Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
www.rawstory.com
Twenty-four hours after a conservative Supreme Court issued a controversial and unpopular 6-3 ruling that dismantled the 50-year-old Roe v Wade decision that gave women the right to an abortion no matter where they lived, a longtime anti-choice activist attempted to make the case on CNN that taking away a woman's right to choose is actually a good thing.
We don't care if people die. ANTIFA in Washington DC. Many examples there.
There are negative liberties and positive liberties , where negative liberties represent protections from either government or from other individuals , where positive liberties represent endowments .Spoil Alert; You don't have to be a citizen in order to be Constitutionally Entitled to the equal protection of our laws.
www.usmessageboard.com
Eagle, I don't waste my time on some of these so called member's. But that's just me... lolYour side pushing forever got us here. Keep pushing and the push from our side will be epic.
About time your side STFU and compromise on a final outcome. Or we will just push you into the stinking bleachers.
Whatever you want. Take a look around..........people are not happy with you right now.
My IGGY LIST IS VERY LARGE. But that is just me ...........lolEagle, I don't waste my time on some of these so called member's. But that's just me... lol
just pointing out his hypocrisy is all,here he is telling someone here not to believe the lamestream media yet when it comes to that particular topic,despite the mountains of evidence thats says otherwise,he believes the propaganda of the CIA controlled media. If that is not hypocrisy i dont know what is.Wat.
Nice attempt at muddying the water but the point of Wo Vs Hopkins (and laws against abortion) ultimately come down to the right of all persons to the "equal protection" of our laws." Perhaps Better Luck Next Time "
* Stipulations In Different Forms Of Liberty *
There are negative liberties and positive liberties , where negative liberties represent protections from either government or from other individuals , where positive liberties represent endowments .
Republicanism asserts that negative liberties are to be equally protected and dissents that positive liberties may not be equally endowed .
Illegal migrants are entitled to equal protections but are not entitled to endowments , for social subsistence ( {{meta.fullTitle}} ) , which should also extend to their children receiving jus sanguinin citizenship from the country of the mother , when the parents are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , when the " subject to us jurisdiction " clause of us 14th amendment is correctly applied .
* Brush Up References *
" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments "
Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments
" Would A Legal Challenge of Subject To Contract Clause Of Us 14th Amendment Succeed ? "
Would A Legal Challenge of Subject To Contract Clause Of Us 14th Amendment Succeed ?
" Would A Legal Challenge of Subject To Contract Clause Of Us 14th Amendment Succeed ? " * Opining Proposition * Enforce " subject to contract " clause of us 14th amendment and provide children birthed by an illegal migrant citizenship to the country of their mother . To avoid humanitarian...
uh you have a really bad memory,do i REALLY have to go back to all the posts you have posted in the past and repost them where you said oswald did it?You may be confused.
I have never voiced much of an opinion about the JFK assassination. I think the only thing I have ever said was there seems to be some credible evidence that the shot that killed Kennedy MAY have been a negligent discharge from a Secret Service agent in the trailing vehicle. However, I don't know.
What the hell does that have to do with the Supreme Court decision today?
uhhh you went and told that person not to believe the lamestream medias propganda yet thats all YOU ever do when it comes to the jfk assassination,i know MANY people here that have laughed at you for saying in thepast oswald did it.dont deny it.I could care less about the JFK assassination. I was probably ridiculing you for being a silly JFK conspiracy nut. God know there are a bunch around.uh you have a really bad memory,do i REALLY have to go back to all the posts you have posted in the past and repost them where you said oswald did it?
dont try and change the fact your being the a hypocrite here telling that person he should notlisten to what the LAMESTREAM propaganda CIA controlled media says when you do the same thing when it comes to oswald and when its proven to you that you are wrong and he is innocent,you always run off unable to admit you are wrong.
How about reading some of the previous responses in this thread , or perhaps you want special attention ?
usmessageboard.com
We don't care if people die. ANTIFA in Washington DC. Many examples there.
NoI am concerned about those women who miscarry their babies through no fault of their own.
Are they going to be treated as criminals until they prove their innocence?
I could care less about the JFK assassination. I was probably ridiculing you for being a silly JFK conspiracy nut. God know there are a bunch around.
This thread is not about the JFK assassination. It is about the Supremes overturning the R v W decision. If you want to me to ridicule you some more about your silly JFK theories then start another thread.
,not only did witnesses say they saw him shot from the front but all the dallas doctors said the entrance wound came from the FRONT moron.SO stop with the lies that you are ridculing me when it is me rediculing YOU.
www.usmessageboard.com
I was bantering politicians and arguing with wasps long before 2002 when title 1 section 8 statute was put in place , and it was largely put in place to simply shut up the moral majority , which is neither , about a diabolical scheme to redefine a basic , a'prior , political science , civics 101 deduction about a contingent relationship between a state and citizens .Nice attempt at muddying the water but the point of Wo Vs Hopkins (and laws against abortion) ultimately come down to the right of all persons to the "equal protection" of our laws.
Your inserted PAP about "endowments" is unwarranted, meritless and easily spotted as the diversion attempt that it was.
I rest my case how you play dodgeball that you are a hypocrite.I could care less about the JFK assassination. I was probably ridiculing you for being a silly JFK conspiracy nut. God know there are a bunch around.
This thread is not about the JFK assassination. It is about the Supremes overturning the R v W decision. If you want to me to ridicule you some more about your silly JFK theories then start another thread.
Not true pain in the womb has been dected as early as 16 to 18 weeks." Belief Does Not Expect Proof "
* Histology Determined Autonomic Thalamus To Higher Order Cortex *
https://serendipstudio.org/local/scisoc/brownbag/brownbag0506/fetalpain.pdf
Thalamocortical fibers begin appearing between 23 to 30 weeks’ gestational age, while electroencephalography suggests the capacity for functional pain perception in preterm neonates probably does not exist before 29 or 30 weeks.
Regardless of whether the emotional content of pain is acquired, the psychological nature of pain presupposes the presence of functional thalamocortical circuitry required for conscious perception, as discussed below.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalamocortical_radiations
Really? I can see a bunch of self righteous finger waggers being a bunch of jerks...
There's no challenging at this end. The need of the woman and the need of the men is that they need to remember how to prevent unwanted pregnancies again. I used the word hopefully because those seeking an abortion are not the brightest of society. Basic sex education is, well, basic. Are you claiming the 10 men gang banged the woman, this she needs an abortion?You seem to be a bit challenged here.
Why does the need of the woman in Colorado get overshadowed by the need of ten men in Maine.
Your response was to what you "hoped" for. My question asked how the pro-life men in Maine were affected, and you proved to be a failure at answering that question.
If you lack the intellectual agility to respond to the actual question, it's okay to say so. But giving some unrelated response is really no response at all...
You see what your biases force you to see. You need to whip yourselves and others into hysteria because your arguments don't hold up to reason and logicReally? I can see a bunch of self righteous finger waggers being a bunch of jerks
