Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, and the one in Aberdeen, Maryland a few years ago that I know of.Of course most criminals most people in prison are overwhelmingly men… so it is very unusual that this was a woman or a transgender again I’m not even sure if she transitioned yet.
A number of recent shooters have been apparent transgender‘s you could think of the Chicago parade shooter they were dressed like a woman. And then I believe that nightclub shooter in Colorado where dozens were killed identified as a trans person.
That's right! They are NUTS!!!!
And now they're getting violent as you excuse their mental ILLNESS!
"Accept us, OR ELSE!"
Fuck THAT!!!!!
It is because they are black...their culture is subhuman and thus, you have them doing subhuman things......it's ok to admit that...and then pass policies to crack down on them.....I think we need to be more careful in how we characterize these things.
Most gun crime is committed by males. That is a fact. But that doesn't translate that being male makes one have a propensity to commit gun crime.
Women also commit gun crime but by a much smaller percentage. But a woman committing a gun crime is not because the person is a woman.
Black people commit gun crime at a much higher percentage of their numbers than do white people. That is not because they are black but because they are more often part of a violent, sometimes sociopathic culture that promotes that kind of behavior and possibly aggravated by leftist conditioning that convinces them they are oppressed victims or some such.
People who mutilate their bodies with hormones and surgeries to transgender can in no way be considered normal. Just identifying oneself as another gender strongly suggests mental issues that are in no way normal. But a transgender committing a gun crime cannot automatically be assumed that transgendering caused the violent, illegal, or sociopathic behavior.
Sometimes we need to put aside our political partisanship and emotional reactions to these things and use critical thinking and honest appraisals of the situation. The hard core leftists seem incapable of doing that. I hold out hope that Patriots can.
Those in power, in any circumstance.In other words, it is still the elites who decide who can and cannot be armed.
Yes.You don’t even link that. Did you write it yourself?
They didn't.You may not know that the war of 1812 came after the 2A was ratified.
People who came to America brought guns. They were not dirt poor farm workers fresh from the potato fields. They had earned enough money to come to the the U.S. and so would have been able to afford to own guns, which they did.
There were NOT any laws preventing gun ownership in Europe, at the time............Besides..........poverty.Europeans could not afford them, nor easily get permission to own them.
The exemption to that were indentured servants and slaves. Slaves are not allowed to touch a gun without the. Master’s permission.
Bitter maniacs that the world won’t cowtow to their mental and emotional deformities.
You're FOS.Fascism is a type of socialism, you doofus....the name coined by marxist Mussolini after he was kicked out of the communist party...
Nazism is Socialism -- F A Hayek, et al
One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too -as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment -have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because -and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany – many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience. But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a move movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt.
A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capitalism.”
It would, indeed, hardly have been possible for the Nationalists to advance fundamental objections to the economic policy of the other socialist parties when their own published programme differed from these only in that its socialism was much cruder and less rational. The famous 25 points drawn up by Herr Feder,[2] one of Hitler’s early allies, repeatedly endorsed by Hitler and recognized by the by-laws of the National-Socialist party as the immutable basis of all its actions, which together with an extensive commentary is circulating throughout Germany in many hundreds of thousands of copies, is full of ideas resembling those of the early socialists. But the dominant feature is a fierce hatred of anything capitalistic -individualistic profit seeking, large scale enterprise, banks, joint-stock companies, department stores, “international finance and loan capital,” the system of “interest slavery” in general; the abolition of these is described as the “[indecipherable] of the programme, around which everything else turns.” It was to this programme that the masses of the German people, who were already completely under the influence of collectivist ideas, responded so enthusiastically.
That this violent anti-capitalistic attack is genuine – and not a mere piece of propaganda – becomes as clear from the personal history of the intellectual leaders of the movement as from the general milieu from which it springs. It is not even denied that man of the young men who today play a prominent part in it have previously been communists or socialists. And to any observer of the literary tendencies which made the Germans intelligentsia ready to join the ranks of the new party, it must be clear that the common characteristic of all the politically influential writers – in many cases free from definite party affiliations – was their anti-liberal and anti-capitalist trend. Groups like that formed around the review “Die Tat” have made the phrase “the end of capitalism” an accepted dogma to most young Germans.[3]
And more...
The Myth of "Nazi Capitalism" | Chris Calton
German socialism, as Mises defines it, differs from what he called “socialism of the Russian pattern” in that “it, seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange.” However, this is only a superficial system of private ownership because through a complete system of economic intervention and control, the entrepreneurial function of the property owners is completely controlled by the State. By this, Mises means that shop owners do not speculate about future events for the purpose of allocating resources in the pursuit of profits. Just like in the Soviet Union, this entrepreneurial speculation and resource allocation is done by a single entity, the State, and economic calculation is thus impossible.
“In Nazi Germany,” Mises tells us, the property owners “were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages labourers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy.”
======
Nazis Were Not Marxists, but They Were Socialists | Jörg Guido Hülsmann
Nazis and marx..
Read A Pile Of Top Nazis Talking About How They Love Leftist Marxism
The Nazis were leftists. This statement is blasphemy to the academic-media complex, since everyone knows the Nazis were degenerate right-wingers fueled by toxic capitalism and racism. But evidence Adolf Hitler’s gang were men of the left, while debatable, is compelling.
The dispute on Nazi origins resurfaced through the confluence of brawling alt-right and antifa fringe movements and recent alternative histories by Dinesh D’Souza and others. The vitriol and lack of candor it produces from supposedly fact-driven academics and media is disturbing, if unsurprising. They stifle dissent on touchy subjects to maintain their narrative and enforce cultural hegemony.
However uncomfortable to opinion shapers, alternative views of the Third Reich exist and were written by the finest minds of their time. Opinions from the period perhaps carry more weight because they are unburdened by the aftermath of the uniquely heinous Nazi crimes.
------
Also, Adolf Hitler Loved Karl Marx
It wasn’t only theoretical. Hitler repeatedly praised Marx privately, stating he had “learned a great deal from Marxism.” The trouble with the Weimar Republic, he said, was that its politicians “had never even read Marx.” He also stated his differences with communists were that they were intellectual types passing out pamphlets, whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun.”
It wasn’t just privately that Hitler’s fealty for Marx surfaced. In “Mein Kampf,” he states that without his racial insights National Socialism “would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground.” Nor did Hitler eschew this sentiment once reaching power. As late as 1941, with the war in bloom, he stated “basically National Socialism and Marxism are the same” in a speech published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Nazi propaganda minister and resident intellectual Joseph Goebbels wrote in his diary that the Nazis would install “real socialism” after Russia’s defeat in the East. And Hitler favorite Albert Speer, the Nazi armaments minister whose memoir became an international bestseller, wrote that Hitler viewed Joseph Stalin as a kindred spirit, ensuring his prisoner of war son received good treatment, and even talked of keeping Stalin in power in a puppet government after Germany’s eventual triumph. His views on Great Britain’s Winston Churchill and the United States’s Franklin Delano Roosevelt were decidedly less kind.
Nazi and Communist Hatred of Each Other Was Brotherly
Despite this, there’s a persistent claim that Nazis and communists hated each other, and mention that the Nazis persecuted socialists and oppressed trade unions. These things are true, but prove little. The camps’ hatred stemmed from familiarity. It was internecine, the nastiest kind.
The Nazis and communists were not only in a struggle for street-war supremacy, but also recruits. These recruits were easily turned, because both sides were fighting for the same men. Hayek recalls
Sure......Like Florida, Georgia, Texas, Arizona and Tennessee.
See above,
I'm sorry but that is too ignorant to even deal with. Comments like yours are really clueless and harmful and provide ammo for leftists to accuse all Patriots, 99+% of whom strongly disagree with you.It is because they are black...their culture is subhuman and thus, you have them doing subhuman things......it's ok to admit that...and then pass policies to crack down on them.....
They are worse than other groups, so they need to be treated worse in order to civilize them.....back when Jim Crow was the law of the land, darkies didn't behave this way...I mean, they were still bad, but manageable......time to bring back Jim Crow
I think we need to be more careful in how we characterize these things.
Most gun crime is committed by males. That is a fact. But that doesn't translate that being male makes one have a propensity to commit gun crime.
Women also commit gun crime but by a much smaller percentage. But a woman committing a gun crime is not because the person is a woman.
Black people commit gun crime at a much higher percentage of their numbers than do white people. That is not because they are black but because they are more often part of a violent, sometimes sociopathic culture that promotes that kind of behavior and possibly aggravated by leftist conditioning that convinces them they are oppressed victims or some such.
People who mutilate their bodies with hormones and surgeries to transgender can in no way be considered normal. Just identifying oneself as another gender strongly suggests mental issues that are in no way normal. But a transgender committing a gun crime cannot automatically be assumed that transgendering caused the violent, illegal, or sociopathic behavior.
Sometimes we need to put aside our political partisanship and emotional reactions to these things and use critical thinking and honest appraisals of the situation. The hard core leftists seem incapable of doing that. I hold out hope that Patriots can.
You're FOS.
Fascism Definition & Meaning
View attachment 770340
Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › fasci...
4 days ago — The meaning of FASCISM is a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above ...
fascism
noun
fas·cism ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm
also ˈfa-ˌsi-
Synonyms of fascism
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
early instances of army fascism and brutality,
listen); 8 May 1899 – 23 March 1992), often referred to by his initials F. A. Hayek, was an Austrian-British intellectual who made contributions to economics,[1] political science, psychology,[2][3] intellectual history,[4][5] philosophy[6]and other fields.[7] Hayek shared the 1974 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences with Gunnar Myrdalfor work on money and economic fluctuations, and the interdependence of economic, social and institutional phenomena.[8] His account of how prices communicate information is widely regarded as an important contribution to economics that led to him receiving the prize.[9][10][11]
You're FOS.
Fascism Definition & Meaning
View attachment 770340
Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › fasci...
4 days ago — The meaning of FASCISM is a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above ...
fascism
noun
fas·cism ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm
also ˈfa-ˌsi-
Synonyms of fascism
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
early instances of army fascism and brutality,
No...you are saying F.A. Hayek is full of shit......
Friedrich August von Hayek CH FBA (/ˈhaɪək/ HY-ək, German: [ˈfʁiːdʁɪç ˈʔaʊɡʊst fɔn ˈhaɪɛk] (
Friedrich_Hayek
Free?Yes
You have listed the most free states.
You're FOS.
Like most teabaggers.
Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsɪzəm, ˈnæt-/ NA(H)T-siz-əm; German: Nazismus), the common name in English for National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus, German: [natsi̯oˈnaːlzotsi̯aˌlɪsmʊs] (
During Hitler's rise to power in 1930s Europe, it was frequently referred to as Hitlerism (German: Hitlerfaschismus). The later related term "neo-Nazism" is applied to other far-right groups with similar ideas which formed after the Second World War.
Nazism is a form of fascism,with disdain for liberal democracy and the parliamentary system. It incorporates a dictatorship, fervent antisemitism, anti-communism, scientific racism, white supremacy, social Darwinism and the use of eugenics into its creed.
Its extreme nationalism originated in pan-Germanism and the ethno-nationalist neopagan Völkisch movement which had been a prominent aspect of German ultranationalism since the late 19th century, and it was strongly influenced by the Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged after Germany's defeat in World War I, from which came the party's underlying "cult of violence".
Nazism subscribed to pseudo-scientific theories of a racial hierarchy,identifying Germans as part of what the Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race.
It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous German society based on racial purity which represented a people's community (Volksgemeinschaft). The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum and exclude those whom they deemed either Community Aliens or "inferior" races (Untermenschen).
An opinion by Sheldon Richman?Here....the truth....
Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty
A
Is an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer.
The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie.
Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.
Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners.
Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.)
Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically.
x
In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace.Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.
I would need context for the "biff"It's Biff.
Not really ---------- we just don't say a lot about it.I'm sorry but that is too ignorant to even deal with. Comments like yours are really clueless and harmful and provide ammo for leftists to accuse all Patriots, 99+% of whom strongly disagree with you.
You don't see black folks attacking Jewish folks.You mean like how militant blacks hate the Jews?
Not really ---------- we just don't say a lot about it.
I wish you wouldn't call us "Patriots." This country has sunk way to far for me to be patriotic about anymore. We took in our flag years ago.
