Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now you believe the FBI?Too bad the FBI testified UNDER OATH that no weapons were found at the Capitol building that day. Thank God you are no longer able to pollute the minds of children with your utter bullshit.
AP’S ASSESSMENT:
Someone said (I think it was Calypso Jones) that they were refused lawyers unless they got the jab. Not sure she ever confirmed that, do you know anything about it?They will gleefully tell you how pleased they are that the unarmed protesters are being held in solitary for years, some withheld from medical attention. Angry citizens without weapons must be put in gulags.
so you admit they were not heavily armed?.....thats because it wasnt a planed operation,just a bunch of dumbasses listening to more dumbasses....They had all they needed to subvert democracy. If they had been heavily armed, the Capitol and Metropolitan police would have had to start shooting. SWAT teams would have been called in right away. They never would have made it as far as they did.
i bet the british thought the same way about those insurrectionist back in the day.....There have always been a minority of weirdos that want a civil war - so they can impose a tyranny.
Nowadays, the internet has given them an echo chamber that makes them feel a whole lot bigger than they really are.
The vast majority of Americans are loyal to the Government as it exists - and like the Capitol Police, they are ready to fight for it.
If any MAGA idiots try to start a civil war, they'll get their asses kicked quickly.
Hell, they're too stupid to have a successful insurrection, much less a civil war.
so what do rioters hope to overturn?...unless you vote to overturn something,that riot becomes an insurrection....Riots do not have the explicit intent of overturning democracy. Insurrections do.
Yes he did. The time of the data says that is were those 242 people were from 12AM to 5AM. Repeatably.No he didn't silly.
He had cell phone data, but there is NO video Evidence of a particular person dropping of multiple ballots on multiple occasions.
If you have the video evidence of Person A dropping off multiple ballots on multiple occasions, then post it.
Don't deflect and say something like......
you already posted it
find it yourself
etc.
If you have it, then PROVE it and POST it NOW.
So, you agree there is NO VIDEO evidence of a particular person dropping off multiple ballot on multiple occasions.Yes he did. The time of the data says that is were those 242 people were from 12AM to 5AM. Repeatably.
Digital evidence shows that kind of activity in very early AM hours by 242 people. People do not vote in the middle of the night.So, you agree there is NO VIDEO evidence of a particular person dropping off multiple ballot on multiple occasions.
But you're being mislead.Digital evidence shows that kind of activity in very early AM hours by 242 people. People do not vote in the middle of the night.
It shows repeated trips by the same people to same drop boxes and non profits. Again, in the very early AM hours.But you're being mislead.
Does the data showing a person casting multiple ballots on multiple occasions?
No, it does NOT.
A Washington Post analysis summarized the film's allegations as a leap of faith - "we're just asked to trust that True the Vote found what it says it found." True The Vote and D'Souza have disputed those fact-checks.It shows repeated trips by the same people to same drop boxes and non profits. Again, in the very early AM hours.
No WP. They lie. Fraud happened. Digital evidence for someones location is accepted by the SC.A Washington Post analysis summarized the film's allegations as a leap of faith - "we're just asked to trust that True the Vote found what it says it found." True The Vote and D'Souza have disputed those fact-checks.
NPR's reporting has raised additional questions about True the Vote and the film's trustworthiness. Dinesh D'Souza did not respond to NPR's requests for comment.
In the film, Phillips also cites ACLED, which is a nonprofit research organization.
"There's an organization that tracks the device IDs across all violent protests around the world. We took a look at our 242 mules in Atlanta and, sure enough, dozens and dozens and dozens of our mules show up on the ACLED databases," Phillips says in the film. "This is not grandma out walking her dog, these are, you know, violent criminals sometimes."
ACLED told NPR both claims are categorically false.
"This is not the type of analysis you can use ACLED data for, and it is highly unlikely that these conclusions have any basis in fact," said Sam Jones, senior communications manager at ACLED.
"This is not what we do - we do not track device IDs," Roudabeh Kishi, the director of research and innovation at ACLED, told NPR in an interview.
For the 2,000th time.Digital evidence for someones location is accepted by the SC.
All those trips certainly do.For the 2,000th time.
Showing Location has ZERO to do with casting Ballots.
Take your own advice moron. No weapons found. And yes they were looking you failure. Crawl back under your rock while we rejoice that you can’t poison children’s minds anymore.Now you believe the FBI?
Nobody LOOKED for weapons (firearms).
Imagine your outrage had they searched an individual and found a firearm.
You'd be screaming about "Illegal Search."
Quit being a dumbass.
Too bad the AP got shown to be lying. NARA never saw those documents and over $20 million spent by your pal Bathhouse Barry fighting FOIA requests. Try again Blind Boy. Another swing and miss.AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Obama administration records are exclusively held and maintained by the National Archives and Records Administration, the federal agency confirmed on Friday. Millions of unclassified documents were transferred after Obama left office to a NARA facility in Chicago, but neither Obama’s personal foundation nor the facility set to house his presidential memorabilia have control over those papers.
Obama didn’t keep millions of classified White House documents
Amid mounting revelations surrounding the FBI’s search of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, a counternarrative pushed online — including by Trump himself — posits that Obama similarly kept possession of White House documents after his term of office.apnews.com
Too bad the AP got shown to be lying. NARA never saw those documents and over $20 million spent by your pal Bathhouse Barry fighting FOIA requests. Try again Blind Boy. Another swing and miss.
