to say war is never justified or necessary. But if I decide to slaughter a few people because they piss me off, I'm going to swing for it. But if some guy in a silly hat tells me to go slaughter some folks I've never even met because it's God's will or he's the king and I should respect his authority, then it's totally cool to kill folks by the bushel because, well it just is.

On your own = crime
Because the state tells you to = authorized

we can get into debates on the nature of state power at this point, but really it comes down to state monopolies on violence, which is a whole other discussion.
 
Not kill, murder. Thou shalt not murder.

If God or a king tells you to kill, then by all means kill as many as you can because it's totally justified or something because, well it just is.

War is murder on a Grand Scale. We murdered Nazi's and Japanese because they were murderers......................

Was it wrong to destroy and murder much of Germany to stop their murders of the Jews and the other countries in the region.

The bible has verses were force and killing are justified. WWII being a prime example.

I'm not trying to say war is never justified or necessary. But if I decide to slaughter a few people because they piss me off, I'm going to swing for it. But if some guy in a silly hat tells me to go slaughter some folks I've never even met because it's God's will or he's the king and I should respect his authority, then it's totally cool to kill folks by the bushel because, well it just is.

On your own = crime
Because the state tells you to = authorized

we can get into debates on the nature of state power at this point, but really it comes down to state monopolies on violence, which is a whole other discussion.

Germany, aka the Nazi's authorized, the slaughter of humanity itself. It was not only immoral it was pure Evil.

In the military you are not required to follow orders IF they are against the rules of War and Conduct. If told to slaughter a village full of women and children via an order from a wacked commander you may very well refuse to follow the unlawful order. Even if the immediate chain of command tells you to do so. If the higher command is also orders the same then you are in between a rock and a hard place.

At that point, what are you willing to risk to maintain your Religion and/or Morals. At that point I'd be willing to die in defense of that belief.
 
War is murder on a Grand Scale. We murdered Nazi's and Japanese because they were murderers......................

Was it wrong to destroy and murder much of Germany to stop their murders of the Jews and the other countries in the region.

The bible has verses were force and killing are justified. WWII being a prime example.

I'm not trying to say war is never justified or necessary. But if I decide to slaughter a few people because they piss me off, I'm going to swing for it. But if some guy in a silly hat tells me to go slaughter some folks I've never even met because it's God's will or he's the king and I should respect his authority, then it's totally cool to kill folks by the bushel because, well it just is.

On your own = crime
Because the state tells you to = authorized

we can get into debates on the nature of state power at this point, but really it comes down to state monopolies on violence, which is a whole other discussion.

Germany, aka the Nazi's authorized, the slaughter of humanity itself. It was not only immoral it was pure Evil.

In the military you are not required to follow orders IF they are against the rules of War and Conduct. If told to slaughter a village full of women and children via an order from a wacked commander you may very well refuse to follow the unlawful order. Even if the immediate chain of command tells you to do so. If the higher command is also orders the same then you are in between a rock and a hard place.

At that point, what are you willing to risk to maintain your Religion and/or Morals. At that point I'd be willing to die in defense of that belief.

That's the moral case for not killing. What is the rational case ?

*or murdering for the sake of the pedantics
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top