Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know...............it's not really an attack if what you say is true, so Mittens needs to sack the fuck up and take it like a man.
BTW...............speaking of Mittens bitching this morning about being constantly attacked by Obama, HE's the fucker that's been doing nothing but attacking Obama and not even giving us a hint of what he'd replace Obama's policies with.
Obama campaign blasts Romney New Hampshire ad as 'deceitful, dishonest' - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room
Actually, that particular ad WAS dishonest because it cherry picked the phrase that they are trying to portray as Obama's.
What Obama ACTUALLY said was "John McCain has said that if we keep talking about the economy, were going to lose".
Interestingly enough, McCain kept talking about the economy, and Obama became president.
Wanna try again?
The ownership structure had changed since the inception of the company...
That the structure has changed is not in question. WHats in question is WHEN. The paper trail does not support Romneys version.
There was a tangential discussion going on here...
The paper trail is the SEC filings which list Mitt as owner up to early 2002 which is a matter of public record and which Mitt did not ever "lie" about.
Mitt, as the sole stock holder and CEO in 1999, took an official leave-of-absence and handed over the Chief Executive Officer position to someone else. After the Olympics, he decided to run for Governor and officially retired retroactively to 1999 and began the process of transferring ownership of his holdings, never returning to his CEO position again.
At that time, in 2002 his political opponents posed a charge about some particular Bain decision which occurred while he was away and he claimed those were not his Executive decisions, and they weren't. Mitt won that election after much scrutiny.
Now in 2012 Dems take all this info as he lied, he must be hiding something, yada, yada...
Romney could clear this all up simply by releasing his tax records and showing that he received no salary from Bain during those years.
Think how embarassed Obama would be
Nobody ever claimed that he didn't receive any salary from Bain. The claim was that from 1999 to 2002 Romney was not in charge of the day-to-day operations of Bain.
Stop trying to move the fucking goalposts, winger.
So Romney received compensation for doing absolutely nothing...
That the structure has changed is not in question. WHats in question is WHEN. The paper trail does not support Romneys version.
There was a tangential discussion going on here...
The paper trail is the SEC filings which list Mitt as owner up to early 2002 which is a matter of public record and which Mitt did not ever "lie" about.
Mitt, as the sole stock holder and CEO in 1999, took an official leave-of-absence and handed over the Chief Executive Officer position to someone else. After the Olympics, he decided to run for Governor and officially retired retroactively to 1999 and began the process of transferring ownership of his holdings, never returning to his CEO position again.
At that time, in 2002 his political opponents posed a charge about some particular Bain decision which occurred while he was away and he claimed those were not his Executive decisions, and they weren't. Mitt won that election after much scrutiny.
Now in 2012 Dems take all this info as he lied, he must be hiding something, yada, yada...
Who did he turn over the CEO position to?
Your post illustrates the problem, Mitt said whatever was politically expedient. He's been denying he had anything to do with Bain after 1999 yet the record does not support this.
Mitt Romney-Helmed Olympics Outsourced Uniforms To Burma
Mitt Romney-Helmed Olympics Outsourced Uniforms To Burma
Mitt Romney was noticeably unwilling Friday to engage in a controversy around the manufacturing of U.S. Olympic uniforms in China, despite criticism from Republican and Democratic lawmakers alike.
For the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, who has repeatedly promised on the trail to "get tough" on China, opposing the manufacturing seemed a likely stance, except that while at the helm of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, Romney outsourced the production of torchbearer uniforms to Burma.
For Romney, the 2002 Olympics anecdote represents another instance of outsourcing under his stewardship, as President Barack Obama's reelection team continues to assail him for shipping jobs overseas while at private equity firm Bain Capital. It also exposes an embarrassing oversight in allowing the uniforms to be manufactured in Burma, which until just last year was controlled by a brutal military regime.
Mitt Romney-Helmed Olympics Outsourced Uniforms To Burma
Mitt Romney-Helmed Olympics Outsourced Uniforms To Burma
Mitt Romney was noticeably unwilling Friday to engage in a controversy around the manufacturing of U.S. Olympic uniforms in China, despite criticism from Republican and Democratic lawmakers alike.
For the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, who has repeatedly promised on the trail to "get tough" on China, opposing the manufacturing seemed a likely stance, except that while at the helm of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, Romney outsourced the production of torchbearer uniforms to Burma.
For Romney, the 2002 Olympics anecdote represents another instance of outsourcing under his stewardship, as President Barack Obama's reelection team continues to assail him for shipping jobs overseas while at private equity firm Bain Capital. It also exposes an embarrassing oversight in allowing the uniforms to be manufactured in Burma, which until just last year was controlled by a brutal military regime.
he wasn't at Bain but that did not keep Mittens from outsourcing the 2002 Olympic uniforms to a military dictatorship in Burma .... good old Mittens - Outsourcing for America, the 2002 Olympics.
You're at the end...*snicker*
So, Bush was practicing 'Chicago politics' when he swiftboated John Kerry, instead of running on his record?So charge him. Otherwise the President and the DOJ are just playing games and going for a smear job.
Hold your President and Holder to a higher standard. Come on Sallow, why waste time playing bullshit on a message board.
Why don't you get out front and make sure Mitt Romney is charged with something, anything?
You beleive he is guilty of a felony. Well hell's bells, don't preach to the other libs on the board that believe the same.
Come on, get out there and demand the President charge Romney with something, anything.
It's called "Chicago Politics". Obama cannot run on his own record, he HAS to smear the opponent, and of course, the media just eats it up.
Romney is as much a felon as Sallow is a chick.
Can you produce any links making that accusation against Bush, by Rightwingers?
The ownership structure had changed since the inception of the company...
That the structure has changed is not in question. WHats in question is WHEN. The paper trail does not support Romneys version.
There was a tangential discussion going on here...
The paper trail is the SEC filings which list Mitt as owner up to early 2002 which is a matter of public record and which Mitt did not ever "lie" about.
Mitt, as the sole stock holder and CEO in 1999, took an official leave-of-absence and handed over the Chief Executive Officer position to someone else. After the Olympics, he decided to run for Governor and officially retired retroactively to 1999 and began the process of transferring ownership of his holdings, never returning to his CEO position again.
At that time, in 2002 his political opponents posed a charge about some particular Bain decision which occurred while he was away and he claimed those were not his Executive decisions, and they weren't. Mitt won that election after much scrutiny.
Now in 2012 Dems take all this info as he lied, he must be hiding something, yada, yada...
They suggest that he is a liar. A large one at that.
Comprehension is not your friend, apparently.
Tell me how Romney retires "retroactively". Statements such as this should disqualify him for being an idiot.
Romney knows what is in those documents. He has made the judgement that disclosing them will bring more damage than hiding them.
If he had nothing to hide...............................
You know...................after McCain lost in 2008, Mittens KNEW he was going to be one of the candidates.
Why the fuck didn't he start to clean things up 4 years ago? He could have whitewashed it good enough to stay under the radar, but, he didn't.
Gonna be great comedy fodder for the next 4 months though. Can't wait to see what Jon Stewart and Colbert have to say about the past 2 weeks on their shows tonight.
That the structure has changed is not in question. WHats in question is WHEN. The paper trail does not support Romneys version.
There was a tangential discussion going on here...
The paper trail is the SEC filings which list Mitt as owner up to early 2002 which is a matter of public record and which Mitt did not ever "lie" about.
Mitt, as the sole stock holder and CEO in 1999, took an official leave-of-absence and handed over the Chief Executive Officer position to someone else. After the Olympics, he decided to run for Governor and officially retired retroactively to 1999 and began the process of transferring ownership of his holdings, never returning to his CEO position again.
At that time, in 2002 his political opponents posed a charge about some particular Bain decision which occurred while he was away and he claimed those were not his Executive decisions, and they weren't. Mitt won that election after much scrutiny.
Now in 2012 Dems take all this info as he lied, he must be hiding something, yada, yada...
Sorry but that is false. The SEC filings list Romney as CEO as well. ( I posted a link to those documents earlier in this thread. ) Therefore, the "story" that he handed over the CEO position to someone else is not supported by the paperwork.
Citizen Bain is in trouble.
