Seattle Mayor Challenges Authority of President Trump

[sartre play]

I went to Seattle news papers to see pictures of the area, no idea how it will end up But sure looks different than how its being portrayed by right wing media.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I went to Seattle news papers to see pictures of the area, no idea how it will end up But sure looks different than how its being portrayed by right wing media.

The Seattle Times is not going show or tell you anything negative about the occupation.

 

[protectionist]

I didn't name names, no. Mostly because the number of them vocally disagreeing with him is high and still going up. It seems like a fairly universal opinion, with no names needed.

Besides anyone I named you'd just suddenly decide was a "never Trumper" and a "RINO" and dismiss out of hand because they run contrary to your bias.

You aren't naming them because you have no idea who they are. And even if you could name 3 or 4, so what ? There are 909 generals in the US Armed forces. All active duty military personnel currently include 38 generals, 141 lieutenant generals, 310 major generals and 420 brigadier generals.


So you come up with 3 or 4 Trump haters, and ignore all the rest. Well

Back to the drawing board for you, Mr "Military Leadership"

 

[WTH_Progs?]

It's the State and City's problem. Only way I see Trump should involve is where there's a federal risk or disruption. If there are federal buildings under their wing, for example, then a dollar says he can send in troops.

Regardless, Washington's makeup is of major pussies.

 

[protectionist]

I went to Seattle news papers to see pictures of the area, no idea how it will end up But sure looks different than how its being portrayed by right wing media.

By right wing media ? Can you name some examples, with links ?

 

[protectionist]

It's the State and City's problem. Only way I see Trump should involve is where there's a federal risk or disruption. If there are federal buildings under their wing, for example, then a dollar says he can send in troops.

You don't call this "disruption" ?

For you edification, the POTUS can call in federal troops anytime state and local authorities are not getting the job done. Period. See Post # 25.

 

[protectionist]

Lock them up is a popular refrain among you Trumpians! Does justice and due process ever niter the question?

How can you Square the actual law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice?

And if federal control of local matters can be justified in this instance, why is it so difficult for you to accept federal control in matters like; fair housing, environmental justice, equal opportunities for decent, safe and sanitary housing, food assistance, educational opportunities and law enforcement that protects and serves rather than brutalizes minorities?

What in the world is all this jibberish about "law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice" ? Have any of you people ever gone to school ? Or did your libby teachers fail to educate you about the use of federal troops by President Eisenhower in 1957. Ever hear of the Insurrection Act ? More distortions coming out of our illustrious MISeducation system.

And in educational opportunities aka Affirmative Action, minorities are not brutalized. They are the BENEFICIARIES. It is the white victims who are brutalized, dummy.

Yes, LOCK THEM UP comes right after adjuduction of justice and due process , in this case, obstruction of justice, by removing the police department from its building, and the entire "autonomous zone" allowing mass extortion et al crimes. All illegal acts, by a criminal nutcase mayor, ans with the support of the governor.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I went to Seattle news papers to see pictures of the area, no idea how it will end up But sure looks different than how its being portrayed by right wing media.

I'm so shocked to hear the Seattle newspapers aren't reporting this like right wing media is.

 

[Desperado]

That's all fake news.

Twitter is not news at all.

Neither is CNN or MSNBC

 

[Nosmo King]

Lock them up is a popular refrain among you Trumpians! Does justice and due process ever niter the question?

How can you Square the actual law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice?

And if federal control of local matters can be justified in this instance, why is it so difficult for you to accept federal control in matters like; fair housing, environmental justice, equal opportunities for decent, safe and sanitary housing, food assistance, educational opportunities and law enforcement that protects and serves rather than brutalizes minorities?

What in the world is all this jibberish about "law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice" ? Have any of you people ever gone to school ? Or did your libby teachers fail to educate you about the use of federal troops by President Eisenhower in 1957. Ever hear of the Insurrection Act ? More distortions coming out of our illustrious MISeducation system.

And in educational opportunities aka Affirmative Action, minorities are not brutalized. They are the BENEFICIARIES. It is the white victims who are brutalized, dummy.

Yes, LOCK THEM UP comes right after adjuduction of justice and due process , in this case, obstruction of justice, by removing the police department from its building, and the entire "autonomous zone" allowing mass extortion et al crimes. All illegal acts, by a criminal nutcase mayor, ans with the support of the governor.

Posse Commitatu

Lock them up is a popular refrain among you Trumpians! Does justice and due process ever niter the question?

How can you Square the actual law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice?

And if federal control of local matters can be justified in this instance, why is it so difficult for you to accept federal control in matters like; fair housing, environmental justice, equal opportunities for decent, safe and sanitary housing, food assistance, educational opportunities and law enforcement that protects and serves rather than brutalizes minorities?

What in the world is all this jibberish about "law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice" ? Have any of you people ever gone to school ? Or did your libby teachers fail to educate you about the use of federal troops by President Eisenhower in 1957. Ever hear of the Insurrection Act ? More distortions coming out of our illustrious MISeducation system.

And in educational opportunities aka Affirmative Action, minorities are not brutalized. They are the BENEFICIARIES. It is the white victims who are brutalized, dummy.

Yes, LOCK THEM UP comes right after adjuduction of justice and due process , in this case, obstruction of justice, by removing the police department from its building, and the entire "autonomous zone" allowing mass extortion et al crimes. All illegal acts, by a criminal nutcase mayor, ans with the support of the governor.

Posse Comitatus.

Why are urban schools and schools in poor rural communities crumbling? Are the minority students there "advantaged" by Affirmative Action?

Eisenhower sent in the 101st to enforce federal law. You want Trump to send in the armed forces to enforce LOCAL law!

 

[Bush92]

'Illegal': mayor says Trump cannot disband Seattle's 'autonomous zone' â video

Seattle's mayor has defended George Floyd protesters' autonomous zone after Donald Trump said in a tweet he would deal with the 'domestic terrorists'

www.theguardian.com

My guess is not for long.

It's too bad the mayor doesn't have enough brains or guts to challenge the authority of the thugs that have captured the morons city.

Negotiate with terrorist and you invite more of the same activity.

 

[Bush92]

'Illegal': mayor says Trump cannot disband Seattle's 'autonomous zone' â video

Seattle's mayor has defended George Floyd protesters' autonomous zone after Donald Trump said in a tweet he would deal with the 'domestic terrorists'

www.theguardian.com

My guess is not for long.

How can you call for smaller federal government and a return of control to localities then advocate Trump's authority on this local matter?

Easy. The President must protect the country from all enemies foreign and domestic. When Constitutional conflict occurs between state and federal government the state must yield. McCulloch v. Maryland 1818.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Hey dummy, read and try to understand Article 90 of the UCMJ!

You're the dummy. The Insurrection Act has been enacted in the past over the objections of the state officials. Maybe you need more pictures ?

View attachment 350194

View attachment 350197

View attachment 350199

You're the dummy. The Insurrection Act has been enacted in the past over the objections of the state officials. Maybe you need more pictures ?

Dance around all you want to get from under your stupidity by trying to change the subject YOUR DUMB ASS brought up...here it is again to refresh your memory!

But if Trump were truly stupid enough to give that a shot, he just might see the troops stand down in disobedience to an unlawful order. You see, the UCMJ and one's Oath upon entry into military service disallows following unlawful orders!

That was not sent to you but your dumb ass or anyone else specifically regarding the implications of Trump sending troops into Capitol Hill Dist. in Seattle, and you post this without fucking thinking;

It is not "unlawful" Mr Talk Without Knowing. See Post # 25.

And I replied;

Hey dummy, read and try to understand Article 90 of the UCMJ!

To which you replied expecting that you WOULD to be referring to the points of lawful orders to the military from the President, his military subordonnants and the UCMJ ;

You're the dummy. The Insurrection Act has been enacted in the past over the objections of the state officials. Maybe you need more pictures ?

Which is your usual ploy when you realize your ass is caught in a crack! Instead of staying on point, you "forget" all about "unlawful orders" to Guardsmen from the President and the UCMJ to pretend the Insurrection Act is the shiny object of the topic.

You're a truly disgustingly dishonest bastard!

 

[Nosmo King]

'Illegal': mayor says Trump cannot disband Seattle's 'autonomous zone' â video

Seattle's mayor has defended George Floyd protesters' autonomous zone after Donald Trump said in a tweet he would deal with the 'domestic terrorists'

www.theguardian.com

My guess is not for long.

How can you call for smaller federal government and a return of control to localities then advocate Trump's authority on this local matter?

Easy. The President must protect the country from all enemies foreign and domestic. When Constitutional conflict occurs between state and federal government the state must yield. McCulloch v. Maryland 1818.

Isn't it as simple as local law enforcement policy versus Posse Comatatus?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Who cares about CHAZ? This is the result of the extemist left wing government the people of Seattle have been voting in for years, so what's the problem? They're getting what they voted for.

 

[22lcidw]

Trump has always been all talk and no action. How did his promise to go out and arrest a million illegals go?

He will call the mayor a few names in a tweet and his followers will be happy.

By the words of your Prog leaders, all of the protesters/rioters should have been arrested for the corona virus edicts. Which proved they are of the Prog Socialist Agendas first and the citizens second.

 

[pknopp]

Trump has always been all talk and no action. How did his promise to go out and arrest a million illegals go?

He will call the mayor a few names in a tweet and his followers will be happy.

By the words of your Prog leaders, all of the protesters/rioters should have been arrested for the corona virus edicts. Which proved they are of the Prog Socialist Agendas first and the citizens second.

If you go back the last few months I quit posting here. I did not and I still do not know what the correct answer is with the virus. I knew that all that would be done here is both sides blaming the other for political one upmanship and I wanted no part of that.

 

[Kondor3]

...Trump commands the military leadership. They don't command him.

True... right up to the moment when he gives an Illegal or Unconstitutional Order... at which point, disobedience to the CIC is a legal imperative.

 

[Crepitus]

I didn't name names, no. Mostly because the number of them vocally disagreeing with him is high and still going up. It seems like a fairly universal opinion, with no names needed.

Besides anyone I named you'd just suddenly decide was a "never Trumper" and a "RINO" and dismiss out of hand because they run contrary to your bias.

View attachment 350204

You aren't naming them because you have no idea who they are. And even if you could name 3 or 4, so what ? There are 909 generals in the US Armed forces. All active duty military personnel currently include 38 generals, 141 lieutenant generals, 310 major generals and 420 brigadier generals.


So you come up with 3 or 4 Trump haters, and ignore all the rest. Well

Back to the drawing board for you, Mr "Military Leadership"

Lol, so you proved you can Google, you figure it out.

Lmao!!

 

[Bush92]

Lock them up is a popular refrain among you Trumpians! Does justice and due process ever niter the question?

How can you Square the actual law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice?

And if federal control of local matters can be justified in this instance, why is it so difficult for you to accept federal control in matters like; fair housing, environmental justice, equal opportunities for decent, safe and sanitary housing, food assistance, educational opportunities and law enforcement that protects and serves rather than brutalizes minorities?

What in the world is all this jibberish about "law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice" ? Have any of you people ever gone to school ? Or did your libby teachers fail to educate you about the use of federal troops by President Eisenhower in 1957. Ever hear of the Insurrection Act ? More distortions coming out of our illustrious MISeducation system.

And in educational opportunities aka Affirmative Action, minorities are not brutalized. They are the BENEFICIARIES. It is the white victims who are brutalized, dummy.

Yes, LOCK THEM UP comes right after adjuduction of justice and due process , in this case, obstruction of justice, by removing the police department from its building, and the entire "autonomous zone" allowing mass extortion et al crimes. All illegal acts, by a criminal nutcase mayor, ans with the support of the governor.

Posse Commitatu

Lock them up is a popular refrain among you Trumpians! Does justice and due process ever niter the question?

How can you Square the actual law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice?

And if federal control of local matters can be justified in this instance, why is it so difficult for you to accept federal control in matters like; fair housing, environmental justice, equal opportunities for decent, safe and sanitary housing, food assistance, educational opportunities and law enforcement that protects and serves rather than brutalizes minorities?

What in the world is all this jibberish about "law prohibiting the use of the armed forces as law enforcement with justice" ? Have any of you people ever gone to school ? Or did your libby teachers fail to educate you about the use of federal troops by President Eisenhower in 1957. Ever hear of the Insurrection Act ? More distortions coming out of our illustrious MISeducation system.

And in educational opportunities aka Affirmative Action, minorities are not brutalized. They are the BENEFICIARIES. It is the white victims who are brutalized, dummy.

Yes, LOCK THEM UP comes right after adjuduction of justice and due process , in this case, obstruction of justice, by removing the police department from its building, and the entire "autonomous zone" allowing mass extortion et al crimes. All illegal acts, by a criminal nutcase mayor, ans with the support of the governor.

Posse Comitatus.

Why are urban schools and schools in poor rural communities crumbling? Are the minority students there "advantaged" by Affirmative Action?

Eisenhower sent in the 101st to enforce federal law. You want Trump to send in the armed forces to enforce LOCAL law!

He

Trump has always been all talk and no action. How did his promise to go out and arrest a million illegals go?

He will call the mayor a few names in a tweet and his followers will be happy.

By the words of your Prog leaders, all of the protesters/rioters should have been arrested for the corona virus edicts. Which proved they are of the Prog Socialist Agendas first and the citizens second.

Need a delivery of cholera tainted water to CHAZ. Also, the food delivered to these idiots needs to have lots of castor oil in it to induce outbreak of Hershey squirts.