If he was stupid enough to believe that, then maybe he really was going senile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he was stupid enough to believe that, then maybe he really was going senile.
Out of area for work, illness, or other circumstance as defined by state legislatures.Define "valid excuse".
All good real core Americans are fed up,It's reasonable to wonder if this was the plan all along: Convince the rubes the election was stolen so that anything done in "response" is justified.
It's all right out in the open, too. Amazing. And once again, we can look to history for parallels.
So...OTR trucker? Oil-field worker? Airline pilot? My wife's best friend votes absentee...she's a nurse who can be required to work a double shift with no notice.Out of area for work, illness, or other circumstance as defined by state legislatures.
I vote EVERY chance I get and I don't need to show ID.Get off your ass and go vote. Show a damn id.
We as a country voted in person for many, many years and had much less of a problem than we have today. It's a cop out that people won't be able to get to the polls. You can take any one of those people, tell them there's a $1,000 check waiting for them at the other end of the state, and all they have to do is get there and present an acceptable form of ID to claim it, they would be there the next day.
We show id and the signature is verified on an ipad. Paper ballot and we put into machine for scan..I vote EVERY chance I get and I don't need to show ID.
Half the country is fantasizing? No, the fraud happened and more proof comes out every day. Your lie is done and over with.Sorry
But not engaging in your stolen election fantasies
Abusing the voting system and progressing to the destruction of your nation is not to be proud of. It is to the point that Progs have voted for people who promote their little girls raped in schools by law. That father will never forget it. And he won't forget the real police state tactics used on him. The people responsible have learned nothing from it. Every Dad who has sense and children and who loves them, sees this as a nightmare.We as a country used to clip ballots out of newspapers. We as a country did not allow women, blacks, and Native Americans to vote. Arizona, as a state has hade mail in voting for twenty years now. So I don’t see how any any of what you are saying is relevant to today.
What is more…there is some relevant history to what Arizona is attempting, and what the Arizona Republican legislator meant when he said he wanted to go back to 1958 style voting.
Navajo people have long battled for the fundamental right to vote. In Arizona, Native Americans could not fully participate in the voting process until 1970 when the United States Supreme Court upheld the Voting Rights Act prohibition on Arizona’s literacy tests as a voter qualification.Arizona's restrictive laws hurt Navajo voters. Will Congress step in to help us?
The U.S. Supreme Court decision to uphold Arizona election laws further harm Native Americans. Congress can and must undo the injustice.www.azcentral.com
If that's what the state's legislature decides, I'm fine with it...It's up to them really....Not the SoS, Not the Governor, and Not some judge, or the SC of the state....So...OTR trucker? Oil-field worker? Airline pilot? My wife's best friend votes absentee...she's a nurse who can be required to work a double shift with no notice.
Well...no, that's wrong. Courts can and will broom restrictive rules.If that's what the state's legislature decides, I'm fine with it...It's up to them really....Not the SoS, Not the Governor, and Not some judge, or the SC of the state....
He's a disciple of Goebbels: The Big Lie. Repeat it enough and it is accepted as fact.Half the country is fantasizing? No, the fraud happened and more proof comes out every day. Your lie is done and over with.
Check the constitutions of these states....You're wrong....Plus, the people don't want some unelected judge deciding their fate.Well...no, that's wrong. Courts can and will broom restrictive rules.
No, you're wrong. Federal courts can, will, and have overruled state courts.Check the constitutions of these states....You're wrong....Plus, the people don't want some unelected judge deciding their fate.
We as a country used to clip ballots out of newspapers. We as a country did not allow women, blacks, and Native Americans to vote. Arizona, as a state has hade mail in voting for twenty years now. So I don’t see how any any of what you are saying is relevant to today.
What is more…there is some relevant history to what Arizona is attempting, and what the Arizona Republican legislator meant when he said he wanted to go back to 1958 style voting.
Navajo people have long battled for the fundamental right to vote. In Arizona, Native Americans could not fully participate in the voting process until 1970 when the United States Supreme Court upheld the Voting Rights Act prohibition on Arizona’s literacy tests as a voter qualification.Arizona's restrictive laws hurt Navajo voters. Will Congress step in to help us?
The U.S. Supreme Court decision to uphold Arizona election laws further harm Native Americans. Congress can and must undo the injustice.www.azcentral.com
No, you're wrong. Federal courts can, will, and have overruled state courts.
LOOOLOOLGood. Maybe you folks won't steal another election.
Trump won.
FJB
No, you're wrong. Courts (state or Federal) override ballot restrictions all the time.Federal courts usually don't get involved in state procedures...Especially when the state constitution spells out said procedure...
Elections are local for a reason....I know you don't like that, but that is what is proper.