Replace the ACA with single payer

[Timmy]

You may have to go bankrupt and lose everything to avoid paying. NOT ANY MORE with ACA.

No, you have to go bankrupt to afford the fucking piece of shit that is Obamacare. Shit for brains
Get your head out of your fucking ass…

You don't have to use Obamacare . Go get your own insurance and see what it costs you .

I have never bought any insurance, I don't need it. I don't believe in the nanny state

Until you get sick , then you'll run the hospital crying "nanny state help meeeee"

Na, I actually think of the future unlike the federal government. I've been saving money for 20+ years more than enough for me and my family for whatever comes up.

Oh yeah? How much?

Have you ever known anyone with cancer? Even a fairLy treatable form would require all sorts of medical care. Surgery , specialists , drugs, appointments, daily radiation for a couple months .

You think $30k in the bank will cover that? Fool.

 

[P@triot]

I believe unregulated capitalism is evil...

Yes...but all of us believe you are dimwitted. That's why we dismiss every stupid thing you say.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

No, you have to go bankrupt to afford the fucking piece of shit that is Obamacare. Shit for brains
Get your head out of your fucking ass…

You don't have to use Obamacare . Go get your own insurance and see what it costs you .

I have never bought any insurance, I don't need it. I don't believe in the nanny state

Until you get sick , then you'll run the hospital crying "nanny state help meeeee"

Na, I actually think of the future unlike the federal government. I've been saving money for 20+ years more than enough for me and my family for whatever comes up.

Oh yeah? How much?

Have you ever known anyone with cancer? Even a fairLy treatable form would require all sorts of medical care. Surgery , specialists , drugs, appointments, daily radiation for a couple months .

You think $30k in the bank will cover that? Fool.

So your solution is that bank account should be every tax payer in the country.

 

[P@triot]

Oh yeah? How much?

Have you ever known anyone with cancer? Even a fairLy treatable form would require all sorts of medical care. Surgery , specialists , drugs, appointments, daily radiation for a couple months .

You think $30k in the bank will cover that? Fool.

This is going to shock you young Timmy but there is this thing called "insurance". You're parents will tell you about it once you reach high school.

 

[P@triot]

Oh yeah? How much? Have you ever known anyone with cancer? Even a fairLy treatable form would require all sorts of medical care. Surgery , specialists , drugs, appointments, daily radiation for a couple months .

You think $30k in the bank will cover that? Fool.

So your solution is that bank account should be every tax payer in the country.

Except him, Missouri_Mike. That's how it works with progressives, you know. They demand everyone else do what they proclaim "moral" so they don't have to.

 

[Timmy]

Oh yeah? How much?

Have you ever known anyone with cancer? Even a fairLy treatable form would require all sorts of medical care. Surgery , specialists , drugs, appointments, daily radiation for a couple months .

You think $30k in the bank will cover that? Fool.

This is going to shock you young Timmy but there is this thing called "insurance". You're parents will tell you about it once you reach high school.

What is insurance other than having other people pay for you?

And Rustic was saying he has savings and doesn't need insurance .

 

[P@triot]

Replace the ACA with single payer the rest of the civilized world enjoys. Lets not be left out in the cold!!!!

-It would be cheaper
-Moral

Only rich can afford what the ryans of this world want. That is wrong.

You may be in luck, that was one of Donald Trump's proposals.
Trump Pushes Single Payer Healthcare, Tax Increase on Wealthy - Breitbart

You're not in luck since the Republican-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate will never do something that stupid.

 

[P@triot]

Oh yeah? How much?

Have you ever known anyone with cancer? Even a fairLy treatable form would require all sorts of medical care. Surgery , specialists , drugs, appointments, daily radiation for a couple months .

You think $30k in the bank will cover that? Fool.

This is going to shock you young Timmy but there is this thing called "insurance". You're parents will tell you about it once you reach high school.

What is insurance other than having other people pay for you? And Rustic was saying he has savings and doesn't need insurance .

The heck are you talking about?!? I pay for my own insurance, snowflake.

 

[francoHFW]

''people who are being encouraged to stay poor because the Democrats are promising to take care of them, so they can be lazy slobs.'' -RW idiocy for dupes only LOL. Meanwhile Reaganism rolls on, defended to the death by the GOP. Now taxing the rich less than the middle class and giving the store away to giant corps. Great job. PRAYING Trump isn't as idiotic as the GOP and its dupes....

''people who are being encouraged to stay poor because the Democrats are promising to take care of them, so they can be lazy slobs.''

After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!! And you complain about the victims? Are you an idiot or an A-hole?

Pay gaps are completely meaningless. Certain jobs would be completely barren of employment if everyone was paid exactly the same. People who complain about wage gaps simply don't know how the job market works.

When you apply for a job, you're selling your skills. If those skills are in high demand, you're offered higher pay. If your skills are in low demand, you're paid less. If you're applying for no-skill jobs, you're paid less.

Democrats happen to be the ones driving wages down, with extremely high taxes on employers, and lowering the amounts employees need to be paid in order to live with their Federal Aid.

They're not victims if they did it to themselves. You're just repeating Liberal talking points that have no merit.

This is what happens when gov't has little money to invest in infrastructure or training for good jobs, all to save the bloated rich from paying their fair share. Great job! Thanks for the stupidest wars ever and the corrupt W/GOP word depression, and 8 years of disfunction, dupes.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb...able=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Your post basically amounts to "The rich keep doing what it was that made them rich, and the poor continue doing what it was that made them poor". Businesses exist to make money, them making money just happens to benefit those that work for them, provided they have skills there's a demand for. If you want money, create your own business.

When the rich pay less %wise than the middle class, they get REALLY rich and the middle class and the country go to hell. Like NOW, GOP dupe.

Perfect chump of the greedy idiot rich GOP...Don't pay taxes either?

 

[francoHFW]

Replace the ACA with single payer the rest of the civilized world enjoys. Lets not be left out in the cold!!!!

-It would be cheaper
-Moral

Only rich can afford what the ryans of this world want. That is wrong.

You may be in luck, that was one of Donald Trump's proposals.
Trump Pushes Single Payer Healthcare, Tax Increase on Wealthy - Breitbart

You're not in luck since the Republican-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate will never do something that stupid.

Some GOP, all the Dems?

 

[francoHFW]

Oh yeah? How much?

Have you ever known anyone with cancer? Even a fairLy treatable form would require all sorts of medical care. Surgery , specialists , drugs, appointments, daily radiation for a couple months .

You think $30k in the bank will cover that? Fool.

This is going to shock you young Timmy but there is this thing called "insurance". You're parents will tell you about it once you reach high school.

What is insurance other than having other people pay for you? And Rustic was saying he has savings and doesn't need insurance .

The heck are you talking about?!? I pay for my own insurance, snowflake.

Until someone in your family gets really sick duh...

 

[francoHFW]

''people who are being encouraged to stay poor because the Democrats are promising to take care of them, so they can be lazy slobs.'' -RW idiocy for dupes only LOL. Meanwhile Reaganism rolls on, defended to the death by the GOP. Now taxing the rich less than the middle class and giving the store away to giant corps. Great job. PRAYING Trump isn't as idiotic as the GOP and its dupes....

''people who are being encouraged to stay poor because the Democrats are promising to take care of them, so they can be lazy slobs.''

After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!! And you complain about the victims? Are you an idiot or an A-hole?

Pay gaps are completely meaningless. Certain jobs would be completely barren of employment if everyone was paid exactly the same. People who complain about wage gaps simply don't know how the job market works.

When you apply for a job, you're selling your skills. If those skills are in high demand, you're offered higher pay. If your skills are in low demand, you're paid less. If you're applying for no-skill jobs, you're paid less.

Democrats happen to be the ones driving wages down, with extremely high taxes on employers, and lowering the amounts employees need to be paid in order to live with their Federal Aid.

They're not victims if they did it to themselves. You're just repeating Liberal talking points that have no merit.

This is what happens when gov't has little money to invest in infrastructure or training for good jobs, all to save the bloated rich from paying their fair share. Great job! Thanks for the stupidest wars ever and the corrupt W/GOP word depression, and 8 years of disfunction, dupes.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb...able=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Your post basically amounts to "The rich keep doing what it was that made them rich, and the poor continue doing what it was that made them poor". Businesses exist to make money, them making money just happens to benefit those that work for them, provided they have skills there's a demand for. If you want money, create your own business.

When the rich pay less %wise than the middle class, they get REALLY rich and the middle class and the country go to hell. Like NOW, GOP dupe.

So in eight years obie hasn't fixed anything?

ACA and the economy. Everything else obstructed by the mindless (50% racist) GOP...

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Pay gaps are completely meaningless. Certain jobs would be completely barren of employment if everyone was paid exactly the same. People who complain about wage gaps simply don't know how the job market works.

When you apply for a job, you're selling your skills. If those skills are in high demand, you're offered higher pay. If your skills are in low demand, you're paid less. If you're applying for no-skill jobs, you're paid less.

Democrats happen to be the ones driving wages down, with extremely high taxes on employers, and lowering the amounts employees need to be paid in order to live with their Federal Aid.

They're not victims if they did it to themselves. You're just repeating Liberal talking points that have no merit.

This is what happens when gov't has little money to invest in infrastructure or training for good jobs, all to save the bloated rich from paying their fair share. Great job! Thanks for the stupidest wars ever and the corrupt W/GOP word depression, and 8 years of disfunction, dupes.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb...able=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Your post basically amounts to "The rich keep doing what it was that made them rich, and the poor continue doing what it was that made them poor". Businesses exist to make money, them making money just happens to benefit those that work for them, provided they have skills there's a demand for. If you want money, create your own business.

When the rich pay less %wise than the middle class, they get REALLY rich and the middle class and the country go to hell. Like NOW, GOP dupe.

So in eight years obie hasn't fixed anything?

ACA and the economy. Everything else obstructed by the mindless (50% racist) GOP...

He hasn't fixed either one of those. How mindless do you have to be to think he did anything good?

 

[francoHFW]

This is what happens when gov't has little money to invest in infrastructure or training for good jobs, all to save the bloated rich from paying their fair share. Great job! Thanks for the stupidest wars ever and the corrupt W/GOP word depression, and 8 years of disfunction, dupes.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb...able=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Your post basically amounts to "The rich keep doing what it was that made them rich, and the poor continue doing what it was that made them poor". Businesses exist to make money, them making money just happens to benefit those that work for them, provided they have skills there's a demand for. If you want money, create your own business.

When the rich pay less %wise than the middle class, they get REALLY rich and the middle class and the country go to hell. Like NOW, GOP dupe.

So in eight years obie hasn't fixed anything?

ACA and the economy. Everything else obstructed by the mindless (50% racist) GOP...

He hasn't fixed either one of those. How mindless do you have to be to think he did anything good?

Change the channel someday...

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Your post basically amounts to "The rich keep doing what it was that made them rich, and the poor continue doing what it was that made them poor". Businesses exist to make money, them making money just happens to benefit those that work for them, provided they have skills there's a demand for. If you want money, create your own business.

When the rich pay less %wise than the middle class, they get REALLY rich and the middle class and the country go to hell. Like NOW, GOP dupe.

So in eight years obie hasn't fixed anything?

ACA and the economy. Everything else obstructed by the mindless (50% racist) GOP...

He hasn't fixed either one of those. How mindless do you have to be to think he did anything good?

Change the channel someday...

What channel would that be? The left wing everything is fine and getting better although you personally are getting butt fucked and not seeing the benefits of our awesome deals because you're just too damn stupid to see it channel? Is that the channel I need to switch to?

 

[francoHFW]

When the rich pay less %wise than the middle class, they get REALLY rich and the middle class and the country go to hell. Like NOW, GOP dupe.

So in eight years obie hasn't fixed anything?

ACA and the economy. Everything else obstructed by the mindless (50% racist) GOP...

He hasn't fixed either one of those. How mindless do you have to be to think he did anything good?

Change the channel someday...

What channel would that be? The left wing everything is fine and getting better although you personally are getting butt fucked and not seeing the benefits of our awesome deals because you're just too damn stupid to see it channel? Is that the channel I need to switch to?

Real news, not RW GOP BS fake news/propaganda, dupe.

 

[francoHFW]

I believe unregulated capitalism is evil...

Yes...but all of us believe you are dimwitted. That's why we dismiss every stupid thing you say.

And then there's the Dems duh. God GOPers/dupes are dumb...

 

[there4eyeM]

[/QUOTE]
Both the depressions happened after 8 years of GOP in power and deregulated insanity and greed, ignorant dupe. "a result of the government being allowed to run amok and expand its powers far beyond what they should be" ? WTH are you talking about? LOL[/QUOTE]

Probably, the person is talking about the catastrophic illegal invasion of Iraq.

 

[Skull Pilot]

It is always surprising to see that people who want socialized health care actually think they will get any health care at all.

Under socialized medicine there is no incentive to do well. You get your salary if your patients die, and you won't be overworked.

Again, no fucking clue how Single payer works... Ignorance is bliss...

Single payer is communism

Single Payer is apart of any truly developed society....

Single Payer is method of insurance...

Communism is regime

Sorry but you are wrong again...

Single payer has been an abject failure everywhere it has been implemented
Just like communism

The ACA is not communism, people pay for it.

Where did I say it was communism in fact where did I mention Obamacare at all?

The thread is about single payer insurance which has been an abject failure everywhere it has been tried just like communism

 

[Skull Pilot]

It is always surprising to see that people who want socialized health care actually think they will get any health care at all.

Under socialized medicine there is no incentive to do well. You get your salary if your patients die, and you won't be overworked.

Again, no fucking clue how Single payer works... Ignorance is bliss...

Single payer is communism

Single Payer is apart of any truly developed society....

Single Payer is method of insurance...

Communism is regime

Sorry but you are wrong again...

Single payer has been an abject failure everywhere it has been implemented
Just like communism

Really ? Where has health care been a success without it?

so you would rather have a system that is a proven failure because you think it lets more people get health care?

Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer Health Care Plan Failed in Vermont
http://www.investors.com/politics/c...s-collapsing-single-payer-health-care-system/
Socialized medicine a global failure
'Single Payer' Healthcare Has Failed The U.S. Indian Health Service -- So Why Does The Left Keep Advocating It?
"Father" of Canadian Health Care Admits its a Failure - Civitas Review