Seattle Democrats Cancel Columbus Day. Replace It With "indigenous People's Day"

[guno]

White people logic at its finest.

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

So what exactly is Columbus’s legacy? It is that of a slaver, murderer, and thief
He didn’t “discover America”—people had already been living on that continent for ages."

 

[guno]

White people logic at its finest.

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

You must have forgotten about whites butchering themselves and enslaving themselves in practice for world conquest.. Quick question. Where does the word slave come from? Hint. Not Africa.

Columbus Day: Celebrating The ‘Greatest Wave Of Genocide In History’
Addicting Info 8211 Columbus Day Celebrating The 8216 Greatest Wave Of Genocide In History 8217

 

[Politico]

Washington state is becoming California North. Jeez what a pack if moon bats!

Becoming? Washington, Oregon and Kalifornia have been in the same nutbag for the last 40 years.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

So what exactly is Columbus’s legacy? It is that of a slaver, murderer, and thief
He didn’t “discover America”—people had already been living on that continent for ages."

Yes he did discover america. The "people" who were here were just savages living in trees. Hell - No north american indians even had a written language.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
I think you miss the fact that columbus was a pedophile and murderer and symbolizes European imperialism, colonialism, disease spreading and genocide. Why in hell would anyone want to celebrate that?

Imperialism? HAHAHA. Us white europeans take care of the injuns. They're all drunken welfare bums, but even at that, they have a better life than they had 300 years ago as savages. Until the white man came, no north american indian tribe even had a written language.

Like blacks, injuns need the white man to always take care of them.

 

[daws101]

n

White people logic at its finest.

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

absolute bullshit,
WHAT RACE OR CULTURE OF PEOPLE HAVE KILLED MORE PEOPLE BROUGHT THE MOST WAR AND MISERY THAN ANY OTHERS


When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

 

[Asclepias]

n

White people logic at its finest.

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

absolute bullshit,
WHAT RACE OR CULTURE OF PEOPLE HAVE KILLED MORE PEOPLE BROUGHT THE MOST WAR AND MISERY THAN ANY OTHERS


When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

Thats why i start laughing so hard I get hiccups when they call Black people violent.

 

[daws101]

n

White people logic at its finest.

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

absolute bullshit,
WHAT RACE OR CULTURE OF PEOPLE HAVE KILLED MORE PEOPLE BROUGHT THE MOST WAR AND MISERY THAN ANY OTHERS


When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

Thats why i start laughing so hard I get hiccups when they call Black people violent.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

n

White people logic at its finest.

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

absolute bullshit,
WHAT RACE OR CULTURE OF PEOPLE HAVE KILLED MORE PEOPLE BROUGHT THE MOST WAR AND MISERY THAN ANY OTHERS


When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

Are you white ?

 

[Picaro]

The reasons many of those people didn't write anything down is so nobody would know just how savage they really were. As for the claim there 'were 5,000,000 killed', that's a number somebody pulled out of their asses, nobody credible. Most tribes were wiped out by other tribes, not Whitey; you could hire natives to wipe out other natives for a bag of beads or a gallon of rum. There weren't nearly enough white men in North America to do squat, much less anything on the scale claimed. Indians warred on each other, before whites got here and then in trade wars after. Sucks to know they were just murderers for hire for the most part, and murdered for the highest bidder, be it Spain, France, England, the Dutch, didn't matter.

But, as we can see, the main reason they hate Whitey is jealousy, not any moral principle; they all know their own racial history is far more violent and reprehensible by any standards, and they resented the new kids on the block, usurping their own dreams in that direction. White people didn't invent slavery, but they ended it. Non-whites never had an anti-slavery movement, nor did they like it when white people forced anti-slavery laws on non-white countries. It's fun to read the vitriolic gibberish and bed-wetting, shrieking, and general idiocy from the usual suspects, though.

 

[daws101]

n

White people logic at its finest.

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

absolute bullshit,
WHAT RACE OR CULTURE OF PEOPLE HAVE KILLED MORE PEOPLE BROUGHT THE MOST WAR AND MISERY THAN ANY OTHERS


When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

Are you white ?

1/2 irish 1/2 cheatwood cherokee....so I have a lot to complain about .

 

[daws101]

The reasons many of those people didn't write anything down is so nobody would know just how savage they really were. As for the claim there 'were 5,000,000 killed', that's a number somebody pulled out of their asses, nobody credible. Most tribes were wiped out by other tribes, not Whitey; you could hire natives to wipe out other natives for a bag of beads or a gallon of rum. There weren't nearly enough white men in North America to do squat, much less anything on the scale claimed. Indians warred on each other, before whites got here and then in trade wars after. Sucks to know they were just murderers for hire for the most part, and murdered for the highest bidder, be it Spain, France, England, the Dutch, didn't matter.

But, as we can see, the main reason they hate Whitey is jealousy, not any moral principle; they all know their own racial history is far more violent and reprehensible by any standards, and they resented the new kids on the block, usurping their own dreams in that direction. White people didn't invent slavery, but they ended it. Non-whites never had an anti-slavery movement, nor did they like it when white people forced anti-slavery laws on non-white countries. It's fun to read the vitriolic gibberish and bed-wetting, shrieking, and general idiocy from the usual suspects, though.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

n

Non-white peoples' envy and jealousy at its finest.

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

absolute bullshit,
WHAT RACE OR CULTURE OF PEOPLE HAVE KILLED MORE PEOPLE BROUGHT THE MOST WAR AND MISERY THAN ANY OTHERS


When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

Are you white ?

1/2 irish 1/2 cheatwood cherokee....so I have a lot to complain about .

Ahh, so you're only half a Tom.

 

[daws101]

n

white false superiority on full display!

Well, you've got us there. The history of non-white peoples does make whites look incompetent comparatively in the atrocities department. No way can white history match the thousands of years of butchery and terror of non-white peoples. I'm sure white history is indeed held in contempt by such masterly perpetrators of genocides and slavery, especially Africans, the world champions.

absolute bullshit,
WHAT RACE OR CULTURE OF PEOPLE HAVE KILLED MORE PEOPLE BROUGHT THE MOST WAR AND MISERY THAN ANY OTHERS


When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

Are you white ?

1/2 irish 1/2 cheatwood cherokee....so I have a lot to complain about .

Ahh, so you're only half a Tom.

false I'm as american as we make um indigenous people plus 34 million irish americans.
if anyone's a tom it's you ....

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Happy Redskins Day everyone !

 

[ShootSpeeders]

n
[

When white man arrived in North America, there were about 5,000,000 native red indians. After 20 years of European occupation, several wars and deliberate hunting and destruction of most of the buffalo herds (the Indian's primary food supply)... this population dropped to only about 250,000 native Indians.

When white Europeans landed in Australia, they killed over 40,000 native black aborigines in a deliberate campaign of genocide and slaughter.

During World War 1, over 21 million people died for no good reason.

During World War 2, over 50 million people died, also for no good reason. Who do you think paid for Hitler's rise to power, and who PAID for the growth of his army?

Given some of these facts, ask yourself: Which RACE of human beings has proven itself to be the most aggressive, violent and harmful compared to other races of people? Which RACE has been involved in more killing and imperial military invasions and occupations of other countries than any other RACE?

any sane person would have to conclude that it was white europeans..

Now tell us about idi amin and robert mugabe and charles taylor. Africa has produced plenty of mass murderers too. Whites have also given us great men like newton and einstein. Blacks have never produced anyone of value. THINK

 

[thereisnospoon]

Washington state is becoming California North. Jeez what a pack if moon bats!

Both Washington and Oregon were invaded by people from California looking to escape, the high taxes, crime, polluted air, impossible traffic, illegal immigrants, etc. One thing they forgot to leave behind is their liberal politics and voting records. They looked to escape the very same things they brought with them and set up in the Pacific Northwest.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

 

[thereisnospoon]

It figures that a violent people would celebrate a violent sick man in Columbus. He was into little girls as sex slaves as documented by his own writings.

A hundred castellanos are as easily obtained for a woman as for a farm, and there are plenty of dealers who go about looking for girls; those from nine to ten are now in demand, and for all ages a good price must be paid.

Which violent people?
How much would you like to wager there is not a single black person in New York that asked to go to work in protest of the violent sex slave trading Columbus?
So you can stow your faux rage.

 

[DigitalDrifter]