Senate Impeachment Trial Thread.

[Olde Europe]

Biden is obviously above the law here. He should be made President by acclamation.

No, Mucky, Biden is not above the law. If there is actual evidence, transfer it to the FBI. If it's real evidence for any criminal wrongdoing, not just a drug deal some imbecile cooked up, the FBI would be happy to act on that evidence. Moreover, once that investigation was properly started, the FBI can go to the DoJ and ask them to contact the Ukrainians under the U.S.-Ukraine "legal assistance treaty" for Ukrainian help, if necessary. Note the words "legal assistance". They are not equal to "starting an electioneering plot and a smear campaign by using a public office's power pressuring a foreign government".

 

[Zorro!]

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

That must have been the 1475th time I am made to read the exact same pap.

How come, regurgitating dummy, there was no impeachment trial without witnesses in all of U.S. history?

Why, having read dozens if not hundreds of times there is ample grounds for conviction and removal, but there's still more evidence out there Trump's obstruction kept from Congress, does none of that penetrate your thick skull? Are you a moron?

And,

If the House Clowns showed up with “an overwhelming case”, why are they begging the Senate to do their investigating.

Great Question!


BREAKING: Democrat Star Witness Lev Parnas Is Escorted from Senate Gallery – Criminal Ankle Bracelets Are Not Allowed

 

[Zorro!]

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

That must have been the 1475th time I am made to read the exact same pap.

How come, regurgitating dummy, there was no impeachment trial without witnesses in all of U.S. history?

Why, having read dozens if not hundreds of times there is ample grounds for conviction and removal, but there's still more evidence out there Trump's obstruction kept from Congress, does none of that penetrate your thick skull? Are you a moron?

son, it sounds like your foot got caught in a blender. you're swirling too fast in circles you're lost and you're disoriented.

He does seem a bit disoriented, and quite chaffed that their "great case" is going down in flames due to lack of evidence of any actual statutory crime, much less Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes.

If a majority of Senators, after evaluating both the prosecution's and The Defense case feels that they need to hear from more witnesses or see additional evidence in order to determine whether or not to vote for removal, they will say so and then do so.

If they think they have heard enough to render a decision, then they will go to a vote. This is an election year, and this is our National Legislature, if their work is done, then they will conclude it and get back to the business of working on the Behalf of The American People.

 

[Dragonlady]

Biden is obviously above the law here. He should be made President by acclamation.

If what Biden did is illegal or even questionable, why didn't the Republican House and Senate object at the time he did it? Why no investigation before now? It's not like Biden hid what he did, or tried to keep it secret. Why did Donald Trump give military aid to the Ukraine in 2017 and 2018 with any question of corruption in the Ukraine?

If all of this is about questions about Biden, why didn't William Barr open an investigation into the Bidens', or either of them?

The Senators could call Joe Biden as a witness. They have the numbers. So why haven't they?

 

[Zorro!]

"No one goes to trial without first doing discovery." (Philbin)

Breat. Taking.

That's a change of pace from claiming they did discovery in the dungeon.

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

 

[Zorro!]

"No one goes to trial without first doing discovery." (Philbin)

Breat. Taking.

That's a change of pace from claiming they did discovery in the dungeon.

Was that before they were whining, in unison, about the "show trials"?

And after the kangaroo court.

R Senators are going to wake screaming, "Bolton!"

It's just this side of cruel.

Why would you claim that? It's not even clear that the US Senate will even see the need to hear from Bolton. Even if they stipulate to the claims, it's not a crime, and certainly nothing that would justify removing Trump from the upcoming Ballet. The Prosecution cannot even show anyone was harmed by the brief delay of aid.

Why are you guys so afraid of Trump being on the upcoming ballet? I thought you folks were confident of victory. Why do you think you have the right to take the decision of who will be President, out of the hands of the Electorate?


White House Moved Last Week to Block Bolton Book, Says Contains “Top Secret” Information

Why in the world would the former NSA be trying to sell a tell all book into the middle of the election? Bolton seems to have decided that if the Biden's can cash out on their public "service" why shouldn't he?

Sad!

 

[Cosmos]

Biden is obviously above the law here. He should be made President by acclamation.

No, Mucky, Biden is not above the law. If there is actual evidence, transfer it to the FBI. If it's real evidence for any criminal wrongdoing, not just a drug deal some imbecile cooked up, the FBI would be happy to act on that evidence. Moreover, once that investigation was properly started, the FBI can go to the DoJ and ask them to contact the Ukrainians under the U.S.-Ukraine "legal assistance treaty" for Ukrainian help, if necessary. Note the words "legal assistance". They are not equal to "starting an electioneering plot and a smear campaign by using a public office's power pressuring a foreign government".

You don't get to talk to me about politics, OldeNazi. You're only here to be scorned and ridiculed.

 

[Cosmos]

Biden is obviously above the law here. He should be made President by acclamation.

If what Biden did is illegal or even questionable, why didn't the Republican House and Senate object at the time he did it? Why no investigation before now? It's not like Biden hid what he did, or tried to keep it secret. Why did Donald Trump give military aid to the Ukraine in 2017 and 2018 with any question of corruption in the Ukraine?

If all of this is about questions about Biden, why didn't William Barr open an investigation into the Bidens', or either of them?

The Senators could call Joe Biden as a witness. They have the numbers. So why haven't they?

Pam Bondi spent a half an hour on the floor of the Senate the other day explaining that. It's on YouTube. And if we get witnesses, I expect and hope the WH will see to it we hear a lot more about it.

 

[joaquinmiller]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

"No one goes to trial without first doing discovery." (Philbin)

Breat. Taking.

That's a change of pace from claiming they did discovery in the dungeon.

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

 

[Zorro!]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

"No one goes to trial without first doing discovery." (Philbin)

Breat. Taking.

That's a change of pace from claiming they did discovery in the dungeon.

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Let help you zoom right up to your final position to explain the coming collapse of your case when Trump is fully exonerated by the US Senate:

"WE WUZ ROBBED!"​

 

[Zorro!]

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

That must have been the 1475th time I am made to read the exact same pap.

How come, regurgitating dummy, there was no impeachment trial without witnesses in all of U.S. history?

Why, having read dozens if not hundreds of times there is ample grounds for conviction and removal, but there's still more evidence out there Trump's obstruction kept from Congress, does none of that penetrate your thick skull? Are you a moron?

If the House Clowns showed up with “an overwhelming case”, why are they begging the Senate to do their investigating.

Bitter Turn Coat

Deep State War Monger Benedict Arnold
​

BREAKING: John Bolton Called Democrat Rep. Engel AFTER HE WAS FIRED, Told Him to Look Into Yovanovitch

Strangely, just one month before Benedict Bolton called Democrat Rep. Engel, he praised our Beloved President Trump and called out Ukraine corruption.

Benedict Bolton backed our Trump during his interview in August and one month later changed his tune and turned on Trump.

 

[joaquinmiller]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

That's a change of pace from claiming they did discovery in the dungeon.

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Those arguments have been blown away, except for the one I didn't strike through.

Philbin was just gaslighting about the timeline of Rudy's plan to kneecap Biden. He said Rudy started in January, and Biden announced in April, implying he wasn't a political opponent at the time. Truthy, but less than honest.

Rumors of an impending Biden announcement have been nonstop since the start of the year. On January 6, the New York Times reported Biden would "most likely make a decision within the next two weeks." Axios reported Biden was eyeing a January 15 announcement date, telling top Democrats he was inching closer to a presidential bid.

When February rolled around, The Hill reported Biden was "95 percent there" and ready to take the plunge.

Joe Biden has been teasing a 2020 presidential campaign announcement for months — now he might jump in the race

 

[ColonelAngus]

What if Biden drops out of the race? Is it still investigation into a political opponent?

 

[Zorro!]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Those arguments have been blown away, except for the one I didn't strike through.

Philbin was just gaslighting about the timeline of Rudy's plan to kneecap Biden. He said Rudy started in January, and Biden announced in April, implying he wasn't a political opponent at the time. Truthy, but less than honest.

Rumors of an impending Biden announcement have been nonstop since the start of the year. On January 6, the New York Times reported Biden would "most likely make a decision within the next two weeks." Axios reported Biden was eyeing a January 15 announcement date, telling top Democrats he was inching closer to a presidential bid.

When February rolled around, The Hill reported Biden was "95 percent there" and ready to take the plunge.

Joe Biden has been teasing a 2020 presidential campaign announcement for months — now he might jump in the race

With that on camera bragging about extorting Ukraine to fire the prosecutor that was investigating the corrupt firm that hired Hunter, Biden "kneecapped" himself.

 

[Cosmos]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

If they didn't think they had enough evidence for conviction and removal, why did they send their articles to the Senate?

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Those arguments have been blown away, except for the one I didn't strike through.

Philbin was just gaslighting about the timeline of Rudy's plan to kneecap Biden. He said Rudy started in January, and Biden announced in April, implying he wasn't a political opponent at the time. Truthy, but less than honest.

Rumors of an impending Biden announcement have been nonstop since the start of the year. On January 6, the New York Times reported Biden would "most likely make a decision within the next two weeks." Axios reported Biden was eyeing a January 15 announcement date, telling top Democrats he was inching closer to a presidential bid.

When February rolled around, The Hill reported Biden was "95 percent there" and ready to take the plunge.

Joe Biden has been teasing a 2020 presidential campaign announcement for months — now he might jump in the race

That whistleblower guy sure put the kibash on any chances Biden had. LOL......Karma.

 

[joaquinmiller]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Those arguments have been blown away, except for the one I didn't strike through.

Philbin was just gaslighting about the timeline of Rudy's plan to kneecap Biden. He said Rudy started in January, and Biden announced in April, implying he wasn't a political opponent at the time. Truthy, but less than honest.

Rumors of an impending Biden announcement have been nonstop since the start of the year. On January 6, the New York Times reported Biden would "most likely make a decision within the next two weeks." Axios reported Biden was eyeing a January 15 announcement date, telling top Democrats he was inching closer to a presidential bid.

When February rolled around, The Hill reported Biden was "95 percent there" and ready to take the plunge.

Joe Biden has been teasing a 2020 presidential campaign announcement for months — now he might jump in the race

With that on camera bragging about extorting Ukraine to fire the prosecutor that was investigating the corrupt firm that hired Hunter, Biden "kneecapped" himself.

Biden stepped in it. He was just the errand boy for the US, the IMF and various European interests. He was puffing himself up at the Foreign Affairs forum and it provided a soundbite ripe for misconstruction. There are letters signed by multiple Senators of both parties supporting the action at the time.

I'm not a Biden fan. He's yesterday, by a long way. None of which justifies Trump's attempted extortion using authorized funding as leverage.

 

[joaquinmiller]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

They have enough. The party of Trump doesn't accept evidence. It's in the Branding business - HOAX! WITCH HUNT! FAKE NEWS! DEEP STATE!

Think of the impeachment trial as a series of campaign commercials against quisling senators. BOLTON!

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Those arguments have been blown away, except for the one I didn't strike through.

Philbin was just gaslighting about the timeline of Rudy's plan to kneecap Biden. He said Rudy started in January, and Biden announced in April, implying he wasn't a political opponent at the time. Truthy, but less than honest.

Rumors of an impending Biden announcement have been nonstop since the start of the year. On January 6, the New York Times reported Biden would "most likely make a decision within the next two weeks." Axios reported Biden was eyeing a January 15 announcement date, telling top Democrats he was inching closer to a presidential bid.

When February rolled around, The Hill reported Biden was "95 percent there" and ready to take the plunge.

Joe Biden has been teasing a 2020 presidential campaign announcement for months — now he might jump in the race

That whistleblower guy sure put the kibash on any chances Biden had. LOL......Karma.

I think so. He'll be dirtied up. That said, I figured he would implode sooner or later. There's a track record.

 

[Olde Europe]

Biden is obviously above the law here. He should be made President by acclamation.

No, Mucky, Biden is not above the law. If there is actual evidence, transfer it to the FBI. If it's real evidence for any criminal wrongdoing, not just a drug deal some imbecile cooked up, the FBI would be happy to act on that evidence. Moreover, once that investigation was properly started, the FBI can go to the DoJ and ask them to contact the Ukrainians under the U.S.-Ukraine "legal assistance treaty" for Ukrainian help, if necessary. Note the words "legal assistance". They are not equal to "starting an electioneering plot and a smear campaign by using a public office's power pressuring a foreign government".

You don't get to talk to me about politics, OldeNazi. You're only here to be scorned and ridiculed.

Good one, Mucky. I understand you'd rather have your imbecilic pap pass without reasoned objections. That, of course, would be risible, and you'll get your flabby arse kicked, richly deserved as it is.

 

[Cosmos]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Those arguments have been blown away, except for the one I didn't strike through.

Philbin was just gaslighting about the timeline of Rudy's plan to kneecap Biden. He said Rudy started in January, and Biden announced in April, implying he wasn't a political opponent at the time. Truthy, but less than honest.

Rumors of an impending Biden announcement have been nonstop since the start of the year. On January 6, the New York Times reported Biden would "most likely make a decision within the next two weeks." Axios reported Biden was eyeing a January 15 announcement date, telling top Democrats he was inching closer to a presidential bid.

When February rolled around, The Hill reported Biden was "95 percent there" and ready to take the plunge.

Joe Biden has been teasing a 2020 presidential campaign announcement for months — now he might jump in the race

That whistleblower guy sure put the kibash on any chances Biden had. LOL......Karma.

I think so. He'll be dirtied up. That said, I figured he would implode sooner or later. There's a track record.

He could have quietly retired to his nice little Florida island and watched the money flow in. Instead, he'll get to spend his days fighting off reporters and court battles when all the shit hits the fan that could hit.

 

[Zorro!]

I'm starting to wonder if Trump has something on Dershowitz.

Your post is an unconvincing mixture of unsupported claims and buzzword salad.

The Trump Defense does no accept the validity of impeachment articles that do not meet the criteria for removal, worse, they contain no statutory crimes, much less Treason Bribery or other High Crimes. They have no crimes at all.

The job of the Prosecution is convince the Jury that they have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty of Treason, Bribery or other High Crimes similarly serious to Treason and Bribery. They have not only failed completely at this, they have failed to produce any compelling evidence that Trump is guilty of ANY CRIMES AT ALL!


WOW! How Embarrassing! Democrat Val Demings Can’t Explain How Harm was Done to Ukraine by Delaying Aid

You can't blame others for the defects in your case, your case is your handiwork.

They are trying to overturn an election and remove Trump from the upcoming ballet based on a series of events that PRODUCED NO HARM AT ALL?

America is saddened that these folks are so deranged that they would even attempt such a thing. America wonders how folks so bereft of sound judgment ended up able to exercise such an awesome constitutional power, and the answer to that is, the majority of Democrats that invoked the Impeachment Power.

The Unh-uh Defense is evolving.

N̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶a̶l̶i̶d̶ ̶i̶n̶q̶u̶i̶r̶y̶
̶ ̶N̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶i̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶ ̶q̶u̶o̶ ̶
̶A̶i̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶d̶i̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶t̶e̶s̶t̶i̶m̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶n̶o̶u̶n̶c̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶i̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶i̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶
We did it! You'll still acquit!

All 4 of those are valid arguments for acquittal. You're catching on. Good for you!

Those arguments have been blown away, except for the one I didn't strike through.

Philbin was just gaslighting about the timeline of Rudy's plan to kneecap Biden. He said Rudy started in January, and Biden announced in April, implying he wasn't a political opponent at the time. Truthy, but less than honest.

Rumors of an impending Biden announcement have been nonstop since the start of the year. On January 6, the New York Times reported Biden would "most likely make a decision within the next two weeks." Axios reported Biden was eyeing a January 15 announcement date, telling top Democrats he was inching closer to a presidential bid.

When February rolled around, The Hill reported Biden was "95 percent there" and ready to take the plunge.

Joe Biden has been teasing a 2020 presidential campaign announcement for months — now he might jump in the race

That whistleblower guy sure put the kibash on any chances Biden had. LOL......Karma.

I think so. He'll be dirtied up. That said, I figured he would implode sooner or later. There's a track record.

You know, I know, and the American People know that the Democrats Impeachment Farce was intended to influence the 2020 election. Never in the history of the Republic has a Congress stooped to that level of desperation in order to affect an upcoming Presidential Election. In your mind, this "dirties up" Trump? Oh my goodness, do you have a shock coming!

If The Call Was Legit, You Must Acquit!​