GreenAndBlue
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2018
- 7,698
- 657
- 145
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #121
What a stupid fukin thread. lol.
Is understanding logjc and what it does
Is that stupid?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a stupid fukin thread. lol.
Is understanding logjc and what it does
Is that stupid?
Actually, no. A requirement to own property is not in the Constitution.Our founders did not intend for a democracy of unwise voters to elect our govt..
They used a property test as their wisdom test
There were SOME states which bestowed suffrage only on property owners. However, four states allowed freed slaves to vote. New Jersey even allowed women to vote.
I get tired of people who speak of our Founders as some monolithic body.
Those was strict down
And women could not be on juries for the same reason
Seen as too unwise and emotional
Actually, no. A requirement to own property is not in the Constitution.Our founders did not intend for a democracy of unwise voters to elect our govt..
They used a property test as their wisdom test
There were SOME states which bestowed suffrage only on property owners. However, four states allowed freed slaves to vote. New Jersey even allowed women to vote.
I get tired of people who speak of our Founders as some monolithic body.
Those was strict down
And women could not be on juries for the same reason
Seen as too unwise and emotional
You know, one of the best offices I ever worked in was filled with women. When I went to limited duty because I broke my foot, they put me at PSD NAS Norfolk, and because of my experience (came from sea duty and did everything), they put me in the computer office. And, because I was the only male in an office of 6, everyone in PSD called me the "token male".
Well, not only was everyone in that office super good at their jobs, it was also the only office in my career where there was little to no drama in the office. Those women were smart, professional, and excellent co workers.
Sorry, but your blanket statement that all women are too unwise and emotional doesn't jibe with my experience. Most of the women that I had as supervisors while in the Navy were better leaders than a lot of the men.
Actually, no. A requirement to own property is not in the Constitution.Our founders did not intend for a democracy of unwise voters to elect our govt..
They used a property test as their wisdom test
There were SOME states which bestowed suffrage only on property owners. However, four states allowed freed slaves to vote. New Jersey even allowed women to vote.
I get tired of people who speak of our Founders as some monolithic body.
Those was strict down
And women could not be on juries for the same reason
Seen as too unwise and emotional
You know, one of the best offices I ever worked in was filled with women. When I went to limited duty because I broke my foot, they put me at PSD NAS Norfolk, and because of my experience (came from sea duty and did everything), they put me in the computer office. And, because I was the only male in an office of 6, everyone in PSD called me the "token male".
Well, not only was everyone in that office super good at their jobs, it was also the only office in my career where there was little to no drama in the office. Those women were smart, professional, and excellent co workers.
Sorry, but your blanket statement that all women are too unwise and emotional doesn't jibe with my experience. Most of the women that I had as supervisors while in the Navy were better leaders than a lot of the men.
Women have better memory than men
Made that way to remember what the higher logic sees to give to the family and children
"The Times, They Are a-Chaining"It's already been tried.
Literacy test - Wikipedia
From the 1890s to the 1960s, many state governments in the United States administered literacy tests to prospective voters purportedly to test their literacy in order to vote. In practice, these tests were intended to disenfranchise racial minorities.
Actually, no. A requirement to own property is not in the Constitution.Our founders did not intend for a democracy of unwise voters to elect our govt..
They used a property test as their wisdom test
There were SOME states which bestowed suffrage only on property owners. However, four states allowed freed slaves to vote. New Jersey even allowed women to vote.
I get tired of people who speak of our Founders as some monolithic body.
Those was strict down
And women could not be on juries for the same reason
Seen as too unwise and emotional
You know, one of the best offices I ever worked in was filled with women. When I went to limited duty because I broke my foot, they put me at PSD NAS Norfolk, and because of my experience (came from sea duty and did everything), they put me in the computer office. And, because I was the only male in an office of 6, everyone in PSD called me the "token male".
Well, not only was everyone in that office super good at their jobs, it was also the only office in my career where there was little to no drama in the office. Those women were smart, professional, and excellent co workers.
Sorry, but your blanket statement that all women are too unwise and emotional doesn't jibe with my experience. Most of the women that I had as supervisors while in the Navy were better leaders than a lot of the men.
Women have better memory than men
Made that way to remember what the higher logic sees to give to the family and children
Hey genius..................those women were a hell of a lot more logical than a lot of dudes I know. Why do I say that? Because our office was the one that did all the computer work for the JUMPS pay system, and that involved a LOT of data entry and working with various computer programs.
Look at this
Understanding how we are designed and how humans were pre wired to get pain or joy this high logic ability makes for the correct predictions
Example
A house with 5 openings to the outside
4 openings have roaring fires
Since we are pre wired to get pain from fire
We can predict which opening the person will seek
In other words. They have no free will
Everything is pre wired to make all do as they do
These cycles are made to come to destruct an area that goes against the laws
No shit. and my premise was/is that doing so would simply hand a tool to people that have already shown conclusively that they would bastardize any such tool.
You have done nothing to rebut that point.
I know it is because you can't.
and now you know that I know that you know you can't.
Wrong Dead Wrong
The founders great system rebuts clearly what you say
The problem
Is low logic that cannot see what proves what
Nothing you can do about low logjc
Because it makes you blind to what proves a fact
The founders together set up the correct voting requirement
It was called a property test but in reality it was part of their whole system to stop the unwise from making decisions around complex issues
The unwise must be stopped from being around harmful influences
The wise can be free to be around everything because they can pick out the good and leave out the harm
Again you are blind with low logic
You cannot understand
You get saved from your self with a high logic tests for voters
China has copied America's wise founders system. They do control their unwise
Chairman Mao said
Women comrades can do what the males comrades can do
Having that system China was falling fast
Today China does the opposite and have stopped the lower logic women and are controlling them to not be around influences to get brainwashed with their lower logic
China in the last 10 years progress is exploding for stopping their unwise from voting or making decisions
you wasted an awful lot of time and effort writing that post.
unfortunately, again, you have rebutted nothing at all of what I've said, which is a perfectly valid point and exposes a fatal flaw in your proposal.
Like a doctor that thinks a shotgun cures cancer, fires it full bore into someone's diseased lung and declares the cancer cured because it is gone along with the rest of the torso, your "logic" ignores the actual result.
If you actually trust politicians to design, implement and regulate a system that is designed to impact the outcomes of elections, which directly impacts them, without exerting whatever influence they possibly could over said system, you are quite simply delusional.
Make an attempt to rebut my actual point and I may respond, else I think I've said all I have to say.
Again the founders proves you wrong
The true wise got together and made the best laws
And made this great nation
They might have, but you sure didn't.
LOL.
Wrong you were proven wrong
The founders and modern China has proved you wrong
Also the sat math test for college proves you wrong
Your low logic cannot accept proof
Wrong Dead Wrong
The founders great system rebuts clearly what you say
The problem
Is low logic that cannot see what proves what
Nothing you can do about low logjc
Because it makes you blind to what proves a fact
The founders together set up the correct voting requirement
It was called a property test but in reality it was part of their whole system to stop the unwise from making decisions around complex issues
The unwise must be stopped from being around harmful influences
The wise can be free to be around everything because they can pick out the good and leave out the harm
Again you are blind with low logic
You cannot understand
You get saved from your self with a high logic tests for voters
China has copied America's wise founders system. They do control their unwise
Chairman Mao said
Women comrades can do what the males comrades can do
Having that system China was falling fast
Today China does the opposite and have stopped the lower logic women and are controlling them to not be around influences to get brainwashed with their lower logic
China in the last 10 years progress is exploding for stopping their unwise from voting or making decisions
you wasted an awful lot of time and effort writing that post.
unfortunately, again, you have rebutted nothing at all of what I've said, which is a perfectly valid point and exposes a fatal flaw in your proposal.
Like a doctor that thinks a shotgun cures cancer, fires it full bore into someone's diseased lung and declares the cancer cured because it is gone along with the rest of the torso, your "logic" ignores the actual result.
If you actually trust politicians to design, implement and regulate a system that is designed to impact the outcomes of elections, which directly impacts them, without exerting whatever influence they possibly could over said system, you are quite simply delusional.
Make an attempt to rebut my actual point and I may respond, else I think I've said all I have to say.
Again the founders proves you wrong
The true wise got together and made the best laws
And made this great nation
They might have, but you sure didn't.
LOL.
Wrong you were proven wrong
The founders and modern China has proved you wrong
Also the sat math test for college proves you wrong
Your low logic cannot accept proof
nonsense. just saying it repeatedly proves nothing.
and now you know my SAT score? LOL. This just gets weirder and weirder.
I never took the SAT but my ACT composite score would have qualified me for Mensa had I so chosen and that is a plain and simple fact.
Good luck floundering in your silly thread on logic, into which you have injected none. I'm out early today, heading for happy hour and done with your stupid ass.....
Wrong Dead Wrong
The founders great system rebuts clearly what you say
The problem
Is low logic that cannot see what proves what
Nothing you can do about low logjc
Because it makes you blind to what proves a fact
The founders together set up the correct voting requirement
It was called a property test but in reality it was part of their whole system to stop the unwise from making decisions around complex issues
The unwise must be stopped from being around harmful influences
The wise can be free to be around everything because they can pick out the good and leave out the harm
Again you are blind with low logic
You cannot understand
You get saved from your self with a high logic tests for voters
China has copied America's wise founders system. They do control their unwise
Chairman Mao said
Women comrades can do what the males comrades can do
Having that system China was falling fast
Today China does the opposite and have stopped the lower logic women and are controlling them to not be around influences to get brainwashed with their lower logic
China in the last 10 years progress is exploding for stopping their unwise from voting or making decisions
you wasted an awful lot of time and effort writing that post.
unfortunately, again, you have rebutted nothing at all of what I've said, which is a perfectly valid point and exposes a fatal flaw in your proposal.
Like a doctor that thinks a shotgun cures cancer, fires it full bore into someone's diseased lung and declares the cancer cured because it is gone along with the rest of the torso, your "logic" ignores the actual result.
If you actually trust politicians to design, implement and regulate a system that is designed to impact the outcomes of elections, which directly impacts them, without exerting whatever influence they possibly could over said system, you are quite simply delusional.
Make an attempt to rebut my actual point and I may respond, else I think I've said all I have to say.
Again the founders proves you wrong
The true wise got together and made the best laws
And made this great nation
They might have, but you sure didn't.
LOL.
Wrong you were proven wrong
The founders and modern China has proved you wrong
Also the sat math test for college proves you wrong
Your low logic cannot accept proof
nonsense. just saying it repeatedly proves nothing.
and now you know my SAT score? LOL. This just gets weirder and weirder.
I never took the SAT but my ACT composite score would have qualified me for Mensa had I so chosen and that is a plain and simple fact.
Good luck floundering in your silly thread on logic, into which you have injected none. I'm out early today, heading for happy hour and done with your stupid ass.....
you wasted an awful lot of time and effort writing that post.
unfortunately, again, you have rebutted nothing at all of what I've said, which is a perfectly valid point and exposes a fatal flaw in your proposal.
Like a doctor that thinks a shotgun cures cancer, fires it full bore into someone's diseased lung and declares the cancer cured because it is gone along with the rest of the torso, your "logic" ignores the actual result.
If you actually trust politicians to design, implement and regulate a system that is designed to impact the outcomes of elections, which directly impacts them, without exerting whatever influence they possibly could over said system, you are quite simply delusional.
Make an attempt to rebut my actual point and I may respond, else I think I've said all I have to say.
Again the founders proves you wrong
The true wise got together and made the best laws
And made this great nation
They might have, but you sure didn't.
LOL.
Wrong you were proven wrong
The founders and modern China has proved you wrong
Also the sat math test for college proves you wrong
Your low logic cannot accept proof
nonsense. just saying it repeatedly proves nothing.
and now you know my SAT score? LOL. This just gets weirder and weirder.
I never took the SAT but my ACT composite score would have qualified me for Mensa had I so chosen and that is a plain and simple fact.
Good luck floundering in your silly thread on logic, into which you have injected none. I'm out early today, heading for happy hour and done with your stupid ass.....
The act scores at the highest level
Will show the same pattern
Learn to be honest so people can learn
Being dishonest destroys nations because people cannot learn
Look at this
Understanding how we are designed and how humans were pre wired to get pain or joy this high logic ability makes for the correct predictions
Example
A house with 5 openings to the outside
4 openings have roaring fires
Since we are pre wired to get pain from fire
We can predict which opening the person will seek
In other words. They have no free will
Everything is pre wired to make all do as they do
These cycles are made to come to destruct an area that goes against the laws
Not necessarily. Some people might seek out the 4 openings with roaring fires in them. Especially if it is a pizza shop with 4 brick ovens and 1 door.
The states still control voting requirement, they just have to let women vote. Trumpybear doesn't have the power to dictate to the states how they do it.
Wouldn't that be the time for a 25th Amendment solution? "The man thinks he's a Dictator! "Quick call the quack."
The founders knew states rights was the answer to bring the best system for all states when states can experiment
The first state that brings a high logic test for its voters will then have all the high logic prophets stampeding to that state
And together in that state the best progress ever would come and other states with their increased pain from losing their wise will also change and copy
This same stampede came when books got printed and religions got compared. The wise of all religions then stampeded to the bible !!
And they then became the most powerful and prosperous
Hogwash, women are superior strategists. The only reason they became subservient to men is because of brute strength, not logic.
No poll tests.
Also check the sat math test scores at the highest level to see how men do have the higher logic
Some of the smartest people I know have absolutely no common sense whatsoever.
When given the same opportunity as males, women equal or exceed males in math and logic skills.
Wrong totally not true
Proof is how women today gets just as good of grades in math class but fail in comparison when truly tested
Proving educators are corrupt to the core. Giving the wrong grades