progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,659
- 38,431
I've answered several times,, if I do it again you will just claim I didnt so whats the use,,who said the taxs would be higher??School choice is simple and the competition it would create for tax dollars would drive changes. Schools receive their money based on how many students are attending.your right the system we have now is so great so lets not do anything,,,home schooling,, mixed with parent controlled community schools,,as is always the case you ignore the topic,,,all public schools should be closeddo you always try and troll every thread with the first comment???Do you always throw out the bath water and the baby?
It's a legitimate point.
And I'm curious.......how many choices? Two? What if I do not like those two? 4? 5? 6? You are going to support this with your taxes, right?
As is so often the case you didn't answer the question.
If you propose a solution you have to be able to explain how that solution would work. Now to my questions.
How is this going to work? Like I asked above, will you support a basic income so people can stay home with their kids and teach them? How will you make up for the loss of the social interaction which is also a part of a kids education? Schools, plural? You are going to raise taxes to pay for these right?
that way you can live in the back of the bus making your retarded outbursts,,,
I am asking you what you would do and you seem unable to answer. I'm suppose to believe this is better?
We have examples of the worst schools getting the most money and still failing miserably so it's time to take the focus off the dollar and put it on administrative performance.
Are you going to step up and pay higher taxes for all these choices?
And I should consider what you have to say? I asked you to explain your plan to me. You would not? How many schools are we talking? Just one choice? Many choices? And this wouldn't cost more?
thats why your the retarded kid in the back of the bus,,