Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Murder rate in England and Wales rises 11%Oh, I beg to differ. Ask Tommy how many people in his country decide against murder when they contemplate the grisly details with a knife, axe or bat. What would be easier for you, CeeCee? To shoot someone in the chest from across the street or across the room, or to run up to that person and thrust a knife into him with the hopes that the person would not fight back and end up knifing you or getting away and calling the police. Which is the more popular scenario, in your mind? You can't do drive-by knifings, either. Ask the kids in Chicago.True. Guns let you kill someone with no physical effort and no goo on your shoes, though. It makes murder much easier.I don't even think the problem is about guns and gun ownership anymore, it's why are people so quick to kill?
You can do damage with a knife and a car...look at London...yes, that was a different, it was terrorism but this person could have waited til these people were outside and mowed them down with an SUV...no?
Maybe, but a murderer isn't worried about getting dirty, especially a murder/suicide.
Why does spellcheck think "knifings" is wrong? What am I missing?
[
That is a highly stupid argument. Guns have only one purpose, _(insert your choice of name I won't call you here)___. Guns are to kill people. So yes, I can blame them for the fact that they were used to kill someone. Duh.
That San Bernardino is turning into some kind of rough place, huh?
That's my only point. I know many responsible gun owners, including my own kid and grandkid; there are a LOT of hunters around here, too. I don't lose any sleep over it, even though I personally wish we were still killing each other with sticks and stones and the damned things had never been invented. It's a hard question when it comes down to individuals and how to decide who should have one, so as a general rule, I say the less there are laying around to abuse in a moment of anger, the better.Yes, it's easier of course to shoot someone but if someone ones to kill...they will.
That's my only point. I know many responsible gun owners, including my own kid and grandkid; there are a LOT of hunters around here, too. I don't lose any sleep over it, even though I personally wish we were still killing each other with sticks and stones and the damned things had never been invented. It's a hard question when it comes down to individuals and how to decide who should have one, so as a general rule, I say the less there are laying around to abuse in a moment of anger, the better.Yes, it's easier of course to shoot someone but if someone ones to kill...they will.
No it's not[
That is a highly stupid argument. Guns have only one purpose, _(insert your choice of name I won't call you here)___. Guns are to kill people. So yes, I can blame them for the fact that they were used to kill someone. Duh.
Now THAT is a truly stupid claim.
I agree serious gun control should not happen until the illegal guns are off the street. That should happen starting yesterday, but apparently we have better things to do. Don't know what.I would be OK with banning guns, if every other country does it first. Also, before they take mine, I want the millions of illegal guns off the street. I also want all munitions production facilities to shut down.
After about 5 years of being gun free, the statists can then continue on to ban swords, knives, fertilizer and what ever weapon the majority uses to replace it.
The problem ISNT inanimate objects. Its PEOPLE. Good luck banning that.
You could double that figure and it would still be at a level you could only dream about.Murder rate in England and Wales rises 11%Oh, I beg to differ. Ask Tommy how many people in his country decide against murder when they contemplate the grisly details with a knife, axe or bat. What would be easier for you, CeeCee? To shoot someone in the chest from across the street or across the room, or to run up to that person and thrust a knife into him with the hopes that the person would not fight back and end up knifing you or getting away and calling the police. Which is the more popular scenario, in your mind? You can't do drive-by knifings, either. Ask the kids in Chicago.True. Guns let you kill someone with no physical effort and no goo on your shoes, though. It makes murder much easier.I don't even think the problem is about guns and gun ownership anymore, it's why are people so quick to kill?
You can do damage with a knife and a car...look at London...yes, that was a different, it was terrorism but this person could have waited til these people were outside and mowed them down with an SUV...no?
Maybe, but a murderer isn't worried about getting dirty, especially a murder/suicide.
Why does spellcheck think "knifings" is wrong? What am I missing?
I agree serious gun control should not happen until the illegal guns are off the street. That should happen starting yesterday, but apparently we have better things to do. Don't know what.I would be OK with banning guns, if every other country does it first. Also, before they take mine, I want the millions of illegal guns off the street. I also want all munitions production facilities to shut down.
After about 5 years of being gun free, the statists can then continue on to ban swords, knives, fertilizer and what ever weapon the majority uses to replace it.
The problem ISNT inanimate objects. Its PEOPLE. Good luck banning that.
No it's not[
That is a highly stupid argument. Guns have only one purpose, _(insert your choice of name I won't call you here)___. Guns are to kill people. So yes, I can blame them for the fact that they were used to kill someone. Duh.
Now THAT is a truly stupid claim.
Yes, there is that much more thoughtful and complicated question of why.....For me the issue isn't how you were killed, it's the fact that you were killed.
And it's happening everywhere lately...places with gun laws, no gun laws...
I agree serious gun control should not happen until the illegal guns are off the street. That should happen starting yesterday, but apparently we have better things to do. Don't know what.I would be OK with banning guns, if every other country does it first. Also, before they take mine, I want the millions of illegal guns off the street. I also want all munitions production facilities to shut down.
After about 5 years of being gun free, the statists can then continue on to ban swords, knives, fertilizer and what ever weapon the majority uses to replace it.
The problem ISNT inanimate objects. Its PEOPLE. Good luck banning that.
Huh! I thought it was against the law to bring guns onto school property.
Yes, there is that much more thoughtful and complicated question of why.....For me the issue isn't how you were killed, it's the fact that you were killed.
And it's happening everywhere lately...places with gun laws, no gun laws...
I've tried to bring it up before here, and I just get run over by these guys. They're being unusually polite today--maybe cause you're in the room.
What is causing us to become a culture with no value for human life? I'm sure there are a lot of factors at work. Maybe violence in video games and on movies and television -- it's so bad now people don't even notice it. We are surrounded by it, soaked in it. I'm not sure if that's a reason or a symptom, but it's gotten SOO much worse over the years.
But they'll shoot your ex, in a pinch.No it's not[
That is a highly stupid argument. Guns have only one purpose, _(insert your choice of name I won't call you here)___. Guns are to kill people. So yes, I can blame them for the fact that they were used to kill someone. Duh.
Now THAT is a truly stupid claim.
Incredibly stupid.
More guns are made for killing animals than anything else.
Not a reason to not try. It's done in other countries. It's all relative, the gun #'s. In Europe, a lot of guys using vehicles to kill folks? Probably because it's harder to get a gun unnoticed.I agree serious gun control should not happen until the illegal guns are off the street. That should happen starting yesterday, but apparently we have better things to do. Don't know what.I would be OK with banning guns, if every other country does it first. Also, before they take mine, I want the millions of illegal guns off the street. I also want all munitions production facilities to shut down.
After about 5 years of being gun free, the statists can then continue on to ban swords, knives, fertilizer and what ever weapon the majority uses to replace it.
The problem ISNT inanimate objects. Its PEOPLE. Good luck banning that.
Easier said than done. Bad guys are going to find ways to get guns, always have and always will.
It's called social responsibility.Huh! I thought it was against the law to bring guns onto school property.
Apparently because criminals don't follow laws, the law abiding must be punished.
Fascist democrat logic 101.
