Should The Rich Be Required To Pay Higher Taxes In the US?

I'm done replying to your nonsense on this

ONCE MORE:...I get it Bubba...

Yepp, you get it, Bubba... You get that great big jar of Vaseline and apply it to your stinging liberal asshole where you just got butt-raped by your Boss with your own stupid point. That's what YOU get! :rofl:
 
`
Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.

Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.

Right, I forgot, it WASN'T the GOP who mostly controlled Congress the past 20 years, lol


Yeah, ANOTHER CONservative who "thinks" bigger is always better *shaking head*


Yes, lets live like Israel *shaking head*

But the US is Israels sugar daddy, whose gonna be ours for the fence, CONservatives/GOP sure aren't going to up tax revenues to pay for it!!!

Building a wall means we have suicide bombers murdering our citizens by the thousands? Israel built the wall because they had a problem to solve. They don't have a problem because they built the wall. In fact, precisely the opposite is the case. You have the cause effect relationship reversed.

The fence Israel built costs $4 million/mile. That comes to about $8 billion for the same thing along our Southern border. I think we can afford that. it's definitely cheaper than the $120 billion we spend every year providing illegals with government services.

And yes, some Republicans also colluded to keep the wall from being built. However, Americans overwhelmingly support it.

As usual, the arguments against building the wall are all dumber than dumb. The American people aren't buying it any longer.
 
Well I am not any kind of a -tarian but I do know what I support and what I don't.

Yep... asking for papers is totally unnecessary if we can simply apply the newly-PC liberal language test... those who can't speak English are illegals... right?

Hey... I am ALL FOR mandatory e-verify! Let's do it! ...Oh wait, California tried and their liberal Supreme Court ruled they couldn't make it mandatory! Ooops! ...We have a problem here!


ONCE MORE:


I get it Bubba, you being the typical dishonest right wing liar, can't recognize the EMPLOYERS CHOOSE NOT TO USE THINGS LIKE EVERIFY, SO THEY CAN HIRE PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE USA, AND YOU SUPPORT THEM BREAKING THE LAW, BECAUSE THEY ARE "JOB CREATORS" lol

As has been pointed out to you REPEATEDLY in these topics, "job creators" CONTINUALLY use Gov't policy to evade the law "legally" by capturing Gov't and their policy makers!

You are a batshit crazy losertarin who will NEVER be honest on anything Bubba, why would the Chamber of Commerce oppose making sure the Corps they represent, are here in the US legally (Everify)?

AND YOU RIGHT WINGERS HAD NO PROBLEM WITH DISCRIMINATION IN ARIZONA ABOUT ASKING FOR THEIR GAWDDAM PAPERS THERE, WHEN THEY WEREN'T DOING ANYTHING THAT REQUIRED IT!!!

Actually, you don't get it. But I understand, you're not a very bright bulb.

I have no problem with E-verify! I've told you repeatedly in the past 5-6 posts that I am all FOR mandatory E-verify! I don't have any problem with punishing "job creators" for illegal aliens! If you are knowingly hiring illegal aliens you need to be punished harshly and severely... and in such a manner that is a clear deterrent. We're at a crucial sticking point on this knowing and unknowing thing... and I am trying to get some clarification from you but you keep indicating one thing then dodging a direct answer to my questions.

If we are going to hold employers accountable for unknowingly hiring illegals then we need to define the parameters by which they can use personal judgement in making an informed decision. You seem to think they can actively discriminate on the basis of whether someone can speak English and I am asking you to clarify if that's what you think the policy should be? So... if we passed a law that you must be able to speak English to be hired in America... you'd be okay with that?

Then, I have some further questions about your policy idea... If we can apply this to employers, can we also apply this to law enforcement? If the cops encounter a Mexican who can't speak English, can they assume he is an illegal alien and deport him?

I thought CONservatives ALREADY decided the "papers please" movement was OK Bubba

Since YOU are NEVER going to get honest, I'm done replying to your nonsense on this

ONCE MORE:

I get it Bubba, you being the typical dishonest right wing liar, can't recognize the EMPLOYERS CHOOSE NOT TO USE THINGS LIKE EVERIFY, SO THEY CAN HIRE PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE USA, AND YOU SUPPORT THEM BREAKING THE LAW, BECAUSE THEY ARE "JOB CREATORS" lol

As has been pointed out to you REPEATEDLY in these topics, "job creators" CONTINUALLY use Gov't policy to evade the law "legally" by capturing Gov't and their policy makers!

What part of "mandatory" didn't you understand?

Better talk to the GOP Plutocrats Bubba, including the Chamber who say you are nuts!

There's a reason we call it the "Chamber of Crony Capitalism." The chamber is populated with Establishment RINOs. Conservatives laugh at it.

The fact that the "plutocrats" oppose it is the reason not to make E-verify mandatory? Since when did Dims start taking orders from plutocrats? Oh, yeah . . . . . they always have.
 
`
Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.

Right, I forgot, it WASN'T the GOP who mostly controlled Congress the past 20 years, lol


Yeah, ANOTHER CONservative who "thinks" bigger is always better *shaking head*


Yes, lets live like Israel *shaking head*

But the US is Israels sugar daddy, whose gonna be ours for the fence, CONservatives/GOP sure aren't going to up tax revenues to pay for it!!!

Building a wall means we have suicide bombers murdering our citizens by the thousands? Israel built the wall because they had a problem to solve. They don't have a problem because they built the wall. In fact, precisely the opposite is the case. You have the cause effect relationship reversed.

The fence Israel built costs $4 million/mile. That comes to about $8 billion for the same thing along our Southern border. I think we can afford that. it's definitely cheaper than the $120 billion we spend every year providing illegals with government services.

And yes, some Republicans also colluded to keep the wall from being built. However, Americans overwhelmingly support it.

As usual, the arguments against building the wall are all dumber than dumb. The American people aren't buying it any longer.


MORE CONservative "math" lol


Keep "believing" your right wing nonsense NOT based on history, rationality, math or honest Bubba, it's ALL the losertarians have!
 
I'm done replying to your nonsense on this

ONCE MORE:...I get it Bubba...

Yepp, you get it, Bubba... You get that great big jar of Vaseline and apply it to your stinging liberal asshole where you just got butt-raped by your Boss with your own stupid point. That's what YOU get! :rofl:


Sure Bubba, sure. I've personally spanked you soooo many times, I'm shocked some posters haven't called the cops on me for abuse of the dumb and mentally handicapped!
 
ONCE MORE:


I get it Bubba, you being the typical dishonest right wing liar, can't recognize the EMPLOYERS CHOOSE NOT TO USE THINGS LIKE EVERIFY, SO THEY CAN HIRE PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE USA, AND YOU SUPPORT THEM BREAKING THE LAW, BECAUSE THEY ARE "JOB CREATORS" lol

As has been pointed out to you REPEATEDLY in these topics, "job creators" CONTINUALLY use Gov't policy to evade the law "legally" by capturing Gov't and their policy makers!

You are a batshit crazy losertarin who will NEVER be honest on anything Bubba, why would the Chamber of Commerce oppose making sure the Corps they represent, are here in the US legally (Everify)?

AND YOU RIGHT WINGERS HAD NO PROBLEM WITH DISCRIMINATION IN ARIZONA ABOUT ASKING FOR THEIR GAWDDAM PAPERS THERE, WHEN THEY WEREN'T DOING ANYTHING THAT REQUIRED IT!!!

Actually, you don't get it. But I understand, you're not a very bright bulb.

I have no problem with E-verify! I've told you repeatedly in the past 5-6 posts that I am all FOR mandatory E-verify! I don't have any problem with punishing "job creators" for illegal aliens! If you are knowingly hiring illegal aliens you need to be punished harshly and severely... and in such a manner that is a clear deterrent. We're at a crucial sticking point on this knowing and unknowing thing... and I am trying to get some clarification from you but you keep indicating one thing then dodging a direct answer to my questions.

If we are going to hold employers accountable for unknowingly hiring illegals then we need to define the parameters by which they can use personal judgement in making an informed decision. You seem to think they can actively discriminate on the basis of whether someone can speak English and I am asking you to clarify if that's what you think the policy should be? So... if we passed a law that you must be able to speak English to be hired in America... you'd be okay with that?

Then, I have some further questions about your policy idea... If we can apply this to employers, can we also apply this to law enforcement? If the cops encounter a Mexican who can't speak English, can they assume he is an illegal alien and deport him?

I thought CONservatives ALREADY decided the "papers please" movement was OK Bubba

Since YOU are NEVER going to get honest, I'm done replying to your nonsense on this

ONCE MORE:

I get it Bubba, you being the typical dishonest right wing liar, can't recognize the EMPLOYERS CHOOSE NOT TO USE THINGS LIKE EVERIFY, SO THEY CAN HIRE PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE USA, AND YOU SUPPORT THEM BREAKING THE LAW, BECAUSE THEY ARE "JOB CREATORS" lol

As has been pointed out to you REPEATEDLY in these topics, "job creators" CONTINUALLY use Gov't policy to evade the law "legally" by capturing Gov't and their policy makers!

What part of "mandatory" didn't you understand?

Better talk to the GOP Plutocrats Bubba, including the Chamber who say you are nuts!

There's a reason we call it the "Chamber of Crony Capitalism." The chamber is populated with Establishment RINOs. Conservatives laugh at it.

The fact that the "plutocrats" oppose it is the reason not to make E-verify mandatory? Since when did Dims start taking orders from plutocrats? Oh, yeah . . . . . they always have.

Oh you mean the 20% of America who follow CONservatives like Rushblo or Insannity?


Sorry Bubba, YOU and your ilk are done in America, time to go back to being the Birchers hiding in the closet1!
 
..........So you won't answer my question? :dunno:

How are we to draw up policies if we don't define these variables going in? If we are going to punish employers for not knowing someone is illegal, which I don't agree with by the way, we need to at least define what lengths they can go to in determining such a thing on the basis of their judgement and assumptions. Because, if we can't establish this beforehand, it leaves the employer subject to all sorts of lawsuits for violating rights to privacy or just plain racial discrimination.

From what you posted, it sounds like you're saying it would be okay to profile people on the basis of whether they speak English. Is THAT what you want to do?
actually except for certain exemptions like age or a mental issue keeping them from learning English, It is a requirement for citizenship.
anyone that is in the working age would know at least basic English in order to be legal. So, in short if Juan comes in looking for a job and he is between the ages of 18 and 54 and cant speak English, he is not a legal citizen.
I think that clears it up.

Well no, not really... Juan could have been raised in a home where everyone spoke Spanish his entire life and that was what he had learned to speak. Or maybe Juan is embarrassed by speaking in English? What if Juan is 50 or older and lived here 20 years? None of these possibilities can be dismissed because if you denied employment to a legal citizen on the basis you assumed they are illegal, you have to be able to back up your assumption in court if they sue you... which, they will.

So AGAIN I ask... Do you favor profiling an individual on the basis of their ability to speak English? And should we assume that all persons unable to speak English are illegal aliens? Because, if not... you can't expect employers to be responsible for unknowingly hiring illegal aliens.
so, you didn't read what I posted.
you were answered there. If Juan is between the ages of 18 and 54 and does not speak English, Juan is illegal and does not qualify to work in this country.
 
Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.

Right, I forgot, it WASN'T the GOP who mostly controlled Congress the past 20 years, lol


Yeah, ANOTHER CONservative who "thinks" bigger is always better *shaking head*


Yes, lets live like Israel *shaking head*

But the US is Israels sugar daddy, whose gonna be ours for the fence, CONservatives/GOP sure aren't going to up tax revenues to pay for it!!!

Building a wall means we have suicide bombers murdering our citizens by the thousands? Israel built the wall because they had a problem to solve. They don't have a problem because they built the wall. In fact, precisely the opposite is the case. You have the cause effect relationship reversed.

The fence Israel built costs $4 million/mile. That comes to about $8 billion for the same thing along our Southern border. I think we can afford that. it's definitely cheaper than the $120 billion we spend every year providing illegals with government services.

And yes, some Republicans also colluded to keep the wall from being built. However, Americans overwhelmingly support it.

As usual, the arguments against building the wall are all dumber than dumb. The American people aren't buying it any longer.


MORE CONservative "math" lol


Keep "believing" your right wing nonsense NOT based on history, rationality, math or honest Bubba, it's ALL the losertarians have!

Yeah, I know math is hard for libturds. That's why you think there's money for stuff like free college for everyone and unlimited healthcare.
 
Went to Target a few years ago, at 8:00 AM (when they first opened) and the cleaning crew was leaving, 3-4 people, the manager had to ask them to wait while she got someone to interpret for her when she asked them questions. Nah she didn't have reason to SUSPECT they might be "illegal" right?


Go to ANY fast food restaurant, motel/hotel in the Salinas Valley near where I live, over 50% of the workers ARE suspected of being INELIGIBLE to work legally. Think BIZ SHOULD KNOW?

So you think we should profile people based on their inability to speak fluent English?

FLUENT? They didn't speak a WORD of English Bubs

This is where you wingnutters lose, and lose BIG, it's called HONESTY, EMPLOYERS KNOWINGLY HIRE PEOPLE NOT ELIGIBLE TO WORK IN THE US, BECAUSE THEY WANT TO PAY LESS!!!

Fine the employers, deport the illegals, build the wall.
I say put the elected officials in jail who refuse to enforce the law and even stop our law enforcement folk from fining the employers and deporting illegals.
As for the wall.. building a wall in the desert next to a river... makes no sense. What is needed is observation towers and law enforcement presence with the backing of our government to do their job. What we have is a piece of shit president who has re-tasked our law enforcement personnel into being bus drivers and enablers for illegal immigration. Instead of punishing illegals we give them money and a free ride into the country. Our laws are a fucking joke.

Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.
Because only dumb asses like the french believe humans won't be able to easily avoid man made obstacles. FYI even Mexicans know how to use ladders.
 
Actually, you don't get it. But I understand, you're not a very bright bulb.

I have no problem with E-verify! I've told you repeatedly in the past 5-6 posts that I am all FOR mandatory E-verify! I don't have any problem with punishing "job creators" for illegal aliens! If you are knowingly hiring illegal aliens you need to be punished harshly and severely... and in such a manner that is a clear deterrent. We're at a crucial sticking point on this knowing and unknowing thing... and I am trying to get some clarification from you but you keep indicating one thing then dodging a direct answer to my questions.

If we are going to hold employers accountable for unknowingly hiring illegals then we need to define the parameters by which they can use personal judgement in making an informed decision. You seem to think they can actively discriminate on the basis of whether someone can speak English and I am asking you to clarify if that's what you think the policy should be? So... if we passed a law that you must be able to speak English to be hired in America... you'd be okay with that?

Then, I have some further questions about your policy idea... If we can apply this to employers, can we also apply this to law enforcement? If the cops encounter a Mexican who can't speak English, can they assume he is an illegal alien and deport him?

I thought CONservatives ALREADY decided the "papers please" movement was OK Bubba

Since YOU are NEVER going to get honest, I'm done replying to your nonsense on this

ONCE MORE:

I get it Bubba, you being the typical dishonest right wing liar, can't recognize the EMPLOYERS CHOOSE NOT TO USE THINGS LIKE EVERIFY, SO THEY CAN HIRE PEOPLE NOT AUTHORIZED TO WORK IN THE USA, AND YOU SUPPORT THEM BREAKING THE LAW, BECAUSE THEY ARE "JOB CREATORS" lol

As has been pointed out to you REPEATEDLY in these topics, "job creators" CONTINUALLY use Gov't policy to evade the law "legally" by capturing Gov't and their policy makers!

What part of "mandatory" didn't you understand?

Better talk to the GOP Plutocrats Bubba, including the Chamber who say you are nuts!

There's a reason we call it the "Chamber of Crony Capitalism." The chamber is populated with Establishment RINOs. Conservatives laugh at it.

The fact that the "plutocrats" oppose it is the reason not to make E-verify mandatory? Since when did Dims start taking orders from plutocrats? Oh, yeah . . . . . they always have.

Oh you mean the 20% of America who follow CONservatives like Rushblo or Insannity?


Sorry Bubba, YOU and your ilk are done in America, time to go back to being the Birchers hiding in the closet1!

No, I mean the majority of all Americans. They are fed up with illegal immigration.
 
So you think we should profile people based on their inability to speak fluent English?

FLUENT? They didn't speak a WORD of English Bubs

This is where you wingnutters lose, and lose BIG, it's called HONESTY, EMPLOYERS KNOWINGLY HIRE PEOPLE NOT ELIGIBLE TO WORK IN THE US, BECAUSE THEY WANT TO PAY LESS!!!

Fine the employers, deport the illegals, build the wall.
I say put the elected officials in jail who refuse to enforce the law and even stop our law enforcement folk from fining the employers and deporting illegals.
As for the wall.. building a wall in the desert next to a river... makes no sense. What is needed is observation towers and law enforcement presence with the backing of our government to do their job. What we have is a piece of shit president who has re-tasked our law enforcement personnel into being bus drivers and enablers for illegal immigration. Instead of punishing illegals we give them money and a free ride into the country. Our laws are a fucking joke.

Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.
Because only dumb asses like the french believe humans won't be able to easily avoid man made obstacles. FYI even Mexicans know how to use ladders.

I don't think illegals are going to be driving tanks over our border, numskull.

Every excuse I read for not building the wall is dumber than dumb.

Just admit you're one of those open borders assholes.
 
`
I say put the elected officials in jail who refuse to enforce the law and even stop our law enforcement folk from fining the employers and deporting illegals.
As for the wall.. building a wall in the desert next to a river... makes no sense. What is needed is observation towers and law enforcement presence with the backing of our government to do their job. What we have is a piece of shit president who has re-tasked our law enforcement personnel into being bus drivers and enablers for illegal immigration. Instead of punishing illegals we give them money and a free ride into the country. Our laws are a fucking joke.

Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.

Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.
Note the GUARD TOWERs. Without human presence a wall is just a joke. FYI we have a river that already introduces a fairly decent barrier to cross. All we need is man power in towers to watch over the river. We don't need a wall.
 
FLUENT? They didn't speak a WORD of English Bubs

This is where you wingnutters lose, and lose BIG, it's called HONESTY, EMPLOYERS KNOWINGLY HIRE PEOPLE NOT ELIGIBLE TO WORK IN THE US, BECAUSE THEY WANT TO PAY LESS!!!

Fine the employers, deport the illegals, build the wall.
I say put the elected officials in jail who refuse to enforce the law and even stop our law enforcement folk from fining the employers and deporting illegals.
As for the wall.. building a wall in the desert next to a river... makes no sense. What is needed is observation towers and law enforcement presence with the backing of our government to do their job. What we have is a piece of shit president who has re-tasked our law enforcement personnel into being bus drivers and enablers for illegal immigration. Instead of punishing illegals we give them money and a free ride into the country. Our laws are a fucking joke.

Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.
Because only dumb asses like the french believe humans won't be able to easily avoid man made obstacles. FYI even Mexicans know how to use ladders.

I don't think illegals are going to be driving tanks over our border, numskull.

Every excuse I read for not building the wall is dumber than dumb.

Just admit you're one of those open borders assholes.
How did you read my statement about using a "ladder" to go over a wall and hear "TANK?" Are you drunk?
 
`
Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.

Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.
Note the GUARD TOWERs. Without human presence a wall is just a joke. FYI we have a river that already introduces a fairly decent barrier to cross. All we need is man power in towers to watch over the river. We don't need a wall.

Yes, that's right. It needs to be manned. the only people assuming it won't be manned are open-borders assholes like you.

we need the wall. The only reason for objecting to is that you support open borders.

Go fuck fuck yourself
 
Fine the employers, deport the illegals, build the wall.
I say put the elected officials in jail who refuse to enforce the law and even stop our law enforcement folk from fining the employers and deporting illegals.
As for the wall.. building a wall in the desert next to a river... makes no sense. What is needed is observation towers and law enforcement presence with the backing of our government to do their job. What we have is a piece of shit president who has re-tasked our law enforcement personnel into being bus drivers and enablers for illegal immigration. Instead of punishing illegals we give them money and a free ride into the country. Our laws are a fucking joke.

Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.
Because only dumb asses like the french believe humans won't be able to easily avoid man made obstacles. FYI even Mexicans know how to use ladders.

I don't think illegals are going to be driving tanks over our border, numskull.

Every excuse I read for not building the wall is dumber than dumb.

Just admit you're one of those open borders assholes.
How did you read my statement about using a "ladder" to go over a wall and hear "TANK?" Are you drunk?

You mentioned the French, which means the Maginot Line. The Germans didn't use ladders to get by that.
 
`
Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.
Note the GUARD TOWERs. Without human presence a wall is just a joke. FYI we have a river that already introduces a fairly decent barrier to cross. All we need is man power in towers to watch over the river. We don't need a wall.

Yes, that's right. It needs to be manned. the only people assuming it won't be manned are open-borders assholes like you.

we need the wall. The only reason for objecting to is that you support open borders.

Go fuck fuck yourself
No, you lying piece of shit ass-hole. I do not support open borders. The reason we have illegal immigration is because the river is not being guarded. And even in the few places where it is, our POS president has ordered ICE to invite them in instead of turn them away. It's not because we need to replace the river border with a wall border ya dumb ass. What part of we are ARMING MEXICAN CARTELS and defending their practice of selling us drugs has you all confused?
 
`
Fine the employers, deport the illegals, build the wall.
I say put the elected officials in jail who refuse to enforce the law and even stop our law enforcement folk from fining the employers and deporting illegals.
As for the wall.. building a wall in the desert next to a river... makes no sense. What is needed is observation towers and law enforcement presence with the backing of our government to do their job. What we have is a piece of shit president who has re-tasked our law enforcement personnel into being bus drivers and enablers for illegal immigration. Instead of punishing illegals we give them money and a free ride into the country. Our laws are a fucking joke.

Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.

Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air

The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.

Then let's totally finish it.
 
`
Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.

Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.
Note the GUARD TOWERs. Without human presence a wall is just a joke. FYI we have a river that already introduces a fairly decent barrier to cross. All we need is man power in towers to watch over the river. We don't need a wall.

Will the guards be using live ammo?
 
`
Yeah, because WALLS and guys with guns keep drugs and cell phones out of the prison system right?

Can we build one along the northern border too? lol

Walls do a great job of keeping suicide bombers out of Israel.

Yes, LET'S US LIVE LIKE ISRAEL, *shaking head*

Don't usually like this source, but even a clock is correct twice a day



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists.


Newsflash to both Donald Trump and Ann Coulter: that wall you’re saying the U.S. needs to build along its border with Mexico…it mostly exists. There aren’t any lasers, a shark-filled moat, or auto-turrets, but it’s there. Don’t believe me? Here it is in Mexicali, California.



And Arizona.



And New Mexico.



The New Mexico part of the fence might seem a little haphazard, but it’s important to realize how the terrain is. The way the mountains are, it really doesn’t make sense to put a big fence up. No one is (or should) going to try to sneak into the country that way. It’s just too dangerous and probably a development nightmare for builders. There’s also this fence in the Sonoran Desert which marks the U.S.-Mexico border.




So why the smaller fence? A part of it has to do with how dangerous the desert is. It’s the climate. The Sonoran Desert is, well, a desert, with blistering heat, mountains, and very little water. When the wall was built in the mid-to-late 2000’s there was no point in building a massive structure because the desert is supposed to be a natural deterrent. It makes no sense to try to cross over through a desert which would probably lead to your death. The Arizona Republic talked to a Border Patrol spokesperson last year who confirmed how dangerous it was.

“It’s the harshest climate along the U.S.-Mexico border. When you’ve got over 30 days of 100-degree weather, that makes it deadly for anybody crossing out there.”

Which is pretty much why coyotes were using this desert to get into the U.S. There aren’t a ton of humans there, which is why the cartels probably use the route. They’d probably still use the route, even if the fence was a massive structure. Desperate people will go anywhere, just look at the Texas border crossings from last year. The Texas fence is done, but it’s not a wall across the state. A lot of that has to do with topography. There are plenty of forests along the border in West Texas, once you get past El Paso, and barely any roads. Lupe Dempsey told FOX News in 2013 why illegal immigrants tend to avoid West Texas.

“…it pushes the migrants into more remote areas where it is easy to get lost, it is very dangerous.”...



The border wall Donald Trump wants (mostly) exists. « Hot Air





.

You call that a wall? Those are pathetic. Here's a wall:

2-imagewest-bank.jpg

Israel_wall_110513.jpg

nigelwallstory483.jpg


The wall wasn't build to standards because Democrats in Congress didn't want it built.
Note the GUARD TOWERs. Without human presence a wall is just a joke. FYI we have a river that already introduces a fairly decent barrier to cross. All we need is man power in towers to watch over the river. We don't need a wall.

Will the guards be using live ammo?
Do cops use live ammo? Of course they do.
 
I say put the elected officials in jail who refuse to enforce the law and even stop our law enforcement folk from fining the employers and deporting illegals.
As for the wall.. building a wall in the desert next to a river... makes no sense. What is needed is observation towers and law enforcement presence with the backing of our government to do their job. What we have is a piece of shit president who has re-tasked our law enforcement personnel into being bus drivers and enablers for illegal immigration. Instead of punishing illegals we give them money and a free ride into the country. Our laws are a fucking joke.

Why does building it in the desert make no sense? Should we build it in Colorado?

"Law enforcement present" can be made to disappear with the stroke of a pen. The wall also reduces the manpower needed at the border. Those who oppose the wall are either dumbasses or open-borders assholes.
Because only dumb asses like the french believe humans won't be able to easily avoid man made obstacles. FYI even Mexicans know how to use ladders.

I don't think illegals are going to be driving tanks over our border, numskull.

Every excuse I read for not building the wall is dumber than dumb.

Just admit you're one of those open borders assholes.
How did you read my statement about using a "ladder" to go over a wall and hear "TANK?" Are you drunk?

You mentioned the French, which means the Maginot Line. The Germans didn't use ladders to get by that.
Yes, the germans did use ladders to get men over the walls and barbed wire. You're focusing on tanks here.
 

Forum List

Back
Top