So Where Does the 1st Amendment End?

Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.
Are you in prison yet for your racist posts?
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.

Racist trash, or stupid kid, it doesn't matter, we all have right to free speech. When I say "we" I mean Americans, you British faggots don't have it.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.

Racist trash, or stupid kid, it doesn't matter, we all have right to free speech.

Yep, they do. They also have a right to the consequences thereof so what's your point.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.

Racist trash, or stupid kid, it doesn't matter, we all have right to free speech.

Yep, they do. They also have a right to the consequences thereof so what's your point.

Consequences for what, free speech at home?

They did not break any law, nor they did anything on the school grounds that school have "right" to punish them for.
 
People can say whatever the hell they want to.
Yes they can, but if people have the right to respond to whatever they hear the way that they choose to respond to whatever they hear, is saying whatever you want to really a smart move to make? In other words, maybe the best thing to do is remain quiet until you are willing to deal with whatever takes place after you put out there whatever is on your mind.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
People yes, government no.

Kids did not break any law. And if they're not breaking the law, what they do in their free time, it's of nobody's concern, especially not concern of the government, or a school.

Government have no right to respond to your free speech. There is no law against being a jerk, racists, or simply stupid.
This could be debatable. Back when I was still in high school, a girl in my class wasn't calling who she was talking to any bad names, but what she did choose to say in the presence of the teacher is what got her sent to the principal's office as well as the threatening delivery of her word choice. She had her head down on her desk and when the boy next to her placed his hand on her to wake her up, she got mad and said what she put out there for the whole class to hear, so in other words, it isn't just about what is said. How something is said is what makes a world of difference.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Apple and oranges. This is public school. It's not school's job to police kids when they're not in school.
Misbehaving in school, and not following school rules is one thing. What kids are doing, or saying, outside of school is not their business.
If what they do outside the school can eventually have a negative impact on what goes on inside the school, then what is done is the school's business and sadly what the guys are guilty of can have a negative impact on what goes on inside. Do I think that they should've been booted from the school if words are the only thing that they are guilty of? No, but because of what their feelings can lead up to later on, some form of restraint/separation may be needed.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
It's not school business to monitor and judge what kids do outside of the school. That's not school purpose, but to educate them. If kids didn't break any laws, it's not school responsibility to find them "guilty" of anything, and to punish them for it. We have a legal system for that.
It may not be the school's responsibility to find students guilty of anything, but it is the school's responsibility to maintain a safe facility for the students to have anything to do with and when students choose to be guilty of belligerent behavior that can lead to life threatening situations, something is to be done right then instead of waiting for a life altering move to happen first. Is removing racist people from the picture in such a way the right move to make? To me, the kids in question should be allowed to finish up their education, but if they can't co-exist in a civil manner with whoever they have an issue with, their education should be completed somewhere else.

God bless you and everyone involved always!!!

Holly
 
People can say whatever the hell they want to.
Yes they can, but if people have the right to respond to whatever they hear the way that they choose to respond to whatever they hear, is saying whatever you want to really a smart move to make? In other words, maybe the best thing to do is remain quiet until you are willing to deal with whatever takes place after you put out there whatever is on your mind.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
People yes, government no.

Kids did not break any law. And if they're not breaking the law, what they do in their free time, it's of nobody's concern, especially not concern of the government, or a school.

Government have no right to respond to your free speech. There is no law against being a jerk, racists, or simply stupid.
This could be debatable. Back when I was still in high school, a girl in my class wasn't calling who she was talking to any bad names, but what she did choose to say in the presence of the teacher is what got her sent to the principal's office as well as the threatening delivery of her word choice. She had her head down on her desk and when the boy next to her placed his hand on her to wake her up, she got mad and said what she put out there for the whole class to hear, so in other words, it isn't just about what is said. How something is said is what makes a world of difference.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Apple and oranges. This is public school. It's not school's job to police kids when they're not in school.
Misbehaving in school, and not following school rules is one thing. What kids are doing, or saying, outside of school is not their business.
If what they do outside the school can eventually have a negative impact on what goes on inside the school, then what is done is the school's business and sadly what the guys are guilty of can have a negative impact on what goes on inside. Do I think that they should've been booted from the school if words are the only thing that they are guilty of? No, but because of what their feelings can lead up to later on, some form of restraint/separation may be needed.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
It's not school business to monitor and judge what kids do outside of the school. That's not school purpose, but to educate them. If kids didn't break any laws, it's not school responsibility to find them "guilty" of anything, and to punish them for it. We have a legal system for that.
It may not be the school's responsibility to find students guilty of anything, but it is the school's responsibility to maintain a safe facility for the students to have anything to do with and when students choose to be guilty of belligerent behavior that can lead to life threatening situations, something is to be done right then instead of waiting for a life altering move to happen first. Is removing racist people from the picture in such a way the right move to make? To me, the kids in question should be allowed to finish up their education, but if they can't co-exist in a civil manner with whoever they have an issue with, their education should be completed somewhere else.

God bless you and everyone involved always!!!

Holly

You're talking about school safety?

Okay, when we're gonna start removing socialists teachers from schools? How about kids who play violent games at home?

You want safe schools, start there.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.
WTF about free speech don't you people understand? If you're not restricted by your employer, you don't have any moral restrictions. If your feelings and sensibilities get hurt by the rough talk. that's really tough shit. You can't legislate morality or political correctness. If you feel that way, go to a totalitarian place like Red China and tell me how that works out.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.

Unfortunately, free speech has consequences.

.
 
People can say whatever the hell they want to.
Yes they can, but if people have the right to respond to whatever they hear the way that they choose to respond to whatever they hear, is saying whatever you want to really a smart move to make? In other words, maybe the best thing to do is remain quiet until you are willing to deal with whatever takes place after you put out there whatever is on your mind.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
People yes, government no.

Kids did not break any law. And if they're not breaking the law, what they do in their free time, it's of nobody's concern, especially not concern of the government, or a school.

Government have no right to respond to your free speech. There is no law against being a jerk, racists, or simply stupid.
This could be debatable. Back when I was still in high school, a girl in my class wasn't calling who she was talking to any bad names, but what she did choose to say in the presence of the teacher is what got her sent to the principal's office as well as the threatening delivery of her word choice. She had her head down on her desk and when the boy next to her placed his hand on her to wake her up, she got mad and said what she put out there for the whole class to hear, so in other words, it isn't just about what is said. How something is said is what makes a world of difference.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Apple and oranges. This is public school. It's not school's job to police kids when they're not in school.
Misbehaving in school, and not following school rules is one thing. What kids are doing, or saying, outside of school is not their business.
If what they do outside the school can eventually have a negative impact on what goes on inside the school, then what is done is the school's business and sadly what the guys are guilty of can have a negative impact on what goes on inside. Do I think that they should've been booted from the school if words are the only thing that they are guilty of? No, but because of what their feelings can lead up to later on, some form of restraint/separation may be needed.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
It's not school business to monitor and judge what kids do outside of the school. That's not school purpose, but to educate them. If kids didn't break any laws, it's not school responsibility to find them "guilty" of anything, and to punish them for it. We have a legal system for that.
It may not be the school's responsibility to find students guilty of anything, but it is the school's responsibility to maintain a safe facility for the students to have anything to do with and when students choose to be guilty of belligerent behavior that can lead to life threatening situations, something is to be done right then instead of waiting for a life altering move to happen first. Is removing racist people from the picture in such a way the right move to make? To me, the kids in question should be allowed to finish up their education, but if they can't co-exist in a civil manner with whoever they have an issue with, their education should be completed somewhere else.

God bless you and everyone involved always!!!

Holly
You're talking about school safety?

Okay, when we're gonna start removing socialists teachers from schools? How about kids who play violent games at home?

You want safe schools, start there.
Actually to me, a violent video game for example is the better place for anyone to express whatever negative feelings it is that they may have for another person. If a person doesn't have something like that in their lives to take their frustrations out on, something or someone real is what they may use instead which is what does not need to happen more than it already has.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
 
People can say whatever the hell they want to.
Yes they can, but if people have the right to respond to whatever they hear the way that they choose to respond to whatever they hear, is saying whatever you want to really a smart move to make? In other words, maybe the best thing to do is remain quiet until you are willing to deal with whatever takes place after you put out there whatever is on your mind.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
People yes, government no.

Kids did not break any law. And if they're not breaking the law, what they do in their free time, it's of nobody's concern, especially not concern of the government, or a school.

Government have no right to respond to your free speech. There is no law against being a jerk, racists, or simply stupid.
This could be debatable. Back when I was still in high school, a girl in my class wasn't calling who she was talking to any bad names, but what she did choose to say in the presence of the teacher is what got her sent to the principal's office as well as the threatening delivery of her word choice. She had her head down on her desk and when the boy next to her placed his hand on her to wake her up, she got mad and said what she put out there for the whole class to hear, so in other words, it isn't just about what is said. How something is said is what makes a world of difference.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Apple and oranges. This is public school. It's not school's job to police kids when they're not in school.
Misbehaving in school, and not following school rules is one thing. What kids are doing, or saying, outside of school is not their business.
If what they do outside the school can eventually have a negative impact on what goes on inside the school, then what is done is the school's business and sadly what the guys are guilty of can have a negative impact on what goes on inside. Do I think that they should've been booted from the school if words are the only thing that they are guilty of? No, but because of what their feelings can lead up to later on, some form of restraint/separation may be needed.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
It's not school business to monitor and judge what kids do outside of the school. That's not school purpose, but to educate them. If kids didn't break any laws, it's not school responsibility to find them "guilty" of anything, and to punish them for it. We have a legal system for that.
It may not be the school's responsibility to find students guilty of anything, but it is the school's responsibility to maintain a safe facility for the students to have anything to do with and when students choose to be guilty of belligerent behavior that can lead to life threatening situations, something is to be done right then instead of waiting for a life altering move to happen first. Is removing racist people from the picture in such a way the right move to make? To me, the kids in question should be allowed to finish up their education, but if they can't co-exist in a civil manner with whoever they have an issue with, their education should be completed somewhere else.

God bless you and everyone involved always!!!

Holly
You're talking about school safety?

Okay, when we're gonna start removing socialists teachers from schools? How about kids who play violent games at home?

You want safe schools, start there.
Actually to me, a violent video game for example is the better place for anyone to express whatever negative feelings it is that they may have for another person. If a person doesn't have something like that in their lives to take their frustrations out on, something or someone real is what they may use instead which is what does not need to happen more than it already has.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
"Actually to me"

To you!

You have one opinion, I have another.

Constitution have no opinions, and neither do laws. They're suppose to be equal for everybody. Either, you break the law, or you don't.

Did these kids do inside of school? No. Did they break any law? No. School have no power over their rights.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.

Racist trash, or stupid kid, it doesn't matter, we all have right to free speech.

Yep, they do. They also have a right to the consequences thereof so what's your point.

Consequences for what, free speech at home?

They did not break any law, nor they did anything on the school grounds that school have "right" to punish them for.
It wasnt at home. It was broadcast to the world.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.

Racist trash, or stupid kid, it doesn't matter, we all have right to free speech.

Yep, they do. They also have a right to the consequences thereof so what's your point.

Consequences for what, free speech at home?

They did not break any law, nor they did anything on the school grounds that school have "right" to punish them for.
It wasnt at home. It was broadcast to the world.

Just because you British cucks can't talk freely online (or in private), it doesn't mean everyone else shouldn't.

What U.S. law they broke when they broadcasted "to the world"?
 
People can say whatever the hell they want to.
Yes they can, but if people have the right to respond to whatever they hear the way that they choose to respond to whatever they hear, is saying whatever you want to really a smart move to make? In other words, maybe the best thing to do is remain quiet until you are willing to deal with whatever takes place after you put out there whatever is on your mind.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
People yes, government no.

Kids did not break any law. And if they're not breaking the law, what they do in their free time, it's of nobody's concern, especially not concern of the government, or a school.

Government have no right to respond to your free speech. There is no law against being a jerk, racists, or simply stupid.
This could be debatable. Back when I was still in high school, a girl in my class wasn't calling who she was talking to any bad names, but what she did choose to say in the presence of the teacher is what got her sent to the principal's office as well as the threatening delivery of her word choice. She had her head down on her desk and when the boy next to her placed his hand on her to wake her up, she got mad and said what she put out there for the whole class to hear, so in other words, it isn't just about what is said. How something is said is what makes a world of difference.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Apple and oranges. This is public school. It's not school's job to police kids when they're not in school.
Misbehaving in school, and not following school rules is one thing. What kids are doing, or saying, outside of school is not their business.
If what they do outside the school can eventually have a negative impact on what goes on inside the school, then what is done is the school's business and sadly what the guys are guilty of can have a negative impact on what goes on inside. Do I think that they should've been booted from the school if words are the only thing that they are guilty of? No, but because of what their feelings can lead up to later on, some form of restraint/separation may be needed.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
It's not school business to monitor and judge what kids do outside of the school. That's not school purpose, but to educate them. If kids didn't break any laws, it's not school responsibility to find them "guilty" of anything, and to punish them for it. We have a legal system for that.
It may not be the school's responsibility to find students guilty of anything, but it is the school's responsibility to maintain a safe facility for the students to have anything to do with and when students choose to be guilty of belligerent behavior that can lead to life threatening situations, something is to be done right then instead of waiting for a life altering move to happen first. Is removing racist people from the picture in such a way the right move to make? To me, the kids in question should be allowed to finish up their education, but if they can't co-exist in a civil manner with whoever they have an issue with, their education should be completed somewhere else.

God bless you and everyone involved always!!!

Holly
You're talking about school safety?

Okay, when we're gonna start removing socialists teachers from schools? How about kids who play violent games at home?

You want safe schools, start there.
Actually to me, a violent video game for example is the better place for anyone to express whatever negative feelings it is that they may have for another person. If a person doesn't have something like that in their lives to take their frustrations out on, something or someone real is what they may use instead which is what does not need to happen more than it already has.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
"Actually to me"

To you!

You have one opinion, I have another.

Constitution have no opinions, and neither do laws. They're suppose to be equal for everybody. Either, you break the law, or you don't.

Did these kids do inside of school? No. Did they break any law? No. School have no power over their rights.
The rights of the kids who were expelled do not over ride the rights of everyone else at the school and since everyone else at the school outnumber those who were expelled, everyone else at the school are who do not have to pack up and leave.

God bless you and them always!!!

Holly
 
People can say whatever the hell they want to.
Yes they can, but if people have the right to respond to whatever they hear the way that they choose to respond to whatever they hear, is saying whatever you want to really a smart move to make? In other words, maybe the best thing to do is remain quiet until you are willing to deal with whatever takes place after you put out there whatever is on your mind.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
People yes, government no.

Kids did not break any law. And if they're not breaking the law, what they do in their free time, it's of nobody's concern, especially not concern of the government, or a school.

Government have no right to respond to your free speech. There is no law against being a jerk, racists, or simply stupid.
This could be debatable. Back when I was still in high school, a girl in my class wasn't calling who she was talking to any bad names, but what she did choose to say in the presence of the teacher is what got her sent to the principal's office as well as the threatening delivery of her word choice. She had her head down on her desk and when the boy next to her placed his hand on her to wake her up, she got mad and said what she put out there for the whole class to hear, so in other words, it isn't just about what is said. How something is said is what makes a world of difference.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Apple and oranges. This is public school. It's not school's job to police kids when they're not in school.
Misbehaving in school, and not following school rules is one thing. What kids are doing, or saying, outside of school is not their business.
If what they do outside the school can eventually have a negative impact on what goes on inside the school, then what is done is the school's business and sadly what the guys are guilty of can have a negative impact on what goes on inside. Do I think that they should've been booted from the school if words are the only thing that they are guilty of? No, but because of what their feelings can lead up to later on, some form of restraint/separation may be needed.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
It's not school business to monitor and judge what kids do outside of the school. That's not school purpose, but to educate them. If kids didn't break any laws, it's not school responsibility to find them "guilty" of anything, and to punish them for it. We have a legal system for that.
It may not be the school's responsibility to find students guilty of anything, but it is the school's responsibility to maintain a safe facility for the students to have anything to do with and when students choose to be guilty of belligerent behavior that can lead to life threatening situations, something is to be done right then instead of waiting for a life altering move to happen first. Is removing racist people from the picture in such a way the right move to make? To me, the kids in question should be allowed to finish up their education, but if they can't co-exist in a civil manner with whoever they have an issue with, their education should be completed somewhere else.

God bless you and everyone involved always!!!

Holly
You're talking about school safety?

Okay, when we're gonna start removing socialists teachers from schools? How about kids who play violent games at home?

You want safe schools, start there.
Actually to me, a violent video game for example is the better place for anyone to express whatever negative feelings it is that they may have for another person. If a person doesn't have something like that in their lives to take their frustrations out on, something or someone real is what they may use instead which is what does not need to happen more than it already has.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
"Actually to me"

To you!

You have one opinion, I have another.

Constitution have no opinions, and neither do laws. They're suppose to be equal for everybody. Either, you break the law, or you don't.

Did these kids do inside of school? No. Did they break any law? No. School have no power over their rights.
The rights of the kids who were expelled do not over ride the rights of everyone else at the school and since everyone else at the school outnumber those who were expelled, everyone else at the school are who do not have to pack up and leave.

God bless you and them always!!!

Holly

Huh?

Kids were deprived of their graduation because school overstep their authority. What about their rights?
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

What about year long schools?

Another figment of your imagination?
 
What we will NOT see is the court overriding the school board's decision. The kids were:
a) Not on school property
b) Did not identify any association with the school
c) Did not identify their names.

The school board loses on all three counts. It will last in court about 2 minutes if the judge knows the precedents in educational law.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.

Racist trash, or stupid kid, it doesn't matter, we all have right to free speech.

Yep, they do. They also have a right to the consequences thereof so what's your point.

Consequences for what, free speech at home?

They did not break any law, nor they did anything on the school grounds that school have "right" to punish them for.
It wasnt at home. It was broadcast to the world.

Just because you British cucks can't talk freely online (or in private), it doesn't mean everyone else shouldn't.

What U.S. law they broke when they broadcasted "to the world"?
As far as I know they havent broken any laws. But then they havent been charged with anything let alone convicted. They can spout their racist poison 24/7 to their hearts content. Where is the freedom of speech issue ?
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.


What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?
Why are they denied a graduation?
Answer: for words spoken.
Not the sharpest pencil in the cup, are you?

Guess I'll just post it again -- What does a school denying graduations have to do with the First Amendment?

You need a hint on this?

The language thereof:
"Congress shall make no Law...."

I've just word-searched the entire Constitution. "High Schools shall make no Law" was not found.

Here, horse. This is called "water".

Because a PUBLIC school is a government institution, brainlet. Do you need this in crayon?
The school has a responsibility to maintain a safe environment where all pupils can study free from violence and hatred. Having racists in the community is a direct assault on that. The school did the only thing it could do.

A school is a community and racism has no place in any civilised society.

The video was made in a private home, moron. The school has ZERO authority to do anything about it. Just watch the inevitable lawsuit. Dumb shits like you just made these kids millionaires.

The school has clear policies on harassment. They cant look the other way and allow this sort of behaviour. It would be a huge knock to their reputation. If these racist shits were teachers they would have been sacked.

Their policies have no jurisdiction over a private residence. First Amendment applies and they're going to get their asses handed to them in court. Just watch.
Well they really do. The school has zero tolerance for racism which is opposed to their ethos. If these kids want to start up a junior klan then I guess they have every right, but they need to make other arrangements for their education.

View attachment 325903

Monitoring social media, arresting people who mispronounce the gender, or sending police to the door for posting a picture with the butter knife on the Facebook, might be "normal" for you British faggots, but it's not normal for us, because we do have constitutional rights in this country. Fuck off.
Kicking out racist trash is pretty standard in the civilised world. Suck it up ya thick fucker.

Racist trash, or stupid kid, it doesn't matter, we all have right to free speech.

Yep, they do. They also have a right to the consequences thereof so what's your point.

Consequences for what, free speech at home?

They did not break any law, nor they did anything on the school grounds that school have "right" to punish them for.
It wasnt at home. It was broadcast to the world.

Just because you British cucks can't talk freely online (or in private), it doesn't mean everyone else shouldn't.

What U.S. law they broke when they broadcasted "to the world"?
As far as I know they havent broken any laws. But then they havent been charged with anything let alone convicted. They can spout their racist poison 24/7 to their hearts content. Where is the freedom of speech issue ?
Glad to know you think the mail service can stop delivery to you for your social behavior.
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.

Do you think all conservatives believe in the first amendment? Clearly some want any criticism of the orange fat boy silenced. Do you understand how that correlates to the first amendment?
 
Yelling fire in a crowded theater endangers people.

What about saying something people don’t like? Can the government punish you for speech made in your home and gets put on the Internet that is not violent, but racist?

One school district thinks it can.
Remember- the schools are closed until at best next September.

Wish I had a nickel for every stupid thing a teen said in the past year.

Do you think all conservatives believe in the first amendment? Clearly some want any criticism of the orange fat boy silenced. Do you understand how that correlates to the first amendment?
That’s the craziest strawman ever. Care to share an example?
 

Forum List

Back
Top