Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You've been trying to take them for decades..........and we still own them............Your still a loser because some in this country still believe in the Constitution here........you not so much.All we have to do is advertise your views on guns to the public and it would sell a million more guns.........
Yes, because my opinion carries so much weight.
Guy, only 22% of the population owns guns. You are in the minority. And even a lot of gun owners think people like you who want to shoot government officials are kind of nuts.
Based on what (very) little that I understand of the case so far, the families have absolutely zero hope for a legal victory... zero.
The plaintiffs' attorneys appear to be feeding on the emotions and grief of the families and holding out the prospect of victories that have no chance of materializing.
Or his father abandoned his kid because he was an asshole
No, a gun gives you protection from violent Democrats. Like I stated before, the only way we can get rid of guns is if we get rid of liberals first. If we can get rid of Democrats, our violent crime rate would drop by at least 80%.
But as long as we do have Democrats, we need guns to protect ourselves.
Why don't you just say the N'word like you really want to, guy. It would be more honest.
The sandy hook pawns-er parents-suing Bushmaster need to be bankrupted by the court for filing such a moronic law suit and their attorneys need to be destroyed with massive fines as well. The idiot judge who allowed that suit to go forward did so because that twit said there is a "question of fact" as to whether a legal product is legal. She should be run out of office and disbarred
She didn't give them to him...............he killed her...........did she it hand them over before or after he shot her .............damn your dumb.Or his father abandoned his kid because he was an asshole
No, the father wanted to get him committed. Mom was the one who decided to give him guns.
You've been trying to take them for decades..........and we still own them............Your still a loser because some in this country still believe in the Constitution here........you not so much.
[
Wow, what a state of denial. Her guns were secured, yet your mind just won't accept that.
Obviously, they weren't secure if he got to them.
That would be the defendant's attorneys, not the plaintiff's.Based on what (very) little that I understand of the case so far, the families have absolutely zero hope for a legal victory... zero.
The plaintiffs' attorneys appear to be feeding on the emotions and grief of the families and holding out the prospect of victories that have no chance of materializing.
They aren't looking for a legal victory...they are looking for millions of dollars in legal fees for the gun company defending itself......
Twit.......the 2a in my title is for the 2nd Amendment...I am not obsessed with guns as you can see from how rarely I post in the firearm thread......my focus is on Civil Rights and Freedom...and the ability of normal, innocent, law abiding people to be safe from harm from street criminals and socialist governments....killers both......
Most killing are committed by gang members. They kill each other off, and these killings are a blessing to the community.
We have 16,000 homicides a year in this country, of which only 1800 a year a gang related. Most of the rest are domestic arguments that got out of hand.
Says the poster child for gun control who will vote for the Hildabeast......yeah she has your back man............when pigs fly........You've been trying to take them for decades..........and we still own them............Your still a loser because some in this country still believe in the Constitution here........you not so much.
Actually, I used to be a right winger, until I realized how they use bullshit issues like this to keep you voting against your own economic interests. When you don't have your gun and bible to cling to, maybe you'll start addressing the real problems.
That would be the defendant's attorneys, not the plaintiff's.Based on what (very) little that I understand of the case so far, the families have absolutely zero hope for a legal victory... zero.
The plaintiffs' attorneys appear to be feeding on the emotions and grief of the families and holding out the prospect of victories that have no chance of materializing.
They aren't looking for a legal victory...they are looking for millions of dollars in legal fees for the gun company defending itself......
Any further questions about Leftists, classmates?...Actually, I used to be a right winger, until I realized how they use bullshit issues like this to keep you voting against your own economic interests. When you don't have your gun and bible to cling to, maybe you'll start addressing the real problems.
They aren't looking for a legal victory...they are looking for millions of dollars in legal fees for the gun company defending itself......
Right, that's like saying a banks money wasn't secure when the robber killed the clerk and took the money.
You've been trying to take them for decades..........and we still own them............Your still a loser because some in this country still believe in the Constitution here........you not so much.
Actually, I used to be a right winger...
Based on what, your personal theory?Shells don't eject into your face with any regularity, who could sell such a gun? I did have a .45acp round hit my forehead once, but only once. Were you doing the gansta sideways shooting?The type of handgun that Lanza allegedly used ejects shells.....and they fly up....if you believe this 19 year old shrimp had a semi automatic and then used it to kill himself? That is your deal......
Lanza used a handgun, not the AR. Yes, you can put a semi-auto round through your skull, why wouldn't you be able to?
As far as the OP, I believe the suit would only apply to Connecticut manufacturer, like Bushmaster (last I heard). Many of them are fleeing the north due to this sort of hostility. I don't see how a Connecticut ruling could effect another state. But as said, the suit will be a big loser for the idiots, the weapon, even if used, wasn't defective.
Incorrect.
Coroner Confirms: No Assault Weapon Used in Sandy Hook Shooting | Conservative Byte
An AR-15, or the so-called “Assault Weapon”, was not used in the school shooting. The shooter even tried weeks earlier to buy a rifle but was turned down in the background check. So he had to kill his Mother to steal her rifle. There were initial reports, right after the shooting, that police found the AR-15 in his car, NOT IN THE SCHOOL. The rifle was not used. The shooter went into the school with 4 handguns, NOT an Assault Rifle as the media has charged.
Twit.......the 2a in my title is for the 2nd Amendment...I am not obsessed with guns as you can see from how rarely I post in the firearm thread......my focus is on Civil Rights and Freedom...and the ability of normal, innocent, law abiding people to be safe from harm from street criminals and socialist governments....killers both......
Guy, private gun ownership doesn't stop crime (We have the highest crime rate in the industrialized world) or government that lose their minds (which usually means the people have lost their minds, they just blame the government afterwards for giving them what they wanted.)
The violent crime rate has been going down as more Americans own and carry guns...that is a fact.....and the states with the most people carrying guns have seen the greatest decrease in violent crime.
