Mr. Shaman
Senior Member
- May 4, 2010
- 23,892
- 822
- 48
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gu2ouJNmXc]Easy Rider (4/8) Movie CLIP - You Represent Freedom (1969) HD - YouTube[/ame]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one is coming for your guns. No one is even saying they are coming for your guns. The only voices who are saying someone is coming for your guns are the ones on the syndicated Idiot Network and the ones in your head.
So if a politician makes a tough guy stand about what he is going to do when they come for your guns, he's basically scooping up the Gullible Rube vote. It's free money lying in the street to those guys.What do you think universal registration is about?No one is coming for your guns. No one is even saying they are coming for your guns.
You haven't been watching the news have you?
Actually, I have been watching the news. You have obviously been listening to the Idiot Network instead.
Please show me they are coming for the guns you own. Show me they are changing ANYTHING AT ALL about the guns you own.
So some misguided idiots think gay marriage is ok, and I'm supposed to accept that?
Sorry that duck don't fly.
You can accept or reject as you see fit. But by every metric, acceptance of homosexuals and support for Same-sex Civil Marriage is on the rise as a function of population. In the early part of the 2000's initiatives/referendums/amendments conducted during general elections passed with margins of victory of (IIRC) 23-76%. By 2008/2009 initiatives in general elections were down to passing where less than a 3% shift in voting results would have changed the outcome (California Prop 8, Maine Question 1). In 2012 Same-sex Civil Marriage questions were on the general election ballot in 4 states and won in all 4 (3 approving SSCM directly and the 4th rejecting an Amendment to bar it).
Not only to the opinion polls show the change, voter reactions in the ballot boxes during general elections also reflect the change in attitudes.
>>>>
California Prop 8? Did some circuit court judge over rule the majority of the people?
North Carolina Amendment 1 passed with a strong majority.
I challenge you to man up and answer this question:
Was being gay more acceptable in 1953, or is it more acceptable now in 2013?
Which way is the tide moving?
Is it more acceptable to be a drug addict today than in 1953? How about a serial womanizer?
It was much more acceptable in 1953 to be a drug addict (ie alcohol) than in 2013. Remember how folks used to drink during their lunch break and it'd be OK? That stuff doesn't fly anymore.
Serial Womanizer? 1953 without a doubt. Think of the roles of men/women then as they compare to now...
What do you think universal registration is about?
You haven't been watching the news have you?
Actually, I have been watching the news. You have obviously been listening to the Idiot Network instead.
Please show me they are coming for the guns you own. Show me they are changing ANYTHING AT ALL about the guns you own.
I live in North Carolina my guns are safe, but what about citizens in states like New York, California, Colorado, And their are a couple of other states that have mandatory confiscation of certain firearms.
You can accept or reject as you see fit. But by every metric, acceptance of homosexuals and support for Same-sex Civil Marriage is on the rise as a function of population. In the early part of the 2000's initiatives/referendums/amendments conducted during general elections passed with margins of victory of (IIRC) 23-76%. By 2008/2009 initiatives in general elections were down to passing where less than a 3% shift in voting results would have changed the outcome (California Prop 8, Maine Question 1). In 2012 Same-sex Civil Marriage questions were on the general election ballot in 4 states and won in all 4 (3 approving SSCM directly and the 4th rejecting an Amendment to bar it).
Not only to the opinion polls show the change, voter reactions in the ballot boxes during general elections also reflect the change in attitudes.
>>>>
California Prop 8? Did some circuit court judge over rule the majority of the people?
North Carolina Amendment 1 passed with a strong majority.
North Carolina is no better than a third world nation.
You can accept or reject as you see fit. But by every metric, acceptance of homosexuals and support for Same-sex Civil Marriage is on the rise as a function of population. In the early part of the 2000's initiatives/referendums/amendments conducted during general elections passed with margins of victory of (IIRC) 23-76%. By 2008/2009 initiatives in general elections were down to passing where less than a 3% shift in voting results would have changed the outcome (California Prop 8, Maine Question 1). In 2012 Same-sex Civil Marriage questions were on the general election ballot in 4 states and won in all 4 (3 approving SSCM directly and the 4th rejecting an Amendment to bar it).
Not only to the opinion polls show the change, voter reactions in the ballot boxes during general elections also reflect the change in attitudes.
>>>>
California Prop 8? Did some circuit court judge over rule the majority of the people?
North Carolina Amendment 1 passed with a strong majority.
North Carolina is no better than a third world nation.
Look pal I don't give a fuck what you say your in. The federal government has been warned by many civilian law enforcement what will happen. You are one that might be in the military their are many more that are not like you who will fight against you.First you better be more concerned with the civil war that is coming.
Between this and the gun issue there is a tender box
Ah, the civil war porn that you fringe right wingers masturbate to.
Look pal, I'm in the Army, deployed three time, the whole nine. If there is some revolt and you summon up the balls to crawl out of your trailer, worried is about the last thing I'll be when I take you out.
Actually, I have been watching the news. You have obviously been listening to the Idiot Network instead.
Please show me they are coming for the guns you own. Show me they are changing ANYTHING AT ALL about the guns you own.
I live in North Carolina my guns are safe, but what about citizens in states like New York, California, Colorado, And their are a couple of other states that have mandatory confiscation of certain firearms.
Link?
And you said the "federal" government. The sheriffs were going to fight the feds.
See you have not been watching the newsLink?
And you said the "federal" government. The sheriffs were going to fight the feds.
Look pal I don't give a fuck what you say your in. The federal government has been warned by many civilian law enforcement what will happen. You are one that might be in the military their are many more that are not like you who will fight against you.Ah, the civil war porn that you fringe right wingers masturbate to.
Look pal, I'm in the Army, deployed three time, the whole nine. If there is some revolt and you summon up the balls to crawl out of your trailer, worried is about the last thing I'll be when I take you out.
^ What passes for English in the third world state of North Carolina.
You missed that english comprehension course didn't you?Look pal I don't give a fuck what you say your in. The federal government has been warned by many civilian law enforcement what will happen. You are one that might be in the military their are many more that are not like you who will fight against you.Ah, the civil war porn that you fringe right wingers masturbate to.
Look pal, I'm in the Army, deployed three time, the whole nine. If there is some revolt and you summon up the balls to crawl out of your trailer, worried is about the last thing I'll be when I take you out.
^ What passes for English in the third world state of North Carolina.
Is it more acceptable to be a drug addict today than in 1953? How about a serial womanizer?
It was much more acceptable in 1953 to be a drug addict (ie alcohol) than in 2013. Remember how folks used to drink during their lunch break and it'd be OK? That stuff doesn't fly anymore.
Serial Womanizer? 1953 without a doubt. Think of the roles of men/women then as they compare to now...
In 1953 a man who was divorced and cheated on his wife couldn't even get a job and certainly had no friends.
There were social consequences completely outside of the law.
Look pal I don't give a fuck what you say your in. The federal government has been warned by many civilian law enforcement what will happen. You are one that might be in the military their are many more that are not like you who will fight against you.
^ What passes for English in the third world state of North Carolina.
Been down that road with him.
He says that correct English is not important.
Which explains a great deal.
.
According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.
By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.
The popular opinion regarding slavery in the United States is that it was a simple matter of racial oppression of blacks by whites. However, the presence of black slaveholders in North America prior to the Civil War shows that slavery was not based solely on color but on economics. Black slave owners, for the most part, were complicities in support of the institution deriving from it wealth and privileges denied to other groups.
Unspoken Reality: Black Slaveholders Prior to the Civil War
The first slave owner in what became the United States was John Rolfe of Jamestown. Now you say he was a black man??????? Since when?
According to colonial records the first slave owner was a black man by the name of Anthony Johnson in 1651.
I live in North Carolina my guns are safe, but what about citizens in states like New York, California, Colorado, And their are a couple of other states that have mandatory confiscation of certain firearms.
Link?
And you said the "federal" government. The sheriffs were going to fight the feds.
See you have not been watching the newsLink?
And you said the "federal" government. The sheriffs were going to fight the feds.
Yes I said the feds but the states are the testing grounds
I never said it was going to happen over night, but it's coming.
Ah, the civil war porn that you fringe right wingers masturbate to.
Look pal, I'm in the Army, deployed three time, the whole nine. If there is some revolt and you summon up the balls to crawl out of your trailer, worried is about the last thing I'll be when I take you out.
Isn't it just wonderful what these loons think of you? Any day now, the DHS and the US Army are going to be shooting us all with 1.6 billion rounds of ammuntion, and locking the rest of us up in FEMA camps and roughing us up.
Good times.
Only a loon thinks it's not going too happen.
Link?
Every time I post that, people find it so unbelievable that they ask for links....which I then provide:
http://nctsn.org/nctsn_assets/pdfs/caring/ChildSexualAbuseFactSheet.pdf
You assume too much
I ask because I was interested in the percentages. It still in no way takes away the fact that men who molest boys are indeed homosexuals, per the definition I provided.
^ What passes for English in the third world state of North Carolina.
Been down that road with him.
He says that correct English is not important.
Which explains a great deal.
.
OH and here we have one that doesn't understand what illiterate means. When you learn the meaning then you can come back and nitpick what AND HOW I POST UNTIL THEN GO FUCK YOURSELF.