Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attacked with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
what are you....like 3?For all we know, he ignores all that too. He just nodded yes to Scalia for 25 years. He'll probably retire soon now that he's required to feign interest in cases with Scalia gone.Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.
So basically you ignore the tons of paperwork he reviews, which is actually what he is supposed to base his decision on, right? All those briefs, pleadings, friend of the court filings, etc?
yes, it's a technical quibble.
Interesting that you're breaking with the alt-right sentiment that the SC is a bunch of activist judges that are in Obama's pocket and should be disbandedBecause we, as Americans, have the highest regards for the highest legal entity in the land.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Or has that sentiment left us as well?
Oh yeah, that's right...Obama found it appropriate to disparage them during his State of the Union Address.
I forgot.....Obama made this a new land....you know...hope and change...;
Oh...so Tawana Brawley should be in there as well? How about the Duke Lacrosse accuser?Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
For all we know, he ignores all that too. He just nodded yes to Scalia for 25 years. He'll probably retire soon now that he's required to feign interest in cases with Scalia gone.Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.
So basically you ignore the tons of paperwork he reviews, which is actually what he is supposed to base his decision on, right? All those briefs, pleadings, friend of the court filings, etc?
yes, it's a technical quibble.
Justice Clarence Thomas is a lazy lump.
I think you are right. Many felt the way you described.Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
I am not on that bandwagon. I support a court where the views of ALL are represented....and they can come to a decision. Sure, I don't agree with all decisions....but I support the SCOTUS 100%.Interesting that you're breaking with the alt-right sentiment that the SC is a bunch of activist judges that are in Obama's pocket and should be disbandedBecause we, as Americans, have the highest regards for the highest legal entity in the land.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Or has that sentiment left us as well?
Oh yeah, that's right...Obama found it appropriate to disparage them during his State of the Union Address.
I forgot.....Obama made this a new land....you know...hope and change...;
He had interns for thatFor all we know, he ignores all that too. He just nodded yes to Scalia for 25 years. He'll probably retire soon now that he's required to feign interest in cases with Scalia gone.Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.
So basically you ignore the tons of paperwork he reviews, which is actually what he is supposed to base his decision on, right? All those briefs, pleadings, friend of the court filings, etc?
yes, it's a technical quibble.
your ideological hatred is noted.
So he never wrote decisions then?
He had interns for thatFor all we know, he ignores all that too. He just nodded yes to Scalia for 25 years. He'll probably retire soon now that he's required to feign interest in cases with Scalia gone.Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.
So basically you ignore the tons of paperwork he reviews, which is actually what he is supposed to base his decision on, right? All those briefs, pleadings, friend of the court filings, etc?
yes, it's a technical quibble.
your ideological hatred is noted.
So he never wrote decisions then?
Those two situations are not comparable. Anita Hill was/is a highly educated woman, an attorney and a law professor.Oh...so Tawana Brawley should be in there as well? How about the Duke Lacrosse accuser?Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Sorry....but if the allegations are not proven, whereas they may be legit, you can not give credit because they very well may not be legit.
I don't have to. Sitting on a bench for 25 years without asking a single question is bad enough.He had interns for thatFor all we know, he ignores all that too. He just nodded yes to Scalia for 25 years. He'll probably retire soon now that he's required to feign interest in cases with Scalia gone.Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"
So basically you ignore the tons of paperwork he reviews, which is actually what he is supposed to base his decision on, right? All those briefs, pleadings, friend of the court filings, etc?
yes, it's a technical quibble.
your ideological hatred is noted.
So he never wrote decisions then?
Keep stretching, hack.
I can very much identify with it. In my first really important career position, when I was young, there were two men who worked with me. At separate times they befriended me, or that's what I thought, that they just wanted friendship. I was so naive. As time went on, it was quite clear they wanted much more. One was married. When I made it clear I had no interest in and no intention of becoming sexually involved with them, they said bad things about me to my boss. All of them were at least 10 or more years older and all had worked for the organization for many years before I arrived. I lost my job in the end. My contract was not renewed.Justice Clarence Thomas is a lazy lump.I think you are right. Many felt the way you described.Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Those two situations are not comparable. Anita Hill was/is a highly educated woman, an attorney and a law professor.Oh...so Tawana Brawley should be in there as well? How about the Duke Lacrosse accuser?Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Sorry....but if the allegations are not proven, whereas they may be legit, you can not give credit because they very well may not be legit.
I'm sorry about your experience. Do you think it would have been different if you told a supervisor about this first?I can very much identify with it. In my first really important career position, when I was young, there were two men who worked with me. At separate times they befriended me, or that's what I thought, that they just wanted friendship. I was so naive. As time went on, it was quite clear they wanted much more. One was married. When I made it clear I had no interest in and no intention of becoming sexually involved with them, they said bad things about me to my boss. All of them were at least 10 or more years older and all had worked for the organization for many years before I arrived. I lost my job in the end. My contract was not renewed.Justice Clarence Thomas is a lazy lump.I think you are right. Many felt the way you described.Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
I think someone like Anita Hill, who risked her career testifying against Thomas, is a hero to many women, especially those who experienced what I experienced.
and her allegations were not proven.Those two situations are not comparable. Anita Hill was/is a highly educated woman, an attorney and a law professor.Oh...so Tawana Brawley should be in there as well? How about the Duke Lacrosse accuser?Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Sorry....but if the allegations are not proven, whereas they may be legit, you can not give credit because they very well may not be legit.
Not the supervisor. This was nearly 30 years ago. Things were different then. Women like Anita Hill have helped make things change. And my supervisor was not only a man, he was a buddy of the two male colleagues I had the problem with. I was a new employee. Young and naive. He would not have believed me. If you said anything in those days, you were just considered a trouble maker.I'm sorry about your experience. Do you think it would have been different if you told a supervisor about this first?I can very much identify with it. In my first really important career position, when I was young, there were two men who worked with me. At separate times they befriended me, or that's what I thought, that they just wanted friendship. I was so naive. As time went on, it was quite clear they wanted much more. One was married. When I made it clear I had no interest in and no intention of becoming sexually involved with them, they said bad things about me to my boss. All of them were at least 10 or more years older and all had worked for the organization for many years before I arrived. I lost my job in the end. My contract was not renewed.Justice Clarence Thomas is a lazy lump.I think you are right. Many felt the way you described.Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
I think someone like Anita Hill, who risked her career testifying against Thomas, is a hero to many women, especially those who experienced what I experienced.
I think an educated woman, an attorney, a law professor has more credibility and has a lot more to risk than a stripper or young mixed up girl.and her allegations were not proven.Those two situations are not comparable. Anita Hill was/is a highly educated woman, an attorney and a law professor.Oh...so Tawana Brawley should be in there as well? How about the Duke Lacrosse accuser?Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.
Sorry....but if the allegations are not proven, whereas they may be legit, you can not give credit because they very well may not be legit.
Are you saying that an arttorney/professor has more rights as it pertains to the law than a dancer? Someone who is well educated is deemed as more believable than someone with a GED when it comes to allegations of abuse?
Are you sure you want that position to stand?
I find that very concerning.I think an educated woman, an attorney, a law professor has more credibility and has a lot more to risk than a stripper or young mixed up girl.and her allegations were not proven.Those two situations are not comparable. Anita Hill was/is a highly educated woman, an attorney and a law professor.Oh...so Tawana Brawley should be in there as well? How about the Duke Lacrosse accuser?Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.
Sorry....but if the allegations are not proven, whereas they may be legit, you can not give credit because they very well may not be legit.
Are you saying that an arttorney/professor has more rights as it pertains to the law than a dancer? Someone who is well educated is deemed as more believable than someone with a GED when it comes to allegations of abuse?
Are you sure you want that position to stand?
Hmmmm, who was it that called it by its appropriate name?
The ALL BLACKS ARE VICTIMS OF WHITES museum.
In other words (for the slower morons on the left) it is yet another piece of leftist victimology propaganda. That is it and that is all.
Not the supervisor. This was nearly 30 years ago. Things were different then. Women like Anita Hill have helped make things change. And my supervisor was not only a man, he was a buddy of the two male colleagues I had the problem with. I was a new employee. Young and naive. He would not have believed me. If you said anything in those days, you were just considered a trouble maker.I'm sorry about your experience. Do you think it would have been different if you told a supervisor about this first?I can very much identify with it. In my first really important career position, when I was young, there were two men who worked with me. At separate times they befriended me, or that's what I thought, that they just wanted friendship. I was so naive. As time went on, it was quite clear they wanted much more. One was married. When I made it clear I had no interest in and no intention of becoming sexually involved with them, they said bad things about me to my boss. All of them were at least 10 or more years older and all had worked for the organization for many years before I arrived. I lost my job in the end. My contract was not renewed.Justice Clarence Thomas is a lazy lump.I think you are right. Many felt the way you described.Most everyone believed her. Her act of note is the courage it took to go before Congress and testify to what happened to her. To suffer the slings and arrows that she was attaced with for doing so. To stand up for sexually harrassed women. She deserves recognitionSo, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.
I think someone like Anita Hill, who risked her career testifying against Thomas, is a hero to many women, especially those who experienced what I experienced.
