Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You may call those that have sent you neg rep attacking jackals, but most would call what we are doing, slapping an asshole.No, that's your false information, all three buildings fell at free fall speeds and that's widely available on the internet, someone has it posted in this thread. You are posting Lies, that's all. And you are labeling the truth I'm posting as "garbage information". So, you have an agenda, you are out to push, which is to smear the truth with disinformation. You aren't discussing anything, neither are you engaged in discussion, you are just attacking the truth with your own bag of Lies and disinformation. I've patiently answered as many of your false posts as I could and you respond by calling the truth a bunch of garbage. So you have an agenda to discredit the truth in this area. I've noticed a couple of your cohorts are busy tossing negative reputation at my posts in this thread, so they are attacking like jackals while you are attacking with false debate, but the group of you obviously came here to attack the thread, not discuss it.
you may call those that have sent you neg rep attacking jackals, but most would call what we are doing, slapping an asshole.no, that's your false information, all three buildings fell at free fall speeds and that's widely available on the internet, someone has it posted in this thread. You are posting lies, that's all. And you are labeling the truth i'm posting as "garbage information". So, you have an agenda, you are out to push, which is to smear the truth with disinformation. You aren't discussing anything, neither are you engaged in discussion, you are just attacking the truth with your own bag of lies and disinformation. I've patiently answered as many of your false posts as i could and you respond by calling the truth a bunch of garbage. So you have an agenda to discredit the truth in this area. I've noticed a couple of your cohorts are busy tossing negative reputation at my posts in this thread, so they are attacking like jackals while you are attacking with false debate, but the group of you obviously came here to attack the thread, not discuss it.
You still haven't addressed how hundreds, if not a thousand or more people that had to be involved in the preparation and cover-up have been kept silent.
Let's hear you address that. Show some verifiable proof.
No it's not, but logic is.you may call those that have sent you neg rep attacking jackals, but most would call what we are doing, slapping an asshole.no, that's your false information, all three buildings fell at free fall speeds and that's widely available on the internet, someone has it posted in this thread. You are posting lies, that's all. And you are labeling the truth i'm posting as "garbage information". So, you have an agenda, you are out to push, which is to smear the truth with disinformation. You aren't discussing anything, neither are you engaged in discussion, you are just attacking the truth with your own bag of lies and disinformation. I've patiently answered as many of your false posts as i could and you respond by calling the truth a bunch of garbage. So you have an agenda to discredit the truth in this area. I've noticed a couple of your cohorts are busy tossing negative reputation at my posts in this thread, so they are attacking like jackals while you are attacking with false debate, but the group of you obviously came here to attack the thread, not discuss it.
You still haven't addressed how hundreds, if not a thousand or more people that had to be involved in the preparation and cover-up have been kept silent.
Let's hear you address that. Show some verifiable proof.
physics is not interested in your imaginings of how many people would need to be silent and how that was done..
No it's not, but logic is.you may call those that have sent you neg rep attacking jackals, but most would call what we are doing, slapping an asshole.
You still haven't addressed how hundreds, if not a thousand or more people that had to be involved in the preparation and cover-up have been kept silent.
Let's hear you address that. Show some verifiable proof.
physics is not interested in your imaginings of how many people would need to be silent and how that was done..
Try to answer instead of deflecting, OK?
Funny this is not the case with all other building collapses
.
all that resilience yet the tower collapse in a matter of secs
no testing for explosives was done
if you call a computer simulation by NIST evidence
Even NIST coincides the initial fireball burned up most of the fuel
When metal under pressure is heated it deforms. Those are irrefutable reproducible facts. There are no facts for any "demolition
there is no evidence in forensic testing of the steel to show temperatures anywhere near what NIST predicted as required to cause structural failure
Really?
It will be a cold day in hell when I need to learn how to direct my posts in a thread from you. I have over ten years experience doing that and my posts are placed exactly where they belong... yours, on OTOH, and consistently misplaced and tossed about nilly-willy in the thread. All you are doing is making as big a mess of the thread as you possibly could. That's not brand new to me, Ollie, I've been watching hucksters post like that for over a decade. It's called disinformation, at least it is one more part of posting disinformation.... attempting to cloud the issue and confuse the reader. I've never seen anyone more blatant about making their droppings than you. You must be proud.
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense during the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart). Appointed by President George H.W. Bush to serve on the American Battle Monuments Commission (1990 - 1994), and on the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces. Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, D.C. 1990 - 1994.
Article 7/1/06: "The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official story of 9/11 - calling it the dog that doesn't hunt. I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's accurate, he said."
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
Funny this is not the case with all other building collapses
.
all that resilience yet the tower collapse in a matter of secs
no testing for explosives was done
if you call a computer simulation by NIST evidence
Even NIST coincides the initial fireball burned up most of the fuel
there is no evidence in forensic testing of the steel to show temperatures anywhere near what NIST predicted as required to cause structural failure
Really?
lol exactly Ollie NIST lots of steel untested that would almost certainly have shown temperatures well in excess of what can occur in a office fire so NIST could not test those..the test they did do however do not show the temperatures they predicted as required for failure
More opinion eots?
You know all about Opinions, don't you?
Try cold hard physical fact and proof sometime instead of opinion...And I don't give a rats ass who the opinion is coming from, they are still just opinion...And opinion from people who did not have access to the investigations.
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense during the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart). Appointed by President George H.W. Bush to serve on the American Battle Monuments Commission (1990 - 1994), and on the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces. Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, D.C. 1990 - 1994.
Article 7/1/06: "The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official story of 9/11 - calling it the dog that doesn't hunt. I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's accurate, he said."
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
No doubt you could get a dozen people to remain silent by appealing to patriotism, religion or duty or their pocket book, but the number of people that would have to be involved in a cover-up of this magnitude is staggering. No way could you keep that many people silent.
More opinion eots?
You know all about Opinions, don't you?
Try cold hard physical fact and proof sometime instead of opinion...And I don't give a rats ass who the opinion is coming from, they are still just opinion...And opinion from people who did not have access to the investigations.
please do try physics...I would love to see the hard physical fact and proof of your collapse theory
We saw the planes hit the buildings. A sinister government plot to destroy the Towers is impossible unless you want to indict the Clinton administration. What's left?
