Should we elect a person who doesnt know what a classified document looks like if they receive one?

[nuhuh]

WASHINGTON—An internal government review found that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent at least four emails from her personal account containing classified information during her time heading the State Department.




sent; not received leftard

you clowns are JOKES

I think everyone sees you as the joke now.


"Clinton aides have maintained that nothing on her server was classified at the time she saw it, suggesting that classified messages were given the label after the fact.

John Kirby, a spokesman for the State Department, said that was the case with two emails, adding that it remained unclear "whether, in fact, this material is actually classified."

"Department employees circulated these emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and ultimately some were forwarded to Secretary Clinton," Kirby said Tuesday. "They were not marked as classified." [NBC News, 8/12/15]

 

[Claudette]

According to Judge Naplitano Clinton could face charges. It will depend on if the Govt wants to press charges.



Judge Andrew Napolitano sat down with Martha MacCallum to go over the two potential criminal investigations that the former First Lady could face.

1. The less serious possibility is an investigation similar to what was brought against Gen. David Petraeus, who pleaded guilty this week for keeping classified documents in an unsecured location. The judge explained that in Mrs. Clinton's case, she kept classified secrets on a home server that was not secured by the government. Napolitano said there's no way Clinton did not have classified material on her home server, since she held the same security clearance as the president. That would only be a misdemeanor charge, however.

2. Napolitano said the far more serious charge would be a conspiracy to "conceal documents from government computers," which carries a penalty of three years in jail per document. A conviction on that charge would disqualify her from holding public office again.

MacCallum asked whether anyone will actually get a hold of these documents through the committee's subpoena. Napolitano pointed out that in Petraeus' case, the FBI went in with a search warrant.

"When you subpoena, you don't know if you get everything," he said.

Napolitano said right now the legal consequences for Clinton are hypothetical, since the government would need to decide to prosecute her.

"If somebody prosecutes her, the consequences are grave for her political future," said Napolitano.

Of course they have to find something to prosecute her for and then make a decision about whether to prosecute or not.

Wonder if Petreus got the same deal???

He said, essentially, Clinton turned the Federal Records Act "on its head."

"She kept the documents, she decided which ones were governmental, gave them to the government and kept her own," said Napolitano.

Clinton tweeted last night that she wants her emails to be released.

Judge Napolitano is no different from the other screwballs trying to make something out of nothing. There is no evidence in this case, Her emails were deleted. If Trey Gowdy can reproduce a Top Secret email that was deliberately erased there may be a case before the law. Not having that critical piece of evidence is going to make this whole thing go away.

I've heard Napolitano go against the right as much as I've heard him agree with them.

He's a judge and knows the law. Sorry you don't agree but opinions are like assholes and everybody has one.

Napolitano is no different than anyone else. A charge needs evidence to back it up. No evidence and it's just opinion mixed up in partisan drivel.

Well Hilbat did delete from the server. Of course nothing is ever truly cleared. Guess We'll just have to wait and see.

 

[nuhuh]

According to Judge Naplitano Clinton could face charges. It will depend on if the Govt wants to press charges.



Judge Andrew Napolitano sat down with Martha MacCallum to go over the two potential criminal investigations that the former First Lady could face.

1. The less serious possibility is an investigation similar to what was brought against Gen. David Petraeus, who pleaded guilty this week for keeping classified documents in an unsecured location. The judge explained that in Mrs. Clinton's case, she kept classified secrets on a home server that was not secured by the government. Napolitano said there's no way Clinton did not have classified material on her home server, since she held the same security clearance as the president. That would only be a misdemeanor charge, however.

2. Napolitano said the far more serious charge would be a conspiracy to "conceal documents from government computers," which carries a penalty of three years in jail per document. A conviction on that charge would disqualify her from holding public office again.

MacCallum asked whether anyone will actually get a hold of these documents through the committee's subpoena. Napolitano pointed out that in Petraeus' case, the FBI went in with a search warrant.

"When you subpoena, you don't know if you get everything," he said.

Napolitano said right now the legal consequences for Clinton are hypothetical, since the government would need to decide to prosecute her.

"If somebody prosecutes her, the consequences are grave for her political future," said Napolitano.

Of course they have to find something to prosecute her for and then make a decision about whether to prosecute or not.

Wonder if Petreus got the same deal???

He said, essentially, Clinton turned the Federal Records Act "on its head."

"She kept the documents, she decided which ones were governmental, gave them to the government and kept her own," said Napolitano.

Clinton tweeted last night that she wants her emails to be released.

Judge Napolitano is no different from the other screwballs trying to make something out of nothing. There is no evidence in this case, Her emails were deleted. If Trey Gowdy can reproduce a Top Secret email that was deliberately erased there may be a case before the law. Not having that critical piece of evidence is going to make this whole thing go away.

I've heard Napolitano go against the right as much as I've heard him agree with them.

He's a judge and knows the law. Sorry you don't agree but opinions are like assholes and everybody has one.

Napolitano is no different than anyone else. A charge needs evidence to back it up. No evidence and it's just opinion mixed up in partisan drivel.

Well Hilbat did delete from the server. Of course nothing is ever truly cleared. Guess We'll just have to wait and see.

No evidence, no crime, no charges. That's how our system works, no one goes to jail for maybe.

 

[bedowin62]

she sent them forward; on an unsecured network. it's a violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

 

[Claudette]

The four emails in question “were classified when they were sent and are classified now,” said Andrea Williams, a spokeswoman for the inspector general. The inspector general reviewed just a small sample totaling about 40 emails in Mrs. Clinton’s inbox—meaning that many more in the trove of more than 30,000 may contain potentially confidential, secret or top-secret information.

From that same article.
Hillary Clinton Sent Classified Information Over Email While at State Department Review Finds - WSJ
“None of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings, but some included IC-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified, appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network,” wrote Inspector General I. Charles McCullough in the letter to Congress.


If somebody sent you a classified email, and you had no idea it was classified, who would be responsible?

YES!! YOU IDIOT.; i work for the federal government. if you actually opened it and read it you would know it was Secret; and since you have it it IS your responsibility

you are a joke

How would you know an email you received is classified if it isn't marked? Psychic communication?

once again you idiot; we KNOW her e-mails were downloaded onto a thumb drive; 30,000 of them. she would have known WHEN SHE READ THEM they were classified WHICH IS WHAT THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF THE CIA IS SAYING. once you know THEY ARE YOUR RESPONSIBILITY

AND it is A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW to download classified material onto a portable thumb drive

idiot

Again, how could she have known if they weren't marked?

Dumbo. She was a Senator and a SOS and I'm sure many classified documents have been passed to her.

You can bet she knows something that's classified from something that's not. It was part of her job to know.

 

[bedowin62]

they were downloaded onto a thumb drive
violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

 

[nuhuh]

she sent them forward; on an unsecured network. it's a violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

There is no law that she can be charged under we already covered this.

 

[Obiwan]

she sent them forward; on an unsecured network. it's a violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

Bozo trained them well, didn't he???

 

[bedowin62]

[PDF]Handbook for Safeguarding Sensitive PII - Homeland Security
www.dhs.gov/.../handbo...

• Cached

United States Department of Homeland Security
Loading...
Mar 1, 2012 - www.dhs.gov/privacy. Page 1 ... On a portable electronic device, such as a Blackberry, laptop, or USB ..... Federal Information System Management Act (FISMA). ... Personally-owned USB flash drives may not be used.

 

[bedowin62]

she sent them forward; on an unsecured network. it's a violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

There is no law that she can be charged under we already covered this.

no we havent leftard; and we've already covered THAT fact
the one where you're an idiot for trying to say "fact" this or "fact that when the whole story still isnt out

 

[bedowin62]

https://ia.signal.army.mil/UserMngmt/Cyber1/common/build/web_dod.htm?false,false,false,false,false


here ya go leftard; the information awareness course ALL government employees are supposed to take

 

[nuhuh]

[PDF]Handbook for Safeguarding Sensitive PII - Homeland Security
www.dhs.gov/.../handbo...

• Cached

United States Department of Homeland Security
Loading...
Mar 1, 2012 - www.dhs.gov/privacy. Page 1 ... On a portable electronic device, such as a Blackberry, laptop, or USB ..... Federal Information System Management Act (FISMA). ... Personally-owned USB flash drives may not be used.

She was no longer in government service in 2012

 

[tyroneweaver]

The four emails in question “were classified when they were sent and are classified now,” said Andrea Williams, a spokeswoman for the inspector general. The inspector general reviewed just a small sample totaling about 40 emails in Mrs. Clinton’s inbox—meaning that many more in the trove of more than 30,000 may contain potentially confidential, secret or top-secret information.

From that same article.
Hillary Clinton Sent Classified Information Over Email While at State Department Review Finds - WSJ
“None of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings, but some included IC-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified, appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network,” wrote Inspector General I. Charles McCullough in the letter to Congress.


If somebody sent you a classified email, and you had no idea it was classified, who would be responsible?

YES!! YOU IDIOT.; i work for the federal government. if you actually opened it and read it you would know it was Secret; and since you have it it IS your responsibility

you are a joke

How would you know an email you received is classified if it isn't marked? Psychic communication?

once again you idiot; we KNOW her e-mails were downloaded onto a thumb drive; 30,000 of them. she would have known WHEN SHE READ THEM they were classified WHICH IS WHAT THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF THE CIA IS SAYING. once you know THEY ARE YOUR RESPONSIBILITY

AND it is A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW to download classified material onto a portable thumb drive

idiot

Again, how could she have known if they weren't marked?

ok let;s go with that
Now that she knows
will she testify against the known source
will she whistle blow
will she in order to protect this great nation rat out the fink that sent it.

 

[Obiwan]

she sent them forward; on an unsecured network. it's a violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

There is no law that she can be charged under we already covered this.

Of Course Hillary Broke the Law And Here s How

 

[nuhuh]

she sent them forward; on an unsecured network. it's a violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

There is no law that she can be charged under we already covered this.

no we havent leftard; and we've already covered THAT fact
the one where you're an idiot for trying to say "fact" this or "fact that when the whole story still isnt out

Yes we have, you haven't posted any evidence that she can be charged with. Everything you have spouted off about is supposition and innuendo, not a single fact.

 

[nuhuh]

she sent them forward; on an unsecured network. it's a violation of federal law

keep trying leftardz

There is no law that she can be charged under we already covered this.

Of Course Hillary Broke the Law And Here s How

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."

 

[bedowin62]

[PDF]Download - Defense Logistics Agency
www.dla.mil/issuances/documents/i8130.01.pdf

• Cached

Defense Logistics Agency
Loading...
Sep 27, 2013 - Mobile Device: A wireless-enabled portable device (cellular phone, Blackberry, .... The risk is that a user could introduce classified information onto ... (1) Users shall not process classified information on mobile devices.

 

[Derideo_Te]

A subsequent joint statement by Mr. McCullough and Mr. Linick said: “These emails were not retroactively classified by the State Department; rather these emails contained classified information when they were generated and, according to IC Classification officials, that information remains classified today.”
At a March press conference, Mrs. Clinton asserted she “fully complied with every rule” in maintaining her private server for official business.
But the joint IG statement said she did not follow the rules. “This classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system,” the two said.

read it and weep leftard

Whomever sent the classified emails is the party who is responsible, not the recipient of the email.

Unless you can establish that Hillary was the originator of the classified email she hasn't broken any laws.

One of the issues was the fact she was using an unsecure server for handling classified information. Are you trying to say the senile old drunk couldn't recognize sensitive material that everyone else spotted immediately????

Get back to us when you have actual evidence of a crime that will stand up in a court in law.

 

[bedowin62]

you're a clown nuh nuh
i have repeatedly gave you the laws governed by this

 

[nuhuh]

you're a clown nuh nuh
i have repeatedly gave you the laws governed by this

You gave nothing, if there was a pertinent law she would be charged. She is not charged and she won't be.