Republicans: Do you have a breaking point with Trump?

[bripat9643]

So you should be happy that he has adopted all of her significant policies, yes?

Trump Flips On Five Core Campaign Promises In Under 24 Hours | Zero Hedge

Where I'm standing, except for that SCOTUS pick, the nation doesn't look significantly different than it would under a Hillary presidency.

Right now, yeah. He only has so much time, though, with the 2018 elections getting into gear. If Republican congresspeople facing tough elections see in their internal polling that he's a drag on them, they'll be tough for him to deal with.

He made some pretty big promises, we'll see.
.

I agree that the morons in tHE gop will not ask themselves if they should trust the polls that were completely wrong last time.

Oh yeah, sure they will. I don't know much about polling, but localized internal polling may be more accurate than national public polling. Who knows.
.

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

You mean there's a connection between government brainwashing and being a liberal. There's nothing particularly "well educated" about them. Most of what they "know" is pure bullshit.

 

[mudwhistle]

In other words, his supporters didn't vote for him because of his policies or promises. They liked his entertainment value. He made them laugh; his speeches didn't put them to sleep. Reality TV star, willing to be rude, talks like a 3rd grader so no one is left out, tweets insults all night long. WHAT'S NOT TO LIKE?

So I could be President!!!

Oh, I was born in Canada to a Scottish\Lebanese mother and Irish\Italian Father, so no damn dice there!

Serious question: Back during the campaign, those of us who were not voting for Trump didn't believe that he'd be able to follow through on a pretty significant percentage of his promises. We were mocked, of course, but now that we know the ACA won't be repealed, that Mexico won't be paying for the wall, that Trump even backed out of requiring WE fund the wall, and that he's softening on NAFTA and NATO and other issues, I'd like to know:

Have you thought about how much leeway you'll give him on his promises before you'd stop supporting him?
.

I have understood for a long time that what someone promises during a campaign and what they can do when they are elected are very different things.

I think part of his appeal may not have even specifically about issues, per se. Part of it was like a primal scream, people who have become so frustrated with the status quo that voting for him was like flipping the bird to the system. If that's the case, the individual decisions and legislation are essentially secondary.
.

You answered your question right there and Trump was the angry vote that usually goes third party but this time some stayed in the GOP to make sure Clinton would not win!

It had more to do with Clinton than if Trump fulfilled any of his promises and the USSC picks which in my opinion is not going to make the fringe voter happy at all!

Yeah, the fallback for Trump supporters (and really, this applies to pretty much any presidency, both parties) is that, regardless how much he disappoints, they can say "at least he isn't Hillary". I get that.

I was just hoping to squeeze a little intellectual honesty out and there have been some interesting responses. So, success!

Trump's presidency is a little more interesting to me, though, because he's such a loose cannon, and loose cannons certainly can blow up both sides.
.

Well according to some I am a Trump supporter ( yeah the love I shower that pathetic excuse of human waste ), let me be honest he did not realize the job would be this hard!

5 things learned from Trump's 100-day interview

When you have someone that had no idea how difficult it was to be President tell me he is clueless and can America afford on the job training for the most important job in this nation or even in the world?

I can not say he is a miserable failure because let be factual and admit you along with me did not have high expectations for him, but as you can see now members within his own political party are unwilling to work with him on key issues like the ACA.

So will this change the minds of the red state voters at this moment?

No.

Now after the 2018 elections if there is still massive learning needed to be done by Trump, and the GOP is still having hard time to work with Trump you could see the Democrats rising and taking the Oval Office again, but only if they do not run Clinton or Warren.

Why?

Because by then Trump shine will wear off and Red Staters will be ready to either move on or not vote in 2020.

Just my opinion and hope Trump prove me wrong but so far he has shown he is clueless like me with a teenage girl at a club!

Yeah, so I've done a full search, am I the only one? I just can't seem to find the full unedited interview. Why?

The MSM tells us it is 42 minutes, I'd like to hear it all.

Fake news.

 

[mudwhistle]

Serious question: Back during the campaign, those of us who were not voting for Trump didn't believe that he'd be able to follow through on a pretty significant percentage of his promises. We were mocked, of course, but now that we know the ACA won't be repealed, that Mexico won't be paying for the wall, that Trump even backed out of requiring WE fund the wall, and that he's softening on NAFTA and NATO and other issues, I'd like to know:

Have you thought about how much leeway you'll give him on his promises before you'd stop supporting him?
.

I was heartbroken he could win any type of election in our country. That being said I was willing to give him a chance, until he assembled his cabinet. He promised to be everyone's president then surrounded himself with racists and homophobes.

You know this country is doomed when you that see people like you get to vote.

I know this country is doomed when people like you make it to adulthood. Surely such an imbecile would have caused his own demise by now, survival of the fittest. You live either a very sheltered life or you are no adult. I think the latter.

I'm rubber. You're glue . . . . . . .

What a fucking dork.

Recess time is over, Kiddo. Have a lollipop, and shut your mouth.

Thanks for the useless input, shitforbrains.

 

[edward37]

Zero point 7
Let that sink in Retarded Right Wingers.

0.7% was Trumpovitch's growth rate in his first quarterly report.

SUCKERS!

What economic policy of Trump's has Congress passed?

none SUCKER you repubs own congress and haven't done sheet

 

[Aries]

Right now, yeah. He only has so much time, though, with the 2018 elections getting into gear. If Republican congresspeople facing tough elections see in their internal polling that he's a drag on them, they'll be tough for him to deal with.

He made some pretty big promises, we'll see.
.

I agree that the morons in tHE gop will not ask themselves if they should trust the polls that were completely wrong last time.

Oh yeah, sure they will. I don't know much about polling, but localized internal polling may be more accurate than national public polling. Who knows.
.

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

You mean there's a connection between government brainwashing and being a liberal. There's nothing particularly "well educated" about them. Most of what they "know" is pure bullshit.

I have stats that support my claim, the more educated you are the more likely you are to be a dem. Do you have any facts that support your nonsensical conspiracy fantasy?

 

[Mac1958]

So I could be President!!!

Oh, I was born in Canada to a Scottish\Lebanese mother and Irish\Italian Father, so no damn dice there!

You answered your question right there and Trump was the angry vote that usually goes third party but this time some stayed in the GOP to make sure Clinton would not win!

It had more to do with Clinton than if Trump fulfilled any of his promises and the USSC picks which in my opinion is not going to make the fringe voter happy at all!

Yeah, the fallback for Trump supporters (and really, this applies to pretty much any presidency, both parties) is that, regardless how much he disappoints, they can say "at least he isn't Hillary". I get that.

I was just hoping to squeeze a little intellectual honesty out and there have been some interesting responses. So, success!

Trump's presidency is a little more interesting to me, though, because he's such a loose cannon, and loose cannons certainly can blow up both sides.
.

I don't feel any disappointment. I just think you folks expect too much from him and don't expect anything from Democrats. So what if they lie to us. We expect that, right?

I have no use for either party, or either end of the spectrum. Indeed, both ends are hypocrites, as you point out.

I can, however, honestly say that I hope the country does great. Regardless of the political affiliation of the current temporary White House occupant.
.

I think your heart is in the right place but you're ideology is out in the weeds.

He comes in this forum and submit post after post attacking all the garbage that Hillary supports, and then he goes and votes for the beast.

Actually, the link on the second line of my sig proves your post to be incorrect.

You can click on that and read my stands on several positions, or you can remain aggressively ignorant, your call.
.

 

[mudwhistle]

So you should be happy that he has adopted all of her significant policies, yes?

Trump Flips On Five Core Campaign Promises In Under 24 Hours | Zero Hedge

Where I'm standing, except for that SCOTUS pick, the nation doesn't look significantly different than it would under a Hillary presidency.

Right now, yeah. He only has so much time, though, with the 2018 elections getting into gear. If Republican congresspeople facing tough elections see in their internal polling that he's a drag on them, they'll be tough for him to deal with.

He made some pretty big promises, we'll see.
.

I agree that the morons in tHE gop will not ask themselves if they should trust the polls that were completely wrong last time.

Oh yeah, sure they will. I don't know much about polling, but localized internal polling may be more accurate than national public polling. Who knows.
.

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

If that's so, why do you folks try to shut down opposing viewpoints using violence? Doesn't take an Einstein to act like a thug.

Apparently you think just voting for a cretin like Hillary jacks up your I.Q. 30 points.

 

[edward37]

I don't have words to describe how much I disliked aligning myself politically with the Regressives by voting for Hillary, seriously.

I would have much preferred to vote third party, but I was going to vote for Hillary if either Trump or Cruz got the nomination.

Politics have been one long, horrific fucking nightmare for me since the day Trump came down that escalator.
.

If 2020 has Trump running against some lefty that does excuse making for the street violence we have seen in Berkeley, will that be your breaking point with the dems?

I'd most likely vote third party. I just don't see myself voting for Trump.

But I'm happy to be proven wrong.
.

Wouldnt be the first time, bud.

Yep.

How about you?
.

I learned Trump's language. Only an idiot takes him too literally. The press uses it against him, but it allows him to accomplish what nobody else can or will accomplish.

Try reading his book. It's still available on Amazon.

1st quarter is in and he accomplished ZERO POINT 7,,,,,lol

 

[bripat9643]

I agree that the morons in tHE gop will not ask themselves if they should trust the polls that were completely wrong last time.

Oh yeah, sure they will. I don't know much about polling, but localized internal polling may be more accurate than national public polling. Who knows.
.

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

You mean there's a connection between government brainwashing and being a liberal. There's nothing particularly "well educated" about them. Most of what they "know" is pure bullshit.

I have stats that support my claim, the more educated you are the more likely you are to be a dem. Do you have any facts that support your nonsense?

"More educated" means more government brainwashing. Of course the longer you spend in the rolling mills of government propaganda, the more you come to believe the horseshit being fed to you.

 

[bripat9643]

Right now, yeah. He only has so much time, though, with the 2018 elections getting into gear. If Republican congresspeople facing tough elections see in their internal polling that he's a drag on them, they'll be tough for him to deal with.

He made some pretty big promises, we'll see.
.

I agree that the morons in tHE gop will not ask themselves if they should trust the polls that were completely wrong last time.

Oh yeah, sure they will. I don't know much about polling, but localized internal polling may be more accurate than national public polling. Who knows.
.

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

If that's so, why do you folks try to shut down opposing viewpoints using violence? Doesn't take an Einstein to act like a thug.

Apparently you think just voting for a cretin like Hillary jacks up your I.Q. 30 points.

Their ideas are so persuasive that they can't bear to hear anyone contradicting them.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah, the fallback for Trump supporters (and really, this applies to pretty much any presidency, both parties) is that, regardless how much he disappoints, they can say "at least he isn't Hillary". I get that.

I was just hoping to squeeze a little intellectual honesty out and there have been some interesting responses. So, success!

Trump's presidency is a little more interesting to me, though, because he's such a loose cannon, and loose cannons certainly can blow up both sides.
.

I don't feel any disappointment. I just think you folks expect too much from him and don't expect anything from Democrats. So what if they lie to us. We expect that, right?

I have no use for either party, or either end of the spectrum. Indeed, both ends are hypocrites, as you point out.

I can, however, honestly say that I hope the country does great. Regardless of the political affiliation of the current temporary White House occupant.
.

I think your heart is in the right place but you're ideology is out in the weeds.

He comes in this forum and submit post after post attacking all the garbage that Hillary supports, and then he goes and votes for the beast.

Actually, the link on the second line of my sig proves your post to be incorrect.

You can click on that and read my stands on several positions, or you can remain aggressively ignorant, your call.
.

There's no link.

 

[Mac1958]

I don't feel any disappointment. I just think you folks expect too much from him and don't expect anything from Democrats. So what if they lie to us. We expect that, right?

I have no use for either party, or either end of the spectrum. Indeed, both ends are hypocrites, as you point out.

I can, however, honestly say that I hope the country does great. Regardless of the political affiliation of the current temporary White House occupant.
.

I think your heart is in the right place but you're ideology is out in the weeds.

He comes in this forum and submit post after post attacking all the garbage that Hillary supports, and then he goes and votes for the beast.

Actually, the link on the second line of my sig proves your post to be incorrect.

You can click on that and read my stands on several positions, or you can remain aggressively ignorant, your call.
.

There's no link.

Second line of sig, Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum, works for me.

 

[Aries]

Oh yeah, sure they will. I don't know much about polling, but localized internal polling may be more accurate than national public polling. Who knows.
.

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

You mean there's a connection between government brainwashing and being a liberal. There's nothing particularly "well educated" about them. Most of what they "know" is pure bullshit.

I have stats that support my claim, the more educated you are the more likely you are to be a dem. Do you have any facts that support your nonsense?

"More educated" means more government brainwashing. Of course the longer you spend in the rolling mills of government propaganda, the more you come to believe the horseshit being fed to you.

I know you'd like to think that everything is rigged against you. Bottom line though friend, some people just aren't cut out for school, like you. Hopefully you picked up a trade young and mastered it, or else someone so clearly paranoid, uniformed, and unintelligent as yourself would only be adding to the number of unemployed welfare suckers.

 

[Mr Natural]

"More educated" means more government brainwashing. Of course the longer you spend in the rolling mills of government propaganda, the more you come to believe the horseshit being fed to you.

Horseshit?

You mean like science, math, engineering, accounting, law, medicine, finance?

That kind of horseshit?

 

[Crixus]

Serious question: Back during the campaign, those of us who were not voting for Trump didn't believe that he'd be able to follow through on a pretty significant percentage of his promises. We were mocked, of course, but now that we know the ACA won't be repealed, that Mexico won't be paying for the wall, that Trump even backed out of requiring WE fund the wall, and that he's softening on NAFTA and NATO and other issues, I'd like to know:

Have you thought about how much leeway you'll give him on his promises before you'd stop supporting him?
.

Don't forget to mention that some of those who campaigned and donated to Trump are even talking about taking back to heir endorsements. Trump has not drained the swamp, all he did was jump in.

Yeah.....however, we've been hearing these lies about him for so long that we're tuned out to them now.

We know that Washington's a mess. Anybody would look bad trying to deal with all of the two-faced back-stabbers.

Can't say they are liars. Trumps own words were quite clear on that he topics that are costing him support. He would do well to do what he promised and really drain the swamp. All he is doing now is reaferming the Democrat parties rise from the ashes.

I guess it's fruitless to tell you that everything is not what it seems.

Trump doesn’t have Fox News to back him up. Fox News is working for the enemy now.

Oh I agree. Foux never was Trumps friend. I'll give Trump the benifet of the doubt for now, but it's hard when he comes out in support of DOCA after promising to undo the Obama executive amnesty. He simply has to sign an EO and DOCA is gone. He will not. His HHS guy need only rip as much of the guts out of ACA as he can with the authority he has, yet isn't. There in the SCOTUS, but I am not comfortable with that until I see him on a case. I'm expecting a John Roberts type surprise.

 

[mudwhistle]

If 2020 has Trump running against some lefty that does excuse making for the street violence we have seen in Berkeley, will that be your breaking point with the dems?

I'd most likely vote third party. I just don't see myself voting for Trump.

But I'm happy to be proven wrong.
.

Wouldnt be the first time, bud.

Yep.

How about you?
.

I learned Trump's language. Only an idiot takes him too literally. The press uses it against him, but it allows him to accomplish what nobody else can or will accomplish.

Try reading his book. It's still available on Amazon.

1st quarter is in and he accomplished ZERO POINT 7,,,,,lol

If you say so.

How well did Obama do in his first quarter?

 

[mudwhistle]

Serious question: Back during the campaign, those of us who were not voting for Trump didn't believe that he'd be able to follow through on a pretty significant percentage of his promises. We were mocked, of course, but now that we know the ACA won't be repealed, that Mexico won't be paying for the wall, that Trump even backed out of requiring WE fund the wall, and that he's softening on NAFTA and NATO and other issues, I'd like to know:

Have you thought about how much leeway you'll give him on his promises before you'd stop supporting him?
.

Don't forget to mention that some of those who campaigned and donated to Trump are even talking about taking back to heir endorsements. Trump has not drained the swamp, all he did was jump in.

Yeah.....however, we've been hearing these lies about him for so long that we're tuned out to them now.

We know that Washington's a mess. Anybody would look bad trying to deal with all of the two-faced back-stabbers.

Can't say they are liars. Trumps own words were quite clear on that he topics that are costing him support. He would do well to do what he promised and really drain the swamp. All he is doing now is reaferming the Democrat parties rise from the ashes.

I guess it's fruitless to tell you that everything is not what it seems.

Trump doesn’t have Fox News to back him up. Fox News is working for the enemy now.

Oh I agree. Foux never was Trumps friend. I'll give Trump the benifet of the doubt for now, but it's hard when he comes out in support of DOCA after promising to undo the Obama executive amnesty. He simply has to sign an EO and DOCA is gone. He will not. His HHS guy need only rip as much of the guts out of ACA as he can with the authority he has, yet isn't. There in the SCOTUS, but I am not comfortable with that until I see him on a case. I'm expecting a John Roberts type surprise.

Hiding under a fucking rock are we?

Every important EO Trump signs results in a stay from an Obama judge.

So quit being a silly fuck

 

[Crixus]

Don't forget to mention that some of those who campaigned and donated to Trump are even talking about taking back to heir endorsements. Trump has not drained the swamp, all he did was jump in.

Yeah.....however, we've been hearing these lies about him for so long that we're tuned out to them now.

We know that Washington's a mess. Anybody would look bad trying to deal with all of the two-faced back-stabbers.

Can't say they are liars. Trumps own words were quite clear on that he topics that are costing him support. He would do well to do what he promised and really drain the swamp. All he is doing now is reaferming the Democrat parties rise from the ashes.

I guess it's fruitless to tell you that everything is not what it seems.

Trump doesn’t have Fox News to back him up. Fox News is working for the enemy now.

Oh I agree. Foux never was Trumps friend. I'll give Trump the benifet of the doubt for now, but it's hard when he comes out in support of DOCA after promising to undo the Obama executive amnesty. He simply has to sign an EO and DOCA is gone. He will not. His HHS guy need only rip as much of the guts out of ACA as he can with the authority he has, yet isn't. There in the SCOTUS, but I am not comfortable with that until I see him on a case. I'm expecting a John Roberts type surprise.

Hiding under a fucking rock are we?

Every important EO Trump signs results in a stay from an Obama judge.

So quit being a silly fuck l.

Calm down Teumpkin, I said I am giving him the benifet of the doubt, but im not expecting anything other then the norm. He could still sign the EO and get it in line world court with the other EO's. He didn't. He came out openly supporting DOCA.

 

[MisterBeale]

So you should be happy that he has adopted all of her significant policies, yes?

Trump Flips On Five Core Campaign Promises In Under 24 Hours | Zero Hedge

Where I'm standing, except for that SCOTUS pick, the nation doesn't look significantly different than it would under a Hillary presidency.

Right now, yeah. He only has so much time, though, with the 2018 elections getting into gear. If Republican congresspeople facing tough elections see in their internal polling that he's a drag on them, they'll be tough for him to deal with.

He made some pretty big promises, we'll see.
.

I agree that the morons in tHE gop will not ask themselves if they should trust the polls that were completely wrong last time.

Oh yeah, sure they will. I don't know much about polling, but localized internal polling may be more accurate than national public polling. Who knows.
.

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

One of my "liberal" friends posted this link in my timeline;

The Media Bubble Is Real — And Worse Than You Think

That is the echo chamber of liberalism.

This is the reality of history though.

First, the POV of the establishment, minimizing the scandalous nature of what they are doing.

U.S. Repeals Propaganda Ban, Spreads Government-Made News to Americans



Now for a dose of the truth.

Carl Bernstein

Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban

Unclaimed Territory - by Glenn Greenwald: Press corrupted by fake news, America yawns

Video news releases - SourceWatch

You do know that Anderson Cooper is CIA, right?

You do know that CNN gave Donna Brazil the debate questions to share with Hillary, yes?

This has nothing to do with "well educated and literate adult, and being liberal."

This has to do with pushing an authoritarian pro- police state perspective.

 

[bripat9643]

All the media is doing now is trying to gin up anti-Trump sentiment. Female Fox News pundits for the most part are against him. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity still back him up, but that's it.

Face it. Almost every journalist is a liberal. Any that aren't are under assault.

"almost every journalist is a liberal"

Correct. There seems to be a direct connection between being a well educated and literate adult, and being liberal.

You mean there's a connection between government brainwashing and being a liberal. There's nothing particularly "well educated" about them. Most of what they "know" is pure bullshit.

I have stats that support my claim, the more educated you are the more likely you are to be a dem. Do you have any facts that support your nonsense?

"More educated" means more government brainwashing. Of course the longer you spend in the rolling mills of government propaganda, the more you come to believe the horseshit being fed to you.

I know you'd like to think that everything is rigged against you. Bottom line though friend, some people just aren't cut out for school, like you. Hopefully you picked up a trade young and mastered it, or else someone so clearly paranoid, uniformed, and intelligent as yourself would only be adding to the number of unemployed welfare suckers.

I have an engineering degree, dumbass.

Universities are rigged against conservatives. Government takes our money and then uses it to brainwash the public to maintain itself in power. Government run universities and elementary schools are the way it does that.

Of course, douche bags like you like to pretend everything is on the up-and-up because brainwashing doesn't work when you know you are being brainwashed. that's why the snow flakes cry like babies whenever someone comes on campus and tells students the facts of reality.