Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That amendment wasn't written for the militia, it was written for the people, it says a well regulated militia is needed for a secure state, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.So you are one that has no idea what "shall not be infringed" means.It's unconstitutional.Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".
Fake news
I'm on the "well regulated" side and requiring an actual militia.
Say which one are you in?
That amendment wasn't written for the militia, it was written for the people, it says a well regulated militia is needed for a secure state, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.So you are one that has no idea what "shall not be infringed" means.It's unconstitutional.Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.
Fake news
I'm on the "well regulated" side and requiring an actual militia.
Say which one are you in?
Now, constitutionally, if you wanted to define who they were referring to when they were giving the right to bear arms, in case a militia was needed to be instituted, mainly male citizens between 18 and 45 years of age, you could go down that road and see if you can gain any ground, but the amendment as written doesn't have anything to do with arming a militia, it has to do with arming the citizens.
MOre idiots who don’t Understand the legal justification of sanctuary cities.
There is no legal justification under immigration law for sanctuary cities.
Yes there is . Immigration is civil law and under complete control of the feds . No one is stopping the Feds from doing their thing . BUT you can’t force the city to do your bidding and jail some guy for a minor offenses until the ins feels like showing up.
The op article basically says that counties are straight up ignoring state laws .
I love this talking.point.
they aren't asking for bbn police to round them up. just to let them know where to pick up illegals involved in crime.
and some released are murderers.....so yeah thank the mayor of Oakland for allowing violent criminals to roam free
Righty lies . Sanc cities don’t let murders go any more than they let citizens murders roam free.
All they do is not hold on to illegals wh get busted for minor crap? Why? Cause they know it will cause the city more problems and money by breaking up families (to say the least).
That amendment wasn't written for the militia, it was written for the people, it says a well regulated militia is needed for a secure state, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.So you are one that has no idea what "shall not be infringed" means.It's unconstitutional.
Fake news
I'm on the "well regulated" side and requiring an actual militia.
Say which one are you in?
Now, constitutionally, if you wanted to define who they were referring to when they were giving the right to bear arms, in case a militia was needed to be instituted, mainly male citizens between 18 and 45 years of age, you could go down that road and see if you can gain any ground, but the amendment as written doesn't have anything to do with arming a militia, it has to do with arming the citizens.
Gotta love the gun nuts . They’re strict constitutionalists.....until they aren’t .
holy crapOh . And you can apologize to me at any time.
Lol! To think an ignorant hick like you would mock my intelligence and knowledge.!?
“Overstaying” is a crime. It violated the law.Now entering the US without going through customs is a crime . That being said , 40% of “illegals” enter legally and overstay . So they wouldn’t count
it is why, our Second Amendment, specifically declares, which Persons of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when it really really matters.Dumb ass...if you are “regulating guns” then you are running “afoul of the 2nd Amendment”.However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment.
.....shall not be infringed
the right wing only doesn't seem to care about natural rights, unless it is specifically about guns; then, they are "all over it".That amendment wasn't written for the militia, it was written for the people, it says a well regulated militia is needed for a secure state, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.So you are one that has no idea what "shall not be infringed" means.It's unconstitutional.
Fake news
I'm on the "well regulated" side and requiring an actual militia.
Say which one are you in?
Now, constitutionally, if you wanted to define who they were referring to when they were giving the right to bear arms, in case a militia was needed to be instituted, mainly male citizens between 18 and 45 years of age, you could go down that road and see if you can gain any ground, but the amendment as written doesn't have anything to do with arming a militia, it has to do with arming the citizens.
Gotta love the gun nuts . They’re strict constitutionalists.....until they aren’t .
are you serious?“Overstaying” is a crime. It violated the law.Now entering the US without going through customs is a crime . That being said , 40% of “illegals” enter legally and overstay . So they wouldn’t count
Do you have a link to that criminal law? How many years in jail do you get?
it is why, our Second Amendment, specifically declares, which Persons of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when it really really matters.Dumb ass...if you are “regulating guns” then you are running “afoul of the 2nd Amendment”.However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment.
.....shall not be infringed
are you serious?“Overstaying” is a crime. It violated the law.Now entering the US without going through customs is a crime . That being said , 40% of “illegals” enter legally and overstay . So they wouldn’t count
Do you have a link to that criminal law? How many years in jail do you get?
timmy you do know that your left buddies defend illegals by saying most of them overstay visas......do you even read posts or any news at all.
you are dumber than I thought, holy shit......is this lakhota?
are you serious?“Overstaying” is a crime. It violated the law.Now entering the US without going through customs is a crime . That being said , 40% of “illegals” enter legally and overstay . So they wouldn’t count
Do you have a link to that criminal law? How many years in jail do you get?
timmy you do know that your left buddies defend illegals by saying most of them overstay visas......do you even read posts or any news at all.
you are dumber than I thought, holy shit......is this lakhota?
So you DONT have a link to the criminal law! I’ll give you a hint . It doesn’t exist .
yes, i do. i am into history, as well.it is why, our Second Amendment, specifically declares, which Persons of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when it really really matters.Dumb ass...if you are “regulating guns” then you are running “afoul of the 2nd Amendment”.However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment.
.....shall not be infringed
you do know what a milita was?
yes, i do. i am into history, as well.it is why, our Second Amendment, specifically declares, which Persons of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when it really really matters.Dumb ass...if you are “regulating guns” then you are running “afoul of the 2nd Amendment”.However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment.
.....shall not be infringed
you do know what a milita was?
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
it is why, our Second Amendment, specifically declares, which Persons of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when it really really matters.yes, i do. i am into history, as well.it is why, our Second Amendment, specifically declares, which Persons of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when it really really matters.Dumb ass...if you are “regulating guns” then you are running “afoul of the 2nd Amendment”.However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment.
.....shall not be infringed
you do know what a milita was?
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
good so now we agree its an average citizen, so why are we bringing militia up in this discussion?
There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...
The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.
More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights
Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.