Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[Esdraelon]

What will happen now is the call for abortion rights to be codified into law.

Which is what should have happened long ago. It's kind of how our Republic works, after all. If the majority support it, let it become law.

 

[Esdraelon]

It’s not. Actual abortions of nearly full term babies are much more horrendous.

If even the most rabid abortion supporters were forced to watch late term "procedures", they'd never advocate for them again - IF they have any humanity left at all.

 

[Blues Man]

The law deciding that murder is wrong.

You have to first decide if a fetus is a person with constitutional rights.

 

[Jets]

Not exactly shocked it’s getting overturned. It was only a matter of when…

 

[Sunsettommy]

View attachment 639658

Which is fine since that was done at the STATE level where it should be, but it was a limited abortion law at the time which you didn't know.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It should never have been a federal issue. Its a state issue.

You blue staters hate the red states anyways, so dont pretend you care about abortion being legal in Mississippi.

You do you, leave the other states the fuck alone.

 

[Cecilie1200]

It's up to the women now. This could get interesting.

Actually, if the Supreme Court actually decides to overturn Roe v. Wade, it's going to be up to the states.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why not wait til Dec 22?! Of course idiot Biden will go over the top and forgive college debt. The idiocy in the WH is unprecedented. Almost as dumb was giving all that money to ARod and Ellsbury.

Because Supreme Court decisions on cases they've heard are released at a specific time, I believe.

 

[BackAgain]

You have to first decide if a fetus is a person with constitutional rights.

Which is a determination which this new decision (if actually the one that is handed down) returns to the States.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You think? I figure it was somebody working for the conservative side, knowing conservatives would be tickled sh#tless to hear it, like Christmas in May.

How could leaking a copy of that draft early possibly benefit conservatives?

 

[Cecilie1200]

You do not have any concept of how the Court guards it's integrity. Justice Roberts would have her tit and the wringer.

The legal profession in general, even the sleazy ambulance chaser types, are shocked by this breach of ethics.

 

[Blues Man]

If even the most rabid abortion supporters were forced to watch late term "procedures", they'd never advocate for them again - IF they have any humanity left at all.

Less than 1% of abortions take place after 21 weeks

Most abortions actually take place in the first 6 weeks of pregnancy 99% take place by week 20

 

[Blues Man]

Which is a determination which this new decision (if actually the one that is handed down) returns to the States.

Does it?

I don;t think it specifically says that nor should it.

 

[Lakhota]

Chief Justice John Roberts Confirms Leaked Draft Opinion On Abortion Is Authentic​

Confirmed.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

View attachment 639648

Amen!

Cool meme bro! Yet republicans have had control of all 3 branches of government and everything in you’re silly little meme is still funded. Yet another leftist lie easily destroyed with facts.

 

[task0778]

Does it?

I don;t think it specifically says that nor should it.

Why not? Why shouldn't each state make it's own determination according to the will of it's citizens?

 

[Cecilie1200]

As I've said elsewhere, I disagree with this. The case was settled fifty years ago, and I see it as a matter of stare decisis.

Sorry, Sparkles, but NO law is "settled" in the sense of "You can't ever, EVER change it." Stare decisis is mostly fictional garbage. The entire point of a free and democratic nation is that the people ALWAYS have the right to decide what kind of nation and society they want to live in.

I notice that there are lots of precedents the fans of stare decisis in the case of abortion don't mind overturning.

 

[Blues Man]

Why not? Why shouldn't each state make it's own determination according to the will of it's citizens?

So you are saying that a state can decide if a fetus has protection under the Constitution of the United States?

The only thing this ruling does is to allow states to decide if they will allow abortions within their borders. If a woman from a state that bans abortions has one in another state there will be no legal repercussions for her when she returns home.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Does it?

I don;t think it specifically says that nor should it.

Yes, it absolutely will be.

It was a bad ruling from the jump.

This is a state issue, the Fed needs to fuck all the way off.

 

[Blues Man]

Yes, it absolutely will be.

It was a bad ruling from the jump.

This is a state issue, the Fed needs to fuck all the way off.

I don;t think it will.

As I said this ruling only allows states to decide if abortions will be allowed within their borders. There will be no legal repercussions for any woman getting an abortion in another state