1stRambo
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2015
- 6,221
- 1,019
- 255
I don't get people who say they want smaller government.
Mainly because I don't believe they want smaller government.
Most of the people who advocate smaller government are the sort of people who support the US having a massive armed forces. They're the sort of people who want the government to ban same sex marriage. They're the sort of people who want the govt to ban drugs like Marijuana, perhaps even alcohol.
In other words, they're people who want the government in YOUR face, just not in their face. They're happy for big government, just so long as it doesn't step on their patch. They're not gay, they're not into recreational drugs, they're not getting invaded by the US armed forces, so they just don't care and they're happy for big government in those areas.
Also, I've been discussing government subsidies. Yes, we all know about welfare (for your information, before you jump on my back about it, I'm in favor of welfare based on how long you have worked, and before you've worked for 5 years you should get no welfare at all unless you're in education and doing well in your education at that, and then the longer you've worked, the more you can get, like after 10 years an increase in payments, if you need them) and the left giving money to people who really shouldn't be getting it, but this isn't what's been spoken about here, so lay off this topic.
Government subsidies to farmer and big corporations. Seem the right is all in favor of handing out money to rich people. Seems strange to talk about smaller govt one minute, then advocate govt giving out loads of money to businesses the next minute.
Does anyone actually, really, truly, support smaller government?
I'm amused by your ideas for welfare, Fridgid. You do know that if a Republican suggested people could only get Welfare if they first worked that he would be eviscerated by the Main Stream Media as being a hater of the poor?
What you suggest we already sort of have in place in Unemployment.
As for subsidies? I'm in favor of doing away with all of them. The government does an awful job at income redistribution.
I understand how things would look, but that's mainly because of the partisan game that's played. If you spend your whole time demonizing the poor, then you do something like that, people are just going to assume.
But it's also how you get your message across, and mainly the politicians do it with advertising and making everyone play the partisan bullshit game.
If a third party were to do something, they might stand a chance of making sensible policies be the norm.
Yo, you might want to look at Ted Cruz? He is not the typical ass!!!
"GTP"