Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since they only case they have taken, they passed on all the others, was the one that said no to gay marriage, why in God's name would you believe that they are going to rule your way and leave it up to the states? So far, the states have lost at every turn with them...Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.What you want is a democracy to represent the few, one which doesn't reflect the will of the rest. While the majority doesn't rule America, the minority shouldn't hijack it. You have all of 1.5% of the American population dictating policy for the other 98.5%. James Madison warned against this, and here we are, watching one of his biggest fears come true.
Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.What you want is a democracy to represent the few, one which doesn't reflect the will of the rest. While the majority doesn't rule America, the minority shouldn't hijack it. You have all of 1.5% of the American population dictating policy for the other 98.5%. James Madison warned against this, and here we are, watching one of his biggest fears come true.
Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
14th amendmentNonsense.You claiming that the level of hardships is what "earns" civil rights for a group of citizens? That if one has not "suffered as much" as blacks did during their civil rights struggle, it doesn't count?You claiming the gay community has suffered the same hardships as the blacks fighting for civil rights?
Obviously the gays are ...since they latched on to the black civil rights movement to make it seem like their plight is worse than it is.
Gay Americans are entitled to the same Constitutional protections as everyone else, separate and apart from any other class of persons – the right to due process and the right to equal protection of the law, where seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in violates the 14th Amendment.
What constitutional protections do they not have?
If marriage means anything then it means nothing.Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
14th amendmentNonsense.You claiming that the level of hardships is what "earns" civil rights for a group of citizens? That if one has not "suffered as much" as blacks did during their civil rights struggle, it doesn't count?
Obviously the gays are ...since they latched on to the black civil rights movement to make it seem like their plight is worse than it is.
Gay Americans are entitled to the same Constitutional protections as everyone else, separate and apart from any other class of persons – the right to due process and the right to equal protection of the law, where seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in violates the 14th Amendment.
What constitutional protections do they not have?
not one of you has yet posted the language from the 14th where the words "gay marriage" appear.
we'll be waiting-----------------------------------------
All people means marriage? You must speak a different dialect of English than the rest ofus, Nutwhacker.14th amendmentNonsense.Obviously the gays are ...since they latched on to the black civil rights movement to make it seem like their plight is worse than it is.
Gay Americans are entitled to the same Constitutional protections as everyone else, separate and apart from any other class of persons – the right to due process and the right to equal protection of the law, where seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in violates the 14th Amendment.
What constitutional protections do they not have?
not one of you has yet posted the language from the 14th where the words "gay marriage" appear.
we'll be waiting-----------------------------------------
The part that says...."all people"
Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
14th amendmentNonsense.Obviously the gays are ...since they latched on to the black civil rights movement to make it seem like their plight is worse than it is.
Gay Americans are entitled to the same Constitutional protections as everyone else, separate and apart from any other class of persons – the right to due process and the right to equal protection of the law, where seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in violates the 14th Amendment.
What constitutional protections do they not have?
not one of you has yet posted the language from the 14th where the words "gay marriage" appear.
we'll be waiting-----------------------------------------
The part that says...."all people"
We were assured that gay marriage would not force religious institutions to violate their conscience. Now the Solicitor General admitted in open court that isnt the case.Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
The only thing repeating itself around here is you, drama queen. People are no longer buying the fear you peddle. If the courts rule against you in a couple weeks I suspect your hysteria will become even more dramatic.
Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
The only thing repeating itself around here is you, drama queen. People are no longer buying the fear you peddle. If the courts rule against you in a couple weeks I suspect your hysteria will become even more dramatic.
This has got to be the foulest, most ignore-worthy post I have ever witnessed.I think TK should reject the law of gravity, it's highly oppressive after all, and then try it out from a tall building, if he can ever get out of the basement that long of course.Yet both are equally subjective, and both just as irrelevant legally and Constitutionally.
WRONG
Religious belief and personal opinion are covered under the 1st Amendment and are both otherwise known as "free expression." That makes them both legally and constitutionally relevant. If you are as competent with case law as you think you are, you know there are a litany of SCOTUS opinions backing me up here.
So what laws couldn't you ignore because of 'free expression'? Who couldn't you deny service to based on your 'religious belief'.
Or are you just making a generic 'Sovereign Citizen' argument where no law that a person disagrees with apples to them?
All people means marriage? You must speak a different dialect of English than the rest ofus, Nutwhacker.14th amendmentNonsense.
Gay Americans are entitled to the same Constitutional protections as everyone else, separate and apart from any other class of persons – the right to due process and the right to equal protection of the law, where seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in violates the 14th Amendment.
What constitutional protections do they not have?
not one of you has yet posted the language from the 14th where the words "gay marriage" appear.
we'll be waiting-----------------------------------------
The part that says...."all people"
We were assured that gay marriage would not force religious institutions to violate their conscience. Now the Solicitor General admitted in open court that isnt the case.Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
The only thing repeating itself around here is you, drama queen. People are no longer buying the fear you peddle. If the courts rule against you in a couple weeks I suspect your hysteria will become even more dramatic.
Gay marriage will utterly ruin society.
We were assured that gay marriage would not force religious institutions to violate their conscience. Now the Solicitor General admitted in open court that isnt the case.Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
The only thing repeating itself around here is you, drama queen. People are no longer buying the fear you peddle. If the courts rule against you in a couple weeks I suspect your hysteria will become even more dramatic.
Gay marriage will utterly ruin society.
Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
The Windsor opinion affirms that states have the power to set marriage laws but those laws are still subject to certain constitutional guarantees. Cry all you wish but gays are still getting married and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
OK, fine, next siblings will be getting married, parents will marry children, cousins will marry, multiple persons will marry.
the precedent will be set. marriage will be whatever the people involved want it to be.
society is going down the tubes and you fools are celebrating. Nero fiddling while rome burns-------------------------------------------------history repeats itself.
14th amendmentNonsense.
Gay Americans are entitled to the same Constitutional protections as everyone else, separate and apart from any other class of persons – the right to due process and the right to equal protection of the law, where seeking to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in violates the 14th Amendment.
What constitutional protections do they not have?
not one of you has yet posted the language from the 14th where the words "gay marriage" appear.
we'll be waiting-----------------------------------------
The part that says...."all people"
it says neither gay or marriage anyplace in the amendment. those words are not used. You are creating an "interpretation" of the words which is not correct.
you may win this because many americans just don't give a shit. but society will suffer in the long run.
This has got to be the foulest, most ignore-worthy post I have ever witnessed.I think TK should reject the law of gravity, it's highly oppressive after all, and then try it out from a tall building, if he can ever get out of the basement that long of course.Yet both are equally subjective, and both just as irrelevant legally and Constitutionally.
WRONG
Religious belief and personal opinion are covered under the 1st Amendment and are both otherwise known as "free expression." That makes them both legally and constitutionally relevant. If you are as competent with case law as you think you are, you know there are a litany of SCOTUS opinions backing me up here.
So what laws couldn't you ignore because of 'free expression'? Who couldn't you deny service to based on your 'religious belief'.
Or are you just making a generic 'Sovereign Citizen' argument where no law that a person disagrees with apples to them?
Buh-bye
Likely the Supreme Court will go with the Constitution and their own finding in Windsor that states have the power under the Constitution to set criteria.Wrong.What you want is a democracy to represent the few, one which doesn't reflect the will of the rest. While the majority doesn't rule America, the minority shouldn't hijack it. You have all of 1.5% of the American population dictating policy for the other 98.5%. James Madison warned against this, and here we are, watching one of his biggest fears come true.
Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
Tough shit! Gays have every right to seek redress in the courts for laws they feel violate in their rights. Get over it or don't. It really doesn't matter b/c all of your foot stomping won't change the fact that gays are getting in 37 states and likely all 50 by the end of the month.
Deal with it.
Not any more. That hasn't happened in the last decade, you know.Wrong.What you want is a democracy to represent the few, one which doesn't reflect the will of the rest. While the majority doesn't rule America, the minority shouldn't hijack it. You have all of 1.5% of the American population dictating policy for the other 98.5%. James Madison warned against this, and here we are, watching one of his biggest fears come true.
Where does it not "reflect the will of the rest"? A majority support marriage equality for gays. A majority supports employment protections for gays. A majority supports Public Accommodation protections for gays.
Gay marriage was a loser in actual referenda held. If gays had any integrity they would work through the political system to get gay marriage enacted instead of running to gay activist judges to do their dirty work for them.
