Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would you agree with Spock, "The Needs of the Many Outweigh the Needs of the Few"?
Correct but it would be disingenuous to imply that as a result of this ruling that abortion won't be outlawed in a number of states.The SC did not outlaw abortions.
That's the decision of the individual as rights are individual rights in America.Would you agree with Spock, "The Needs of the Many Outweigh the Needs of the Few"?
Each state will get to decide for themselves.Rape only contributes to a tiny tiny percentage of abortions, barely 1%, yet it comes out 100% of the time to support abortion.
Jesse Jackson was conceived from rape and he went on to do great things that 99% of the population have never done, and many would have aborted him.
Federalist #10I agree, that is why Congress need to be more diligent in doing their job and working together to find agreement on both sides, instead of going to extremes. The small percentage of extremists are killing America.
Beat me to it!
Good job!
Jennifer Pizer, Acting Chief Legal Officer, Lambda Legal, issued the following statement:
“The damage wrought by today’s ruling is incalculable. As we warned when a draft was leaked in May, people will die as a result of this ruling. More than half the states are already poised to ban or at least severely restrict abortion access, forcing patients to travel hundreds of miles out of state or to continue pregnancies against their will. Officials in some states have even suggested they will move to prevent pregnant people from leaving. We are seeing the threat of a radical, totalitarian state more and more resembling Gilead of The Handmaid’s Tale. If we want to retain any shred of gender equality and personal freedom, every one of us must raise our voices and engage.”
While the reversing of Roe is correct, many don't know why the court took up this at all at this time. It wasn't done with political actions at all. This helps abortion Democrat Party in November because it riles up their base and the ignorant. So, to blame Trump or Republicans is complete wrong. The court didn't do this to help Republicans.Most of the states will allow abortions in first trimester
There are about a dozes states on the east coast, west coast, and serval in the mid section that will not restrict abortion. There are also about a dozen more that will have limited restrictions. The remainder of the states mostly in the south will band abortion entirely. However, the abortion pill can now be sent legally through the mail so a number of countries which sell the pills over the counter will sell them in the US. For those who choose not to use the abortion bill, they can always get an abortion from the states that don't restrict abortions. Planned Parenthood and other organizations are there to help those with financial problems.
With the overturning of Roe v Wade I doubt that the number of abortions will decrease significantly. However we won't really know for sure since abortions via the pill will remain unknown
Non-viable? When babies are that defected, they die before birth and abortions have to be performed anyways. So, what do you mean non-viable? You mean they will be severely handicapped and a burden on society? Sick people who think that way. Heck, why don't Democrats just write bills to kill the handicap off now that can't support themselves on their own? We are truly a sick and perverted generation.The most necessary ones are often the ones least wanted, the happily married mother of other children who finds out on her 20 week check-up that the child has a genetic defect that makes it non-viable. Those are the worse abortions, expecting and wanting a baby and having a funeral instead.
Who??....................Besides the best vacation time in the industry, the retirement benefits here are primoThanks for demonstrating the reason we need moderators.
A+
Both were stupid examples, did not really see the need to address them both.
As we have just seen, precedence means nothing to the court.
I hope the effect on all, irrelevant of State, is to hopefully make them remember how to prevent unwanted pregnancies again. But will they have the brains?Do I agree with a fictional character?
No, I do not.
But since you brought it up, how does a woman getting an abortion in Colorado adversely affect a hundred men, who are pro-life, in Maine?
Is it just my imagination, or are liberal women generally less attractive? (Not that I’m perfect….my doctor says I need to lose 10 pounds, and ideally 15. But not 150 like I see in the photo!)Most of these beasts could not possibly get impregnated by anything walking on 2 legs. Perhaps on 4 legs, but never 2
Lambda Legal: “People Will Die”
Lambda Legal today condemned the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, severely undermining more than 50 years of individual liberty, bodily autonomy, and gender equality rights. Jennifer Pizer,...www.lambdalegal.org
Way less attractive both inside and out. Still stop some vids of a number on both sides and seeIs it just my imagination, or are liberal women generally less attractive? (Not that I’m perfect….my doctor says I need to lose 10 pounds, and ideally 15. But not 150 like I see in the photo!)
The exception is Tulsi Gabbard. She’s actually quite pretty. Too bad the Dems didn’t make her the VP, but wrong color.
Change "democrats" to liberals and you hit the nail right on the headIt looks like the Democrats are still waiting to post on here until they are given their direction on what to think and say.
convenience ? What the hell are you talking about?
View attachment 662230
That's Priceless!
Apparently, "Equality" is more of a matter of convenience and less of a matter of biology or anything else.
lolWimpy decision by the court
Your now half way home...all ya have to do is stop pretending you were worried about the life of the mother and admit it was nothing more than for convenience sake.If Abortion is immoral……say it is immoral and outlaw it
It makes plenty more sense than pretending the constitution allows for and provides a right to abortion...which, for matters of convenience" I would like to see stay legalLetting 50 states determine morality makes no sense
It is very convenient for "Lamda Legal" to maintain a denial of children in the womb, as they claim to be "Making the Case for Equality."convenience ? What the hell are you talking about?
