dcraelin
VIP Member
- Sep 4, 2013
- 2,553
- 136
- 85
Flat would be ideal, but just getting rid of all the exemptions, "incentives", and similar bullshit would be a fine start. And there'd be actual bipartisan support for such an effort.
A lot of the exemptions and deductions were put in place to justify higher rates. A change needs to involve reducing rates as well.
Linking the two issues isn't necessary and ensures gridlock. We should seize the opportunity for positive change, even if it results in higher net taxes for some. The argument for lower tax rates will be much more compelling when people are actually paying the rates in question.
Uh. Yes it is. Example. If you want to get rid of the mortgage deduction, then rates should be lowered for individuals.
If you want to get rid of depreciation on capital equipment as a deduction, then 100% of capital purchases should be eligible for deductions from income upon purchase.
We have a convoluted tax code because businesses and groups of individuals have quite rightly lobbied to offset high tax rates. You can't get rid of the deductions and leave rates high, unless you want to make the economy even worse.
the mortgage deduction is mostly just a favor for the real-estate lobby, it is a benefit renters dont get....it should be eliminated or severely cut back, with a cap.
businesses and groups have lobbied....you're right on that.
the pile up of debt is what will REALLY make the economy bad.....Eisenhower had a top MARGINAL rate of 91%.....we have since added even more to our debt....top rates should go back up to that.
Reagan stopped the credit card interest deductions, but left the mortgage interest deductions UNLIMITED and even for second homes? lol
END tax loopholes that benefit the rich, PRIMARY residence ONLY deduction AND cap it at $1,000,000 value (adjust it for inflation)!
I'd take the cap way way down to 250,000 ...if that.